Jazz fusion vs Jazz rock

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   Generally the music press referred to late '60s-early 70's bands such as Chicago and BS&T as jazz-rock.  There are lesser known bands that fit this same mold:  Ten Wheel Drive, Coliseum, Lighthouse come to mind though I'm sure I'm missing a dozen others.  These were all essentially rock bands that happened to have a horn section.
To a lesser extent perhaps Bitches Brew was considered jazz-rock, though it shouldn't be confused with any of the stuff listed above.

Jazz-fusion, again as generally referred to in the music press in the middle 70's, consisted of Herbie Hancock/Headhunters, Chick Corea/Return to Forever, Weather Report.  These also have nothing to do the the previously mentioned jazz-rock artists.  They are all the offspring of Miles' Bitches Brew experiementation.

So in my mind, jazz-rock was never really about jazz, it was just a convenient way to refer to rock bands with horn sections, whereas fusion was totally about jazz.  

Not to be too grumpy about it, but generally speaking fusion bands were generally competent jazz artists, whereas the same could not be said of your average jazz-rock musician.  There are of course exceptions, e.g., Dave Sanbourn's work with the Butterfield Blues Band, etc.