Print Page | Close Window

Jazz fusion vs Jazz rock

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
Forum Description: Discuss specific prog bands and their members or a specific sub-genre
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=45188
Printed Date: November 05 2024 at 12:46
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Jazz fusion vs Jazz rock
Posted By: Guests
Subject: Jazz fusion vs Jazz rock
Date Posted: January 09 2008 at 13:29
I want to hear your opinions about the differences between these two. Wink



Replies:
Posted By: Vibrationbaby
Date Posted: January 09 2008 at 13:34
Isn`t jazz rock a fusion of sorts ?

-------------
                


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: January 09 2008 at 13:43
Maybe..


Posted By: Dick Heath
Date Posted: January 09 2008 at 18:23
Been explained on a historical basis on this site many times before. Also check the only reference on the subject Stuart Nicholson's Jazz Rock:A History. Jazz rock is a sub division of jazz fusion, as is Indo-jazz fusion, jazz funk, nu.jazz, nu.fusion, folk jazz, Arabo-jazz, etc. etc. The term jazz fusion may stem from one of the early band Joe Harriot-John Mayer Double Quintet and their two albums Indo Jazz Fusion (1966-7) - although I've read somewhere that the use of the word fusion can be found on an earlier jazz album.  Somewhat forgotten when rock jazz appeared 1967-8  - rock with jazzy solos, e.g. Chicago, Timebox, BST, Satisfaction,  early Soft Machine and even Nice when they did their Brubeck. When the jazz men started to attack from the other end we had jazz rock (jazz with either strong rock rhythms and/or rock group amplification/instrumentation)- even so we now acknowledge some obscure US jazz men were experimenting 1964/5 although not recorded until later (e.g. Spirits Flown). Jazz Britannia series on BBC TV two years ago, claimed that the roots of jazz rock in the UK were in bands such Graham Bonds Organisation. The obvious rock element in jazz rock disappeared, to some extent 1975-8, whilst the electric, amplified elements remained, and then the term jazz fusion was resurrected. Shakti appeared almost 10 years after the first Indo-jazz fusion group. BTW the term jazz rock fusion has also been used.

-------------
The best eclectic music on the Web,8-11pm BST/GMT THURS.
CLICK ON: http://www.lborosu.org.uk/media/lcr/live.php - http://www.lborosu.org.uk/media/lcr/live.php
Host by PA's Dick Heath.



Posted By: Jshutt64
Date Posted: January 09 2008 at 20:25
Here's how I understand it. Might not be right, but, I'm going to try.
 
Jazz rock is, like the name implies, a mix of jazz and rock. However, it tends to not have so much of the incredible musicianship and diversity as fusion. It's almost mainstream, in a way. Bands like Steely Dan and Chicago.
 
Jazz fusion is much more progressive. It frequently showcases individual ability and fusion compositions are much more elaborate and complex than those of jazz rock. When I think fusion, I think of Mahavishnu Orchestra and Return To Forever.


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: January 10 2008 at 16:12
Originally posted by Jshutt64 Jshutt64 wrote:

Here's how I understand it. Might not be right, but, I'm going to try.
 
Jazz rock is, like the name implies, a mix of jazz and rock. However, it tends to not have so much of the incredible musicianship and diversity as fusion. It's almost mainstream, in a way. Bands like Steely Dan and Chicago.
 
Jazz fusion is much more progressive. It frequently showcases individual ability and fusion compositions are much more elaborate and complex than those of jazz rock. When I think fusion, I think of Mahavishnu Orchestra and Return To Forever.


Exactly.


Posted By: BaldFriede
Date Posted: January 10 2008 at 16:24
Originally posted by Aeternus Aeternus wrote:

Originally posted by Jshutt64 Jshutt64 wrote:

Here's how I understand it. Might not be right, but, I'm going to try.
 
Jazz rock is, like the name implies, a mix of jazz and rock. However, it tends to not have so much of the incredible musicianship and diversity as fusion. It's almost mainstream, in a way. Bands like Steely Dan and Chicago.
 
Jazz fusion is much more progressive. It frequently showcases individual ability and fusion compositions are much more elaborate and complex than those of jazz rock. When I think fusion, I think of Mahavishnu Orchestra and Return To Forever.


Exactly.

Definitely not! I think that jazz-rock is just one kind of fusion. Though I remember there was a time when both terms were used as synonyms in Germany.


-------------


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: January 15 2008 at 13:45
Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

Originally posted by Aeternus Aeternus wrote:

Originally posted by Jshutt64 Jshutt64 wrote:

Here's how I understand it. Might not be right, but, I'm going to try.
 
Jazz rock is, like the name implies, a mix of jazz and rock. However, it tends to not have so much of the incredible musicianship and diversity as fusion. It's almost mainstream, in a way. Bands like Steely Dan and Chicago.
 
Jazz fusion is much more progressive. It frequently showcases individual ability and fusion compositions are much more elaborate and complex than those of jazz rock. When I think fusion, I think of Mahavishnu Orchestra and Return To Forever.


Exactly.

Definitely not! I think that jazz-rock is just one kind of fusion. Though I remember there was a time when both terms were used as synonyms in Germany.


I know that everywhere is stated that jazz fusion is a fusion between jazz and other types of music and jazz rock is one of them; however, "fusion" is mentioned, everybody thinks of Mahavishnu Orchestra or Weather report. but not Steely Dan, or Chicago. This approves Jshut64' oppinon I think. Steely Dan's is a jazz sounding rock band. Mahavishnu is vice cersa - and that's the difference. But still, I may be wrong - that's why I created this thread.


Posted By: Dick Heath
Date Posted: January 15 2008 at 17:18
You mention Steely Dan, making jazzy sounding rock and also employed top notch session jazz players for their later album - so what are your feelings for Joni Mitchell with Tom Scott LA Express, then Jaco and subsequent albums?  (BTW   it was interesting to hear Sir Simon Rattle, nominate one of Joni Mitchell's recent recordings for his 8 Desert Island Discs this week, stating that her cigarette tempered voice was the jazz!)

-------------
The best eclectic music on the Web,8-11pm BST/GMT THURS.
CLICK ON: http://www.lborosu.org.uk/media/lcr/live.php - http://www.lborosu.org.uk/media/lcr/live.php
Host by PA's Dick Heath.



Posted By: Angelo
Date Posted: January 15 2008 at 18:21
Originally posted by Dick Heath Dick Heath wrote:

Been explained on a historical basis on this site many times before.


Completely true. This question however could be a trigger for action on this: the Jazz Rock/Fusion definition is the shortest and least explanatory on this site, maybe it's time for an update. Smile


-------------
http://www.iskcrocks.com" rel="nofollow - ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected]


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: January 15 2008 at 20:03
Originally posted by Angelo Angelo wrote:

Originally posted by Dick Heath Dick Heath wrote:

Been explained on a historical basis on this site many times before.


Completely true. This question however could be a trigger for action on this: the Jazz Rock/Fusion definition is the shortest and least explanatory on this site, maybe it's time for an update. Smile
 
completely agree!!
 
i cant really add too much, mostly because a lot of times i have trouble drawing the line between jazz rock, jazz fusion, and non rock-influenced jazz. 


-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



Posted By: victor77
Date Posted: January 16 2008 at 06:01

As a I see it, it ranges from the general to a more specific sub genre

Jazz fusion: blend of jazz with other different styles
 
Jazz rock: music on the boundaries between jazz and rock (Brand X, Alan Holdsworth, Headhunters, Chick Corea, some Miles Davis, Machine and the Synergic Sluts, etc)
 
Progressive Jazz Rock: most innovative and risky music on the basis of jazz rock (Mahavishnu Orchestra, Magma, some King Crimson, Soft Machine, French TV, and so on)


Posted By: BaldFriede
Date Posted: January 16 2008 at 06:27
Originally posted by victor77 victor77 wrote:

 
Progressive Jazz Rock: most innovative and risky music on the basis of jazz rock (Mahavishnu Orchestra, Magma, some King Crimson, Soft Machine, French TV, and so on)

And don't forget Embryo. Probably the most progressive jazz-rock band of all, with many ethnic influences. The band with the most complicated rhythms. Drummer Christian Burchard studied the tala tarangini (the highly complex Indian style of rhythm) with the Karnataka College of Percussion.


-------------


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.


Posted By: Dick Heath
Date Posted: January 16 2008 at 07:42
Originally posted by victor77 victor77 wrote:

As a I see it, it ranges from the general to a more specific sub genre

Jazz fusion: blend of jazz with other different styles
 
Jazz rock: music on the boundaries between jazz and rock (Brand X, Alan Holdsworth, Headhunters, Chick Corea, some Miles Davis, Machine and the Synergic Sluts, etc)
 
Progressive Jazz Rock: most innovative and risky music on the basis of jazz rock (Mahavishnu Orchestra, Magma, some King Crimson, Soft Machine, French TV, and so on)
 
About right but hair-splitting - simply those bands pigeon-holed in "jazz-rock" and "progressive jazz-rock" are interchangeable. [IMHO Allan Holdsworth being the most innovative, therefore progressive of the bands/musicians listed]. Problem with PA is the bad tendency to over-categorise and worse ignore what fans and experts in the genre have used previously.
 
Now at the risk of over-categorising myself, to use terms long established before PA existence, to repeat jazz-fusion is the fusion of jazz with any other form of music. I suggest of relevance to PA: jazz-rock , jazz-funk (aka soul jazz), world-jazz (with some legit sub-divisions: Indo Jazz fusion, Arabo-jazz fusion, Anglo-Celtic-jazz fusion, flamenco-jazz etc.), Latin-jazz, nu. jazz, nu.fuzz, hiphop jazz, drum'n'bass jazz, acid jazz, metal jazz, (sic) smooth jazz (aka fusak), dance jazz, jazz turn-tablism fusion, progressive fusion, and then maybe brass-rock cover most of those bases. Whilst jazz-fusion is a catch-all term, there is also is a point where a band's music doesn't fit any of these sub-categories, then the use of jazz-fusion is the last resort. To repeat my perrenial moan, bands like Soft Machine, through their career have produced: psychedelic pop, psychedelic rock, jazz rock, avante/free jazz, jazz fusion, electronica..... hence the need to show the most precise definition (or definitions) of any particular album by a band: not Canterbury!


-------------
The best eclectic music on the Web,8-11pm BST/GMT THURS.
CLICK ON: http://www.lborosu.org.uk/media/lcr/live.php - http://www.lborosu.org.uk/media/lcr/live.php
Host by PA's Dick Heath.



Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: January 17 2008 at 11:06
Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

Originally posted by Aeternus Aeternus wrote:

Originally posted by Jshutt64 Jshutt64 wrote:

Here's how I understand it. Might not be right, but, I'm going to try.
 
Jazz rock is, like the name implies, a mix of jazz and rock. However, it tends to not have so much of the incredible musicianship and diversity as fusion. It's almost mainstream, in a way. Bands like Steely Dan and Chicago.
 
Jazz fusion is much more progressive. It frequently showcases individual ability and fusion compositions are much more elaborate and complex than those of jazz rock. When I think fusion, I think of Mahavishnu Orchestra and Return To Forever.


Exactly.

Definitely not! I think that jazz-rock is just one kind of fusion. Though I remember there was a time when both terms were used as synonyms in Germany.
 
Let's not confuse rock groups veering jazz often, called back then as Brass Rock >> BS&T, Chicago
 
The same name is applied of black groups with heavy brass section like EW&F and The Commodores >> Although I've heard the Brass Funk name used before.
 
and
 
 
 
Jazz musicians going into the rock world >> their musuc got called jazz-rock: from Nucleusto Miles Davis and early Mahavishnu, Weather Report (the Mirislav Vitous years) and even Colosseum (Hiseman & Heckstall Smith were real jazz players. the core years 69-72 (although Soft Machine and Nucleus kept doing jazz rock for a long time)
 
 
Then we should coinsider a sort "degenerescence of jazz-rock that can be called jazz funk >> Weather Report from Mysterious Traveller (the Alphonso Johnson years) onwards, Herbie Hancok's Sextant and Headhunters and from Miles' Man On The Corner. core years 71-75
 
Then from 75 onwards the whole things gets pinned under the name jazz fusion (which is why I  rarely ever heard RTF being named jazz rock. This can be defined as an anything goes a bit like Weather Report's (Pastorius years) Heavy Weather and Black Market >> very much unfocused album compared to their earlier works.


-------------
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword


Posted By: Real Paradox
Date Posted: January 20 2008 at 10:52
Jazz Fusion defenatly, although it misses some of rock's charismatic power, I would defenatly go for fusion....my fav is Weather Report...Jacob is a great bassist,;)Clap .

-------------
What is This?
It is what keeps us going...


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: January 20 2008 at 11:21
Originally posted by Real Paradox Real Paradox wrote:

Jazz Fusion defenatly, although it misses some of rock's charismatic power, I would defenatly go for fusion....my fav is Weather Report...Jacob is a great bassist,;)Clap .


Did you read the first post?


Posted By: Real Paradox
Date Posted: January 20 2008 at 11:44

yes, sry if I didn't give the opinion about the two...



-------------
What is This?
It is what keeps us going...


Posted By: wolfvaga
Date Posted: February 21 2008 at 19:30
I can't find the difference. But I now what is between Jazz/Fusion and Prog Rock. In one word-Santana Smile
. I'm talking about their earlier works, of course ('70)...


-------------
Lupus in fabula :)


Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: February 21 2008 at 19:46
A lot of it has to do with time period too. As a young musician trying to learn this stuff along with other young musicians, we refered to this music as jazz-rock up to about the mid-70s and then fusion after that. I don't know why the term changed, probably something we picked up in music magazines

Although now that we have had time to reflect, I would say it makes sense to say jazz-rock is a mix of jazz and rock, and jazz fusion is jazz plus whatever.

It all started with what used to be called soul-jazz ie Les McCann, Eddie Harris, Adderly Brothers etc.

-------------
Help the victims of the russian invasion:
http://www.jazzmusicarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=28523&PID=130446&title=various-ways-you-can-help-ukraine#130446


Posted By: jammun
Date Posted: February 21 2008 at 21:16

Generally the music press referred to late '60s-early 70's bands such as Chicago and BS&T as jazz-rock.  There are lesser known bands that fit this same mold:  Ten Wheel Drive, Coliseum, Lighthouse come to mind though I'm sure I'm missing a dozen others.  These were all essentially rock bands that happened to have a horn section.

To a lesser extent perhaps Bitches Brew was considered jazz-rock, though it shouldn't be confused with any of the stuff listed above.
 
Jazz-fusion, again as generally referred to in the music press in the middle 70's, consisted of Herbie Hancock/Headhunters, Chick Corea/Return to Forever, Weather Report.  These also have nothing to do the the previously mentioned jazz-rock artists.  They are all the offspring of Miles' Bitches Brew experiementation.
 
So in my mind, jazz-rock was never really about jazz, it was just a convenient way to refer to rock bands with horn sections, whereas fusion was totally about jazz. 
 
Not to be too grumpy about it, but generally speaking fusion bands were generally competent jazz artists, whereas the same could not be said of your average jazz-rock musician.  There are of course exceptions, e.g., Dave Sanbourn's work with the Butterfield Blues Band, etc.


Posted By: Dick Heath
Date Posted: February 22 2008 at 07:25
Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

o in my mind, jazz-rock was never really about jazz, it was just a convenient way to refer to rock bands with horn sections, whereas fusion was totally about jazz. 

 
 
I wouldn't agree. If you get the chance check out the marvellous bootleg recording (lifted from the desk by Henry Kaiser) of Nels & Alex Cline with Wayne Peet playing the music of the original Tony Williams Lifetime - specifically  off the 1969 and 1970 albums. At the end of the show Nels Cline (I think) can be clearly saying "That's what they called jazz rock". Until the jazz men joined in the mix of jazz with rock, the rock musicians who had middle 8s or 16s or... as jazzy improv solos, were called 'rock jazz' (e.g. a few of  Timebox 's minor hit singles, Soft Machine's Volume 2, Tasavallan Presidentii's Lambertland)- then if brass or woodwind were added  that became 'brass rock' (e.g. as stated BST, Chicago, Dreams but also  Heaven, Satisfaction and If in the UK during the first phase - Chase, Ides Of March were examples of 2 phase brass rock). Listen to Free Spirits 1966 recording  with young jazz musicians playing what they called jazz rock - thery seriously want to marry jazz with this new fangled rock music.
 
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/images/B000FVGLI4/sr=1-2/qid=1203682985/ref=dp_image_0?ie=UTF8&n=229816&s=music&qid=1203682985&sr=1-2">Out%20of%20Sight%20and%20Sound
 - also Steve Marcus's Count's Rock Band or Charles Lloyd's late 60's albums.   WEA Records over the last 5 years have issued a number of compilation albums of jazz mixed with rock - and played by jazz musicians during the late 60's. These are worth sampling to give some ideas of the range of experiments/hybrids being tried  prior to Miles Davis's commitment to electric jazz.
 
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/images/B00005RG5M/sr=1-1/qid=1203682658/ref=dp_image_0?ie=UTF8&n=229816&s=music&qid=1203682658&sr=1-1">Psychedelic%20Jazz%20and%20Soul:%20the%20in%20Sound%20-%20from%20the%20Atlantic%20and%20Warner%20Vaults   http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/images/B0002JEDNY/sr=1-4/qid=1203682658/ref=dp_image_0?ie=UTF8&n=229816&s=music&qid=1203682658&sr=1-4">More%20Psychedelic%20Jazz%20and%20Soul http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/images/B00004T2JV/sr=1-4/qid=1203682658/ref=dp_image_0?ie=UTF8&n=229816&s=music&qid=1203682658&sr=1-4">Right%20on%20Vol.2:%20Break%20Beats%20&%20Grooves%20from%20the%20Atlantic%20&%20Warner%20Vaults
 


-------------
The best eclectic music on the Web,8-11pm BST/GMT THURS.
CLICK ON: http://www.lborosu.org.uk/media/lcr/live.php - http://www.lborosu.org.uk/media/lcr/live.php
Host by PA's Dick Heath.




Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk