We Want Bjork!...

She's awesome, but not prog!

not sure if shes prog , shes experimental though, and shes definitely awesome

107 steps must have influence Sleepytime Gorilla Museum. 

paolo.beenees wrote: Cheesecakemouse wrote: Bjork to me appears to be of the pseudo arty types like Yoko Ono, no real talent but if they act bizarre and weird then they  appear to be creative and are considered art by people who can't tell the difference between their backsides and music.   I've got no problem in having my proposal rejected (in fact, this is only a proposal and a point of view). I've got absolutely no problem in assuming that Bjork may be deeply disliked by anybody. But you end up by being offensive and, for you as a person, this is really a problem. There's always time for getting better. Cheers

Sorry I wasn't trying to indirectly insult you, I was targeting the music critics and magazines, I respect your choice and I apologise if I've offended you that wasn't my intention.

paolo.beenees wrote: ...Or at least, I'd like to find Björk somewhere in the "prog related" or "prog electronic" category... Come on! Admit it: "Isobel" could be the new millenium's version of Genesis's "White Mountain"...

Cheesecakemouse wrote: Again if we have Bjork then we have to have Yoko Ono; and who wants her on the archives. From what I've heard Bjork to me appears to be of the pseudo arty types like Yoko Ono, no real talent but if they act bizarre and weird then they  appear to be creative and are considered art by people who can't tell the difference between their backsides and music. Bjorks music (from what I've heard and I'm prepared to be corrected) sounds like simple pop songs and she just sings weird and wears weird costumes, and to some that sounds 'arty'. Just like Devo has suckered many people in, with lack of talent and looking weird, she strikes me as a bit of a charletan. I AM OPEN TO BEING CORRECTED MY KNOWLEDGE OF HER MUSIC IS RELATIVELY LIMITED SO THIS IS JUST MY IMPRESSION SO FAR.

No, you've pretty much summed her up

^ ??? Unless you want a photo of her naked, that's what the web offers. I think it's clear we're talking about music.

Again if we have Bjork then we have to have Yoko Ono; and who wants her on the archives.
From what I've heard Bjork to me appears to be of the pseudo arty types like Yoko Ono, no real talent but if they act bizarre and weird then they  appear to be creative and are considered art by people who can't tell the difference between their backsides and music.
Bjorks music (from what I've heard and I'm prepared to be corrected) sounds like simple pop songs and she just sings weird and wears weird costumes, and to some that sounds 'arty'. Just like Devo has suckered many people in, with lack of talent and looking weird, she strikes me as a bit of a charletan.
I AM OPEN TO BEING CORRECTED MY KNOWLEDGE OF HER MUSIC IS RELATIVELY LIMITED SO THIS IS JUST MY IMPRESSION SO FAR.

rushfan4 wrote: Wasn't she the lady that showed up at some music award show wearing a swan dress including the head.  I don't believe tha I have ever heard anything that she has ever done but stuff like that kind of creeps me out.

What's creepy about that?




Edited by Empathy - October 15 2007 at 17:09

Well she is pretty "Out There", Wherever that may be. She sure as as heck doesn't fall into conventional pop territory. I'm not saying she's prog though, That's for the experts to determine.