Print Page | Close Window

We Want Bjork!...

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Suggest New Bands and Artists
Forum Description: Suggest, create polls, and classify new bands you would like included on Prog Archives
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=42633
Printed Date: December 02 2024 at 02:50
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: We Want Bjork!...
Posted By: paolo.beenees
Subject: We Want Bjork!...
Date Posted: October 15 2007 at 15:21

...Or at least, I'd like to find Björk somewhere in the "prog related" or "prog electronic" category... Come on! Admit it: "Isobel" could be the new millenium's version of Genesis's "White Mountain"...



-------------



Replies:
Posted By: Prog-jester
Date Posted: October 15 2007 at 15:26
"WE WANT BJÖRK!..."

Do we?


C'mon, we don't!!!


Okay, if you insist




This is how the addition will look like


Posted By: Ricochet
Date Posted: October 15 2007 at 15:41
prog electronic?

-------------


Posted By: cuncuna
Date Posted: October 15 2007 at 15:49
Love her work... but as sure as it is highly experimental, I doubt her very much as a prog act. Electronica scene is way more advanced...

-------------
¡Beware of the Bee!
   


Posted By: E-Dub
Date Posted: October 15 2007 at 15:57
But the fact she just about scalped that female Asian reporter outside the airport automatically puts her in the angst-ridden punk category. LOL

E


-------------


Posted By: Jimbo
Date Posted: October 15 2007 at 16:04
Originally posted by cuncuna cuncuna wrote:

Love her work... but as sure as it is highly experimental, I doubt her very much as a prog act. Electronica scene is way more advanced...

Seconded.


-------------


Posted By: rushfan4
Date Posted: October 15 2007 at 16:08
Wasn't she the lady that showed up at some music award show wearing a swan dress including the head.  I don't believe tha I have ever heard anything that she has ever done but stuff like that kind of creeps me out.

-------------


Posted By: Bastille Dude
Date Posted: October 15 2007 at 16:25
Well she is pretty "Out There", Wherever that may be. She sure as as heck doesn't fall into conventional pop territory. I'm not saying she's prog though, That's for the experts to determine.

-------------
DEATH TO FALSE PROG!


Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: October 15 2007 at 16:31
Not prog. Very eclectic, but not prog.

-------------
http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want!


Posted By: Empathy
Date Posted: October 15 2007 at 17:08
Originally posted by rushfan4 rushfan4 wrote:

Wasn't she the lady that showed up at some music award show wearing a swan dress including the head.  I don't believe tha I have ever heard anything that she has ever done but stuff like that kind of creeps me out.


What's creepy about that? Wink




-------------
Pure Brilliance:


Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: October 15 2007 at 17:17
Originally posted by Prog-jester Prog-jester wrote:

"WE WANT BJÖRK!..."

Do we?


C'mon, we don't!!!


Okay, if you insist




This is how the addition will look like
 
No
yes
no
yes
no


-------------
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...



Posted By: Cheesecakemouse
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 06:01
Again if we have Bjork then we have to have Yoko Ono; and who wants her on the archives.
From what I've heard Bjork to me appears to be of the pseudo arty types like Yoko Ono, no real talent but if they act bizarre and weird then they  appear to be creative and are considered art by people who can't tell the difference between their backsides and music.
Bjorks music (from what I've heard and I'm prepared to be corrected) sounds like simple pop songs and she just sings weird and wears weird costumes, and to some that sounds 'arty'. Just like Devo has suckered many people in, with lack of talent and looking weird, she strikes me as a bit of a charletan.
I AM OPEN TO BEING CORRECTED MY KNOWLEDGE OF HER MUSIC IS RELATIVELY LIMITED SO THIS IS JUST MY IMPRESSION SO FAR.


Posted By: Cheesecakemouse
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 06:02
Originally posted by paolo.beenees paolo.beenees wrote:

...Or at least, I'd like to find Björk somewhere in the "prog related" or "prog electronic" category... Come on! Admit it: "Isobel" could be the new millenium's version of Genesis's "White Mountain"...



A COOL COSTUME DOES NOT MAKE SOMEONE PROG!!!


Posted By: paolo.beenees
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 15:19
^ ??? Unless you want a photo of her naked, that's what the web offers. I think it's clear we're talking about music.

-------------


Posted By: The T
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 15:31
Originally posted by paolo.beenees paolo.beenees wrote:

^ ??? Unless you want a photo of her naked, that's what the web offers. I think it's clear we're talking about music.
 
If we're about to put pictures of naked artists in our website, we don't have to restrict ourselves to prog music! Big%20smileTongueBig%20smile
 
We want our MTV!


-------------


Posted By: Gog/Magog
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 15:59
Originally posted by Cheesecakemouse Cheesecakemouse wrote:

Again if we have Bjork then we have to have Yoko Ono; and who wants her on the archives.
From what I've heard Bjork to me appears to be of the pseudo arty types like Yoko Ono, no real talent but if they act bizarre and weird then they  appear to be creative and are considered art by people who can't tell the difference between their backsides and music.
Bjorks music (from what I've heard and I'm prepared to be corrected) sounds like simple pop songs and she just sings weird and wears weird costumes, and to some that sounds 'arty'. Just like Devo has suckered many people in, with lack of talent and looking weird, she strikes me as a bit of a charletan.
I AM OPEN TO BEING CORRECTED MY KNOWLEDGE OF HER MUSIC IS RELATIVELY LIMITED SO THIS IS JUST MY IMPRESSION SO FAR.


No, you've pretty much summed her up


-------------
Some swear they see me weeping in the poppy fields of France


Posted By: paolo.beenees
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 16:07
Originally posted by Cheesecakemouse Cheesecakemouse wrote:

Bjork to me appears to be of the pseudo arty types like Yoko Ono, no real talent but if they act bizarre and weird then they  appear to be creative and are considered art by people who can't tell the difference between their backsides and music.
 
I've got no problem in having my proposal rejected (in fact, this is only a proposal and a point of view). I've got absolutely no problem in assuming that Bjork may be deeply disliked by anybody. But you end up by being offensive and, for you as a person, this is really a problem.
There's always time for getting better.
Cheers


-------------


Posted By: Moogtron III
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 16:12
Originally posted by paolo.beenees paolo.beenees wrote:

...Or at least, I'd like to find Björk somewhere in the "prog related" or "prog electronic" category... Come on! Admit it: "Isobel" could be the new millenium's version of Genesis's "White Mountain"...

 
I love Isobel! And some other tunes, like Joga and Bachelorette, and Visur Vatnsenda Rosu, what she did with Hector Zazou.
 
Prog-related? Her music, however eclectic and innovative, is still very much song-based. No prog in the strict sense of the word, but prog related is such a wide category that there must be a place for Bjork. For me she was the most important innovative artist of the '90's. She hasn't lost her sense for musical sense for adventure, BTW.


Posted By: Jimbo
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 16:33
Originally posted by Cheesecakemouse Cheesecakemouse wrote:

Again if we have Bjork then we have to have Yoko Ono; and who wants her on the archives.
From what I've heard Bjork to me appears to be of the pseudo arty types like Yoko Ono, no real talent but if they act bizarre and weird then they  appear to be creative and are considered art by people who can't tell the difference between their backsides and music.
Bjorks music (from what I've heard and I'm prepared to be corrected) sounds like simple pop songs and she just sings weird and wears weird costumes, and to some that sounds 'arty'. Just like Devo has suckered many people in, with lack of talent and looking weird, she strikes me as a bit of a charletan.
I AM OPEN TO BEING CORRECTED MY KNOWLEDGE OF HER MUSIC IS RELATIVELY LIMITED SO THIS IS JUST MY IMPRESSION SO FAR.

Seeing as how you've probably never heard a full Björk album, you're awfully quick to judge her entire output & any fans she might have on this website. How very constructive... To be honest, this tells a lot more about you than it does about Björk. I have no problem about you not liking Björk, but how about placing your words in a more polite manner next time?


-------------


Posted By: Cheesecakemouse
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 17:59
Originally posted by paolo.beenees paolo.beenees wrote:

Originally posted by Cheesecakemouse Cheesecakemouse wrote:

Bjork to me appears to be of the pseudo arty types like Yoko Ono, no real talent but if they act bizarre and weird then they  appear to be creative and are considered art by people who can't tell the difference between their backsides and music.
 
I've got no problem in having my proposal rejected (in fact, this is only a proposal and a point of view). I've got absolutely no problem in assuming that Bjork may be deeply disliked by anybody. But you end up by being offensive and, for you as a person, this is really a problem.
There's always time for getting better.
Cheers


Confused Sorry I wasn't trying to indirectly insult you, I was targeting the music critics and magazines, I respect your choice and I apologise if I've offended you that wasn't my intention.


Posted By: Cheesecakemouse
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 18:02
Originally posted by Jimbo Jimbo wrote:

Originally posted by Cheesecakemouse Cheesecakemouse wrote:

Again if we have Bjork then we have to have Yoko Ono; and who wants her on the archives.
From what I've heard Bjork to me appears to be of the pseudo arty types like Yoko Ono, no real talent but if they act bizarre and weird then they  appear to be creative and are considered art by people who can't tell the difference between their backsides and music.
Bjorks music (from what I've heard and I'm prepared to be corrected) sounds like simple pop songs and she just sings weird and wears weird costumes, and to some that sounds 'arty'. Just like Devo has suckered many people in, with lack of talent and looking weird, she strikes me as a bit of a charletan.
I AM OPEN TO BEING CORRECTED MY KNOWLEDGE OF HER MUSIC IS RELATIVELY LIMITED SO THIS IS JUST MY IMPRESSION SO FAR.

Seeing as how you've probably never heard a full Björk album, you're awfully quick to judge her entire output & any fans she might have on this website. How very constructive... To be honest, this tells a lot more about you than it does about Björk. I have no problem about you not liking Björk, but how about placing your words in a more polite manner next time?


Yeah ok.


Posted By: Shakespeare
Date Posted: October 16 2007 at 18:04
107 steps must have influence Sleepytime Gorilla Museum. 


Posted By: Lanor
Date Posted: October 17 2007 at 07:04
Anyone who questions her artist credibility should listen to the Vespertine. Glitchy goodness. I believe Matmos had something to do it.

A candidate for crossover I think.


Posted By: yoel?
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 14:50
not sure if shes prog , shes experimental though, and shes definitely awesome


Posted By: Ghandi 2
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 16:14
End the prog-related madness! That is all I ask.


Posted By: Arsillus
Date Posted: October 19 2007 at 16:24
She's awesome, but not prog!



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk