Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Prog Pop - an oxymoron?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedProg Pop - an oxymoron?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Author
Message
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2007 at 11:38
Originally posted by Time Signature Time Signature wrote:

Is the concept "progressive pop" completely inconceivable, or are there pop albums/songs out there that you'r consider progressive in some sense or another?

 
I agree partially with you.
 
Progressive is only and adjective that qualkifies the approach of the bands to music, there vxcan be progressive )with low case p) in every genre, for example I believe REM was ahead of most bands ion their genre, so they were some kind of progressive Alternative.
 
No Prog (with capital P) is an acrionym for "Progressive Rock", in this case saying Pop prog or Prog Pop is clearly an oxymoron, because both genres are uncopatible to coexist.
 
Of course there are usually prog bands that played some Pop material and Pop bands that played a couple of tracks, but two opposite genres coexisting together is a natural contradiction.
 
Even the bands that made some Prog with Pop influences, were creating a different thing, it was not Pop anymore, because the structure, timing and characteristics are not the traditional characteristics of Prog.
 
My two cents.
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - September 15 2007 at 15:35
            
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2007 at 14:50
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Time Signature Time Signature wrote:

Is the concept "progressive pop" completely inconceivable, or are there pop albums/songs out there that you'r consider progressive in some sense or another?

 
I agree partee partially with you.
 
Progressive is only and adjective that qualkifies the approach of the bands to music, there vxcan be progressive )with low case p) in every genre, for example I believe REM was ahead of most bands ion their genre, so they were some kind of progressive Alternative.
 
No Prog (with capital P) is an acrionym for "Progressive Rock", in this case saying Pop prog or Prog Pop is clearly an oxymoron, because both genres are uncopatible to coexist.
 
Of course there are usually prog bands that played some Pop material and Pop bands that played a couple of tracks, but two opposite genres coexisting together is a natural contradiction.
 
Even the bands that made some Prog with Pop influences, were creating a different thing, it was not Pop anymore, because the structure, timing and characteristics are not the traditional characteristics of Prog.
 
My two cents.
 
Iván
I think the exception to that is Talk Talk. Their first two albums (The Party's Over & It's My Life) were unashamedly Pop while they last two (Spirit of Eden & Laughing Stock) are completely progressive, leaving their middle album (The Colour of Spring) as a wonderful blend of the two, ergo: Prog-Pop.


Edited by darqdean - September 15 2007 at 14:51
What?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.242 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.