| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
Firefly 
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 29 2007
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 384
|
 Posted: July 16 2007 at 11:32 |
This is Spinal Tap.
Epicly funny!
|
 |
ClassicRocker
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 894
|
Posted: July 17 2007 at 21:12 |
^^^ Oh, nice. Ok, I change my mind: I'm going with spinal tap! 
|
|
|
|
Dim
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 17 2007
Location: Austin TX
Status: Offline
Points: 6890
|
Posted: July 18 2007 at 01:23 |
|
THIS IS SPARTA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!KICK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
purplepiper
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 23 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 280
|
Posted: July 22 2007 at 15:22 |
STAR WARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
|
|
for those about to prog, we salute you.
|
|
SoundsofSeasons
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 08 2007
Location: Arizona -- USA
Status: Offline
Points: 221
|
Posted: July 24 2007 at 20:31 |
|
Saving Private Ryan is my most epic movie. Its not like all 300 or Gladiator like, but i do believe it is EPIC and you feel like your part of something greater in the movie. Besides the epic cast of actors makes it great on its own...im not going to list them but there are literally more than a dozen AAA actors in it. Look it up.
|
|
1 Chronicles 13:7-9
Then David and all Israel played music before God with all their might, with singing, on harps, on stringed instruments, on tambourines, on cymbals, and with trumpets.
|
|
The Doctor
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543
|
Posted: July 24 2007 at 20:33 |
 SoundsofSeasons wrote:
Saving Private Ryan is my most epic movie. Its not like all 300 or Gladiator like, but i do believe it is EPIC and you feel like your part of something greater in the movie. Besides the epic cast of actors makes it great on its own...im not going to list them but there are literally more than a dozen AAA actors in it. Look it up. |
But did you see Shaving Ryan's Privates? 
|
|
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
|
|
Leningrad
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 15 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 7991
|
Posted: July 24 2007 at 20:34 |
Why isn't Wayne's World on this list? 
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65513
|
Posted: July 24 2007 at 20:36 |
Chameleon wrote:
Why isn't Wayne's World on this list? |
one of only two or three times I've ever walked out in the middle of a movie
|
|
Leningrad
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 15 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 7991
|
Posted: July 24 2007 at 20:38 |
|
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: July 24 2007 at 20:53 |
Interesting poll....From the ones I've seen:
Troy : a decent movie, I liked it much more than the critic which panned it. I hate Orlando Bloom in that movie and Pitt is too much of a "celeb-Achilles" but O'Toole as King gives a lot of seriousness to this movie.
The Last Samurai: Very good movie, I actually love it, even though I have to rcognize a few flaws, the biggest one being that it's kind of diffcult to swallow the idea that a group of SAMURAIS could almost be LEAD by an american soldier, and that he happens to be the lone survivor in the final battle ... but full of atmosphere, NO CGI (there you have another proof that you CAN make big movies withoput using CGI for everything) and magic...
300: haven't seen it. The fact that is a cgi-fest scares me away from it.
Kingdom of Heaven: Orlando Bloom makes for an awful hero, no character, and suddenly he turns from simple farmer to the best military strategist ever... Salahadin has character, but Bloom lacks it... It's a shame the little time Jeremy Irons and Neeson have on-screen, for the take all the screen when they appear...
Gladiator: Good movie, at times it's only a fight movie with no story, no substance, but it's entertaining and well done... Some CGI scenes are so phony and fake it's not forgiveable (the first pan over Rome is ludicrous, you can SEE that it's a CGI effect)... Good, could've been better.
Spartacus: I'm one of the few who thinks this is Kubrick's worst movie alongside EYES WIDE SHUT.... Douglas slave has no character, that's no hero one can rally behind.... Peter Ustinov EATS him alive, that was THE actor...
The 13th Warrior: irrelevant little entertaining movie... actually, much better than I expected/...
The vikings : if it's the one with Kirk Douglas, well, it's kind of atrocious... but we can forgive its flaws, as it's an old movie in an era where some things were not there yet and when cinema was still coming out of the theater womb..... the vikings are too polite, everything phony...but entertaining, somewhat..
Braveheart: THE BEST. Clothes, story, acting, the era-investigation, you can see a lot of reseacrh went into the clothing, all the aspect that make you submerge in that era... Yes, the story of William Weallace may not be as the movie shos us,. but who cares, the movie tells a story and does it wonderfully,... fantastic and Mel Gibson's best.
There's a lot of other movies that should be on the list, but it's decent nevertheless... and entertaining... like some of these movies...
Edited by The T - July 24 2007 at 20:54
|
|
|
|
SoundsofSeasons
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 08 2007
Location: Arizona -- USA
Status: Offline
Points: 221
|
Posted: July 26 2007 at 18:41 |
Thats pretty damn disgusting, especially since Ryan is also my name.  .
|
|
1 Chronicles 13:7-9
Then David and all Israel played music before God with all their might, with singing, on harps, on stringed instruments, on tambourines, on cymbals, and with trumpets.
|
|
Niki ( IO )
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 20 2007
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 172
|
Posted: July 28 2007 at 12:50 |
Epic?...
"Fitzcarraldo" if you consider it...
|
|
IO
|
|
Zargus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 08 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 3491
|
Posted: July 30 2007 at 18:53 |
|
Braveheart & Gladiator.
|
|
|
|
TheProgtologist
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
|
Posted: July 30 2007 at 18:57 |
It's weird that the only movies considered "epic" in this poll mostly are set in the ancient world.
What about The Godfather or a movie like Gettysburg?
Edited by TheProgtologist - July 30 2007 at 18:57
|
|
|
|
Time Signature
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 20 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 362
|
Posted: July 30 2007 at 19:07 |
I'll go with Star Wars - especially the old ones (so I've gone with 'others'). 'Spartacus' and 'The Vikings' are pretty nice epic movies too as is 'Braveheart'. And don't forget 'Jason and the Argonauts' and 'Clash of the Titans'. 'Kingdom of Heaven' is okay, even though Orlando Bloom just can't act. I don't know if Mel Gibson's and Kenneth Brannagh's versions of 'Hamlet' count as epics, but if they do, I'd recommend them too. Oh, and there's also 'Ben-Hur'. I guess 'Lord of the Rings' would belong here too. They're okay, although I was disappointed a bit with the third and second ones. Oh, and does 'Conan the Barbarian' count? How about 'The Neverending Story'? 'Willow'?
'Troy' on the other hand is terrible. One of the worst films I've ever seen. The last Samurai has it's moments, but is generally silly. If the Matrix movies count as epics too, then the first one's okay, but the two other ones are quite terrible.
|
|
Hirgwath
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 16 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 262
|
Posted: July 30 2007 at 19:37 |
|
Braveheart was utterly terrible from the historical perspective. For instance, the Scots were not dressed in rags and living in mud hovels. They lived similarly to everyone else in Europe. And I've read that in the one hundred years prior to this war, it had been relatively peaceful between Scotland and England (the film mentions "one hundred years of oppression").
Although The Last Samurai takes a few liberties with history, it does so in a realistic manner. We see the faults and the nice parts of the samurai way of life (instead of thoughtless glorification of the non-English, as in Braveheart...and The Patriot. Mel Gibson just seems to hate the Britons.), and a real sense of the effects of the West's intrusion into Japan (warts and all).
I liked Gladiator and Spartacus, but then who didn't? No complaints there.
|
|
Zargus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 08 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 3491
|
Posted: July 30 2007 at 19:38 |
TheProgtologist wrote:
It's weird that the only movies considered "epic" in this poll mostly are set in the ancient world.
What about The Godfather or a movie like Gettysburg? |
The Deer Hunter & Apocalypse now redux. 2 of my all time fav war movies and they are both preety epic i whuld say. 
|
|
|
|
1800iareyay
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2492
|
Posted: July 30 2007 at 19:39 |
Hirgwath wrote:
Braveheart was utterly terrible from the historical perspective. For instance, the Scots were not dressed in rags and living in mud hovels. They lived similarly to everyone else in Europe. And I've read that in the one hundred years prior to this war, it had been relatively peaceful between Scotland and England (the film mentions "one hundred years of oppression"). |
Yes, but I also think that the Celts fought in the nude, so...sacrifices have to be made 
|
|
Time Signature
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 20 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 362
|
Posted: July 30 2007 at 19:50 |
Hirgwath wrote:
Braveheart was utterly terrible from the historical perspective. For instance, the Scots were not dressed in rags and living in mud hovels. They lived similarly to everyone else in Europe. And I've read that in the one hundred years prior to this war, it had been relatively peaceful between Scotland and England (the film mentions "one hundred years of oppression").
|
True, but it's still entertaining. 
|
|
TheProgtologist
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
|
Posted: July 30 2007 at 20:00 |
Hirgwath wrote:
Braveheart was utterly terrible from the historical perspective. For instance, the Scots were not dressed in rags and living in mud hovels. They lived similarly to everyone else in Europe. And I've read that in the one hundred years prior to this war, it had been relatively peaceful between Scotland and England (the film mentions "one hundred years of oppression").
|
Another glaring factual error is the big battle scene in the movie.Historically it is called "The Battle of Sterling Bridge".and one of the reasons the Scots won it is because the English were on one side of the river and the Scots on the other.The English were crossing 1-2 thousand men at a time and instead of being "honorable" and letting the troops cross and marshal their forces the Scots cut them down when they crossed and the rest of the English forces looked on in horror.After witnessing the slaughter the remaining English forces fled to Sterling Castle.
Never saw a bridge or anything about it in the film,the battle was fought on a big,open plain.
Edited by TheProgtologist - July 30 2007 at 20:01
|
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
Epic Movies
