Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Is Steve Hackett's guitar work... Weird?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedIs Steve Hackett's guitar work... Weird?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3456>
Author
Message
Atomic_Rooster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2007 at 23:06
In reply to Ivan's rather lengthy reply:

You seem to have taken my post the wrong way.  I mean to attack on you person; my intent was merely to keep the focus of this thread on Steve Hackett and his style, which I believe it was intentionally supposed to be, and not a forum for argument over whether or not he invented any given technique.  Though, since you are standing by your position that Hackett was the first rock musician to use tapping, I must disagree with verifiable proof.  Guitar Player Magazine (in an article written in 1970) that Randy Resnick of Pure Food and Drug Act (with John Mayall) used tapping techniques in concert and recordings as early as 1969, though he may not have originated the use in rock.  Check it out if you doubt me,

But it doesn't really matter if Hackett innovated the technique for rock or not, he was very influential in its use as it is today (for better or worse), as he served to popularize a more aggressive implementation of such techniques in a rock atmosphere.

And finally, bringing the topic back to the initial question of the thread, yes, Hackett's style is weird, in that it is non-traditional, but prog and rock in general has room for all kinds of guitarists; in fact, one of my favorite is the very eccentric and lately departed  "Snakefinger" Lithman who guested often with The Residents.

But, as our Existentialist and Deconstructionist friends say, its all a matter of subjective opinion, and doesn't matter at all in the course of events.
I am but a servant of the mighty Fripp, the sound of whose loins shall forever be upon the tongues of his followers.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2007 at 23:11
Please Atomic Rooster, before calling me a bully, check Mr PROGGER'S history and notice I haven't changed a word or even the size of the font of his posts. 
.
if you haven't read at least 20 posts provoking and attacking or even calling Administrators, Collaborators and Members liars, corrupts, manipulators, Genesis fanboys, then please don't guess who bullies.
 
Progger comes once every several months to cause problems and when proved wrong vanishes in thin air for a couple of months just to start again.
 
You want proves? Here they are:
 
Progger wrote on  March 22, 2006:
Originally posted by Progger Progger wrote:

Not only has this site now lost all credibility, prog itself has also!

How can a sh*tty album like SEBTP be considered to be the best that prog can offer

 
Calling sh!t to what other members like is BULLYING. Of course Mr. Progger escaped from the thread.
 
 
Progger wrote on March 16, 2006, without nobody having even mentioned him:
Quote

OK Ivan, here I am

Jon>Peter>Phil>Ray>Trevor

Rick>Patrick>Tony>Igor>Geoffrey

Howe>Rabin>Hackett>Phillips>Banks>Sherwood> ;Steurmer

Chris>Mike

Bill>Phil>Alan>Chester

THE YES ALBUM>TRESSPASS

FRAGILE>NURSERY CRYME

CTTE>FOXTROT

TALES>LAMB

TRICK OF THE TALE>TORMATO

DRAMA>WIND AND WUTHERING

90125>DUKE

Please note everybody that my list is objective and the truth. Anybody who says different knows nothing about musicians and how music is constructed!

BTW Ivan, in the latest issue of classic rock magazine, their is a feature on the greatest 100 rock albums as voted for my musicians and critics. Yes has three albums in that chart, Genesis has one

Of course his post was meaningless in a meaningless thread, but read the red highlighted part of his post....ISN'T THIS BEING AN ARROGANT BULLY???
 
Not happy with that he replied to Ivan Frost (Trickster):
 
Originally posted by Progger Progger wrote:

Originally posted by ivansfr0st ivansfr0st wrote:

Originally posted by Progger Progger wrote:

My response is quite simple. Even YES or ELP at their worse is far better than Genesis at their worst! Big Generator has great tracks  like 'Shoot High....' 'Final Eyes' 'Big Generator'. Love Beach has 'Canario'...ect. So I can excuse Yes and ELP fanboys if they want to rate those albums highly but Genesis at their worst......no way! Giving FGTR *****'s is just someone taking the piss!!!!!!

I suggest you to learn to accept others' opinions, which is why this site exists. It is naive to suspect that whenever a person disagrees with your opinion he is being corrupt. It is also rather biased, from my point of view, to close your eyes when a group's *worst* album gets 5 stars and just find a single album out of a thousand more just because you disagree with someone's opinion.

 -- Ivan

Ivan....is that you?

I do not have to accept others oppinions! If I did I would accept that Milosevic was innocent, that the holocaust never happened, that the moon landings were a conspiracy, that the......I think you get my point! We have to know how seperate the facts from the bullsh*t. That is why I will never believe that Genesis were a great prog band. A very good prog band who made very good albums but don't believe the hype!!!!!!

 
Of course he made a fool of himself. LOL
 
Progger wrote about Prog Archives:
Quote It has become a joke and corrupts the charts! How else can you explain SEBTP to be at number two! It's not even Genesis's best album
 
Just in case, in the thread http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=20117&KW=Genesis&PN=2 Tony R proved that Progger used another nickname with his own computer to support his insults and praise hinself, so not only wanted to make problems, but cheated.
 
I could go with even worst, but it's enough to prove who comes once in a while to provoke people and then tuns to start the same exact nonsense on another thread, so please if you don't know this member's history, please don't call me a bully, check all his posts. 
 
Yes, I loose the patience with him, but he won't scare me ouyut, a new member who receives this treatment may leave and that bothers me, we have lost many valuable members because of harrassment ibn the past years and I don't want this to happen again.
 
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - April 22 2007 at 23:15
            
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2007 at 23:14
Atomic Rooster, I have no problem with your opinion or taste, as long as you keep the forms, you may say whatever you want.
 
I have repeated constantly I don't like most King Crimson, so if I say something so hard about an icon, why shouuld I annoy when somebody talks about the bands I like.
 
Your opinion and even Progger's is valuable, but when he calls people corrupt or liars, as he has done rpepeatedly...then I have a problem.
 
Now about being weird.....Prog is essentially weird in comparison with mainstream, the music is complex, the songs are ussually 4 or 5 times longer than the average, the times are weird, the lyrics are not simple, is full of changes and blends of styles...ergo it's weird.
 
Hackett is not a common performer, his style is different, he's more worried about atmospheres and band playing than in making long solos, his music is even darker than most of Symphonic musicians.
 
So yes, he's weird because his music escapes to the average parameters, I have absolutely no problem with that........But hey...weird id good, if not we would be listening Rap and Hip Hop instead of this complex and hard to find music..
 
Thanks
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - April 22 2007 at 23:44
            
Back to Top
MadcapLaughs84 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 21 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 658
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2007 at 23:15
He's a great guitar player, one of the factors that make me enjoy Genesis. But I don't think he's weird, maybe he has a funny face, like a comedy movie guy, but he's an awesome musician.
Back to Top
Chus View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: Venezuela
Status: Offline
Points: 1991
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2007 at 23:21
Originally posted by MadcapLaughs84 MadcapLaughs84 wrote:

He's a great guitar player, one of the factors that make me enjoy Genesis. But I don't think he's weird, maybe he has a funny face, like a comedy movie guy, but he's an awesome musician.
 
 No he doesn't... he looks like Gianluigi Buffon Wink(a girl who I was in love with happened to love himCry What does she see in him anyway)
 


Edited by Chus - April 22 2007 at 23:22
Jesus Gabriel
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 23 2007 at 03:22
Originally posted by Chus Chus wrote:

 
 I would dare say that Holdsworth's guitar sound was very similar to that of Hackett (in comparison to Daryl Stuemmer, that is -saving also the obvious differences in technique and approach) in that the "tapping" was very present (while Holdsworth's "tapping" manifested itself in playing legato, without breaking the notes with alternate picking.. it wouldn't be called tapping perse but it's a sort of hammering on the fret without picking); I believe Holdsworth would had been a great choice for Genesis' gigs
 
Single-handed vs two-handed tapping:
 
The reason it's a big(gish) deal is that single-handed tapping has been in use practically since the invention of stringed instruments, but it's only been since the invention of the electric guitar pickup that it's been at all possible to use two hands on the fretboard and create any kind of performable sound.
 
The effect, as has been pointed out earlier, is not unlike the sound of a keyboard - hence much of Hackett's playing blends in with Bank's keyboards: Hackett's has never been an overtly virtuosic style, and was never intended to be - he seems to have always tried for the ambient; to create new, smooth and keyboard-like sounds from the guitar, and in that, he succeeded beyond almost any other guitarist of the time in creating a new sound. To me, that's the same as inventing a new technique.
 
Hackett seems to have not only used it in solos, but as a (tasteful, IMO) textural device during pieces that's both innovative and creative.
 
There are obvious exceptions - Hackett could ROCK too, as his solo in "The Musical Box" (among others) shows, and it seems to be the Rock solos he is judged on - but if you listen to the more subtle stuff he did, it was ahead of its time - although, granted, somewhat clumsy in places.
 
The clumsiness hardly matters, since it's obvious he was blazing a trail - just as any Judas Priest fan forgives them the even greater clumsiness on their early albums for the same reason. And besides, as every musician knows, sometimes it's the slips and accidents in the studio that become the best parts of a piece of music!
 
The other Steve H (Hillage) was also remarkable for creating ambient guitar sounds, but not as well-known until he joined Gong. The Arzachel album (which predates Hackett-era Genesis) is a stunning display of what Hillage could make a guitar sound like - completely different in style, of course, but with a very similar end goal.
 
So I don't think Hackett's guitar work was/is wierd, per se - more like very creative, and with a deeply personal style (you can spot a Hackett solo a mile off!). Among the huge plethora of Page imitators of the time, a personal style is valuable commodity!
 
I'm not so convinced by the Holdsworth option - a fine guitarist, but possibly too overt and "busy" (in a non-derogatory sense) for the more intimate and relaxed sound of Genesis?
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65606
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 23 2007 at 03:54
Indeed, the hammer/pull technique, both one and two-hand, has been around almost as long as stringed intstruments (especially in the Flamenco traditions). Hackett was the first electric rock guitarist on an album to distinctly utilize a linear, two-handed extension of it as a method of effect. What Eddie then did with it was much like what Hendrix did with other techniques (with the help of powerful amplification); he highlighted it, brought it to the foreground and used it as a source of phrasing (sometimes spontaneous), taking up where Hackett and others (Jeff Beck) seemed to stop. EVH also developed a 'slapping' maneuver heard on the opening moments of the 'Fair Warning' album. Eddie called these things 'neat noises' and though he rarely credited Beck or Hendrix, it is in this family of sound pyrotechnics that EVH was able to capitalize on Hackett's 'little trick'. Hackett was far more of a traditional guitarist and therefore smoothly incorporated the technique into the music, and became more of a harmonizer in Genesis than a lead guitarist -- much like Jimmy Page's role evolved in Zeppelin.




    


Edited by Atavachron - April 23 2007 at 07:44
Back to Top
Progger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1188
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 23 2007 at 21:45
Certified,
I recently read an article about Eric Clapton using the 'Tapping'  technique in Cream but cannot remember exactly where. I'm one of those people that  visits a magazine store once a week and will 'flip' thru the various muso mags without actually buying them! I wonder how many of us actually do that? I mean, those magazine prices are ridiculous. I wish I had bought the article though as I know I don't have anything to back up my claim without it.
 
Ivan,
You have really gone to great lenghs to try and discredit me and get me banned. Those quotes you have dug up are months old and I was told at the time by the administrators to tone it down or be banned. You should have noticed that I have mellowed since!
 
Personally, I don't think that interview article gives much credence to your statement that Van Halen was influenced by Hackett. As I have said on many occasions, if someone says something often and loudly enough, people will start to believe it.
 
Today I bought three of the new SACD releases, W & W, TOTT and Duke. I opted not to buy the box set as I never liked ATWT & Ababcab & I know that  even better sound quality wouldn't change my oppinions on those two albums.  Listening to W & W in particular on SACD & DVD-A  shows Hackett in a new light & his guitar parts are more distinguishable from the keyboards. I'm surprised he decided to quit after that album as he seems to be more prominent on that release than anything previous. I was also drawn to the songwriting credits and was again surprised that he wrote quite a 'chunk' of that album.
 
Wind And Wuthering has always been my favourite Genesis album and know doubt Hackett must take some credit for that. He still dosn't make my top 5 though but he is A VERY GOOD GUITARIST!
 
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 23 2007 at 23:37
Originally posted by Progger Progger wrote:

 
Ivan,
You have really gone to great lenghs to try and discredit me and get me banned. Those quotes you have dug up are months old
 
Well Progger, here you have one dated April 14 2007 (10 days ago) where you call me and other members liars trying to make gulñlible people believe false things:
 
Originally posted by Progger Progger wrote:

 
It amazes me that when people say something often enough that isn't true, gullible people will believe itConfused  
 
 I was told at the time by the administrators to tone it down or be banned. You should have noticed that I have mellowed since!
 
I don't want you to get banned Progger, honestly I don't care so much about your accusations without  fundament, but adter the last post quoted, I had to seach for 8 quotes to prove all my claims were accurate and heavilly supported.
 
You can love or hate whoever you want, as long as you stop calling people liars or corrupts.
 
Personally, I don't think that interview article gives much credence to your statement that Van Halen was influenced by Hackett. As I have said on many occasions, if someone says something often and loudly enough, people will start to believe it.
 
OK, Van Halen MAYBE never heard about Steve Hackett, MAYBE he developed the tapping technique alone with help of nobody, but he did it seven years after Hackett, MAYBE the Magazine is lying, MAYBE the owners of the magazine are dirty Genesis fanboys.....that's not trascendental (And very unlikely).
 
The point of the thread is that many of us mentioned Hackett is the first Rock musician to use that technique in 1971, all the quotes and the availlable references reinforce this  and you specifically said we were lying and making people believe things.
 
Today I bought three of the new SACD releases, W & W, TOTT and Duke. I opted not to buy the box set as I never liked ATWT & Ababcab & I know that  even better sound quality wouldn't change my oppinions on those two albums.  Listening to W & W in particular on SACD & DVD-A  shows Hackett in a new light & his guitar parts are more distinguishable from the keyboards. I'm surprised he decided to quit after that album as he seems to be more prominent on that release than anything previous. I was also drawn to the songwriting credits and was again surprised that he wrote quite a 'chunk' of that album.
 
Hackett left Genesis because he felt the songs he proposed were not going to be accepted and he wanted more freedom to write and perform whatever he wanted.
 
I guess he didn't liked the path Genesis was taking, but that's a guess.
 
There was a large interview to Steve that has been deleted God knows why, where he talked about the multiple reasons that lead him to leave Genesis, but in this short passages of different interviews he explains the reason of his departure:
 
 
1.-
Quote

It came to a point where I simply couldn’t handle playing “I know what I like in Your Wardrobe” any longer.  I also didn’t feel enough of my writing and playing was being included into the music.  I wanted to work with other people such as Randy Crawford, Kansas, etc.  I also wanted to see how good I was on my own.  Being on my own has been far more rewarding as I found myself able to get things done much more efficiently.  Being in a band like Genesis involves too much corporate thinking, taking too long to get things done.

2.-
Quote
    "I think early Genesis tried to sketch in a number of styles," said Hackett. "I think later Genesis tended to become more of a corporation where the rough edges were all ironed out. But I personally think the rough edges are what it's all about."

http://www.stevehackett.com/reviews/dream.html 

 
Seems he was a bit tired of Genesis at that moment.
 
Wind And Wuthering has always been my favourite Genesis album and know doubt Hackett must take some credit for that. He still dosn't make my top 5 though but he is A VERY GOOD GUITARIST!
 
That's an opinion and that's valid, if you stick to give opinions and avoid calling people names, even if you rate every Genesis album with one star and believe Hackett is less talented than any Prog musician, it's OK with me.
 
Iván
 


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - April 24 2007 at 02:31
            
Back to Top
bhikkhu View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 06 2006
Location: A² Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 23 2007 at 23:39
Originally posted by Progger Progger wrote:

Certified,
I recently read an article about Eric Clapton using the 'Tapping'  technique in Cream but cannot remember exactly where. I'm one of those people that  visits a magazine store once a week and will 'flip' thru the various muso mags without actually buying them! I wonder how many of us actually do that? I mean, those magazine prices are ridiculous. I wish I had bought the article though as I know I don't have anything to back up my claim without it.

 

Ivan,

You have really gone to great lenghs to try and discredit me and get me banned. Those quotes you have dug up are months old and I was told at the time by the administrators to tone it down or be banned. You should have noticed that I have mellowed since!

 

Personally, I don't think that interview article gives much credence to your statement that Van Halen was influenced by Hackett. As I have said on many occasions, if someone says something often and loudly enough, people will start to believe it.

 

Today I bought three of the new SACD releases, W & W, TOTT and Duke. I opted not to buy the box set as I never liked ATWT & Ababcab & I know that  even better sound quality wouldn't change my oppinions on those two albums.  Listening to W & W in particular on SACD & DVD-A  shows Hackett in a new light & his guitar parts are more distinguishable from the keyboards. I'm surprised he decided to quit after that album as he seems to be more prominent on that release than anything previous. I was also drawn to the songwriting credits and was again surprised that he wrote quite a 'chunk' of that album.

 

Wind And Wuthering has always been my favourite Genesis album and know doubt Hackett must take some credit for that. He still dosn't make my top 5 though but he is A VERY GOOD GUITARIST!

 


Amazing how an opinion can change once you actually listen to an artist.

Back to Top
Chus View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: Venezuela
Status: Offline
Points: 1991
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 23 2007 at 23:45
 
Originally posted by Progger Progger wrote:

Certified,
I recently read an article about Eric Clapton using the 'Tapping'  technique in Cream but cannot remember exactly where. I'm one of those people that  visits a magazine store once a week and will 'flip' thru the various muso mags without actually buying them! I wonder how many of us actually do that? I mean, those magazine prices are ridiculous. I wish I had bought the article though as I know I don't have anything to back up my claim without it.


 
Again.. might had been the usual one-hand tapping, so the question remains.


Edited by Chus - April 23 2007 at 23:45
Jesus Gabriel
Back to Top
King Mango View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: April 14 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 38
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2007 at 00:04
Hackett is one of those guys who goes "solo-less" in my mind. (Like Lindsey Buckingham for example) A weaver of great melodies, but no solo at all stands out as making me stop and give over to it status as a "masterpiece" of technical execution. His is more emotion and expression over self indulgence perhaps?

But admittedly I don't listen to much Genesis and none of his solo work except for a tune here or there heard at a friend's house. My buddy Glen was ALWAYS trying to convert me at an early age into a Genesis legionnaire but I was too busy trying to get the timing down for Jacob's Ladder back then. ><

Any guitarists out there want to toss a suggestion for me to pay attention to?

To whoever it was that hailed Steve Howe as the fastest guitarist, I have a list for you ;)
Best regards,
King Mango
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65606
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2007 at 00:17
Originally posted by King Mango King Mango wrote:


Any guitarists out there want to toss a suggestion for me to pay attention to?



Ron Jarzombek for tech, Kaki King for innovation.


Back to Top
Chus View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: Venezuela
Status: Offline
Points: 1991
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2007 at 00:23
Fareed Haque for versatility
Jesus Gabriel
Back to Top
william314159 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 24 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 144
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2007 at 00:31

i think that if you want to go with the best musicianship (i said musicianship, not composition) you need to go with the fusion masters- morse, di meola, coryell, abercrombie, holdsworth, gambale, etc.

Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2007 at 04:17
I trawled a few sites to try to link Clapton to tapping - as it does seem somewhat remarkable that Hackett was first to use this technique - and there were some references to "Crossroads" - but, as this video ("Crossroads") and this video ("Tales of Brave Ulysses") demonstrate (at 3:00, you could be forgiven for thinking you were listening to two-handed tapping), the playing is quick, but the technique is not used - in fact, it's not even tapping - it's string-bending combined with alternate picking.
 
It's a damned good excuse to enjoy some Cream at their best, though!
 
Here's the Page solo in "Heartbreaker", in case there's any doubt (and because it's amazing). See how close Page comes to two-handed tapping, by combining single-handed tapping with "nut-bending" (he used this technique on Led Zep II, so don't be put off by the fact that the film that the clip comes from was released in 1976).
 
I couldn't track down any evidence that the technique was used by the Bluesbreakers - but that is among the first of places that I would look. I wouldn't be surprised if they used single-handed tapping - especially since that's an old technique.
 
I couldn't even find evidence of this man performing two-handed tapping, much as I half-expected to - although he practically patented many styles single-handed, and the first clip clearly shows that he wasn't averse to using things other than the plectrum to pick the strings, and that it wasn't entirely for show!
 
 
Back to Hackett's guitar work - my favourite of his solo albums are Spectral Mornings and Voyage of the Acolyte - so here are some clips from both Big%20smile
 
Ace of Wands (Voyage of the Acolyte) - note how he uses the guitar mainly in a textural way; it's almost always a part of layers with keyboards or mandolin. Note also, around 4:15 the two techniques he uses - the camera helpfully shows these very clearly. OK, bottlenecks are nothing new, and it doesn't take any special skill to play that way - but that's still a great sound, and it's a very creative use of it (and what he does before the bottleneck is remarkable too).
 
Anyway (Spectral Mornings) - again the focus is on the sound, with excellent volume control - although the modal scales and effects also help give an exotic or even ethereal sound. Shame it's so short!
 
These two clips show that Steve's work is primarily focussed in two areas;
 
1. Creating a sound/texture that will blend in with the music around it.
2. Creating strong melodies that also have a degree of unpredictability about them, with the emphasis on the melody.
 
None of his work is about overt showmanship - it seems to be more about introspection and the search for personal space.
 
 
Talking about Crossroads, as I was earlier, THIS is about showmanship (and includes two-handed tapping) Big%20smile
 
...OK, part of this is just an excuse to share great music  - but on the whole, the point is to show just how different Hackett's style is from his predecessors - although the techniques the bluesmen used may seem antiquated now, these examples should illustrate perfectly that it's not so much what they did (although much of it is still amazing), but how they did it, and why Hackett is actually rather wierd in comparison.
 
Finally, if there's anyone still wondering if two-handed tapping is that much of a big deal, take a look at this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6NA9nd4Fgs Big%20smile


Edited by Certif1ed - April 24 2007 at 04:28
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2007 at 04:57
Good post Cert. Good use of video's.
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
King Mango View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: April 14 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 38
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2007 at 07:09
Interesting sidebar about tapping but...
For all your video posting, left (assuming left=frettinghand) handed tapping has been around as long as there's been fretted instruments. It's called legato.
HOWEVER, I'd be very interested in seeing the earliest example of TWO handed tapping. IMO that's what really revolutionized guitar sound. I know this may not be the proper place or time, but for anyone interested in virtuoso guitar with the utmost consideration to melody, check out a youtube playlist I started a few months ago.
I've never ever (yes, never ever) been discouraged or disgusted with my abilities but these guys come close...
Guitarists click at own risk...

Edited by King Mango - April 24 2007 at 07:11
Best regards,
King Mango
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2007 at 08:52
Originally posted by King Mango King Mango wrote:

Interesting sidebar about tapping but...
For all your video posting, left (assuming left=frettinghand) handed tapping has been around as long as there's been fretted instruments. It's called legato.
 
No, legato is something else - while it is correct that single handed tapping is a legato style, legato simply means to play smoothly, and there are several ways to do that on a guitar.
 
Originally posted by King Mango King Mango wrote:


HOWEVER, I'd be very interested in seeing the earliest example of TWO handed tapping. IMO that's what really revolutionized guitar sound. I know this may not be the proper place or time, but for anyone interested in virtuoso guitar with the utmost consideration to melody, check out a youtube playlist I started a few months ago.
I've never ever (yes, never ever) been discouraged or disgusted with my abilities but these guys come close...
Guitarists click at own risk...
 
Actually, the main focus of my exploration is into two-handed tapping, specifically whether Steve Hackett was first to use it in Rock, and who else, apart from Emmett Chapman used it before Hackett did in "Return of the Giant Hogweed".
 
You may need to go back a post or two... Tongue
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
King Mango View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: April 14 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 38
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2007 at 09:04
hehe I didn't mean to imply hammer-ons and pull-offs were the ONLY way to achieve legato. For instance when you play the 32nd notes in La Alborada, you use the fleshy parts of your picking fingers to soften the attack.
I'm actually going to start asking around some of my more informed friends and see if we can't try and nail something down. :rockon:
Best regards,
King Mango
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3456>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.289 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.