Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all.
Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage") |
|
Post Reply 
|
| Author | ||
DallasBryan 
Forum Senior Member 
Joined: November 23 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3323 |
 Topic: Rating 70's(ish) R&RPosted: September 23 2006 at 02:02 |
|
 IRON BUTTERFLY - In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida DEEP PURPLE - Burn DEEP PURPLE - In Rock DEEP PURPLE - Machine Head BEATLES, THE - Revolver BEATLES, THE - Let It Be BEATLES, THE - Abbey Road BEATLES, THE - Magical Mystery Tour (US Version) BEATLES, THE - Sergeant Pepper's Lonely Heart's Club Band ROXY MUSIC - Siren ROXY MUSIC - Country Life ROXY MUSIC - For Your Pleasure QUEEN - News Of The World QUEEN - A Day At The Races QUEEN - A Night At The Opera QUEEN - Queen II QUEEN - Sheer Heart Attack URIAH HEEP - The Magician's Birthday URIAH HEEP - Salisbury URIAH HEEP - Demons and Wizards SUPERTRAMP - Breakfast in America SUPERTRAMP - Even in the Quietest Moments.... SUPERTRAMP - Crime of the Century RUSH - Moving Pictures RUSH - Permanent Waves RUSH - Hemispheres RUSH - 2112 RUSH - A Farewell to Kings OLD MAN & THE SEA, THE - The Old Man & The Sea MANN'S EARTH BAND, MANFRED - Solar Fire KAYAK - Royal Bed Bouncer KAYAK - Kayak II JANE - Together HØST - Hardt Mot Hardt GNIDROLOG - Lady Lake GARYBALDI - Nuda CAPTAIN BEYOND - Captain Beyond BARCLAY JAMES HARVEST (BJH) - Octoberon ARGENT - Nexus
3 stars are very good albums
ps - Dont forget that I grade stiffly using the full 1-5 star rating system.
5 being masterpiece, dont give this mark to many
4 being near masterpiece, or very good, classic sound, defining
3 being really good, some may consider classic, worthy listen
2 being good or collectors or those who really like the band, clone bands
1 being some good some fair songs, fair clone bands, not bad anything below this I dont consider worth rating  Edited by DallasBryan - September 23 2006 at 02:03 |
||
 |
||
|
Ricochet
Special Collaborator 
Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 27 2005 Location: Nauru Status: Offline Points: 46301 |
Posted: September 23 2006 at 02:05 |
|
 at Rush. at Beatles. |
||
|
||
|
||
|
R o V e R
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 13 2005 Location: India Status: Offline Points: 2747 |
Posted: September 23 2006 at 02:22 |
|
|
RUSH ******
|
||
|
||
|
R o V e R
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 13 2005 Location: India Status: Offline Points: 2747 |
Posted: September 23 2006 at 02:24 |
|
|
poor ratings "Faltu" in my language |
||
|
||
|
Australian
Prog Reviewer 
Joined: June 13 2006 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 3278 |
Posted: September 23 2006 at 02:33 |
|
I agree. A too harsh there.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
DallasBryan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 23 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3323 |
Posted: September 23 2006 at 02:39 |
|
|
whoa.....salesmen........
|
||
|
||
|
lucas
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 06 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 8138 |
Posted: September 23 2006 at 03:22 |
|
|
Beatles & iron butterfly 70' ish ?
|
||
|
"Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)
|
||
|
||
|
R o V e R
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 13 2005 Location: India Status: Offline Points: 2747 |
Posted: September 23 2006 at 03:42 |
|
|
Huddd 
|
||
|
||
|
fuxi
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 08 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 2459 |
Posted: September 23 2006 at 04:15 |
|
|
What a funny list! If you're talking about Roxy Music, where's STREET LIFE? I also assume you've limited yourself to performers included in Progarchives, otherwise where are the Who, the Stones, Led Zep, David Bowie and Lou Reed? (All of whom recorded far better stuff than Deep Purple, Queen or [yuk!] Rush...)
(Not to mention Graham Parker, Elvis Costello, Ian Dury, Patti Smith and the Pretenders: first rate R&R, every single one of them!) No, don't worry, I AM a proghead! 
|
||
|
||
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21196 |
Posted: September 23 2006 at 04:22 |
|
|
The only rating that I could *never* agree with - is 2 stars for Queen II. Especially from a prog standpoint it is their masterpiece!
|
||
|
||
|
Sean Trane
Special Collaborator
Prog Folk Joined: April 29 2004 Location: Heart of Europe Status: Online Points: 20241 |
Posted: September 23 2006 at 05:22 |
|
Not really. Realistic would be my description, although he is just as severe as I am
I am more shocked that Supertramp and Roxy's proggier moments are rated lower than their poppier albums: COTC is less than BIA anf Roxy's FYP less than Siren????  and Mike's remark about Queen too!Edited by Sean Trane - September 23 2006 at 05:23 |
||
|
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword |
||
|
||
|
Ricochet
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 27 2005 Location: Nauru Status: Offline Points: 46301 |
Posted: September 23 2006 at 05:45 |
|
|
Sorry Hugues, but nothing is realistic about Rush's best albums being two stars. Two stars for me = mediocrity that is just about fit for a listen.
I admire Dallas Bryan for being excellent in his impartiality, except those medium-rated Schulze albums I had no major discontent (  ), but up to some albums it's just too low. Rush, overall, in its best years, is anything but a two stars. On the other hand, The Beatles being such jewels and models is also edgy in realistic impression. I admit that, up here, I personally dislike the Beatles; but it's the perspective of many albums being of high value. Disproportion or what? Exception from the impartiality or am I just mistaking?  Edited by Ricochet - September 23 2006 at 05:47 |
||
|
|
||
|
||
|
Sean Trane
Special Collaborator
Prog Folk Joined: April 29 2004 Location: Heart of Europe Status: Online Points: 20241 |
Posted: September 23 2006 at 06:55 |
|
|
Well his Beatles ratings seems flawless except for the Magical Mystery tour which I give three stars (and two according to Dallas's scale)
Rush: it really depends if you dig Geddy's Vocals doesn't it?
and if you read the scale Bryan gives under his list (this means forget the PA scale),
 is still good. |
||
|
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword |
||
|
||
|
Ricochet
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 27 2005 Location: Nauru Status: Offline Points: 46301 |
Posted: September 23 2006 at 07:04 |
|
|
well I said two stars in my version.
DallasB does not have other accent than good. Leaving, indeed, PA out of the bussines, can anything of 1 star sound like "some good and fair"? (this is nothing too serious meant, just discussing, if we caught the motion of discussion...) |
||
|
|
||
|
||
|
Eetu Pellonpaa
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 17 2005 Location: Finland Status: Offline Points: 4828 |
Posted: September 23 2006 at 12:16 |
|
|
||
|
yesfan88
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 24 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 357 |
Posted: October 02 2006 at 00:02 |
|
|
Why is Magical Mystery Tour rated higher than Sgt. Pepper's? Also, you've rated Rush too low all around.
|
||
|
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"- Evelyn Beatrice Hall
|
||
|
||
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Rating 70's(ish) R&R
Topic Options
DallasBryan wrote:
