Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Report errors & omissions here
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - RESIDENTS - Baby Sex
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedRESIDENTS - Baby Sex

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Joolz View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 24 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1377
Direct Link To This Post Topic: RESIDENTS - Baby Sex
    Posted: July 05 2006 at 04:51
Noticed this review on the front page. I do not know the band, but this seems to be describing a bootleg [repeated on another review and the album description], and as such shouldn't be here.


THE RESIDENTS — Baby Sex

Review by penguindf12 (Dex F.)
PROG REVIEWER 2 stars Firstly, to clear things up: this is probably 3 stars at best, not the gross overrating of 5 that someone gave it earlier. This early piece of The RESIDENTS' work remains officially unreleased. However, through the grace of the internet, it can obtained only by a large amount of blood, sweat, and tears (I myself still haven't been able to get it - all I've heard of it are MP3 streams of it from a very obscure source). The reasons it is not more available are: A) The RESIDENTS are somewhat embarrassed by its sophomoric nature; B) The sound quality is somewhat inferior; C) It is very obscure anyway to all but RESIDENTS fans; and D) In accordance with their "Theory of Obscurity", because it is so revealing of their nature in the early years, it may endanger their anonymity (much like reason A).

ALSO

the following album has just been added:


THE RESIDENTS

The Warner Bros. Album

(Studio Album, 1971)
Title information (Edit) | MP3 | Reviews | Buy Music Track listing


1. Strawberry Feilds Forever (0:27)
2. Mad Sawmill of Copenhagen, Germany (1:04)
3. Baby Skeletons and Dogs (1:23)
4. Bop Bop (Shoo Bop Bop) (0:35)
5. unknown (0:32)
6. A Merican Fag (1:11)
7. Oh Mommy, Oh Daddy Can't You See That It's True (0:49)
8. Baby Skeletons and Dogs (Reprise) (1:46)
9. Mad Sawmill of Copenhagen (Reprise I) (0:26)
10. Going to Arcata Blues (1:50)
11. Mad Sawmill of Copenhagen (Reprise II) (0:05)
12. Black Velvet Original (0:13)
13. Mad Sawmill of Copenhagen (Reprise III) (0:06)
14. Jimi Hendrix Dildo (0:37)
15. Mad Sawmill of Copenhagen (Reprise IV) (1:56)
16. In the Still of the Night (0:18)
17. Maggie's Farm (1:20)
18. Mad Sawmill of Copenhagen (Reprise V) (0:02)
19. Snot and Feces Live at the Grunt Festival (0:48)
20. Sweet Meat (2:20)
21. Oh Yeah Uhh Bop Shu Bop (0:43)
22. Om Is Where the Art Is (2:54)
23. Concerto in R Flat Minor I (0:28)
24. Concerto in R Flat Minor II (0:41)
25. unknown (0:11)
26. Gagagapiggaeioupe (0:36)
27. Sold American (0:38)
28. Love Theme from a Major Motion Picture (0:36)
29. Prelude for Accordian Sousaphone and French Horn (0:29)
30. Oh God You're a Pie in the Sky (0:52)
31. unknown (0:05)
32. unknown (0:06)
33. Marching Toward AEIOU Blues (0:44)
34. In the Still of the Night Again (1:55)
35. unknown (0:24)
36. Oh Mommy, Oh Daddy Can't You See That It's True Agian (1:02)
37. Art the White Elephant (1:07)
38. Psychedelic and Orgasmic Finale I (1:46)
39. Psychedelic and Orgasmic Finale II (4:00)

Total Time: 38:11

Line-up


Snakefinger/ guitar, violin
N. Senada/ ???
The Residents / everything else

Releases information

Never officially released (only available online)




Edited by Joolz - July 05 2006 at 04:55
Back to Top
Zac M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 03 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2006 at 18:15
I think they should stay, they are an important document of one of the best and most creative ensembles to ever walk the earth. While not officially released, I see no problem in including them in the site.
"Art is not imitation, nor is it something manufactured according to the wishes of instinct or good taste. It is a process of expression."

-Merleau-Ponty
Back to Top
Joolz View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 24 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1377
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2006 at 01:48
Originally posted by Zac M Zac M wrote:

I think they should stay, they are an important document of one of the best and most creative ensembles to ever walk the earth. While not officially released, I see no problem in including them in the site.


Even if they break site policy? Shocked

Sorry, but if these are unauthorised releases, then they do indeed break site policy. Others have already been removed from other bands, so why should this be an exception?


Edited by Joolz - July 06 2006 at 01:52
Back to Top
Zac M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 03 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2006 at 02:10
I don't really see that they break site policy, as they are important steps in the band's career and every fan knows about them of course. Maybe it's just because I am a ResFan, and that's why I think they should/could be here. I won't be offended if they get removed, but I don't think it's absolutely necessary to do so.
"Art is not imitation, nor is it something manufactured according to the wishes of instinct or good taste. It is a process of expression."

-Merleau-Ponty
Back to Top
Joolz View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 24 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1377
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2006 at 09:35
Nudge ......
Back to Top
Fitzcarraldo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2006 at 10:55
Both deleted.
Back to Top
penguindf12 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 20 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 831
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2006 at 01:44

I agree with Zac M, but then again I did spend a LOT of time researching the track listings for those, and that review took me hours!! Why blindly uphold such a policy? If you think about it, you'll realize that the "no bootlegs" rule is in place largely to prevent fakes and repeat material, and an excess of crap. HOWEVER, the albums I added are legit Residents material, withheld only because of their own "Theory of Obscurity". The albums have been, in fact, played on radio before (Oregon, 1977). Really, can not an exception be made in this case? The purpose of this site is to promote progressive music - and there are precious few places on the internet you can find reviews of these albums.

Please reconsider.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.160 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.