![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
Joolz ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 24 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1377 |
![]() Posted: July 05 2006 at 04:51 |
Noticed this review on the front page. I do not know the band, but this seems to be describing a bootleg [repeated on another review and the album description], and as such shouldn't be here.
THE RESIDENTS — Baby SexReview by penguindf12 (Dex F.)PROG REVIEWER ![]() ALSO the following album has just been added: THE RESIDENTSThe Warner Bros. Album(Studio Album, 1971)![]()
Never officially released (only available online) Edited by Joolz - July 05 2006 at 04:55 |
|
![]() |
|
Zac M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 03 2005 Status: Offline Points: 3577 |
![]() |
I think they should stay, they are an important document of one of the best and most creative ensembles to ever walk the earth. While not officially released, I see no problem in including them in the site.
|
|
"Art is not imitation, nor is it something manufactured according to the wishes of instinct or good taste. It is a process of expression."
-Merleau-Ponty |
|
![]() |
|
Joolz ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 24 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1377 |
![]() |
Even if they break site policy? ![]() Sorry, but if these are unauthorised releases, then they do indeed break site policy. Others have already been removed from other bands, so why should this be an exception? Edited by Joolz - July 06 2006 at 01:52 |
|
![]() |
|
Zac M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 03 2005 Status: Offline Points: 3577 |
![]() |
I don't really see that they break site policy, as they are important steps in the band's career and every fan knows about them of course. Maybe it's just because I am a ResFan, and that's why I think they should/could be here. I won't be offended if they get removed, but I don't think it's absolutely necessary to do so.
|
|
"Art is not imitation, nor is it something manufactured according to the wishes of instinct or good taste. It is a process of expression."
-Merleau-Ponty |
|
![]() |
|
Joolz ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 24 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1377 |
![]() |
Nudge ......
|
|
![]() |
|
Fitzcarraldo ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 30 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1835 |
![]() |
Both deleted.
|
|
![]() |
|
penguindf12 ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: September 20 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 831 |
![]() |
I agree with Zac M, but then again I did spend a LOT of time researching the track listings for those, and that review took me hours!! Why blindly uphold such a policy? If you think about it, you'll realize that the "no bootlegs" rule is in place largely to prevent fakes and repeat material, and an excess of crap. HOWEVER, the albums I added are legit Residents material, withheld only because of their own "Theory of Obscurity". The albums have been, in fact, played on radio before (Oregon, 1977). Really, can not an exception be made in this case? The purpose of this site is to promote progressive music - and there are precious few places on the internet you can find reviews of these albums. Please reconsider.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |