Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Compare and contrast McLaughlin & Holdsworth
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedCompare and contrast McLaughlin & Holdsworth

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
oracus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 12 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 497
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 00:49
They are both playing more than virtuosic but i prefer Allan's sound

Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 00:58
Originally posted by JrKASperov JrKASperov wrote:

McLaughlin is really uninnovative when improvising, except on acoustic. And Holdsworth cheats by hammeronning lots of his notes, which makes him sound playing faster than he can.

My vote goes to....

DiMeola.Tongue
 
Really now?  I saw John M on tour in 1975 with Jeff Beck on his Blow By Blow tour.  (This would have been Mahavishnu's Vision of Emerald Beyond with Jean Luc Ponty and Michael Walden.)  John came out at the end of Becks set and with Ritchie Blackmore sitting in the the third row proceeded to trades chops on a blues song with the blues master Beck.  At one point after this incredible chop McLaughlin pulled off Beck threw his hands in the air and started playing chords.
 
As for Alan I love his work.  If anything he is too picky about what he does.  I wish he would play live more often.
 
 


Edited by Garion81 - June 02 2006 at 01:00


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
Empathy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 30 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1864
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 01:01
^ WOW. Sounds like an amazing show!
Pure Brilliance:
Back to Top
pero View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 11 2005
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 1242
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 04:25
I like them both.
 
Holdswort is fantastic guitarist. I like his work with Gong, Brufford and Larry Coryell.
His solo works are not my cup of tee. Technically perfect but a bit clinical and cold.
 
On the other hand McLaughlin is one of the greatest as a guitarist and composer.
His solo albums are exceptional (especially "Extrapolation and Electric guitarist).
His work with Miles Davis  Mahavishnu orchestra and Shakti and a lot of other musicians is milestone of jazz/rock.
 
Above mentioned Dimeola is no match to Holdswort and McLaughlin, his best moments was as a member of Return to forever with Corea, White and Stanley Clarke
Back to Top
Visitor13 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 04:36
Holdsworth by a mile. Probably the best phrasing in rock. DEFINITELY NOT clinical or cold. Technical doesn't equal cold, or else Fred Durst would be the most emotional player ever.
 
Most of the electric stuff I heard by McLaughlin and DiMeola was quite boring, self-indulgent and show-offy (is that an adjective?) really, definitely more so than Petrucci, for example. They're much better on acoustic, IMO.
Back to Top
pero View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 11 2005
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 1242
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 04:50
Originally posted by Visitor13 Visitor13 wrote:

Holdsworth by a mile. Probably the best phrasing in rock. DEFINITELY NOT clinical or cold. Technical doesn't equal cold, or else Fred Durst would be the most emotional player ever.
 
Most of the electric stuff I heard by McLaughlin and DiMeola was quite boring, self-indulgent and show-offy (is that an adjective?) really, definitely more so than Petrucci, for example. They're much better on acoustic, IMO.
 
You obviously didn't heard much of McLaughlin solo albums, Mahavishnu orchestra and Shakti.
 
McLaughlin boring. Good joke  LOL
Back to Top
Visitor13 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 04:52
Originally posted by pero pero wrote:

Originally posted by Visitor13 Visitor13 wrote:

Holdsworth by a mile. Probably the best phrasing in rock. DEFINITELY NOT clinical or cold. Technical doesn't equal cold, or else Fred Durst would be the most emotional player ever.
 
Most of the electric stuff I heard by McLaughlin and DiMeola was quite boring, self-indulgent and show-offy (is that an adjective?) really, definitely more so than Petrucci, for example. They're much better on acoustic, IMO.
 
You obviously didn't heard much of McLaughlin solo albums, Mahavishnu orchestra and Shakti.
 
McLaughlin boring. Good joke  LOL
 
His playing with Santana was really weak. Mahavishnu...  better, but definitely the weakest link in the band.


Edited by Visitor13 - June 02 2006 at 04:56
Back to Top
pero View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 11 2005
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 1242
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 05:10
His playing with Santana was really weak. Mahavishnu...  better, but definitely the weakest link in the band.
[/QUOTE]
 
What are you talking about???? Weakeast link ??? Wacko
 
Write of the bands and musitians you know better and like.
 
Back to Top
Visitor13 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 05:14
^ I see I've struck a nerveWink
Back to Top
S Lang View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 01 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 441
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 06:31
Holdsworth has always played better when he was hired by Tony Williams, Gong, Jean-Luc Ponty, Bill Bruford,  but on his own his technical prowess left me cold and frankly - bored. Once I did walk out of his live performance, for it was hard to access. I don't mean that it was mediocre, only less than exciting, enjoyable.
 
McLaughlin on the other hand has not only invented genres, but played his guitar with the intensity that is yet to be surpassed.
 
DiMeola? He is a poor second to either of them. On record he plays fantastic, I just wonder how many takes it took for him?  I saw him perform live and on that experience he wouldn't get a chance to play for free at a Spanish Cafe with 20 seats...  
Back to Top
wolf0621 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 07 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 264
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 07:06
Originally posted by Visitor13 Visitor13 wrote:

Originally posted by pero pero wrote:

Originally posted by Visitor13 Visitor13 wrote:

Holdsworth by a mile. Probably the best phrasing in rock. DEFINITELY NOT clinical or cold. Technical doesn't equal cold, or else Fred Durst would be the most emotional player ever.
 
Most of the electric stuff I heard by McLaughlin and DiMeola was quite boring, self-indulgent and show-offy (is that an adjective?) really, definitely more so than Petrucci, for example. They're much better on acoustic, IMO.
 
You obviously didn't heard much of McLaughlin solo albums, Mahavishnu orchestra and Shakti.
 
McLaughlin boring. Good joke  LOL
 
His playing with Santana was really weak. Mahavishnu...  better, but definitely the weakest link in the band.
 
That "weakest link" could play in my band any time (or in just about any other band in the world)...Watch some of the Orchestra videos, it's clear who the band's leader is...Also wrote most of the material...I saw J. McLaughlin on tour in the early '80's, in a 2,000-seat theater, with one of the Labeque sisters on piano. He came out with his classical nylon-string, sat on a stool at the front of the stage, crossed his legs & for the next 1 &1/2 hours proceeded to blow everyone in the place away with his fingerpicking style. I was not more than 30-40 feet away & I swear he never even came close to breaking a sweat, just had those intense expressions on his face to match the music. You would have thought it was just another practice session...One of the few players who can really play anything well, I'm waiting for his first rap song...
Back to Top
Visitor13 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 08:07
Originally posted by wolf0621 wolf0621 wrote:

Originally posted by Visitor13 Visitor13 wrote:

Originally posted by pero pero wrote:

Originally posted by Visitor13 Visitor13 wrote:

Holdsworth by a mile. Probably the best phrasing in rock. DEFINITELY NOT clinical or cold. Technical doesn't equal cold, or else Fred Durst would be the most emotional player ever.
 
Most of the electric stuff I heard by McLaughlin and DiMeola was quite boring, self-indulgent and show-offy (is that an adjective?) really, definitely more so than Petrucci, for example. They're much better on acoustic, IMO.
 
You obviously didn't heard much of McLaughlin solo albums, Mahavishnu orchestra and Shakti.
 
McLaughlin boring. Good joke  LOL
 
His playing with Santana was really weak. Mahavishnu...  better, but definitely the weakest link in the band.
 
That "weakest link" could play in my band any time (or in just about any other band in the world)...Watch some of the Orchestra videos, it's clear who the band's leader is...Also wrote most of the material...I saw J. McLaughlin on tour in the early '80's, in a 2,000-seat theater, with one of the Labeque sisters on piano. He came out with his classical nylon-string, sat on a stool at the front of the stage, crossed his legs & for the next 1 &1/2 hours proceeded to blow everyone in the place away with his fingerpicking style. I was not more than 30-40 feet away & I swear he never even came close to breaking a sweat, just had those intense expressions on his face to match the music. You would have thought it was just another practice session...One of the few players who can really play anything well, I'm waiting for his first rap song...
 
Ah, see, there's the key word. He is fantastic on acoustic/classical - maybe because it's more challenging to play one than an e-guitar, and therefore his approach has to be more thoughtful? Anyway, I stand by what I wrote about his electric playing. I might yet change my mind, but I've given it more than enough listens, and don't put listening to it again as a any priority.
Back to Top
wolf0621 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 07 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 264
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 09:16
Mahavishnu is not for everyone...You mentioned Petrucci earlier, his stuff doesn't particularly interest me. Go figure!Approve
Back to Top
Visitor13 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 10:03

^ I love Mahavishnu... for Hammer, Goodman, Laird and CobhamSmile.

Back to Top
wolf0621 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 07 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 264
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 10:20
Originally posted by Visitor13 Visitor13 wrote:

^ I love Mahavishnu... for Hammer, Goodman, Laird and CobhamSmile.

 
 
That's not the whole band, so sounds like you love parts of Mahavishnu, not the whole groupCry...Wonder what those 4 would have sounded like w/McLaughlin removed & replaced by Petrucci? Or Holdsworth? Or DiMeola? Still (as) ground-breaking? Still the single most influential fusion band of all time? Maybe...Question
Back to Top
pero View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 11 2005
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 1242
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 14:00
I was on Mclaughlin concerts 3 time.
 
First time it was Mahavishnu orchestra with Billy Cobham, but without Hammer.
 
Second time was Shakti with Shankar on violin. I was sitting in the first row 3 meters from Mclughlin. It was expirience I will never forghet.
 
Third time it was acoustic concert with Larry Coryell and Paco the Lucia. It was one of the best concerts for me, and for shure acoustic one. Paco de Lucia was amazing too, maybe even better than Mclauglin, but there is only one Paco.
Back to Top
wolf0621 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 07 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 264
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 18:16
Compare & Contrast you say? Everyone missed the obvious similarities that stare you in the face...Both last names contain 10 letters each! Also, both first names contain 4 letters each (I always misspell "Alan", so there you go)...Take that, all you numerologists out there!Wink
Back to Top
DaleHauskins View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 23 2005
Location: So.California
Status: Offline
Points: 239
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 20:44
The ONLY thing John and my old drinking mate Allan have in common and roots are Bradford,England and the late amazing drummer Tony Williams.
 
 
 
 
 
Dale Hauskins:Los Angeles Californian guitarist(Member of Switzerland progressive rock band FLAME DREAM) http://www.myspace.com/dalehauskins http://www.progressiveworld.net/flamedream2.html


Edited by Guitsy - June 02 2006 at 20:46
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.195 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.