OMG! Anyone who has 10,000 days, read this !!!!!

If you mixed down 10000 mp3s into one mp3 - it isn't going to be any bigger in bytes than the longest mp3. It dosn't matter how much is "happening" its all about the bitrate of the song. There is only a certain amount of bytes per second being processed regardless of what is "happening". Everything on the same frequency would just cancel out and you're left with one solid block of noise.

There are nearly 30 "Guests" reading this topic!

If you are interested in Tool or want to know more about Prog,why not join us?


Just hit the   Register button

Tony R wrote: There are nearly 30 "Guests" reading this topic! If you are interested in Tool or want to know more about Prog,why not join us? Just hit the   Register button

Nothing like a little shameless self-promotion, eh?

As if the reviews didn't made me want to buy the cd, now It has a big secret behind the fillers to make things better! Friday will be the day I'll buy the album. I can't control the hype of other people. It's contagious!  

It seems like the song was intended to be synchronized in either order of the 2 songs ... but it may fit better with the virgini Tres put first. So, the song sounds even better now!

Holy crap, I got it as one track, and wow this is sick.  I wish I could upload it online for everyone to have but I think it's illegal.

If you want info on how to make it, hit me up on AIM.


Edited by Petary791 - May 15 2006 at 22:10

Moatilliatta wrote: Now, I'm just trying this:   I notcied there is the same segment of music (the very brief heavy segment with triplets, if that makes sense) in each part of Wings, and they both occur about two minutes before the end of both tracks. So I'm thinking the sync actualyl starts with Viginti Tres, and ends with Wings Pt. 1. I'm about 3 minutes into it right now, and I think it's much better than the original suggestion.   Edit: After listening to this once through, I think it works. The heavy part and the vocal melodies toward the end sync. I don't think on my first time I got it perfectly, but it made enough sense to me. Try it out!

Now I know why these songs by themselves suck!

valravennz wrote: All very interesting. But I can't help wondering why Tool would bother to separate the three tracks when they could have simply combined them in production.!!! I think the 3 tracks are mean't to be separate, period. However, there is nothing wrong in adding to the hype around a great album - cheers!

The reason why they're separated IMNSHO is because they're pretentious enough to do it.

heyitsthatguy wrote: chamberry wrote: As if the reviews didn't made me want to buy the cd, now It has a big secret behind the fillers to make things better! Friday will be the day I'll buy the album. I can't control the hype of other people. It's contagious!   Ha! Don't worry. The little "synch" thing is not even close to the best part of the album. And don't be put off, it's definitely a grower. "Rosetta Stoned" for all its weirdness is a good, wellrounded track, Right in Two is good societal commentary *and good music*, and Vicarious is just plain good. Plus, I still can't calculate what the hell Jambi is in!

Don't worry man, I will give it time to grow and  if its wierd, its a must for me.

chamberry wrote: valravennz wrote:    Quite possibly! Perhaps another ...how should I put this... publicity stunt!!! Well, whatever it is, its working