Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Iran Crisis
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedIran Crisis

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 10>
Author
Message
Bob Greece View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 1823
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2006 at 06:03
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Despite their obvious insanity, Iran does not want to die in a nuclear fire, just as the Russians didn't. A balance of power in the region may actually bring about peace. I may be wrong, but the MAD principle did seem to work for the West and the USSR, wouldn't you say?

Maybe we were just lucky that the cold war didn't escalate into something worse. If too many people get their hands on nuclear weapons then there's always the worry of someone trying to use them. It's like in USA, there are lots of guns but knowing that other people have guns doesn't stop people using them. It's incredibly scary that there might just be some people mad enough to try using nuclear weapons. That is my biggest fear for the world at the moment.

That's not to say that you should just attack everyone who wants to get nuclear weapons though. That's a bit like firing a gun into nest of bees.

What's the answer ... who knows.

Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20414
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2006 at 07:31
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Hi Mark

Russia and Iran have been pretty cosy for many years. I guess it's all about scratching each others back. I think Russia may have known for years that the US - or the west in general - would seek to control the oil in the ME eventually. I also believe that Putin's government is suffering a huge hangover from the Soviet days. He is after all an ex KGB officer, and his recent backslapping of the re-elected leader of Belarus, just reinforces this idea. The US says they will not recognise the new Belarus leader, and the EU threatens sanctions on them. Putin is very happy with the result. Despite the wests claims, Russia is still regarded as an enemy.

Russia has been selling arms to Iran for years, and the true extent of Irans capability is unknown.

andy, Mark*

let's face it !! Russia has a very different geographical situation than Western nations do about Iran. To us, westereners, Iran is just one country is a very difficult area and is not controlling much

But to Russia outside of the fact that Iran is almost a close neighbor (actually they were so during the USSR throughe Azerbaidjan and the old Turkestan - later Turmenistan etc...)  , the shortest access to Southern seas is Iran. >>> economically speaking this means Iran is someone to contend with

I mean the Black Sea or Barents Sea or the Sea of Otskov (above japan) are hardly axed towards world econmy>>> In this regards we could understand Russia looking after its own interest in Collaborating with Iran; There are also the problems in Tadjikistan (Iranian dialects - speaking countries) and even though they are Christians the Ossetia Russian republic is also Persanophone!!

Knowing this and that in the Caucasian mountains , only the Ossetes are the only Christians people (all of the others are Suffist Muslim or worsely fanatical Muslims such as the Tchetchens ) and therefore the only reasonably safe route towards Geogia and Armenia is through Ossetia.

You can bet that Persia/Iran being very proud people about their origins and their great past - they are NOT Arabs  (surrounded by Arabs on the South and West and Turcs-speaking on the north and east)  and surrounded by hostile Sunnites Muslims all around, they make sure that the Cultural heritage (through the language anyway) is being respected in other parts of the world. This dimension is one more reason why Russia and Iran are likely to cooperate. >> this is why Russia offered Iran to enrich its Uranium on Russian facilities.

let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2006 at 08:08
Originally posted by Bob Greece Bob Greece wrote:

Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Despite their obvious insanity, Iran does not want to die in a nuclear fire, just as the Russians didn't. A balance of power in the region may actually bring about peace. I may be wrong, but the MAD principle did seem to work for the West and the USSR, wouldn't you say?

Maybe we were just lucky that the cold war didn't escalate into something worse. If too many people get their hands on nuclear weapons then there's always the worry of someone trying to use them. It's like in USA, there are lots of guns but knowing that other people have guns doesn't stop people using them. It's incredibly scary that there might just be some people mad enough to try using nuclear weapons. That is my biggest fear for the world at the moment.

That's not to say that you should just attack everyone who wants to get nuclear weapons though. That's a bit like firing a gun into nest of bees.

What's the answer ... who knows.

Yes, we were lucky during the cold war. It's ironic that I used to be a member of CND and campaign for unilateral nuclear disarament in the 80's. Years later, I have partially succomb to the MAD argument. I would rather the whole world disarm, but no country will, and I dont just mean the US and Israel.

There are people mad enough to use them, given what they believe to be the right excuse. They currently reside in Washington, London, Paris and Tel Aviv. The world would be better if we dont allow Iran to go down the nuclear road, but I think it would have been better if we had not given them a reason to want a bomb in the first place.

This of course assumes that they do have a WMD program. They may not. I'm not going to take the word of the US or UK at face value. The IAEA have so far not confirmed that Iran DO have a program.

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Bob Greece View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 1823
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2006 at 02:59

In the news today:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4897786.stm

The "long war" - the new cold war.

 



Edited by Bob Greece
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2006 at 05:32
Originally posted by Bob Greece Bob Greece wrote:

In the news today:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4897786.stm

The "long war" - the new cold war.

 

It's all gone rather 'Orwell' hasn't it....

Just as Orwell predicted, we live in a world in a constant state of conflict. Fighting an anonymous enemy we rarely see any evidence of. Because of this conflict it has - apparently - become necessary to curtail certain liberties. Our streets bristle with security cameras, there's talk of ID cards. To voice certain opinions in public is now a crime. Spin and 'double speak' has become the norm in politics, and despite huge advances in science and technology, despite our belief that we are more advanced than ever before, still half the world starves starves to death.

Our leaders like us to have something to fear. It used to be communists now its Muslims, because of course before 9/11 there were no disenchanted Muslims and the terror threat never existed until then. Incorrect! Buts thats how it feels for most of the 'proles' dribble fed little drops of half truth from their crooked media. There is a deliberate move afoot to incite racial hatred and conflict by our leaders. We need an enemy, and they are relying on our stupidity and our obsession with the media to swallow all their gobsh!te and lies.

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Bob Greece View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 1823
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2006 at 05:41

Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

It's all gone rather 'Orwell' hasn't it....

Just as Orwell predicted, we live in a world in a constant state of conflict.

Yes, that's one of Orwell's predictions from 1984 that isn't talked about so much but is very relevant. Everyone knows about Big Brother watching you but not so many people remember that in Orwell's 1984 there was always an enemy and that the enemy keeps changing.

Back to Top
Jim Garten View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin & Razor Guru

Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2006 at 07:35
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Spin and 'double speak' has become the norm in politics


Also, has anyone else noticed the increased use by politicians of the word "transparency" to denote openness and the lack of hidden agendas?

To my mind this is either their ignorance of the true meaning of the word (not unlikely, I know), or their relying on the general public's ignorance of the fact that something which is transparent cannot be seen and is therefore hidden from view (double-speak, indeed)...

...or am I just being cynical?

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2006 at 07:48

Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:

Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Spin and 'double speak' has become the norm in politics


Also, has anyone else noticed the increased use by politicians of the word "transparency" to denote openness and the lack of hidden agendas?

To my mind this is either their ignorance of the true meaning of the word (not unlikely, I know), or their relying on the general public's ignorance of the fact that something which is transparent cannot be seen and is therefore hidden from view (double-speak, indeed)...

...or am I just being cynical?

No, you're just wide awake and able to see things for how they really are. You can see beyond the smoke and mirrors. Well done, you're probably in a minority.

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Jim Garten View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin & Razor Guru

Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2006 at 07:56
I was afraid of that...

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2006 at 13:08

Iran has just announced they enriched Uranium (low grade 3%) for the first time. Washington has described this as a 'Step in the wrong direction'

Uranium needs enriching to 80% for weapons use.

Well done Iran!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4900260.stm

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
saulman View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: April 12 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 14
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 12 2006 at 15:41

 

I'm new here and here's my two penneth........

I'm from the UK and Tony Blair has just announced that nuclear power for electricity purposes is still on the agenda.  That makes me embarassed that we should be telling another country not to develop it.

With regards to nuclear weapons, we have them.  Once again, how can we tell someone not to develop them when we have them. It's like telling someone not to smoke whilst lighting up.

Also, Iran has the USA occupying countries to the left and right of it so it's no wonder they feel threatened.

And why the hell didn't we (and the USA) use this sort of 'diplomacy' when India and Pakistan were developing nukes and on the brink of war?  No oil, perhaps?

This whole episode stinks.  Like Iraq.

 

 

If you don't want to come down......don't go up!!!
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 03 2006 at 05:38
^
The difference is, that Iran is the kind of insane fundamentalist country who would launch a pre-emptive attack on another country, breaking international law, whereas the US and the UK....oh ok I see what you mean..

Anyway, an update for whoevers interested. The US is calling for 'Tough sanctions' Tuesdays meeting between UNSC delegates ended without agreement. They shall meet again later in the week. Russia has told Iran that it is against sanctions of any kind, and the Iranian foreign minister has said the west wrongly assumes it can do anything it likes through the Security Council.

This is still not being mentioned on prime time news in the UK, in any detail. However if you listen to the BBc world service or BBC Radio 4 late at night the discussions are somewhat chilling...speculative, but chilling nonetheless.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4965264.stm

Edited by Blacksword - May 03 2006 at 05:39
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
yeppp View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 22 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 108
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 03 2006 at 11:28
Rock you like a hurricane

Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 03 2006 at 14:43
Originally posted by yeppp yeppp wrote:

Rock you like a hurricane




Cry for the Nations...


     

MSG
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 04 2006 at 03:10
Resolution now tabled.

'Despite objections from Russia and China, the draft falls under 'Chapter 7' of the UN charter which allows for sanctions, and even military action'

This implies to me, that in the event that the US and the EU wish to pursue the military option, they will not need to seek a further resolution.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4970904.stm
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 04 2006 at 03:22
As The Doctor is no longer with us, I'll imagine what he might have said:

"I have nothing personal against Muslims, individually or as a whole. I just think it would serve the greater good for them to be permanantly removed from the equation."

Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 04 2006 at 05:20
Originally posted by James Lee James Lee wrote:

As The Doctor is no longer with us, I'll imagine what he might have said:"I have nothing personal against Muslims, individually or as a whole. I just think it would serve the greater good for them to be permanantly removed from the equation."


Well, his absence from this discussion is therefore no great loss. Not that I contest his right to that opinion.

The extremists on the Muslim side of the fence hold the same views about Jews and Christians..probably. No one side is exclusively right or wrong.
    
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
marktheshark View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 24 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1695
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 04 2006 at 11:37
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by James Lee James Lee wrote:

As The Doctor is no longer with us, I'll imagine what he might have said:"I have nothing personal against Muslims, individually or as a whole. I just think it would serve the greater good for them to be permanantly removed from the equation."


Well, his absence from this discussion is therefore no great loss. Not that I contest his right to that opinion.

The extremists on the Muslim side of the fence hold the same views about Jews and Christians..probably. No one side is exclusively right or wrong.
    

I don't know about that Blackie. Christians and Jews don't go killing people for not being Christians and Jews.

The extremist Muslims hate us simply for what we are. They hate us for our culture, our lifestyle. They hate us for MTV, they hate us for Madonna kissing Britney on TV, they hate us for R&R (Prog too, I imagine), they hate us for pornography, they hate us for our tolerance toward gays.

The list goes on.
    
Back to Top
sleeper View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: Entropia
Status: Offline
Points: 16449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 04 2006 at 12:54
Originally posted by marktheshark marktheshark wrote:

Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by James Lee James Lee wrote:

As The Doctor is no longer with us, I'll imagine what he might have said:"I have nothing personal against Muslims, individually or as a whole. I just think it would serve the greater good for them to be permanantly removed from the equation."


Well, his absence from this discussion is therefore no great loss. Not that I contest his right to that opinion.

The extremists on the Muslim side of the fence hold the same views about Jews and Christians..probably. No one side is exclusively right or wrong.
    

I don't know about that Blackie. Christians and Jews don't go killing people for not being Christians and Jews.

The extremist Muslims hate us simply for what we are. They hate us for our culture, our lifestyle. They hate us for MTV, they hate us for Madonna kissing Britney on TV, they hate us for R&R (Prog too, I imagine), they hate us for pornography, they hate us for our tolerance toward gays.

The list goes on.
    
 
No, generally Christians kill each other for being "the wrong type of Christan" (Northern Ireland anyone). The Crusades were also motivated by religion.
 
If that really was a view that The Doctor would take, then I would contest his right toahve that view as I believe no one has that right (I cant abide racists of any description).
Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005

Back to Top
marktheshark View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 24 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1695
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 04 2006 at 13:11
Originally posted by sleeper sleeper wrote:

Originally posted by marktheshark marktheshark wrote:

Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by James Lee James Lee wrote:

As The Doctor is no longer with us, I'll imagine what he might have said:"I have nothing personal against Muslims, individually or as a whole. I just think it would serve the greater good for them to be permanantly removed from the equation."
Well, his absence from this discussion is therefore no great loss. Not that I contest his right to that opinion. The extremists on the Muslim side of the fence hold the same views about Jews and Christians..probably. No one side is exclusively right or wrong.     
I don't know about that Blackie. Christians and Jews don't go killing people for not being Christians and Jews. The extremist Muslims hate us simply for what we are. They hate us for our culture, our lifestyle. They hate us for MTV, they hate us for Madonna kissing Britney on TV, they hate us for R&R (Prog too, I imagine), they hate us for pornography, they hate us for our tolerance toward gays. The list goes on.     

 

No, generally Christians kill each other for being "the wrong type of Christan" (Northern Ireland anyone). The Crusades were also motivated by religion

That may have been true 100s of years ago. But now?
    
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 10>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.254 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.