Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Is the hall of fame anti-prog?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedIs the hall of fame anti-prog?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
Chicapah View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8238
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Is the hall of fame anti-prog?
    Posted: March 14 2006 at 15:14
After reading today about the most recent induction of bands into the rock and roll hall of fame I have to ask....  Is freaking Blondie more deserving than Genesis?  Or Lynyrd Skynrd more deserving than Yes?  Both Genesis and Yes get constant airplay on the classic rock stations and they've certainly been around longer than the required 25 years so what gives?  As far as I can tell Pink Floyd and Zappa are the only proggies in the hall.  Come on, the musicianship of the Sex Pistols in comparison to that of Jethro Tull?   Don't make me laugh!  
"Literature is well enough, as a time-passer, and for the improvement and general elevation and purification of mankind, but it has no practical value" - Mark Twain
Back to Top
eddietrooper View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 27 2006
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 940
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2006 at 15:18
Unfortunately it's not only the Hall of Fame that is anti-prog. it's the majority of music business.
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20035
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2006 at 15:26
'Tis indeed a travesty, and I think eddietrooper just about summed it up.
Back to Top
salmacis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

Content Addition

Joined: April 10 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3928
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2006 at 15:27

I wouldn't hold the Hall Of Fame in any great regard myself- it accounts for music that is basically 'hip' and 'trendy' so bands that have contemporary relevance and influence, or have been namedropped over and over (New York Dolls, Velvet Underground, Clash, Ramones etc.). I think Black Sabbath were up for induction not so long ago, but prior to Ozzy's sudden (and imo, HIGHLY dubious...) renaissance into the public eye they were a bit of a joke for years, which shows up such 'halls of fame' for what they are. It's a doctrine that tells us what music is 'acceptable' and I'd avoid like the plague.

I don't think such attitudes can last too long now though- only an absolute fool would really deny that prog is having some kind of resurgence; the likes of Muse, Mars Volta, Coheed and Cambria and latterly Porcupine Tree have achieved such plaudits and sales that the genre can't be revisionised or airbrushed any more.

Back to Top
Chicapah View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8238
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2006 at 15:38
I feel that the hall of fame will represent the music of my generation a hundred years from now whether we think it's relevant or not and I'd like to think that my great-grandchildren will be able to know that groups like Genesis, Yes and ELP were huge influences in the industry.  At least as much as ZZ Top!
"Literature is well enough, as a time-passer, and for the improvement and general elevation and purification of mankind, but it has no practical value" - Mark Twain
Back to Top
Space Dimentia View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 25 2005
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 440
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2006 at 15:58
Well Black Sabbeth were inducted last night from what I heard with Metal'sell out, only in it for the money now'lica presenting the award and covering some songs, Led Zeppelin is there, ok not prog in the way most people thing of prog but they had an experimental side and are thus in the archives, plus ahem Pink Floyd are in there so teh msuic biz is not that much anti-prog at least there are a few bands there flying the experimental/prog-rock musical flag
Prog is music for the mind
Hear your Orphaned child!
Check out my bands myspace site: www.myspace.com/equinox17
Back to Top
Firepuck View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 28 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 657
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2006 at 16:02

Originally posted by Chicapah Chicapah wrote:

I feel that the hall of fame will represent the music of my generation a hundred years from now whether we think it's relevant or not and I'd like to think that my great-grandchildren will be able to know that groups like Genesis, Yes and ELP were huge influences in the industry.  At least as much as ZZ Top!

Or that Beethoven guy!

Kryten : "'Pub'? Ah yes, A meeting place where humans attempt to achieve advanced states of mental incompetence by the repeated consumption of fermented vegetable drinks."
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2006 at 16:06
Yes. No Rush. No Yes. No Genesis. They obviously don't consider Pink Floyd a prog band, so I wouldn't argue that point.
Back to Top
Ridge View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: September 29 2005
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 96
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2006 at 16:15

I don't care for the rock and roll hall of fame any more that I would care whether a Prog artist receives a Grammy. They are just popularity contests IMHO.

Anyways do we really want to see Yes or Genesis next to the Bee Gees? C'mon!

Discipline is never an end in it self, only a means to an end.
Back to Top
Rust View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 14 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1148
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2006 at 16:18
Originally posted by Ridge Ridge wrote:

I don't care for the rock and roll hall of fame any more that I would care whether a Prog artist receives a Grammy. They are just popularity contests IMHO.

Anyways do we really want to see Yes or Genesis next to the Bee Gees? C'mon!

What if they were next to Green Day?

We got to pump the stuff to make us tough
from the heart
Its astart
What we need is awareness we cant get careless
Mental self defensive fitness
Make everybody see in order to fight the powers that be
Back to Top
Ultaigh View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 12 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 272
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2006 at 16:19
Originally posted by Ridge Ridge wrote:

I don't care for the rock and roll hall of fame any more that I would care whether a Prog artist receives a Grammy. They are just popularity contests IMHO.

Anyways do we really want to see Yes or Genesis next to the Bee Gees? C'mon!


ooo, nicely put!
I was shocked to hear what artists WERE in the Hall of Fame and then to hear which weren't...
Back to Top
el böthy View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 27 2005
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 6336
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2006 at 18:55
Originally posted by eddietrooper eddietrooper wrote:

Unfortunately it's not only the Hall of Fame that is anti-prog. it's the majority of music business.

Sad but true...Why do you hate us so much music business...?...well, I hate you too...
"You want me to play what, Robert?"
Back to Top
Atkingani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: October 21 2005
Location: Terra Brasilis
Status: Offline
Points: 12288
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 14 2006 at 19:02
Better create our own PROGRESSIVE HALL OF FAME!
Guigo

~~~~~~
Back to Top
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 15 2006 at 07:11

Originally posted by Chicapah Chicapah wrote:

After reading today about the most recent induction of bands into the rock and roll hall of fame I have to ask....  Is freaking Blondie more deserving than Genesis?  Or Lynyrd Skynrd more deserving than Yes?  Both Genesis and Yes get constant airplay on the classic rock stations and they've certainly been around longer than the required 25 years so what gives?  As far as I can tell Pink Floyd and Zappa are the only proggies in the hall.  Come on, the musicianship of the Sex Pistols in comparison to that of Jethro Tull?   Don't make me laugh!  

First thing, the rock n roll hall of fame has squat to do with technical skill, its all about importance, impact and influence, which is something The Sex Pistols had a hell of a lot more of than Jethro Tull, regardless if you think Tull are better or not.

Blondie were major pioneers of the new wave movement, in doesnt matter if you dont like that genre, impact is impact, and Lynyrd Skynyrd though not to the same extent as The Allman Brothers were very important in the sound and development of southern rock, and c'mon, Genesis and Yes get nowhere near as much airplay as Lynyrd Skynyrd, Lynyrd just appeal more to the public, a tons of their songs get played on the radio while Yes have maybe 4 or 6 songs that are played from time to time such as Roundabout, I've Seen All Good People and Owner Of A Lonely Heart, hardly anything beyond that, and the only Genesis they play is the Phil Collins stuff.

I agree they have a bias against prog rock, i certainly think Yes should have been there before The Pretenders and Tom Petty, but on the other hand theres a lot more than just prog to take into consideration, and the fact of the matter is, all of those that are being inducted probably have more influence and impact than Yes, Genesis and Jethro Tull, and thats really what the hall of fame is measuring, not technical chops, if they did, they would induct guys like Michael Angelo Batio, Rusty Cooley and other technical w**ker guys who havent contributed to music in any way.

You seem to be biased towards prog the same way they are biased against it.

I suggest you be more open minded and accept that there is a lot more music out there than just prog.

Besides, im pretty sure bands like Yes and King Crimson will be inducted eventualy, once they run out of other bands to induct. ;)



Edited by boo boo
Back to Top
Zargus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 08 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 3491
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 15 2006 at 07:12
Ofcourse they are like every crapy punk band that ever existed are there, and how many prog bands? Pink Floyd and...
Back to Top
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 15 2006 at 07:13

Originally posted by Zargus Zargus wrote:

Ofcourse they are like every crapy punk band that ever existed are there, and how many prog bands? Pink Floyd and...

^ Ignorant posts like this give prog fans a bad name.



Edited by boo boo
Back to Top
Pafnutij View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 02 2005
Location: Russian Federation
Status: Offline
Points: 415
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 15 2006 at 07:20

Keep in mind that it's called the Rock'n'Roll Hall of fame - and progressive rock doesn't really emphasise the Rocking element.

Still, the main problem is, of course, that prog isn't cool enough



Edited by Pafnutij
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 15 2006 at 07:22

Prog needs its own Hall of Fame



Edited by Tyranny
Back to Top
boo boo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 905
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 15 2006 at 07:23
Originally posted by Pafnutij Pafnutij wrote:

Keep in mind that it's called the Rock'n'Roll Hall of fame - and progressive rock doesn't really emphasise the Rocking element.

Bingo.

I think they should lighten up and be more open minded to prog, but then again they are still open minded to pretty much every other genre, and i think too many people on this forum are not.

True that a lot of bands who should be there arent there yet, but most of the artists who have been inducted deserved it.



Edited by boo boo
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 15 2006 at 08:25

Frank Zappa is a bit of an anomoly!  I would have thought him the last artist to end up on that list.

The Hall of Fame is crammed with all sorts of crap. A difficuly genre like prog only has a few offerings that the masses are even allowed to hear with any regularity. Pink Floyd was the prog band 'for the people' Much of their fan base dont even know what prog rock is. Floyds music is uncomplicated and simply structured, so they get to represent the genre as a whole in the hall.

Although why Genesis were not entered after selling over 80 million albums, AND being accessable even in their prog days, I'll never understand.

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.270 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.