Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: February 27 2006 at 22:59 |
AFTK? Cinderella Man??!?!?!?!?!?
|
|
|
Zac M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 03 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
|
Posted: February 27 2006 at 22:59 |
Cygnus X-2 wrote:
meurglysIII wrote:
Cygnus X-2 wrote:
Nah. I got the Real to Reel/Brief Encounter remaster, Fugazi
Remastered (up until this point I had it on mp3), and Thrakattak
instead.
|
Fugazi is yummy, I haven't heard the others.
|
It's a lot better in my opinion than when I first reviewed it. And
Reel to Real is a live album that came out after Fugazi and Brief
Encounter I believe was a single that came out after Misplaced
Childhood that had Freaks and Lady Nina on it, it also contains live
versions of Kayleigh, Script, and Fugazi. |
Fugazi is my least favorite of the Fish era studio albums I have to
admit, but it's still very good. I'm planning on purchasing Reat to
Reel/Brief Encounter sometime soon.
|
"Art is not imitation, nor is it something manufactured according to the wishes of instinct or good taste. It is a process of expression."
-Merleau-Ponty
|
|
Cygnus X-2
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 24 2004
Location: Bucketheadland
Status: Offline
Points: 21342
|
Posted: February 27 2006 at 23:03 |
meurglysIII wrote:
Cygnus X-2 wrote:
meurglysIII wrote:
Cygnus X-2 wrote:
Nah. I got the Real to Reel/Brief Encounter remaster, Fugazi Remastered (up until this point I had it on mp3), and Thrakattak instead.
|
Fugazi is yummy, I haven't heard the others.
|
It's a lot better in my opinion than when I first reviewed it. And Reel to Real is a live album that came out after Fugazi and Brief Encounter I believe was a single that came out after Misplaced Childhood that had Freaks and Lady Nina on it, it also contains live versions of Kayleigh, Script, and Fugazi.
|
I also forgot to mention, Thrakattak is a live album composed solely of King Crimson instrumentals from the 1995-1996 tours.
Fugazi is my least favorite of the Fish era studio albums I have to admit, but it's still very good. I'm planning on purchasing Reat to Reel/Brief Encounter sometime soon.
|
|
|
|
Cygnus X-2
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 24 2004
Location: Bucketheadland
Status: Offline
Points: 21342
|
Posted: February 27 2006 at 23:03 |
stonebeard wrote:
AFTK? Cinderella Man??!?!?!?!?!?
|
Cinderella Man has a great riff and an awesome solo... Madrigal is by far the weakest on the album, but I still like it.
|
|
|
Rising Force
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 09 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 439
|
Posted: February 27 2006 at 23:05 |
If I love the album, I'll give it five stars. I'm don't have to go by other peoples' standards.
|
|
Buze
Forum Senior Member
New Releases Album Reviewer
Joined: February 25 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 112
|
Posted: February 27 2006 at 23:22 |
I think the star system is relative inside a specific Genre. Reviewers should compare albums with others before giving it 5 stars.
To illustrate the 5 stars "sickness", I went to the Prog Metal Genre to discover music. Opeth seemed to be a good starter. All the albums are 4.5 and higher !! This is simply impossible. These albums can not be equivalent. There must be a bad one and a "okay" one !
Public systems, like Progarchives, are ment to be unaccurate, we have to live with that !
|
|
Viajero Astral
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 16 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3118
|
Posted: February 27 2006 at 23:27 |
Its subjetive, what for a person could be a masterpiece for another one its just crap.
|
|
|
razifa
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 21 2005
Location: Costa Rica
Status: Offline
Points: 224
|
Posted: February 27 2006 at 23:33 |
Buze wrote:
I am new to this site and I simply love the Progressive community ! New bands and new music to discover, Yeeee !!!
But why is there so many 5 stars albums? To me, 5 stars is THE BEST, but always compared to other albums, AND relative to the artist.
Ex. : Selling England by the Pound from Genesis could be a 5 stars, but Trespass can not be a 5 stars because it is not as "perfect" as Selling England.
I knew Progressive enthusiasts were generous, but please, for newbies who wants to discover the BEST prog music, give them just a few choices...
So, do you think there are too much 5 stars albums?
|
OK I do think there are many 5-stars albums... and by the way I disagree completly with your Genesis example.
I definitively think "Trespass" is a 5-stars album without a doubt! This album was released in 1970 with a defying concept... The Knife is the very first beginning for Prog Metal influences, this album is way too influencial in Symphonic Prog Tendencies....!!!
|
**********
**razifa**
**********
|
|
Guests
Forum Guest Group
|
Posted: February 28 2006 at 02:21 |
SEBTP is only a 4 star. The only 5 star album by Genesis is Foxtrot ;). The yes album is 5 star. TAAB by Tull is 5 star. Tull only have one 5 star album, but they could have had about 5 or 6 ;)
|
|
Bj-1
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 04 2005
Location: No(r)Way
Status: Online
Points: 31378
|
Posted: February 28 2006 at 02:32 |
I give 5 stars only to albums I think really deserves it (because I think the music is brilliant!)
|
RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
|
|
avestin
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 18 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 12625
|
Posted: February 28 2006 at 02:38 |
Atkingani wrote:
IMO, a 5-star or a 1-star album should be accompanied by a very good explanation. Remember that our reviews also serve as a guide for someone to purchase that particular album and he/she may be frustated or bothered for being ill advised. |
I understand what you mean, however what Stonebeard and others here say is also true from their point of view. I read the reviews but with extreme caution. I need to know the reviewers background first, know what his likes and dislikes are, to know if we have the same basic assumptions about what we like in music and what we do not appreciate. This is why I have read reviews about albums I love and albums I don't love. In each I have picked a reviewer I have agreed with. Then I read that reviewer's other reviews about albums I don't know and I can be more certain that we have the same basic assumptions about music, hence I will love the album he is now reviewing which I do not know. It can be done with a reviewer you don't necessarily agree with, as long as you know his likes and dislikes and then you know where you stand in relation to him. For example, in symphonic prog there are two collaborators with whom I share a similar taste, there are other two collabs in Italian bands, another two in prog-metal and one other in Rio and Avantgarde, one for Krautrock and Canterburry (I reckon they know who they are). Aside from these I have some reviewers which I appeciate their opinions and I can speculate what I will think of the album in regards with their review.
|
|
|
Zenith
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 21 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 331
|
Posted: February 28 2006 at 03:51 |
Yes it's to many 5 star albums IMO. A review should be considered in a much more objective way than a lot of reviwers seems to be doing here. E.g if you have only a couple albums with a band that maybe have recorded 15 albums and think they're fantastic, how is it possible to give the two albums 5 stars?
|
We're only in it for the music!!!
|
|
BaldJean
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
|
Posted: February 28 2006 at 03:59 |
Atkingani wrote:
IMO, a 5-star or a 1-star album should be accompanied by a very good explanation.
Remember that our reviews also serve as a guide for someone to purchase
that particular album and he/she may be frustated or bothered for being
ill advised. |
|
A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
|
|
avestin
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 18 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 12625
|
Posted: February 28 2006 at 04:11 |
|
|
|
Nazgul
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 30 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 148
|
Posted: February 28 2006 at 05:24 |
VanBuren wrote:
who cares really, if a person really likes an album and wants to show
their effection for it, why not let them, who are you to say hey, you
might really love that album, it might even be your favorite album, but
we don't feel it's that great so to hell with your individual thoughts
|
I can't agree with You. If many pepole rate album then we have average estimate.
|
|
ANDREW
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 21 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 3064
|
Posted: February 28 2006 at 05:26 |
Buze wrote:
I am new to this site and I simply love the Progressive community ! New bands and new music to discover, Yeeee !!!
But why is there so many 5 stars albums? To me, 5 stars is THE BEST, but always compared to other albums, AND relative to the artist.
Ex. : Selling England by the Pound from Genesis could be a 5 stars, but Trespass can not be a 5 stars because it is not as "perfect" as Selling England.
I knew Progressive enthusiasts were generous, but please, for newbies who wants to discover the BEST prog music, give them just a few choices...
So, do you think there are too much 5 stars albums?
|
YES, TOO MANY 5 STARS RATINGS!!!
|
|
BaldJean
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
|
Posted: February 28 2006 at 06:20 |
I gave 5 stars to 5 albums so far, and those are more or
less my personal top 5 of all time. many may not agree with me,
especially about "Vital".
|
HAMMILL, PETER - The Fall of the House of Usher
Review (Permanent link) by
BaldJean
@ 11:43:32 AM EST, 6/25/2005
SPECIAL COLLABORATION
—
This is one of the finest albums of Peter Hammill. It exists in 2 different versions, one
from 1990, the other from 1999 (therefore it should be listed in here twice). The main
difference between the two versions is the absence of drums in the 1999 version; my
personal opinion is Peter Hammill was right to remove them, their absence makes the
whole atmosphere more dense, and it is more like an opera because of this.
The album is based on the well known story of Edgar Allan Poe. Chris Judge-Smith, the
librettist, expanded the dramatis personae of the original story a little by giving the
herbalist, who in Poe's story only appears in one sentence, a supporting role, using the
device of a chorus that comments on the action from ancient Greek or Elizabethian
theater and, most important and ingenious idea, by letting the house itself become a
main character of the plot. The nameless friend of Usher, who tells the tale in the story
of Poe, is given the name Montresor from another Poe story ("The Cask of
Amontillado").
The opera is divided into six acts. The first act has the chorus (sung by the wonderfully
warm contralto voice of Sarah Jane Morris; on first hearing you might belive this is a
man singing) deplore its own role as a mere commentator, before Montresor (Andy Bell)
arrives at the house and describes the scenery he sees and why he visits his friend
Usher. Thus ends act one.
Act two begins with a dreaming and sinister monologue of the voices of the house
(sung by Hammill in a chorus with himself), describing the gothic architecture of the
house. One immediately feels this house must be evil. Then Roderick Usher appears,
singing a morbid song (lyrics of this by Poe), accompanying himself on the organ. Then
Usher realizes his friend has appeared, the two greet each other, and Usher tells his
friend about his oversensitive senses in the aria "I shun the light", one of the highlights
of this album. Montresor comes to the conclusion the house has a bad influence on
Usher and asks him to leave the house with him, but Usher says he can not, the house
and he belong together. All this time the voices of the house threaten "we will not let
him go!"
Act three begins with the first appearance of Madeleine Usher (Lene Lovich), who
obviously is in a trance and sings in a monoluge, in which two strings of lyrics are
interwoven; in one of them she sees herself floating as a corpse on the water. Usher
explains to his friend that his sister suffers from catalepic fits, but that her waking
moments are even worse. The herbalist, an obvious quack (Herbert Grönemeyer)
appears and offers his services, which Montresor rejects. Montresor goes to bed and
muses about the house and the influence it has on Usher, while the chorus in vain tells
him to leave this house.
Act four has Montresor and Madeleine meet next morning. It seems they had almost
become lovers some time ago, but for some reason they had been afraid to touch each
other (a beautiful duet between Bell and Lovich). Madeiline disappears, and Usher
enters, telling his friend his sister does not know how very ill she is. Montresor asks him
to have her removed from this house, but Usher again tells his friend they can not
leave, and when his friend again begs to leave because he would rot in this house
Usher flips and tells his friend "there will be no rot in Usher"; a great duet between
Hammill and Bell. Finally they come to the conclusion that together they can fight the
eveil influence of the house, after which again the voices of the house ominously
threaten "we wil not let them go!"
Act five consists of a single piece of music only. Usher tells his friend Madeiline is dead,
and he, Montresor and the herbalist mourn that he had to die so young. They decide to
put her corpse to rest in the crypt, and the act ends with a kind of funeral march.
Act six begins with a storm raging outside the house. Both Usher and Montresor can't
sleep. Usher makes a few cryptic remarks about another sound that is not hidden to his
ears by the sounds of the storm, which Montresor fails to understand. Montresor asks
Usher to play some music for him, and Usher plays "The Haunted Palace" (another
poem by Poe, slightly altered). While he is playing Montresor is sure he hears some
other sounds and asks his friend to stop playing several times, but Usher denies he
hears anything and continues playing more and more desperately, until finally he can't
deny he too hears the sounds anymore and tells his friend that his hypersensitive ears
had heard this sound long before, and that the had put Madeiline living into the tomb.
The music reaches pandemonium, he voies of the house appear again, more
threatening than ever, and finally Madeliine enters, now completely mad. Themes from
throughout the opera are now repeated while Usher, Madeline and Montresor sing in a
confused meddle. Montresor flees, while Madeline in mad revenge strangles Usher, and
the house collapses behind Montresor.
4 stars for the 1990 version, 5 for the 1999 version.
|
|
TURNER'S SPHYNX, NIK - Xitintoday
Review (Permanent link) by
BaldJean
@ 5:48:52 PM EST, 7/29/2005
SPECIAL COLLABORATION
—
This is one of the forgotten gems of prog. Of Nik Turner, sax and flute player of
Hawkwind, one would expect something on the heavy side, but this wonderful album is
very quiet and spacy (though not completely without rhythm, and in the last track it even
rocks a little - but don't expect anything like Hawkwind). With half of Gong plus former
Hawkwind drummer Alan Powell and Morris Pert of Brand X on percussion the lineup is
exquisite. But the biggest surprise is Nik Turner himself. His flute clearly dominates the
album, and one really feels the ancient Egyptian Gods evoked by it. The music makes a lot
of use of vocoder, which adds to the feeling that supernatural beings are around. This is
not an album to play in the background; listen to it late at night by candle light. In m
opinion clearly the best album of 1978.
Warning: The 1994 CD of Nik Turner of the same name - "Xitintoday" - only has the lyrics in
common with this album. The music of that release is completely different though, not even
the same compositions. It is not a bad album itself, but no competition for this masterpiece.
So stick to the vinyl, if you can find it somewhere (unless Virgin decides to reissue this gem
on CD). And then "Hommage to Thee, Oh Ra, in Thy Rising".
|
|
MOTHER GONG - Fairy Tales
Review (Permanent link) by
Jeanine Greifswald-Tolleson
@ 2:59:23 AM EST, 2/11/2006
SPECIAL COLLABORATION
—
This is one of the very best albums of all time and in my personal top three.
Vocalist Gilli Smyth, she of the space whisper from Gong, tells three fairy tales,
and the band supplies the necessary moods to these tales with their music. Everything
about it is just right - the way Gilly Smyth tells the tales, the way the band
follows every twist of the tales and makes the images appear before your eyes, and
above all an almost supernatural Ddier Malherbe on flutes and saxes. Whether he
illusrates the tunes the Pied Piper plays on his flute (you would have followed him
too!), imitates the sounds of rats, lets a frog croak, dogs bark, or sends Wassilissa
flying over a landscape - he is always perfect. Not that the rest of the band are
slouches, but Didier Malherbe just outshines them all.
Oh, and this album is also the very best if you want to get your little kids
interested in prog. It is the favorite album of our kids Dorothy and Alice (both age
4). Don't hesitate, buy it now!
|
|
VAN DER GRAAF GENERATOR - Vital
Review (Permanent link) by
BaldJean
@ 8:18:48 AM EST, 5/28/2005
SPECIAL COLLABORATION
—
This album may not have the best of sounds, but it shows the band at the peak of their
energy, and there never has been a more brutal bass guitar than that of Nic Potter on this
album. Hammill is in excellent form and screams away at the top of his lungs. The
opener "Ship of Fools" is a real killer. The adding of a cello works wonderfully for tracks
like "Still Life" and "Pioneers Over c" (watch out for the part where violin and cello go manic
at high tempo while the bass guitar suddenly starts playing the slow rhythm of the begiing
again). The only thing I hate is that the CD version misses 2 tracks (I can't get hold of the
Japanese pressing), so I am really looking forward to the remastering Virgin is going to do
this year and hope they won't leave out any tracks this time.
One of my absolutely favorite live albums ever. Raw Power!
|
|
HIGH TIDE - Sea Shanties
Review (Permanent link) by
BaldJean
@ 8:06:19 AM EST, 6/2/2005
SPECIAL COLLABORATION
—
When I first listened to this album I couldn't believe it was from 1969; it is way ahead of
the time. Definitely the heaviest album of that aera. Its trademark is the constant battling
between electric guitar and electric violin. The album starts right away with a heavy electric guitar riff out of one of the boxes, a
pumping bass and drums enter, the guitar riff is answered with heavy electric violin out of
the other box, and then "Futilist's Lament" is on the way. The vocals of Tony Hill sound a
bit like Jim Morrison; the lyrics throughout the whole album are rather pessimistic. The second track, "Death Warmed Up", is an instrumental and probably the first prog metal
piece ever. Guitar and violin together play a very complicated theme of about 3 minutes
length, which is repeated once. Then it looks as if they go into another repetition, but
what follows for the last 4 minutes is a wild battle between electric guitar and electric violin. "Pushed, But Not Forgotten" starts quietly with some phased guitar and melancholic violin,
over which Hill sings. But the silence is not for long, soon heavy guitar crashes again, and
the violin counters maniacally. The song ends with sad viloin over quiet guitar chords. "Walking Down Their Outlook" provides an interesting early example of violin and guitar
actually playing two different voices, which is rare in rock music. "Missing Out" has a slightly bluesy feeling, although a lot heavier than blues usually is. "Nowhere" finally is what one could call a ballad, with lines like "On the stage there is no
door, at your feet the moving floor decides to burn", yet again it is very heavy, as the
whole album. The mix is not the best, but who cares? The music is fantastic! I rarely deal out 5 stars, but
this one deserves it. Be warned though: This album is not for the timid!
|
|
A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
|
|
Kid-A
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 613
|
Posted: February 28 2006 at 06:28 |
I do think some are too ready to give albums 5 stars, but on average very few of them are above 4.5, so it's not too much of a problem.
|
|
|
BebieM
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 01 2004
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 854
|
Posted: February 28 2006 at 06:28 |
I don't understand why 5 star albums need to be flawless. SEBTP is the
best example, IMO it has 3 of the best 20 songs in prog on it (Dancing
with the Moonlit Knight, Firth of Fifth, Cinema Show) + 2 excellent
ones (After the Ordeal, Aisle of Plenty) + 2 just good ones (Battle of
the Epping Forest, I know what i like) + one rather bad one (More Fool
me). Still it's a solid 5 star album for me, just because of the 5
tracks mentioned at the start. A couple of average songs hardly
diminish the quality of the best ones, I still think it's absolutely
essential to own that album, it's more than the sum of its parts.
So basically what I'm saying is that if an album consists to 3/4 of
material you find masterpiece-worthy or even better there's no need to
give it 4 stars just because of 1 or 2 bad songs.
|
|
Buze
Forum Senior Member
New Releases Album Reviewer
Joined: February 25 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 112
|
Posted: February 28 2006 at 12:18 |
BebieM wrote:
I don't understand why 5 star albums need to be flawless. SEBTP is the
best example, IMO it has 3 of the best 20 songs in prog on it (Dancing
with the Moonlit Knight, Firth of Fifth, Cinema Show) + 2 excellent
ones (After the Ordeal, Aisle of Plenty) + 2 just good ones (Battle of
the Epping Forest, I know what i like) + one rather bad one (More Fool
me). Still it's a solid 5 star album for me, just because of the 5
tracks mentioned at the start. A couple of average songs hardly
diminish the quality of the best ones, I still think it's absolutely
essential to own that album, it's more than the sum of its parts.
So basically what I'm saying is that if an album consists to 3/4 of
material you find masterpiece-worthy or even better there's no need to
give it 4 stars just because of 1 or 2 bad songs.
|
I agree with you, but I'd rather give a 5 stars to an album that reinvented a style, that inspired a large community (who does not know SEBTP?), that traces a definitive path in progressive music. Those guys created something totally new and I'm not sure in 1973 they were a "5 stars" band. But 30 years later... So I think we must be cautious and remember that a band' music will live FOR YEARS and so will our reviews and therefore, there something beside 5 stars.
|
|