Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: January 03 2006 at 15:42 |
Tony R wrote:
However,to me,Bat Out Of Hell is prog-related.Much as I despise it,it has as much progginess as Queen or Supertramp's best offerings.
|
Hardly - Bat... is no Queen II or Crime of the Century.
But I'd rather listen to it than DISCO VERY...
Edited by Certif1ed
|
|
Tony R
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
|
Posted: January 03 2006 at 16:08 |
Certif1ed wrote:
But I'd rather listen to it than DISCO VERY...
|
I have to admit that I've seen them live....
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: January 03 2006 at 17:19 |
Them?
You mean Van Morrison?
I didn't think you were that old...
|
|
Tony R
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
|
Posted: January 03 2006 at 17:51 |
Well I have seen them on the road!
Edited by Tony R
|
|
Yanns
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 25 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 999
|
Posted: January 03 2006 at 19:29 |
I apologize that some of you don't like the inclusion of ELO. Yes, albums from about Out of the Blue on are very poppy, but listen to Eldorado and other songs from that same period.
But MEATLOAF??? Come on.
Bat Out of Hell (the album) is among my top 15 easily. But absolutely NOT PROG.
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: January 04 2006 at 02:49 |
Why is Bat absolutely not Prog? I don't think that is true.
Why is Bat... less prog than Eldorado?
It has orchestrations - although more of piano and guitar than a couple of violins and a cello - and the orchestrations and arrangements of Steinman are more imaginative and complex than those of Lynne.
"Bat..." is undeniably MORE prog than "Out of the Blue", "Discovery", "Time", "A New World Record", "Xanadu" and a whole load of other ELO offerings I could mention.
*If I really thought that adding ELO was such a bad idea, trust me - you'd know about it
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
|
Posted: January 04 2006 at 06:05 |
I think that Bat might qualify as an early kind of Progressive Pop ... popular music composed in a progressive way. It is designed to seem simplistic, similarly to the Neo Prog genre, but the complexity is there. The music is full of art-music elements.
However, I don't think that Meat Loaf was ever considered to be a Prog Rock artist by his fans or the press, and because of that it would be wrong to add him ... even when his music suggests otherwise. After all, Prog Rock is a phrase with both historical and musical implications, and both of these aspects must be taken into account.
|
|
|
PROGMAN
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 03 2004
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 2664
|
Posted: January 04 2006 at 06:12 |
No
|
CYMRU AM BYTH
|
|
Yanns
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 25 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 999
|
Posted: January 04 2006 at 06:48 |
Certif1ed wrote:
Why is Bat absolutely not Prog? I don't think that is true.
Why is Bat... less prog than Eldorado?
It has orchestrations - although more of piano and guitar than a couple of violins and a cello - and the orchestrations and arrangements of Steinman are more imaginative and complex than those of Lynne.
"Bat..." is undeniably MORE prog than "Out of the Blue", "Discovery", "Time", "A New World Record", "Xanadu" and a whole load of other ELO offerings I could mention.
*If I really thought that adding ELO was such a bad idea, trust me - you'd know about it
|
at that last statement there.
I see what you mean. However, the whole concept album mystique of Eldorado, with the string themes and all throughout, makes it prog, for me at least. Bat... I just don't see as prog. It's just a matter of taste. I grew up with the album, I know it like the back of my hand. I just don't think it's prog. Really really really really good popular music from 1977. Tood Rundgren produced it. That also makes it fantastic.
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: January 04 2006 at 16:23 |
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
I think that Bat might qualify as an early kind of Progressive Pop ... popular music composed in a progressive way. It is designed to seem simplistic, similarly to the Neo Prog genre, but the complexity is there. The music is full of art-music elements.
Not at all similar to Neo Prog, in fact;
It's not designed to be simplistic - it's designed to be bombastic and over the top with theatrical flourishes more akin to Prog Metal - except with greater compositional skills, especially with regards to form and complexity.
It's designed to be accessible, which is what it does have in common with some Neo Prog - but it's not pop music any more than Genesis were when they wrote "Trespass".
However, I don't think that Meat Loaf was ever considered to be a Prog Rock artist by his fans or the press, and because of that it would be wrong to add him ... even when his music suggests otherwise. After all, Prog Rock is a phrase with both historical and musical implications, and both of these aspects must be taken into account.
I don't think King Crimson, Genesis, Pink Floyd or a whole number of other bands were considered Prog Rock at the time either - people still scoff at Queen, Radiohead - and even Pink Floyd on occasion.
I've also yet to hear any Prog metal that has anything to do with Prog Rock, except, maybe, some borrowed ideas from Floyd or even Yes.
But I doubt that any of this will be taken into account...
|
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
|
Posted: January 04 2006 at 16:38 |
Certif1ed wrote:
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
I think that Bat might qualify as an early kind of Progressive Pop ... popular music composed in a progressive way. It is designed to seem simplistic, similarly to the Neo Prog genre, but the complexity is there. The music is full of art-music elements.
Not at all similar to Neo Prog, in fact;
It's not designed to be simplistic - it's designed to be bombastic and over the top with theatrical flourishes more akin to Prog Metal - except with greater compositional skills, especially with regards to form and complexity.
It is simplistic by my definition. Unskilled listeners would hear the "theatrical flourishes", but not necessarily think of them as complex. However, people listening to Stravinsky or similarly complex compositions would recognize the complexity immediately.
It's designed to be accessible, which is what it does have in common with some Neo Prog - but it's not pop music any more than Genesis were when they wrote "Trespass".
It is pop because people who normally don't like prog, classical or jazz listen to it. It is popular music, and that's what the term "pop" implies.
However, I don't think that Meat Loaf was ever considered to be a Prog Rock artist by his fans or the press, and because of that it would be wrong to add him ... even when his music suggests otherwise. After all, Prog Rock is a phrase with both historical and musical implications, and both of these aspects must be taken into account.
I don't think King Crimson, Genesis, Pink Floyd or a whole number of other bands were considered Prog Rock at the time either - people still scoff at Queen, Radiohead - and even Pink Floyd on occasion.
Ok, let's put it another way: Most people would not have put Meat Loaf and Genesis in the same genre.
I've also yet to hear any Prog metal that has anything to do with Prog Rock, except, maybe, some borrowed ideas from Floyd or even Yes.
I'm not going there ... been there, done that. Just let me rephrase your statement:
"No Prog Metal has anything to do with Prog Rock, except for borrowing ideas from classic prog rock bands".
I leave it to the informed reader to decide if this statement makes any sense. Suffice it to say that I believe that most prog metal has much to do with prog rock.
But I doubt that any of this will be taken into account...
Neither do I.
|
|
|
|
|
bluetailfly
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1383
|
Posted: January 04 2006 at 16:50 |
I'm surprised there's this agreement among prog fans that "Bat Out Of Hell" is a good album. The album has no subtly, it's just an obnoxious, in your face, barrage of sound that after maybe the second or third listen, compels you to attack the source of the sound or flee from it. Meat Loaf? Do you remember those mediocre "rock anthems" blaring out of the FM radios over and over to the point of a nausea? I do. Meat Loaf had his day. There's no point trying to claim it has "classic" status. It doesn't.
"I wanna know right now.... I wanna know right now...." Ugh!
|
"The red polygon's only desire / is to get to the blue triangle."
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
|
Posted: January 04 2006 at 16:59 |
^ why are you linking the quality and the prog status? there is no connection ...
|
|
|
bluetailfly
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1383
|
Posted: January 04 2006 at 17:12 |
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
^ why are you linking the quality and the prog status? there is no connection ... |
No, I just mean those who have refined prog tastes should know low quality when they hear it regardless of the genre...
|
"The red polygon's only desire / is to get to the blue triangle."
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
|
Posted: January 04 2006 at 17:28 |
Well, calling Jim Steinman compositions "low quality" ... I won't do that. Anybody's entitled to their own opinion though.
|
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: January 05 2006 at 03:34 |
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
Certif1ed wrote:
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
I think that Bat might qualify as an early kind of Progressive Pop ... popular music composed in a progressive way. It is designed to seem simplistic, similarly to the Neo Prog genre, but the complexity is there. The music is full of art-music elements.
Not at all similar to Neo Prog, in fact;
It's not designed to be simplistic - it's designed to be bombastic and over the top with theatrical flourishes more akin to Prog Metal - except with greater compositional skills, especially with regards to form and complexity.
It is simplistic by my definition. Unskilled listeners would hear the "theatrical flourishes", but not necessarily think of them as complex. However, people listening to Stravinsky or similarly complex compositions would recognize the complexity immediately.
I'm not sure about that - I know plenty of people who just like Stravinsky and don't even reliase that the music is complex - and why should they?
I also know plenty of people that think that Mozart was somehow a "simple" composer... Hopefully, since this year commemorates 250 years since Mozart was born, there should be plenty of education available regarding his genius.
It's designed to be accessible, which is what it does have in common with some Neo Prog - but it's not pop music any more than Genesis were when they wrote "Trespass".
It is pop because people who normally don't like prog, classical or jazz listen to it. It is popular music, and that's what the term "pop" implies.
Yes, and so is Dark Side of the Moon (among others), which is partly why some of the "hard core" progholes have a problem accepting DSOTM. That doesn't mean it's not Prog though.
However, I don't think that Meat Loaf was ever considered to be a Prog Rock artist by his fans or the press, and because of that it would be wrong to add him ... even when his music suggests otherwise. After all, Prog Rock is a phrase with both historical and musical implications, and both of these aspects must be taken into account.
I don't think King Crimson, Genesis, Pink Floyd or a whole number of other bands were considered Prog Rock at the time either - people still scoff at Queen, Radiohead - and even Pink Floyd on occasion.
Ok, let's put it another way: Most people would not have put Meat Loaf and Genesis in the same genre.
Most people wouldn't put Supertramp, Hawkwind, Dream Theater and Genesis in the same genre.
I've also yet to hear any Prog metal that has anything to do with Prog Rock, except, maybe, some borrowed ideas from Floyd or even Yes.
I'm not going there ... been there, done that. Just let me rephrase your statement:
"No Prog Metal has anything to do with Prog Rock, except for borrowing ideas from classic prog rock bands".
I leave it to the informed reader to decide if this statement makes any sense. Suffice it to say that I believe that most prog metal has much to do with prog rock.
It has far more to do with metal/standard rock - it's closer to Metallica than it is to Gentle Giant.
But I doubt that any of this will be taken into account...
Neither do I.
Still, whiles away a dull morning...
|
|
|
bluetailfly wrote:
I'm surprised there's this agreement among prog fans that "Bat Out Of Hell" is a good album. The album has no subtly, it's just an obnoxious, in your face, barrage of sound that after maybe the second or third listen, compels you to attack the source of the sound or flee from it. Meat Loaf? Do you remember those mediocre "rock anthems" blaring out of the FM radios over and over to the point of a nausea? I do. Meat Loaf had his day. There's no point trying to claim it has "classic" status. It doesn't.
"I wanna know right now.... I wanna know right now...." Ugh!
|
Has no subtlety - what, like Meshuggah does, you mean? Or Uriah Heep? Or ELP?
The fact that Meatloaf's songs turned into FM Rock Anthems or whatever is hardly Steinman's fault - he couldn't choose what was going to happen to his music. Those same FM stations are responsible for overplaying a large number of classics - but that does not stop them from being classics, in fact it underscores the fact.
"Every little thing she does... She does for me" UGH!!!
"Ooooh, what a lucky man he was... Ooooh, what a lucky man he was" UGH!!!
|
|
Dragon Phoenix
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 31 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 1475
|
Posted: January 05 2006 at 05:22 |
bluetailfly wrote:
I'm surprised there's this agreement among prog
fans that "Bat Out Of Hell" is a good album. The album has no subtly,
it's just an obnoxious, in your face, barrage of sound that after maybe
the second or third listen, compels you to attack the source of the
sound or flee from it. Meat Loaf? Do you remember those mediocre "rock
anthems" blaring out of the FM radios over and over to the point
of a nausea? I do. Meat Loaf had his day. There's no point trying
to claim it has "classic" status. It doesn't.
"I wanna know right now.... I wanna know right now...." Ugh! |
I'm surprised that some people still don't understand that their own
assessment of the quality of music is not the universal truth.
|
Blog this:
http://artrock2006.blogspot.com
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.