Prog & classical - whos into both? |
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Author | ||||||||||||||
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: December 07 2005 at 02:38 | |||||||||||||
I'm just obsessed with music - I don't limit myself. It's not only Classical I like, but everything from pre-Mediaeval, through Renaissance, Baroque, Classical, Romantic, and all the 20th Century idioms. |
||||||||||||||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: December 07 2005 at 03:25 | |||||||||||||
I am into both genres.
Ravel and Debussy are the progheads of classical! BTW, i'm waiting a record from Schmidt/La tragédie de Salomé, french composer close to Ravel who inspired Tchaicovsky. |
||||||||||||||
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: December 07 2005 at 08:21 | |||||||||||||
What do you think of Messiaen - especially the Turangaglia Symphonie? |
||||||||||||||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: December 07 2005 at 09:02 | |||||||||||||
Olivier Messian is excellent! but i don't know as well as you. Another good one to explore!
|
||||||||||||||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21151 |
Posted: December 07 2005 at 09:33 | |||||||||||||
Add to that George Gershwin, who was a great admirer of Ravel. Great Jazz-Classical fusion, in particular Rhapsody in Blue, An American in Paris and the Cuban Overture. |
||||||||||||||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: December 07 2005 at 09:54 | |||||||||||||
That's true.
|
||||||||||||||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: December 07 2005 at 11:37 | |||||||||||||
Hey Cert, don't mix terms:
So the question is well done Iván |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
memowakeman
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 19 2005 Location: Mexico City Status: Offline Points: 13032 |
Posted: December 07 2005 at 12:37 | |||||||||||||
Classical music is awesome, excellent in all ways, but i cant say that i love that, im not a "fan" of classical... Tchaikovsky for me !!!
|
||||||||||||||
Follow me on twitter @memowakeman |
||||||||||||||
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: December 07 2005 at 16:56 | |||||||||||||
Iván The Classical era is from 1750-1820(ish - some would say 1825, and who am I to argue?). http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=The+classical+era &meta= The term "Classical" is very commonly but incorrectly applied to virtually all orchestral and much acoustically instrumented music. My favourite book on the Classical era is the very famous one by Charles Rosen, if you'd like some enlightenment as to the exact style of music rather than rough timelines http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp? endeca=1&isbn=0393317129 (B&N sell it for half the price that Amazon do - and it's a brilliant book!).
The term isn't "Classic" - that means an enduring piece. HTH
Edited by Certif1ed |
||||||||||||||
Deliriumist
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 25 2005 Location: Estonia Status: Offline Points: 342 |
Posted: December 08 2005 at 11:28 | |||||||||||||
Aside from prog I like some of the impressionist artists such as Ravel and Debussy.
I also like romantic composers such as Schubert, Chopin, all the Russian romantics and so on. Bach IMO is the biggest genius in music history. Don't like the classical era very much...maybe Beethoven (but he was almost romantic). From my tiny motherland I love the late 19th and the early 20th century choir music - it's something magical (M. Saar, C. Kreek, M. Härma etc.) Sometimes I wish I didn't like prog more than this so called "classical" music but I can't help it - It's SO GOOD. Edited by Deliriumist |
||||||||||||||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: December 08 2005 at 17:09 | |||||||||||||
Cert wrote:
Not so sure, read the Classical Music Pages (I place the link at the bottom of the quote:
My music teacher always made clear difference between Classical Music as all the eras and Clssic music from 1750 to 1820, 25 or 30 (Not precise ending date, I'll give you that one). Many people (even experts) don't discriminate between Classical Music (As a broad term) and Classical era, so in the worst scenario the word Classical can be used to describe, both the period from Middle Ages to XXIst Century and the years between 1750 and 1820 - 1830. I believe this approach is wrong. Iván Edited by ivan_2068 |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: December 08 2005 at 17:26 | |||||||||||||
Ivan I have had many music teachers, professors, etc. As you probably know, my handle comes from the fact that I have qualifications up to my eyeballs - ie Certified, with the pun on being mad about music. I have studied music in considerable depth for my whole life - in academic institutions and in real life. I don't know about "Classical Music Pages", but I do know about the New Grove Encyclopedia (the reference for all serious musicians) - and also that Charles Rosen is one of THE most respected authorities on Classical music (1750-1825ish) in the world. The term "Classical" is bandied about incorrectly by academics and non academics alike, but the term "Classic" is almost never used by academics to describe the period in music - at least, not in the limited spheres I have travelled. All experts I've ever met (and I have met a few...) agree with what I'm saying here. And to round it off, when you're talking about architecture, painting, literature or sculpture, you also refer to it in terms of periods with the same names (but differing dates), and Classical is always Classical, not Classic. I guess it doesn't matter - but you picked me up on the term, and I believe that your music teacher was wrong. I'm saying that from the very rare position of "showing my stripes": I too am a music teacher.
|
||||||||||||||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: December 08 2005 at 17:55 | |||||||||||||
Cert: The last thing I would want to do with you is to argue about this word, but it's obvious that the word Classical is also used to describe all the lets say Orchestral music since Medieval age up to today. BTW, my music teacher also taught in the Conservatory and the National Symphonic Orchestra even when he was born in London. You can check, there's even a Classical Web Ring http://h.webring.com/hub?ring=classicalring that includes artists from all eras. You can also visist the Classical Net http://www.classical.net/music/rep/top.html , which includes:
They rather use the term Clasisicism rather than Classic or Classical, even when in the articles inside the site they use the term Classical Music to describe all eras and Classical Period to describe only what I refer as Classic era. I'm not a teacher of music, nor I have your credentials in music (Which I respect very much), but I guide myself from what I learned in 5 years of piano and Music elective subjects in the University. And from what I read, the term is often used to describe both meanings. The Classical Music Pages which I quote are part of The Classical Music Web Ring which is supported by such entities as The Vienna Symphony Orchestra, and includes such composers as Bach (Baroque) Beethoven (Classic or Classical), Brahms (Romantic), Elgar (Modern). etc. I believe all this guys have at least the same credentials as you, and they don't make a problem with including Baroque, Modern, Romantic, Medieval, etc into a whole genre denominated Classical Music. The advantage in Spanish is that we used the Word Clasica to describe Classicism and the expression Musica Selecta to refer to all eras, still many opeople often misuse terms. Iván Edited by ivan_2068 |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: December 09 2005 at 03:53 | |||||||||||||
That doesn't make it any less incorrect, Ivan. The period is the Classical period, and Classicism refers to the movement - I don't see anything referring to Classic in your links... Most people refer to orchestral or non-folk acoustic music as classical, and I'm not saying they're wrong to, because it's common use. I'm just saying that this common use is incorrect, which is true. I wouldn't trust a web ring - but I would trust what the Royal Academy of Music, the Guildhall and Oxford University teach, The New Grove, and Charles Rosen. Maybe things are different in Peru to the U.K...
|
||||||||||||||
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 27 2005 Location: NE Indiana Status: Offline Points: 28057 |
Posted: December 09 2005 at 10:59 | |||||||||||||
Cert: I agree with you, if only because this approach is the way I have come to understand the musical time periods. "Classic" is the time period, but no one I've ever known (in my limited experience) refers to that.
I guess anyone could argue about this, but what's the point? I'd rather try and put Mozart to shame with my virtuosity. |
||||||||||||||
Man With Hat
Collaborator Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team Joined: March 12 2005 Location: Neurotica Status: Offline Points: 166178 |
Posted: December 09 2005 at 12:22 | |||||||||||||
I like 'em both. |
||||||||||||||
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect. |
||||||||||||||
Bj-1
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 04 2005 Location: No(r)Way Status: Online Points: 31319 |
Posted: December 09 2005 at 21:47 | |||||||||||||
Some classical music is interesting, but I never listen to it...
|
||||||||||||||
RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
|
||||||||||||||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: December 09 2005 at 22:15 | |||||||||||||
OK Cert, I won't argue with someone who is my friend and knows more than me about a determined subject, but you say:
Not to argue with you, but The Classical Music Pages, member of the Classical Web Ring and supported by the Vienna Symphony Orchestra says: Classic (1750-1825) Even when I know you would never believe I change a quote, I give you the link http://w3.rz-berlin.mpg.de/cmp/classmus.html There's some more:
It's clear according to the last text quoted that Classic is the period between the middle 1700's and the early 1800's and the word CLASSICAL referrs to the whole genre that goes for 10 Centuries. I diidn't invented the quote, you know me and I usually argue if I have support for my claims,I believe it's correct , but if it's wrong, well, it's a mistake even made by the experts, which include my music teacher (With strong credentials) and the page with stronger credentials. I still believe (and I'm supported with wrutten material you can check) that the term CLASSICAL is widely used in reference to all select music from the Middle Ages to the date and CLASSIC is refered to the music betweem 1750 and the early 1800's. But again this is a Bizantine discussion and I won't ruin a virtual friendship for the use done of a term in different countries. You say tomato I say tomate, you say Classical era I say Classic era Iván BTW: Cert, just checled my old texts in Spanish (if it helps you), they use the same term with a different expression: EPOCA CLASICA: Classic Epoch, they even mention 1750 to 1830. MÚSICA CLASICA: ALL the orchestral music from the midddle Ages to the 70's (When I studied music) . The same word is used with the two meanings.
Edited by ivan_2068 |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 27 2005 Location: NE Indiana Status: Offline Points: 28057 |
Posted: December 10 2005 at 21:18 | |||||||||||||
Haha!! Then that make me even more confused. I thought I was agreeing with Cert!!! Oh well, I need to take a nap! And I'm glad we agree on MY virtuosity, at least. ... |
||||||||||||||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: December 10 2005 at 22:47 | |||||||||||||
Well hope you won't believe me, I'm a lawyer Iván |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |