Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Fish verses Hogarth ...Poll
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedFish verses Hogarth ...Poll

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Poll Question: Who was (is) The best voice for Marillion ... Fish or Steve Hogarth ?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
46 [67.65%]
22 [32.35%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Ed_The_Dead View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 29 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4928
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 13 2005 at 10:51
I prefer the Fish
Back to Top
Marc Baum View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 30 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 259
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 13 2005 at 10:59

Fish is or was more important for Marillion, specially because of his charisma, even though Steve Hogarth is an excellent singer. In "Brave" he grows over himself.

"All you need to do is sit back, and acquire the taste." - GENTLE GIANT
Back to Top
Under View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 389
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 13 2005 at 11:12

As a band member Fish made the chemistry really work within Marillion.

Judging only his quality of vocals perhaps Hogarth is the better singer, but he does not have made a better band. Too bad, but I very mich like his voice.

 

Back to Top
Gentle Tull View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 13 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 518
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 13 2005 at 12:09
Fish hands down.
Back to Top
Trotsky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 25 2004
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Points: 2771
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 13 2005 at 14:01
Fish-era Marillion is one of the few instances in prog, where I feel the singer is the real star of the show ... his lyrics, emotion and presence ... made the band ...


"Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.”

"No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present."
Back to Top
buckethead View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: May 12 2005
Location: Switzerland
Status: Offline
Points: 77
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 13 2005 at 14:19
i like them both, but marillion was probably more interesting musically with fish, so my vote goes to him.
Back to Top
dr_shoganai View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: October 02 2005
Location: Slovenia
Status: Offline
Points: 18
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 13 2005 at 14:28

Fish!

A hard decision though...

Hogarth is technicaly better singer but Fish had such charisma in his voice and stage presence!



Edited by dr_shoganai
Air, fire, earth and water
Balance of change
World on the scales
On the scales.
Back to Top
Nipsey88 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: Kadath
Status: Offline
Points: 706
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 13 2005 at 14:38
No question...Fish.


Back to Top
Man With Hat View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team

Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166183
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 13 2005 at 14:51
Fish.
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive
Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 13 2005 at 15:00
DONE!erased my cache and voted for both...
Back to Top
Garbs View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: October 22 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 94
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 13 2005 at 16:23

Fish !

Agree that Hogarth is technically a better musician but Marillion made it because of the charisma of Fish - similar to what Gabriel did to Genesis.

 

So here I am once more
Back to Top
paulindigo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 24 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 490
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 13 2005 at 16:41
Fish!
Back to Top
Manunkind View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 2373
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 14 2005 at 18:12

Originally posted by Wolf Spider Wolf Spider wrote:

Hoggy

My man Wolf Spider knows what the fcuk is up

"In war there is no time to teach or learn Zen. Carry a strong stick. Bash your attackers." - Zen Master Ikkyu Sojun
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 15 2005 at 03:12
Fish for me
Back to Top
iguana View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 01 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 825
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 15 2005 at 03:38
Originally posted by muffley_mirkin muffley_mirkin wrote:

Fish without a doubt.
Hogarth sometimes comes across as if the other
guys
are his backing band and that we should feel
privilaged to be in his
presence.


you have got to be bloody joking!!!! or you are plain
simply mixing the two up...
Back to Top
Libor10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 19 2005
Location: Czech republic
Status: Offline
Points: 692
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 15 2005 at 04:38
Hard to say. By me it's 50:50. I like Fish and that era was for Marillion (probably) more important (the question could be, if it's only in vocalist change, usually bands are more progressive and productive in theirs first few records), but I always felt Fish try to copy in some way Peter Gabriel. And I haven't any problem with Hogarth too, he's good singer, but sometimes his voice is rather 'weepy' (if his is the right word for what I mean). So I don't give my voice to any of them.
Back to Top
Moogtron III View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 26 2005
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 10616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 15 2005 at 05:06

Technically, Hogarth has the best voice, and he uses it very well within Marillion's music. He did some great things for Marillion.

Still, I prefer Fish because he's a much more colourful person, singer and lyricist. My 3 favourite Marillion albums are all from the Fish era, and that's no coincidence. It's the Fish-factor  !

Back to Top
Manunkind View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 2373
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 15 2005 at 05:47
Not to degrade Fish in any way, but is it true that he's never actually written a song (and can't write music at all) and is only respeonsible for the lyrics? 
"In war there is no time to teach or learn Zen. Carry a strong stick. Bash your attackers." - Zen Master Ikkyu Sojun
Back to Top
Under View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 389
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 15 2005 at 07:03

^ Cannot be. Judge the difference between Old Marillion and New Marillion. Even if he did not actively contribute to writing he surely contributed to the songs just by being in the same room.

The sense of irritation is sometimes a good fundament for inspiration.

 

Back to Top
Moogtron III View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 26 2005
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 10616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 15 2005 at 07:48

I get the impression that there was at least some musical collaboration between Fish and Steve Rothery, but that Fish' main contribution was in the lyrics and in the theatrical stuff. When you listen to his solo albums, I think musically they are quite less than the Marillion albums.

My guess that he did contribute something to the music, but not a lot.

But that's only guesswork  .

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.145 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.