Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - What do you like to change ?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhat do you like to change ?
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
The Doctor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 21 2005 at 20:32
You're right.  The machinist does more work than the CEO and is more necessary to the functioning of the company.  He should make more.  But seriously, there is no reason for the CEO of the company to make somewhere around 100 times what the machinist makes.  And I'm sorry, but my sympathies lie with the machinist who is struggling to make ends meet and not with the CEO who is struggling with trying to decide which yacht he wants.  Oh, and "BUZZ!WRONG!NEXT!" isn't really a good debating method.  While it gets across your disagreement, it does nothing to clarify or expound upon your position.  Just a little tip from the Doc MTS.  Free of charge.  Although, since you're so fond of capitalism perhaps I should charge you for it.
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
Back to Top
marktheshark View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 24 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1695 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 21 2005 at 22:52
Originally posted by The Doctor The Doctor wrote:

You're right.  The machinist does more work than the CEO and is more necessary to the functioning of the company.  He should make more.  But seriously, there is no reason for the CEO of the company to make somewhere around 100 times what the machinist makes.  And I'm sorry, but my sympathies lie with the machinist who is struggling to make ends meet and not with the CEO who is struggling with trying to decide which yacht he wants.  Oh, and "BUZZ!WRONG!NEXT!" isn't really a good debating method.  While it gets across your disagreement, it does nothing to clarify or expound upon your position.  Just a little tip from the Doc MTS.  Free of charge.  Although, since you're so fond of capitalism perhaps I should charge you for it.

Ok, no more "BUZZ!WRONG!NEXT!" I'm just in bit of a rank mood this week. Do you take credit cards?

But seriously, people have this misconception that CEOs just coast right into business without breaking a sweat. Far from it! Somestimes that's true but 90% of your business owners and millionaires are self made. They bust their humps and pay their dues. Look at Ross Perot, he started as a computer salesman after he got out of the Navy working 12-18 hours a day. It's pretty much the same story with most of them.
Back to Top
maani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Founding Moderator

Joined: January 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2632 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 21 2005 at 23:11

BB:

Kill George Bush?  But that would make Cheney president.  Not good.  In fact, you'd have to kill quite a few people - including the entire Cabinet - since the order of presidental succession is as follows:

Given that all of these people are neocons or right-wing Republicans, I'd say we're in gib trouble...

Peace.
Back to Top
marktheshark View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 24 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1695 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 21 2005 at 23:21
Originally posted by maani maani wrote:

BB:


Kill George Bush?  But that would make Cheney president.  Not good.  In fact, you'd have to kill quite a few people - including the entire Cabinet - since the order of presidental succession is as follows:



Given that all of these people are neocons or right-wing Republicans, I'd say we're in gib trouble...


Peace.


Ok maani, time for the truth. As an undercover operative for the Secret Service, I'm afraid I'm going to have to seize your computer, tax records, church, prog collection, throw you in a basement in Washington, slap your face and hurt your feelings! We got you now!


Edited by marktheshark
Back to Top
The Doctor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2005 at 00:00
Originally posted by marktheshark marktheshark wrote:

Originally posted by maani maani wrote:

BB:


Kill George Bush?  But that would make Cheney president.  Not good.  In fact, you'd have to kill quite a few people - including the entire Cabinet - since the order of presidental succession is as follows:



Given that all of these people are neocons or right-wing Republicans, I'd say we're in gib trouble...


Peace.


Ok maani, time for the truth. As an undercover operative for the Secret Service, I'm afraid I'm going to have to seize your computer, tax records, church, prog collection, throw you in a basement in Washington, slap your face and hurt your feelings! We got you now!

...see I told everyone that the secret service was going to come knocking on the door.  By the way MTS, I take any form of payment someone wants to use...except for personal checks, you just can't trust people nowadays.
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2005 at 05:34

Originally posted by The Doctor The Doctor wrote:

Wow.  I see the U.S. Secret Service showing up to some members' doors.  I'm sorry I posted in this thread now.  I don't want to be mixed up with you lot.  I'll be right back...someone's at the door.

Yeah, I wouldn't be so quick to discuss killing a president on line, folks. A joke it may be, but we live in 'monitored' times....

Read Orwell, he saw it coming...
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Trotsky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 25 2004
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Points: 2771 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2005 at 05:59

Originally posted by The Doctor The Doctor wrote:

You're right.  The machinist does more work than the CEO and is more necessary to the functioning of the company.  He should make more.  But seriously, there is no reason for the CEO of the company to make somewhere around 100 times what the machinist makes.  And I'm sorry, but my sympathies lie with the machinist who is struggling to make ends meet and not with the CEO who is struggling with trying to decide which yacht he wants. 

Good God, Doc, that was beautfiul ... you must have a split personality (or be played by 8 different actors) ... 

And by the way 100 times doesn't even begin to cover it in countries with weak unions ... I can't write too much cos stuff can get traced, but try 5,000 times

"Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.”

"No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present."
Back to Top
BitchBrew View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 10 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 216 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2005 at 10:39
Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

No problem Ricochet,but that comment from BitchBrew really got my dander up.

Well in real life I am against death penilty, so I guess I don't really won't to exacly kill him.
But why are you mad at me for dissliking Bush? Im sorry for your dead friends, but what tho they got to do whith my comment?
Back to Top
TheProgtologist View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2005 at 12:31

Originally posted by BitchBrew BitchBrew wrote:

Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

No problem Ricochet,but that comment from BitchBrew really got my dander up.

Well in real life I am against death penilty, so I guess I don't really won't to exacly kill him.
But why are you mad at me for dissliking Bush? Im sorry for your dead friends, but what tho they got to do whith my comment?

I'm not mad at you for disliking Bush,BB.Hell...I don't care much for him myself.I will say and have said before that I am a war and combat veteran and have seen enough death in my life,it really changed the way I look at things.I just think killing someone won't solve the problem,and that your comment sort of stepped over the line.You might have been joking but honestly,it offended me.

And now I am going to contradict everything I just said and say I am very much for the death penalty.I also think that in my country the judicial system is in shambles and parole and the appeals system should be abolished.People sentenced to death here can languish for 10-20 years in prison,while they exhaust their appeals and cost us taxpayers 80k per year,per prisoner.


Back to Top
maani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Founding Moderator

Joined: January 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2632 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2005 at 12:43

MtS:

You can have everything but my prog collection!

Doctor:

Re the machinist and the CEO, as one who spent over a decade as a legal assistant in various law firms and corporations, I can tell you for a fact that, without the secretaries, "copy shop" staff and receptionists, law firms and corporations would simply cease to function.  These "lower class" workers are the "nerve center," the "lifeline," of any corporation or law firm.  If secretaries, copy shop staff and receptionists "banded together" and went on strike, it would cripple American transnational corporations in under two hours.

Quite a thought, huh?

Peace.
Back to Top
sigod View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2779 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2005 at 12:55
Originally posted by maani maani wrote:

BB:

Kill George Bush?  But that would make Cheney president.  Not good.  In fact, you'd have to kill quite a few people - including the entire Cabinet - since the order of presidental succession is as follows:

Given that all of these people are neocons or right-wing Republicans, I'd say we're in gib trouble...

Peace.



Okay, I've been doing some detailed research into this, checking out exactly how far down this list you can go and I've discovered (after hours on the net) that apparently the last person in line to the presidency is 7 year old May Hicks who lives in Salina, just west of Kansas City.



Let's show her some respect!



Edited by sigod
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
Back to Top
BitchBrew View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 10 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 216 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2005 at 15:57
Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

Originally posted by BitchBrew BitchBrew wrote:

Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

No problem Ricochet,but that comment from BitchBrew really got my dander up.

Well in real life I am against death penilty, so I guess I don't really won't to exacly kill him.
But why are you mad at me for dissliking Bush? Im sorry for your dead friends, but what tho they got to do whith my comment?

I'm not mad at you for disliking Bush,BB.Hell...I don't care much for him myself.I will say and have said before that I am a war and combat veteran and have seen enough death in my life,it really changed the way I look at things.I just think killing someone won't solve the problem,and that your comment sort of stepped over the line.You might have been joking but honestly,it offended me.

And now I am going to contradict everything I just said and say I am very much for the death penalty.I also think that in my country the judicial system is in shambles and parole and the appeals system should be abolished.People sentenced to death here can languish for 10-20 years in prison,while they exhaust their appeals and cost us taxpayers 80k per year,per prisoner.


Ok, well since I never experienced war and stuff like that I look at things diffrently ofcourse. My intention was not to insult you. I'm sorry for that. But I really do want to get rid of Bush, and thats that.
Back to Top
TheProgtologist View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2005 at 16:03
Originally posted by BitchBrew BitchBrew wrote:

Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

Originally posted by BitchBrew BitchBrew wrote:

Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

No problem Ricochet,but that comment from BitchBrew really got my dander up.

Well in real life I am against death penilty, so I guess I don't really won't to exacly kill him.
But why are you mad at me for dissliking Bush? Im sorry for your dead friends, but what tho they got to do whith my comment?

I'm not mad at you for disliking Bush,BB.Hell...I don't care much for him myself.I will say and have said before that I am a war and combat veteran and have seen enough death in my life,it really changed the way I look at things.I just think killing someone won't solve the problem,and that your comment sort of stepped over the line.You might have been joking but honestly,it offended me.

And now I am going to contradict everything I just said and say I am very much for the death penalty.I also think that in my country the judicial system is in shambles and parole and the appeals system should be abolished.People sentenced to death here can languish for 10-20 years in prison,while they exhaust their appeals and cost us taxpayers 80k per year,per prisoner.


Ok, well since I never experienced war and stuff like that I look at things diffrently ofcourse. My intention was not to insult you. I'm sorry for that. But I really do want to get rid of Bush, and thats that.

No need to apologize,though I do appreciate the thought and your sincerity.Since Bush came to office so many disastrous events have occured,it makes me wonder sometimes how someone else would have handled it.

Peace



Edited by TheProgtologist


Back to Top
The Doctor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2005 at 16:07
Originally posted by sigod sigod wrote:

Originally posted by maani maani wrote:

BB:

Kill George Bush?  But that would make Cheney president.  Not good.  In fact, you'd have to kill quite a few people - including the entire Cabinet - since the order of presidental succession is as follows:

Given that all of these people are neocons or right-wing Republicans, I'd say we're in gib trouble...

Peace.



Okay, I've been doing some detailed research into this, checking out exactly how far down this list you can go and I've discovered (after hours on the net) that apparently the last person in line to the presidency is 7 year old May Hicks who lives in Salina, just west of Kansas City.



Let's show her some respect!

Well Hail to the Chief I say.  She'd probably do a better job than our current "esteemed" leader.

Maani:

I worked as a law clerk while in law school, and even in the smaller firms I worked for, it was myself, the secretary and the runner who kept the law firm from collapsing in on itself.  Really, the attorneys were superfluous.  They were just there to collect the checks. 

Trotsky:

Economically, I'm very much a working class liberal.  While I don't think we should help those people who contribute absolutely nothing to society, except for maybe crime and having children out of wedlock, I think that we should help those who are productive members of society who are struggling or those who are trying to better themselves.  Unfortunately, the government here works very hard at supporting the wealthy and supporting the bottom feeders of society and does absolutely nothing for those who are the backbone with which this society functions.  It's time for a workers' revolution.
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
Back to Top
King of Loss View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 21 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Points: 16889 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2005 at 16:09
That's why it is really hard to vote in the US since the American system is really really biased towards the major two parties and smaller parties have 0.000000 % chance of winning anything.
Back to Top
King of Loss View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 21 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Points: 16889 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2005 at 16:13
Originally posted by The Doctor The Doctor wrote:

 Unfortunately, the government here works very hard at supporting the wealthy and supporting the bottom feeders of society and does absolutely nothing for those who are the backbone with which this society functions.  It's time for a workers' revolution.

That is very true. In our current tax system, the rich are taxed a lot, but they are still rich, the poor does not get taxed a lot, but reaches benefits, the middle class does not receive any benefits from the system what-so-ever. Unlike an European system where they get free healthcare, government insurance and good public transportation, the Middle Class in America gets nothing but more and more taxes.  Sure, it is a good thing that Politicians give a taxcut to the rich, but they are forgetting us. The ones who earn money, but get nothing back...
Back to Top
Borealis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 06 2005
Location: Neutral Zone
Status: Offline
Points: 599 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2005 at 18:29

I would says an end to man's desire of always more power and money, ecspecially money. That would ends so many things, lie most wars, a lot of polution, crime, all the dumb commercial stuff, well, everything that only exist to make a rich or powerfull man. Everything bad in society happens because of this.

If we could live in a sane world, it would be so great...
Vive le Québec libre!...
Back to Top
maani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Founding Moderator

Joined: January 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2632 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2005 at 21:52

KoL:

The U.S. is actually a one-party system - the "transnational corporate" party - with two branches, the RepubliCrats and the DemoCans.  True, the DemoCans tend to try to do more for the lower and middle classes, while the RepubliCrats tend to be more about securing and maintaining wealth and power.  However, no one should kid themselves: they both answer to the same corporate puppetmasters.

Peace.
Back to Top
marktheshark View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 24 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1695 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2005 at 23:13
Originally posted by maani maani wrote:

KoL:


The U.S. is actually a one-party system - the "transnational corporate" party - with two branches, the RepubliCrats and the DemoCans.  True, the DemoCans tend to try to do more for the lower and middle classes, while the RepubliCrats tend to be more about securing and maintaining wealth and power.  However, no one should kid themselves: they both answer to the same corporate puppetmasters.


Peace.


I can see some truth in that maani. But sometimes government inaction can be an appropriate action. Let's go back 70 years:

In his 1935 State of the Union Address, FDR spoke to a nation mired in the Depression, but still marinated in conservative values:

"Continued dependence" upon welfare, said FDR, "induces a spiritual disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber. To dole our relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit."

Seems he was trying to tell us something that was unfortunatley not well heeded.


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.191 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.