Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Thoughts on my taste?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThoughts on my taste?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 10>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Thoughts on my taste?
    Posted: August 06 2011 at 12:03
Originally posted by Losendos Losendos wrote:

I always thought it was prog
 
no 1 song in oz in 1969 a prog like track

This thread did not need to be bumped.

Not even a little bit.
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
Losendos View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 03 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 571
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 06 2011 at 08:22
I always thought it was prog
 
no 1 song in oz in 1969 a prog like track
How wonderful to be so profound
Back to Top
dfle3 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: April 10 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 08 2011 at 02:47
Forgot to mention something in my previous reply to TheGazzardian (I've got an earlier reply to you a little upthread)...this is going back to their reply here:

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=77386&PN=8


You were mentioning "10,....,1" and saying (in an earlier post, I believe...keeping track is hard) that you liked "Tin legs and tine mines"...occasionally I'll look at customer reviews on sites like Amazon and look for American points of view...I think I may have come across such reviews where songs like "Tin legs and tin mines" gets mentioned as a better song off of the album. I'm wondering if that is an American thing or something. You American? It's weird, in a lot of those American reviews I'm dumbfounded...the songs which are part of Australia's classic rock landscape off of that album go unmentioned, and 'minor' songs like "Tin legs and tin mines" get mentioned! It's a bit like an Eskimo reviewing "Sgt. Pepper" and saying that whilst the album doesn't have any great songs, the best songs are "Lovely Rita" and "Fixing a hole"...sort of WTF? moments! To me, American's seem to be liking the 'wrong' songs!

I was Googling the lyrics for "Tin legs and tin mines"...thought it might have been about the Vietnam war, say...not confident that it is now...the subject matter seems a bit obscure for me...if it was about that, I would have listed the following track as one I like much better on the subject...I find the violins in it beautiful (it's an Australian song):

Redgum - I was only nineteen



This song came out before the Paul Hardcastle song with a similar name (US act). Same subject matter though...the Vietnam war.

You mentioned liking Rob Hirst's drum solo in "Power and the passion"...I remember liking a bit he did which was used as the theme to a tv series about da yoof:

Beatbox theme:



It's got 125 views...not sure how long the vid will be up.

Just by the by, Midnight Oil covered Russell Morris' classic "The real thing"...I prefer the original...don't know if you could call the original "proggy"...think it usually gets called "psychedelic"...here's the original...

Russell Morris - The real thing



That's the entire song, but there is a shorter clip actually featuring the singer...I prefer the long version...it's what gets played on classic hits stations here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQ8d2EB435Q

There is a You Tube which includes what some describe as a 3rd part to the song...but you never hear that '3rd part':

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1RP9sy1-LQ

Not sure if you've heard the Oils version...original is the best from my point of view.

***** Did you get around to stating what genre you thought the Oils were? Or at least for particular albums? I think that Wiki describes them as "alternative rock" or something...to me they seem pretty straight pop/rock, for most of their classic hits. "Red sails" strikes me as a bit proggy...you agree? If not, how would you describe it? "Place without a postcard" strikes me as being Nu-Traditional or something...sort of folk-rock or roots-rock.

But, overall, I think Protest-Rock is the best description of their music...it pretty much describes what you get with their music.

Maybe I'm not surprised that 10-1 didn't really take in the US...it was very much an anti-imperial album and the US was often a target of their lyrics. "Diesel and dust" was mostly about Australia's treatment of Aborigines...maybe that was 'safer' for US radio/audience? Presumably Americans didn't really view "Beds are burning" as just as easily being about native Americans.

Like I said, this is my 2nd reply to you...didn't want to edit my first reply.

Edited by dfle3 - May 08 2011 at 02:49
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2011 at 18:23
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Originally posted by Green Shield Stamp Green Shield Stamp wrote:

If the title Top Prog Albums, which heads the list,  needs to by accompanied by an explanation that non prog albums are also included, then maybe a more accurate title should be selected. eg. Top albums produced by prog artists (not very catchy, I know...but perhaps less misleading)


Good thinking, I think.
I don't think it is. It's too long to fit in the sidebar and it's still misleading - it would be easier just to leave out the word "Prog" all together.
 
I'm not going to suggest it to M@X however if anyone else wants to, please be my guest.


You're far too magnanimous. ;)  It's having a more accurate title that I think a good idea -- not necessarily his example of a possible title.  I don't actualy think of artists as being Prog artists (it is the music itself that is prog or not).  If it becomes just Top Albums, then I think it should have clarification below it explaining that it excludes albums by acts included in Proto-Prog and Prog-Related.

EDIT: As for contacting M@X, I wouldn't simply because we have not had any contact before, and I like to break the ice with people in the forums before PMing them or making any requests.
re:edit -  yeah, you and me both. LOL ....and I've been an Admin for 2½ years Ouch
 
Anyway this is a 0.003% problem, while it is a moderately interesting diversion to think of 100% solutions, I doubt that would resolve anything in the end and the pareto principle kicks in pretty sharply for me on this one...
 
"May Contain Prog"
 
What?
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Online
Points: 35864
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2011 at 17:24
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Originally posted by Green Shield Stamp Green Shield Stamp wrote:

If the title Top Prog Albums, which heads the list,  needs to by accompanied by an explanation that non prog albums are also included, then maybe a more accurate title should be selected. eg. Top albums produced by prog artists (not very catchy, I know...but perhaps less misleading)


Good thinking, I think.
I don't think it is. It's too long to fit in the sidebar and it's still misleading - it would be easier just to leave out the word "Prog" all together.
 
I'm not going to suggest it to M@X however if anyone else wants to, please be my guest.


You're far too magnanimous. ;)  It's having a more accurate title that I think a good idea -- not necessarily his example of a possible title.  I don't actualy think of artists as being Prog artists (it is the music itself that is prog or not).  If it becomes just Top Albums, then I think it should have clarification below it explaining that it excludes albums by acts included in Proto-Prog and Prog-Related.

EDIT: As for contacting M@X, I wouldn't simply because we have not had any contact before, and I like to break the ice with people in the forums before PMing them or making any requests.


Edited by Logan - May 06 2011 at 17:34
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2011 at 16:49
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Originally posted by Green Shield Stamp Green Shield Stamp wrote:

If the title Top Prog Albums, which heads the list,  needs to by accompanied by an explanation that non prog albums are also included, then maybe a more accurate title should be selected. eg. Top albums produced by prog artists (not very catchy, I know...but perhaps less misleading)


Good thinking, I think.
I don't think it is. It's too long to fit in the sidebar and it's still misleading - it would be easier just to leave out the word "Prog" all together.
 
I'm not going to suggest it to M@X however if anyone else wants to, please be my guest.
What?
Back to Top
Purple_Floyd View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: April 30 2011
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 76
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2011 at 16:22
Originally posted by dfle3 dfle3 wrote:


I'm pretty sure that there must be forums with people just like yous on it...you know, people arguing that Ke$ha REALLY is better than Katy Perry...no doubt invoking the superiority of Proust to Brown to 'prove' their 'argument' too!

Originally posted by dfle3 dfle3 wrote:


It would be really cool to be able to delete posts in this thread...Snow Dog's irrelevant posts...Dean's thoughts on my album rating sytem...guff...there have been irrelevant posts in this thread...like You Tubes of songs I should check out, but that kind of stuff may interest people, so I don't have an in principle objection to it.


May I put my two cents in? You seems to get irritated by any little criticisms present in this topic. Even when other users explain and present their point of view, you're still bashing them. These quotes are simple examples of what I mean. I believe you should take a deep breath be polite and turn down your arrogance in relation to other's comments.

Back on the subject topic : I don't understand what you're really looking for here. it's not my cup of tea, but your selection is fine, even if there's some album that aren't prog (as far as I know). Why are you so preoccupied by the "radio play potential" of your selection / prog music in general?

 
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Online
Points: 35864
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2011 at 13:30
Originally posted by Green Shield Stamp Green Shield Stamp wrote:

If the title Top Prog Albums, which heads the list,  needs to by accompanied by an explanation that non prog albums are also included, then maybe a more accurate title should be selected. eg. Top albums produced by prog artists (not very catchy, I know...but perhaps less misleading)


Good thinking, I think.
Back to Top
Green Shield Stamp View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 17 2009
Location: Telford, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 933
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2011 at 13:27
If the title Top Prog Albums, which heads the list,  needs to by accompanied by an explanation that non prog albums are also included, then maybe a more accurate title should be selected. eg. Top albums produced by prog artists (not very catchy, I know...but perhaps less misleading)
Haiku

Writing a poem
With seventeen syllables
Is very diffic....
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Online
Points: 35864
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2011 at 13:23
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Green Shield Stamp Green Shield Stamp wrote:

I think that dfle3 has made a very valid point about 'Kind of Blue' appearing in the PA top 100.  A non Prog album being cited as one of the best prog albums of all time is a nonsense.  I know there are admin reasons for it but it must be very baffling for new visitors to this website.
 
When non prog albums appear in the PA top 100, it seems ironic that dfle3 is criticised for including non prog albums in his list (something of a double standard operating here).
 
Prog music is a very broad church but perhaps Prog Archives is less so.
When new visitors to the site say "Hey - Kind of Blue isn't prog", 'we' agree with them and explain why it appears in the chart eventhough 'we' know it isn't Prog. Usually that explanation is sufficient.


It sure can get a bit boring explaining it again and again, though.  Maybe since we don't have a system to exclude such albums from the top-list, nor album tagging, a little disclaimer could be added under the "TOP PROG ALBUMS" headline.  On the other hand, if we didn't have such things to talk about over-an-over again, the forums would be a little less lively. Wink
We could end up with a front page that is more disclaimer than content LOL


We certainly could. LOL

We do have already below the list on the front page "* Weighted Ratings (aka WR), used for ordering, is cached and re-calculated every 15 minutes" and a little more info about the list would be beneficial. 

M@X could include a hyperlink (say entitled, "How this list works") right under the "TOP PROG ALBUMS " text which links to a page where  details on how the list operates are explained.
That link could point to the Top 100 page and the details could be there just under where M@X has explained how the weighting works.
 
Of course words are inversely proportional to reading - the more words you have the less people read them. Most people have an aversion to small print regardless of how informative it is so even with disclaimers we will still get those kinds of responses, just as we still get people complaining about Metallica or Ironing Maiden being here even though the text definition on the Prog Related section explains why these bands are not Prog.


Yes, but I still think it would be a worthwhile addition, and perhaps a few less people would complain and perhaps more people would be prepared to explain when the question comes up.  Even if hardly anybody reads such things, somehow I like the principle of including explanations in such ways.  And then when someone complains in a perturbed fashion, we can always say, "Didn't you even bother to take the time to read the explanation, which is (or at least the hyperlink is) plainly in sight?"

I think it's good to try to make things as clear as possible for visitors (including ones who never visit the forum) and make such info easily accessible/ easy to find.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2011 at 13:20
LOL works for me.
What?
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2011 at 13:18
Or better yet, I propose to have a link that says "How this list works" and it redirects to an empty white page with just one big message: 

WHY DO YOU HAVE TO TAKE THIS LIST SO SERIOUSLY? 
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2011 at 13:12
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Green Shield Stamp Green Shield Stamp wrote:

I think that dfle3 has made a very valid point about 'Kind of Blue' appearing in the PA top 100.  A non Prog album being cited as one of the best prog albums of all time is a nonsense.  I know there are admin reasons for it but it must be very baffling for new visitors to this website.
 
When non prog albums appear in the PA top 100, it seems ironic that dfle3 is criticised for including non prog albums in his list (something of a double standard operating here).
 
Prog music is a very broad church but perhaps Prog Archives is less so.
When new visitors to the site say "Hey - Kind of Blue isn't prog", 'we' agree with them and explain why it appears in the chart eventhough 'we' know it isn't Prog. Usually that explanation is sufficient.


It sure can get a bit boring explaining it again and again, though.  Maybe since we don't have a system to exclude such albums from the top-list, nor album tagging, a little disclaimer could be added under the "TOP PROG ALBUMS" headline.  On the other hand, if we didn't have such things to talk about over-an-over again, the forums would be a little less lively. Wink
We could end up with a front page that is more disclaimer than content LOL


We certainly could. LOL

We do have already below the list on the front page "* Weighted Ratings (aka WR), used for ordering, is cached and re-calculated every 15 minutes" and a little more info about the list would be beneficial. 

M@X could include a hyperlink (say entitled, "How this list works") right under the "TOP PROG ALBUMS " text which links to a page where  details on how the list operates are explained.
That link could point to the Top 100 page and the details could be there just under where M@X has explained how the weighting works.
 
Of course words are inversely proportional to reading - the more words you have the less people read them. Most people have an aversion to small print regardless of how informative it is so even with disclaimers we will still get those kinds of responses, just as we still get people complaining about Metallica or Ironing Maiden being here even though the text definition on the Prog Related section explains why these bands are not Prog.
What?
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Online
Points: 35864
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2011 at 13:05
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Green Shield Stamp Green Shield Stamp wrote:

I think that dfle3 has made a very valid point about 'Kind of Blue' appearing in the PA top 100.  A non Prog album being cited as one of the best prog albums of all time is a nonsense.  I know there are admin reasons for it but it must be very baffling for new visitors to this website.
 
When non prog albums appear in the PA top 100, it seems ironic that dfle3 is criticised for including non prog albums in his list (something of a double standard operating here).
 
Prog music is a very broad church but perhaps Prog Archives is less so.
When new visitors to the site say "Hey - Kind of Blue isn't prog", 'we' agree with them and explain why it appears in the chart eventhough 'we' know it isn't Prog. Usually that explanation is sufficient.


It sure can get a bit boring explaining it again and again, though.  Maybe since we don't have a system to exclude such albums from the top-list, nor album tagging, a little disclaimer could be added under the "TOP PROG ALBUMS" headline.  On the other hand, if we didn't have such things to talk about over-an-over again, the forums would be a little less lively. Wink
We could end up with a front page that is more disclaimer than content LOL


We certainly could. LOL

We do have already below the list on the front page "* Weighted Ratings (aka WR), used for ordering, is cached and re-calculated every 15 minutes" and a little more info about the list would be beneficial. 

M@X could include a hyperlink (say entitled, "How this list works") right under the "TOP PROG ALBUMS " text which links to a page where  details on how the list operates are explained.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2011 at 12:51
Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Green Shield Stamp Green Shield Stamp wrote:

I think that dfle3 has made a very valid point about 'Kind of Blue' appearing in the PA top 100.  A non Prog album being cited as one of the best prog albums of all time is a nonsense.  I know there are admin reasons for it but it must be very baffling for new visitors to this website.
 
When non prog albums appear in the PA top 100, it seems ironic that dfle3 is criticised for including non prog albums in his list (something of a double standard operating here).
 
Prog music is a very broad church but perhaps Prog Archives is less so.
When new visitors to the site say "Hey - Kind of Blue isn't prog", 'we' agree with them and explain why it appears in the chart eventhough 'we' know it isn't Prog. Usually that explanation is sufficient.


It sure can get a bit boring explaining it again and again, though.  Maybe since we don't have a system to exclude such albums from the top-list, nor album tagging, a little disclaimer could be added under the "TOP PROG ALBUMS" headline.  On the other hand, if we didn't have such things to talk about over-an-over again, the forums would be a little less lively. Wink
We could end up with a front page that is more disclaimer than content LOL
What?
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Online
Points: 35864
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2011 at 12:10
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Green Shield Stamp Green Shield Stamp wrote:

I think that dfle3 has made a very valid point about 'Kind of Blue' appearing in the PA top 100.  A non Prog album being cited as one of the best prog albums of all time is a nonsense.  I know there are admin reasons for it but it must be very baffling for new visitors to this website.
 
When non prog albums appear in the PA top 100, it seems ironic that dfle3 is criticised for including non prog albums in his list (something of a double standard operating here).
 
Prog music is a very broad church but perhaps Prog Archives is less so.
When new visitors to the site say "Hey - Kind of Blue isn't prog", 'we' agree with them and explain why it appears in the chart eventhough 'we' know it isn't Prog. Usually that explanation is sufficient.


It sure can get a bit boring explaining it again and again, though.  Maybe since we don't have a system to exclude such albums from the top-list, nor album tagging, a little disclaimer could be added under the "TOP PROG ALBUMS" headline.  On the other hand, if we didn't have such things to talk about over-an-over again, the forums would be a little less lively. Wink
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2011 at 11:50
Originally posted by Green Shield Stamp Green Shield Stamp wrote:

I think that dfle3 has made a very valid point about 'Kind of Blue' appearing in the PA top 100.  A non Prog album being cited as one of the best prog albums of all time is a nonsense.  I know there are admin reasons for it but it must be very baffling for new visitors to this website.
 
When non prog albums appear in the PA top 100, it seems ironic that dfle3 is criticised for including non prog albums in his list (something of a double standard operating here).
 
Prog music is a very broad church but perhaps Prog Archives is less so.
When new visitors to the site say "Hey - Kind of Blue isn't prog", 'we' agree with them and explain why it appears in the chart eventhough 'we' know it isn't Prog. Usually that explanation is sufficient.
What?
Back to Top
Green Shield Stamp View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 17 2009
Location: Telford, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 933
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2011 at 11:18
I think that dfle3 has made a very valid point about 'Kind of Blue' appearing in the PA top 100.  A non Prog album being cited as one of the best prog albums of all time is a nonsense.  I know there are admin reasons for it but it must be very baffling for new visitors to this website.
 
When non prog albums appear in the PA top 100, it seems ironic that dfle3 is criticised for including non prog albums in his list (something of a double standard operating here).
 
Prog music is a very broad church but perhaps Prog Archives is less so.
Haiku

Writing a poem
With seventeen syllables
Is very diffic....
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2011 at 04:53
Originally posted by dfle3 dfle3 wrote:

"Other than that, what worthless opinions have I expressed? More worthless than yours are they?"

Your opinion of me. It blows in the breeze. A lot of the guff in this thread is by you...your constantly changing attitude to me in posts...I've tended to ignore you because you write guff.

It would be really cool to be able to delete posts in this thread...Snow Dog's irrelevant posts...Dean's thoughts on my album rating sytem...guff...there have been irrelevant posts in this thread...like You Tubes of songs I should check out, but that kind of stuff may interest people, so I don't have an in principle objection to it.

Sorry, I don't know what you mean. My changing attitude?

But most of the guff is written by you.....imo of course.
Back to Top
dfle3 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: April 10 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2011 at 04:49
"Other than that, what worthless opinions have I expressed? More worthless than yours are they?"

Your opinion of me. It blows in the breeze. A lot of the guff in this thread is by you...your constantly changing attitude to me in posts...I've tended to ignore you because you write guff.

It would be really cool to be able to delete posts in this thread...Snow Dog's irrelevant posts...Dean's thoughts on my album rating sytem...guff...there have been irrelevant posts in this thread...like You Tubes of songs I should check out, but that kind of stuff may interest people, so I don't have an in principle objection to it.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 10>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.250 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.