Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Why Waters Left the Floyd's !!
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhy Waters Left the Floyd's !!

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28070
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Why Waters Left the Floyd's !!
    Posted: July 14 2010 at 00:57

Originally posted by Dellinger Dellinger wrote:

Originally posted by RoyFairbank RoyFairbank wrote:

I totally oppose any insult to Roger. He is Pink Floyd. Pink Floyd was nothing before Syd Left. Psychadelic bullsh*t, decent for that, but punchless. When the band was democratic they sucked even worst. Only when Roger took charge and began writing material "selfishly" did the greatest rock works come to life. Roger had a vision, a conscience and an intelligent plan. Gilmour, the only other serious writer in the Floyd, was completely groundless and incapable when it came to writing ART and not just music. Roger made his guitar work meaningful. When Roger left David HIRED a bunch of great writers and they put together a MUSICAL copycat of Pink Floyd that is quite good, but misses the intellectual points of Floyd as seen in Rog's works Pros and Cons and Amused to Death. Rog's show is brilliant by the way.


Ofcourse I totally oppose any insult to Roger too, but so do I oppose any inslut to the rest of the band. I wouldn't say the band got better when Roger began writing material "selfishly" (and I even must say that there were great thing in the albums before DSotM), but rather when they learned what each was best at, and Waters is best at creating concepts and writing lyrics, and ofcourse he is a very good songwriter - but he needed the input of the others to make those Pink Floyd classics. Roger couldn't have created DSotM, Wish you Were here, nor even Animals all by himself. Nor the song Echoes. And even The Wall may have suffered if he hadn't had the feedback of the band (and Comfortably Numb wouldn't have been the song so many love). And Gilmour wasn't the only other serious writer in Floyd, Wright also did his share of writing, and in DSotM I think he was a more important writer than Gilmour, and about as important as Waters (Great Gig in the Sky and Us & Them were his babies, and he co-wrote Time and Any color you like with the rest of the band); and he was co-writer of Shine on you Crazy Diamond. And perhaps Gilmour's Floyd misses the points of the classic Pink Floyd, but Waters solo output misses the music.

Of course as many have stressed Floyd were a band and as such they all contributed vital things to make it what it was. I wanted to use the Beatles as an example. In some respects Waters = Lennon and Gilmour = Mc Cartney. The Beatles were great because of (obviously) sheer talent but also the right mix of people. Floyd were very much the same imo.

 

Back to Top
Dellinger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12732
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2010 at 22:53
Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

To compare just how much Floyd were not without Waters, you only have to listen to Amused To Death and compare it to MLOR & The Division Bell. The latter two are ordinary, whilst the former is utter genius.They were a great collective, but most certainly missed Waters lyrical and creative input after the collective egos basically tore the band apart.I would imagine that all would now admit to having played a part in that.


Well, it all depends on taste, ofcourse. Even though I completley agree that Amused to Death is by far superior to MLOR & TDB as far as concept and lyrics is concerned, for me at least The Division Bell is far superior than Amused to Death as far as music is concerned. I find The Division Bell among my very favourite Pink Floyd albums, even above The Wall, I love all of the songs, while AtD has some very boring songs (Too Much Rope, Watching TV, and a few others I don't even remember).
Back to Top
Dellinger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12732
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2010 at 22:38
Originally posted by RoyFairbank RoyFairbank wrote:

I totally oppose any insult to Roger. He is Pink Floyd. Pink Floyd was nothing before Syd Left. Psychadelic bullsh*t, decent for that, but punchless. When the band was democratic they sucked even worst. Only when Roger took charge and began writing material "selfishly" did the greatest rock works come to life. Roger had a vision, a conscience and an intelligent plan. Gilmour, the only other serious writer in the Floyd, was completely groundless and incapable when it came to writing ART and not just music. Roger made his guitar work meaningful. When Roger left David HIRED a bunch of great writers and they put together a MUSICAL copycat of Pink Floyd that is quite good, but misses the intellectual points of Floyd as seen in Rog's works Pros and Cons and Amused to Death. Rog's show is brilliant by the way.


Ofcourse I totally oppose any insult to Roger too, but so do I oppose any inslut to the rest of the band. I wouldn't say the band got better when Roger began writing material "selfishly" (and I even must say that there were great thing in the albums before DSotM), but rather when they learned what each was best at, and Waters is best at creating concepts and writing lyrics, and ofcourse he is a very good songwriter - but he needed the input of the others to make those Pink Floyd classics. Roger couldn't have created DSotM, Wish you Were here, nor even Animals all by himself. Nor the song Echoes. And even The Wall may have suffered if he hadn't had the feedback of the band (and Comfortably Numb wouldn't have been the song so many love). And Gilmour wasn't the only other serious writer in Floyd, Wright also did his share of writing, and in DSotM I think he was a more important writer than Gilmour, and about as important as Waters (Great Gig in the Sky and Us & Them were his babies, and he co-wrote Time and Any color you like with the rest of the band); and he was co-writer of Shine on you Crazy Diamond. And perhaps Gilmour's Floyd misses the points of the classic Pink Floyd, but Waters solo output misses the music.
Back to Top
enigma View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 12 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 154
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2010 at 15:25
It was interesting to see that Waters and Gilmour played together for a charity gig last weekend. They only played a handful of songs, but speculation is no doubt rife over Waters' upcoming Wall tour. I'd love Gilmour to make a guest appearance.
Back to Top
Rabid View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 20 2008
Location: Bridge of Knows
Status: Offline
Points: 512
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2010 at 08:06
He did'nt leave.......he just evaporated !  LOL
"...the thing IS, to put a motor in yourself..."
Back to Top
Follix View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 02 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2010 at 02:37
As an instrumentalist he was the worst of the four.

One of the best lyricist of all time - Yes
One of the good songwriter too

But not a so good Bass player and good vocals in the 70's,

And dunno why but I prefer Gilmour solo stuff but its fun to see that they played together 3 days ago.


Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2010 at 23:11
This is for me another stick a fork in them, they're done groups.  That doesn't mean that the guys don't have some more good shows or music left in them.

I saw them without Waters on The Division Bell Tour when they came by Atlanta to the Georgia Tech outdoor football stadium for a concert.  Just looked it up and there were two shows.  I don't have the ticket stub handy but it may be in storage.  Anyway, it was a rainy day, brought down a good umbrella.  They made everyone entering the stadium with an umbrella leave it near the entrance.  I did wear a raincoat but the weather was awful and severely distracted from the show.  All the umbrellas had been carried off by the time the show was over.  That was just wrong.  Well, at least we had seats.

I think it was a Friday May 3, 1994.  Uh no, it was one of those horrid middle of the week concerts.  Anyway, on top of being on either a Tuesday or a Wednesday when I was there, the weather sucked!!!LOL


Edited by Slartibartfast - July 12 2010 at 23:18
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Ronnie Pilgrim View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 09 2010
Location: The South of TX
Status: Offline
Points: 771
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2010 at 22:09
Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:


Ohhh ... maybe you should check out the article today in the news ... David has been showing up in many Wall concerts, and I'm sure that Roger is the one that said ... get your butt here ... your guitar is wanted!

Really? I guess you just read the headlines and the stories write themselvesLOL
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17529
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2010 at 18:06
Hi,
 
I find it incredibly sad to read some of the comments made here ... it's sort of like saying that Stravinsky is better than Tchaikovsky or vice versa.
 
That is just such a crock of garbage guys ... and all members were important to the band in their own way, even if Roger spent more time creating new stuff that the others might not have.
 
In general, my view is this ... to just play rock'n'roll and 4/4 stuff that has the feel of a lamp post, is not worth it! And Roger certainly knows that and has shown that. For the others, it might be thought of as a reaction to the more difficult stuff they were doing, but if it wasn't the difficult stuff the staging for all of this stuff was insane and required attention that ... probably burned everyone out! So much of the stuff in DSOTM was computerized and along a film, and that means ... you can't make a mistake!  And the emotional take in all that stuff makes it much tougher to appreciate, so hearing anyone of them say it was Roger's baby ... well, I can tell you that if would not have been Pink Floyd without all this stuff in it.
 
There are other things ... I am not sure about this one, but here is my thinking ... Eric Clapton played on The Pros and Cons of Hitchhiking ... and it was my understanding that Roger was going to do a few dates and that Eric was going to play them ... and in the end that crashed. You know why? ... it's not blues and it was not "easy stuff" that Eric could do all day long and challenge himself to do more! ... and to me, that was the whole thing. Each Roger album got better and better and Amused to Death is fabulous, but not appreciated sometimes. But it also tells you that Roger has a knack for music, and allow each person some freedom ... you can't say that Jeff Beck is not tremendous in that album, or you are not listening. Eric Clapton before that. David Gilmour before that.
 
So, if David was tired and wanted to do something simpler for a change, that's understand'able, and probably appreciated ... you forget that he had to be "on" every night and not fail ... and he didn't ... you won't find a lot of "mistakes" in the bootlegs, and you have to have a very good musician and person behind that, to do so! Roger would probably be the first one to tell you ... yeah, we disagreed, but he is, and was, pretty good. I'm not sure Pink Floyd could have succeeded as much if it had not happened so strongly and they stuck together.
 
Lastly, Richard Wright appears to have been the one that first said no, to all the stuff, and I think that Roger was simply asking too much from the equipment to the point of alienating some folks. And it is well known that Richard just about was not in The Final Cut", and to be honest with you ... that is exactly what that album is missing ... the softness that Richard always added to the whole thing that smoothed out the harshness and the roughness.
 
Roger never left.
 
They just took a break from each other.
 
Ohhh ... maybe you should check out the article today in the news ... David has been showing up in many Wall concerts, and I'm sure that Roger is the one that said ... get your butt here ... your guitar is wanted!
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
The Truth View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 19 2009
Location: Kansas
Status: Offline
Points: 21795
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2010 at 16:33
I just wish the whole band could've seen how much better their music was when they all worked as a team... The whole deal could be everybody was getting lazy except Roger.
Back to Top
Icarium View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: March 21 2008
Location: Tigerstaden
Status: Offline
Points: 34055
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2010 at 16:28
it was the same with Dire Straits and Knoplers willing to control EVERYTHING even he's brother could not stand him. to much EGO is bad, just look at the French footbal squad during the world cup...
 
on the Pink Floyd quistion I have nothing to say that hadent been said earlyer in this thread better.
 
 
Back to Top
Alberto Muñoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2010 at 15:39

To the thread starter, i'll put by memory an interview that i read from Gilmour in Guitar Player in 92 or 93.

Gilmour said that Waters and him start to arguing about many many things regarding the music, he felt that DSOTM was musically a product of all, but he didn't like as much as WYWH because Roger's need to put his lyrics over the music, that's why he (Gilmour) view DSOTM a forced job and WYWH the zenith of PF.
 
He made some remarks about the recordings sessions of the Animals album, for example he did a great guitar solo in Pigs and Dogs, he did not mention what take  but later came Roger and wipe them out, so he have to do another, when the interviewer ask him that Waters action was on purpose?  he replied "by Mistake".
 
Also Bob Ezrin (producer of the Wall) said to GP that in the recording sessions of  The Wall the relation between Roger and David was in a verge to collapse that in a italian restaurant, he stop what could be a real physical fight between them.
 
When a partnership come close as that, very little is to know why the classic PF were apart.
 
 




Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17847
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2010 at 14:55
Originally posted by nordwind nordwind wrote:

The same Roger Waters who spit on fans in Toronto . Shocked
 
He was fighting a cold....it was snot, phlehm, he was clearing from his throat
Back to Top
Klogg View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 10 2010
Location: Goiânia-Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 682
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2010 at 14:32
Why Waters entered Floyd !!!!
Syd was much better. He wasn't a genius, but his music was very better to hear.
Back to Top
lazland View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13634
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2010 at 14:31
Originally posted by nordwind nordwind wrote:

The same Roger Waters who spit on fans in Toronto . Shocked


It was the whole anonymous stadium rock experience he was spitting upon, with ignorants screaming at him to play certain tracks whilst trying to play new music from Animals.

Don't complain about it - at the end of the day, it did bring about The Wall, one of the greatest albums of all timeWink


Edited by lazland - July 12 2010 at 14:32
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17847
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2010 at 14:28

Who cares!!!!

Yes and Rush are still touring after 900 yrs together, and making great music still.......Pink Floyd died after DSOTM...what about 1974ish??
Back to Top
nordwind View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 07 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 170
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2010 at 14:26
The same Roger Waters who spit on fans in Toronto . Shocked
Jazz isn't dead.......it just smells funny.
Frank Zappa / Live in New York
Back to Top
lazland View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13634
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2010 at 13:30
To compare just how much Floyd were not without Waters, you only have to listen to Amused To Death and compare it to MLOR & The Division Bell. The latter two are ordinary, whilst the former is utter genius.

They were a great collective, but most certainly missed Waters lyrical and creative input after the collective egos basically tore the band apart.

I would imagine that all would now admit to having played a part in that.
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
Back to Top
Ronnie Pilgrim View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 09 2010
Location: The South of TX
Status: Offline
Points: 771
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2010 at 07:09
Originally posted by Proletariat Proletariat wrote:

Originally posted by RoyFairbank RoyFairbank wrote:

He is Pink Floyd.
Roger had a vision, a conscience and an intelligent plan. Gilmour, the only other serious writer in the Floyd, was completely groundless and incapable when it came to writing ART and not just music. Roger made his guitar work meaningful. When Roger left David HIRED a bunch of great writers and they put together a MUSICAL copycat of Pink Floyd that is quite good, but misses the intellectual points of Floyd as seen in Rog's works Pros and Cons and Amused to Death.

Rog's show is brilliant by the way.
waters? itellectual? if he were a writer he would not be a writer of great literature. he would be a memoirist writing books along the same line as "A Million Little Pieces"... Great, Interesting, Powerfull.... yet full of contradictions and exaggerations and unbearably repetitive.
 


Good points, Roy, Prolie. Finally, someone who sees that Roger is only an average lyricist. I am a big Waters/Floyd fan, but a realist. After all, it's the slight imperfections that give music a human warmth. Heart


Edited by Ronnie Pilgrim - July 12 2010 at 07:29
Back to Top
Proletariat View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 30 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1882
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2010 at 01:27
Originally posted by RoyFairbank RoyFairbank wrote:

I totally oppose any insult to Roger. He is Pink Floyd. Pink Floyd was nothing before Syd Left. Psychadelic bullsh*t, decent for that, but punchless. When the band was democratic they sucked even worst. Only when Roger took charge and began writing material "selfishly" did the greatest rock works come to life.

Roger had a vision, a conscience and an intelligent plan. Gilmour, the only other serious writer in the Floyd, was completely groundless and incapable when it came to writing ART and not just music. Roger made his guitar work meaningful. When Roger left David HIRED a bunch of great writers and they put together a MUSICAL copycat of Pink Floyd that is quite good, but misses the intellectual points of Floyd as seen in Rog's works Pros and Cons and Amused to Death.

Rog's show is brilliant by the way.
waters? itellectual? if he were a writer he would not be a writer of great literature. he would be a memoirist writing books along the same line as "A Million Little Pieces"... Great, Interesting, Powerfull.... yet full of contradictions and exaggerations and unbearably repetitive.
 
Also, had the Floyd disbanded after pipers they would be sitting over in canterburry and not space rock and would likely be considered a long lost gem. Syd was a great songwriter. His solo work has never made me as depressed as waters solo work does.
who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.176 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.