Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Masterpieces or not ?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedMasterpieces or not ?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
DavidInsabella View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 317
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Masterpieces or not ?
    Posted: May 26 2005 at 17:30
Originally posted by Titan Titan wrote:

We have a lot of "masterpieces": Dark Side Of The moon, Close To the edge, Foxtrot, Wish you were here etc.

iam curious which "masterpieces" you dont consider as masterpiece

for example me:

Close to the edge: really great album without doubt, but too overrated, i heard a lot of better albums than this, Yes has better albums imo, (Relayer)

I don't concider anything by Pink Floyd to be a masterpiece really. They're above the regular standards though.
Life seemed to him merely like a gallery of how to be.
Back to Top
Dragon Phoenix View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 31 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 1475
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 26 2005 at 17:12

Excellent post jojim.

Back to Top
jojim View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 27 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 155
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 26 2005 at 17:11
Can't you all see that taste is a feeling depending on time, personal circumstances and knowlegde???? - I personally like "Close to the edge" by YES, I like "Selling England ..." by GENESIS, but I dislike RUSH "Moving pictures". I can tell you why. For me, really very personally, the RUSH record has no development in the musical time line. So I don't like it very much. I can listen to it, but I'm far away from loving it. "Selling England ..." makes my hair standing up on my  back. That is a criteria of quality - for me. For others RUSH is doing the same job. But not for me. - The question is: why? And no one can tell you the reason for that. It is taste. Pure taste. It's a part of getting socialized, having special backgrounds or being born in a certain year. - There is no link between them. It just exists. The different taste.

What is taste?

Stop it.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 26 2005 at 12:18
Originally posted by Dazo Dazo wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

I thought this thread was about masterpieces that members didn't like , not "name the albums that you think are masterpieces"

Anyway, any album that is claimed to be a masterpiece is a bit of a pretentious claim IMO

"Pretentious Moi"   

(anag)

 

Was I being a pretentious dyxlexic?

Back to Top
Dazo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 20 2005
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 178
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2005 at 19:37
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

I thought this thread was about masterpieces that members didn't like , not "name the albums that you think are masterpieces"

Anyway, any album that is claimed to be a masterpiece is a bit of a pretentious claim IMO

"Pretentious Moi"   

(anag)

 

Back to Top
BebieM View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 01 2004
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 854
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2005 at 19:29
Originally posted by Heptade Heptade wrote:



Why? Because I'm me...was it nature or nurture? Did my parents warp my
mind in some way that resulted in a lack of appreciation for Anglagard?
Who knows.


Yes, and that's why you deserve to die
 
Back to Top
Heptade View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: May 19 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 427
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2005 at 13:29
From the Oxford Dictionary:

masterpiece 1 an outstanding piece of artistry or workmanship
2 a person's best work

Sounds pretty subjective to me...for instance, I consider Grave New World
to be the Strawbs' best work. I don't consider Hybris to be an outstanding
piece of artistry.

Why? Because I'm me...was it nature or nurture? Did my parents warp my
mind in some way that resulted in a lack of appreciation for Anglagard?
Who knows.
Back to Top
lpd42 View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: May 09 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 60
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2005 at 12:58
foxtrot is hardly a masterpiece, considering "The Lamb Lies Down On
Broadway," which can blow it away any day of the week!!!!!!
Blarg! My cheese has bones!
Back to Top
Dick Heath View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock Specialist

Joined: April 19 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 12818
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2005 at 07:13

[QUOTE=Heptade]Grave New World is indeed a masterpiece. QUOTE]

 

A record I get out and play occasionally nowadays - indeed played New World on my radioshow last Thursday - but never a masterpiece to my ears (one reason evident: because it only comes to play  with me on occasions not regularly or often).

Back to Top
spectral View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 04 2005
Location: Vatican City State
Status: Offline
Points: 1422
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2005 at 04:33
I was just fooling around.  beauty is in the eye of the beholder after all.  There are various albums I consider masterpieces, but I try to use that word sparingly.
"...misty halos made visible by the spectral illumination of moonshine."
Back to Top
BebieM View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 01 2004
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 854
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2005 at 22:00
Originally posted by spectral spectral wrote:

Any hoot, calling something a masterpiece is a subjective viewpoint and that is just plain wrong.



why is a subjective statement about music plain wrong?
It's quite obvious that albums are only masterpieces for particular people and not for everyone. And that's what the thread's asking for...
so what's wrong about that?
 
Back to Top
Joren View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 07 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 6667
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2005 at 19:59
Originally posted by Titan Titan wrote:

We have a lot of "masterpieces": Dark Side Of The moon, Close To the edge, Foxtrot, Wish you were here etc.

iam curious which "masterpieces" you dont consider as masterpiece

for example me:

Close to the edge: really great album without doubt, but too overrated, i heard a lot of better albums than this, Yes has better albums imo, (Relayer)

DSOTM, CTTE, they do not deserve 5 stars IMO (DSOTM 3, CTTE 4 or 4,5) the other two I haven't heard yet.



Edited by Joren
Back to Top
atomicbomb View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: May 22 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2005 at 19:57

foxtrot!!! it's a great album, of course, but for me it's a 4 stars.

crime of the century....

tales from topographic oceans....

not to mention the two most absurd overrating cases in all history:

frances the mute and DITC - the mars volta,.......whoever sayd that a reflex of the overall poor quality of newer releases is probably right.....good albums thought

Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 29415
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2005 at 18:53

Originally posted by Cygnus X-2 Cygnus X-2 wrote:

For me Dark Side of the Moon: A lot of filler and it's terribly, I mean TERRIBLY overrated.

Quite agree.There is filler indeed.2 great tracks (Time and Us And Them) surrounded by mediocrity.I love WYWH and Animals(both true masterpeices) but DSOTM leaves me totally underwelmed. 

Back to Top
alchemist View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 31 2005
Location: Colombia
Status: Offline
Points: 119
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2005 at 18:23
Lark's Tongue in Aspic is starting to annoy me, so if u consider it a masterpiece, I disagree.
And a Farewell to Kings, just don't conside it a masterpiece....
no great genius has existed without a touch of madness...
Back to Top
spectral View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 04 2005
Location: Vatican City State
Status: Offline
Points: 1422
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2005 at 18:20

"99% of cases"...I would say that is too high, Snow Dog.

Using the Bovineswab statistical algorithm, I would put the value nearer to 98.49%.

Any hoot, calling something a masterpiece is a subjective viewpoint and that is just plain wrong.

 

"...misty halos made visible by the spectral illumination of moonshine."
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2005 at 18:14
Originally posted by spectral spectral wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Anyway, any album that is claimed to be a masterpiece is a bit of a pretentious claim IMO

Are you saying that the band are pretentious or the person who makes the claim is pretentious?

Anyway, can any album truly be called a masterpiece?  Is there actually an album which everyone considers flawless...I doubt it - in which case, there can never really be a masterpiece.

I would say that whoever claimed it.........pretentious and a bit precious too!........in about 99% of cases

I'm making this up as I go along you know, sounds alright tho

Back to Top
Progger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1188
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2005 at 18:09

[/QUOTE]

Sorry... but a lot of Genesis bores me to tears...

[/QUOTE]

I agree, their albums arn't consistent enough to be called masterpieces. Even Tony Banks & Phil Collins state as much if you read their interviews. I think people just get too over protective of them just because thay are their favourite band. Put Genesis's 70's album against Yes, ELP & Pink Floyd & it's impossible to compare!

Back to Top
spectral View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 04 2005
Location: Vatican City State
Status: Offline
Points: 1422
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2005 at 18:09
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Anyway, any album that is claimed to be a masterpiece is a bit of a pretentious claim IMO

Are you saying that the band are pretentious or the person who makes the claim is pretentious?

Anyway, can any album truly be called a masterpiece?  Is there actually an album which everyone considers flawless...I doubt it - in which case, there can never really be a masterpiece.

"...misty halos made visible by the spectral illumination of moonshine."
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2005 at 18:05

Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

No!
Fragile is the best, by far!

No!

It is Relayer....Honest!

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.172 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.