Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Report errors & omissions here
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - UH 40
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedUH 40
 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
NotAProghead View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Errors & Omissions Team

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 7851 		Direct Link To This Post Topic: UH 40
    Posted: October 13 2009 at 18:48
Killer argument Thumbs Up. We already have enough definitions.
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2009 at 18:31

I think that going to the trouble of creating definitions, (which most of the people who add albums will probably never read anyway), over an exception is unnecessary.
What?
Back to Top
NotAProghead View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Errors & Omissions Team

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 7851 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2009 at 18:20
I can't agree and don't see much sense in words "they've re-recorded a compilation".
Though I don't care much, let it stay in Compilations.

But it seems we need definitions of "Studio album" and "Compilation" for the site.
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2009 at 15:06
I disagree - there is nothing to say that a compilation should be the original recordings - if they had re-recorded a whole album, like Oldfied or Eloy did then it could be called a studio album - but they've re-recorded a compilation, which makes it still a compilation.
What?
Back to Top
NotAProghead View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Errors & Omissions Team

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 7851 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2009 at 13:58
I don't agree - it was recorded in the studio specially for this release, tracks were not taken from other albums.

I think it should stay in Studio albums section, no matter that there are only 2 completely new tracks.
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2009 at 13:53
fixed
What?
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2009 at 13:27
Uriah Heep has an album called Celebration: 40 Years of Rock.

It is listed as a studio album when it is clearly a compilation (although with two new tracks).

Shouldn't this be moved to box sets / compilations?
https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.521 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.