Topics with more than 4000 posts closed |
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Author | |||
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer Joined: July 04 2005 Location: Malaria Status: Offline Points: 89372 |
Topic: Topics with more than 4000 posts closed Posted: August 25 2008 at 14:18 |
||
We used to have a chat facility and although it was initially used for a while, it died a very quick death.
The issue for me with a chat facility, is that when there are lots of people present in them, they are almost impossible to keep track of. Also, people soon seem to turn to nonsensical stuff and go off topic and it gets quite annoying. With a dedicated thread, people can reply to things in their leisure. Somebody may go away for a few days and upon return, they will be able to go through previous pages and find out if they have missed anything So that's a very useful thing for me. Also, I do not want to spend all my time in a chat facility, when I can take a break and not miss anything, because I browse back at things in my leisure. |
|||
|
|||
darkshade
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: November 19 2005 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 10964 |
Posted: August 24 2008 at 19:53 | ||
it would be cool if this forum had an online chat room you could go to, like Prog Archives AIM or something haha. That'd probably save some bandwidth, cause who's going to reference general chats?
|
|||
Abstrakt
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 18 2005 Location: Soundgarden Status: Offline Points: 18292 |
Posted: August 24 2008 at 05:40 | ||
Seems to have helped a bit. Havn't got those annoying error things for a while.
Yesterday, PA was slooow, though. But then, so was every other page aswell. |
|||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Online Points: 35691 |
Posted: August 13 2008 at 20:45 | ||
A hidden thread is accessible if you know the URL though, so just bookmark a page of a to be hidden topic (I've found some old ones using google cache, history, or just playing around with the numbers of forum threads). |
|||
micky
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46833 |
Posted: August 12 2008 at 18:05 | ||
thanks guys.. probably my computer.. .was fine yesterday along with everyone.. but the site is SLOW today in spots ... funny thing is.. not having a problem loading other sites. Oh well... Edited by micky - August 12 2008 at 18:06 |
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
Pnoom!
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 02 2006 Location: OH Status: Offline Points: 4981 |
Posted: August 12 2008 at 18:04 | ||
Same here, TGM.
Also, since it pretty much got lost on the last page:
|
|||
TGM: Orb
Prog Reviewer Joined: October 21 2007 Location: n/a Status: Offline Points: 8052 |
Posted: August 12 2008 at 18:00 | ||
^
Not had that, myself, mick. PA has been peachy as a peach since this thing for me. |
|||
micky
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46833 |
Posted: August 12 2008 at 17:48 | ||
getting error messages again.. and long waits for pages to load... not sure if it is just me... still on my old war-horse of a computer. Need to get the new one going and use that I guess hahah.
|
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
Pnoom!
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 02 2006 Location: OH Status: Offline Points: 4981 |
Posted: August 12 2008 at 17:26 | ||
Especially since they would only appear temporarily, and there would only be one or two at a time at most given how long they take to reach 4000 posts.
|
|||
Padraic
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 16 2006 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 31169 |
Posted: August 12 2008 at 17:19 | ||
A solution like this sounds reasonable - and there aren't many prog forum threads of this size, so it shouldn't effect performance too much, I would think. |
|||
Pnoom!
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 02 2006 Location: OH Status: Offline Points: 4981 |
Posted: August 12 2008 at 16:35 | ||
Here's my ideal solution:
When a useful thread (like RIO drop in) reaches 4000 posts, close it and sticky it for two months. That way, people can still have access to the latest suggestions in it for a good while. After the two months, when people have gleaned the info they need from it, then hide it, since the new thread will have taken off and the old one won't be needed anymore. That way, the site isn't significantly slowed down by larger threads (since the threads like Rio Drop In take a long time to reach 4000, meaning there will only be a handful of stickied large threads at a time, if that) that linger forever, and people don't lose the information they need. Of course Velvet Rooms and the like can disappear as they reach 4000. Edited by Pnoom! - August 12 2008 at 16:36 |
|||
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
Posted: August 12 2008 at 16:32 | ||
The reason the threads are hidden too is so that they are no accessed during searches etc. The point about being able to refer back for info is taken, although finding such posts in a very large thread may prove challenging anyway.
Let's see how much improvement there is, then look to see if M@x can find any compromises.
|
|||
Pnoom!
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 02 2006 Location: OH Status: Offline Points: 4981 |
Posted: August 12 2008 at 15:58 | ||
Or just exploiting the rules
|
|||
Henry Plainview
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 26 2008 Location: Declined Status: Offline Points: 16715 |
Posted: August 12 2008 at 15:55 | ||
Now that's thinking outside the box!
|
|||
if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
|||
Pnoom!
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 02 2006 Location: OH Status: Offline Points: 4981 |
Posted: August 12 2008 at 13:48 | ||
So I think the idea is start a new thread at 3500 so it doesn't get to 4000, and then it doesn't get hidden. |
|||
Man With Hat
Collaborator Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team Joined: March 12 2005 Location: Neurotica Status: Offline Points: 166178 |
Posted: August 12 2008 at 13:01 | ||
Ironically I got a timeout error when trying to post in this thread last night....
|
|||
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect. |
|||
Henry Plainview
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 26 2008 Location: Declined Status: Offline Points: 16715 |
Posted: August 12 2008 at 12:54 | ||
EL said hidden. Deleting the chat threads is fine (in fact it's probably what we should have been doing originally), but it really would make me sad not to be able to go through some of those old appreciation threads. Yes, you could ask whatever question you have again, but some people aren't posting as much anymore... |
|||
if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
|||
Slartibartfast
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam Joined: April 29 2006 Location: Atlantais Status: Offline Points: 29630 |
Posted: August 12 2008 at 12:45 | ||
If I'm not mistaken old threads are still accessible but stopped at 4000, so all you have to do is start a new one after 4000 to keep it alive?
|
|||
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|||
Pnoom!
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 02 2006 Location: OH Status: Offline Points: 4981 |
Posted: August 12 2008 at 11:41 | ||
I know, it's just the hypocrisy of banning the chat room for young people and not old people simply because young people aren't boring and slow and thus clog up the server more that bugs me. |
|||
Padraic
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 16 2006 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 31169 |
Posted: August 12 2008 at 11:33 | ||
Hmm. This does pose a bit of a problem. I have no problem with throwing old VR threads in the trash, but those appreciation threads do have a lot of useful information - it would really be a shame to not be able to access them.
edit: is there any way to implement a sliding window, such that for every new post > 4000 the oldest post in the thread is removed? Edited by NaturalScience - August 12 2008 at 11:35 |
|||
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |