Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - the pope turns "green". what do you think?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closedthe pope turns "green". what do you think?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 9>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
markosherrera View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 01 2006
Location: World
Status: Offline
Points: 3252
Direct Link To This Post Topic: the pope turns "green". what do you think?
    Posted: April 09 2008 at 12:27

The video of killed  Seals was in Canada(more than 300000 in one years) only because the skin is expensive



Edited by markosherrera - April 09 2008 at 12:32
Hi progmaniacs of all the world
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 09 2008 at 12:13
^ that's fine Markos - the (hidden) video without explanation of why you posted it could be seen as inflamatory. However, due to the graphic nature of the images, I will keep it hidden.

Edited by darqDean - April 09 2008 at 12:13
What?
Back to Top
markosherrera View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 01 2006
Location: World
Status: Offline
Points: 3252
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 09 2008 at 12:04
In the video that I send there are images of how the humans are cruel with the nature ,how kill animals in the artic like whales,or tigers ,lions in the jungle or bulls in bullfighting or corridad de toros,the human are the biggest predators ,so I defend the Pope ,because he want that humanity stop the ecocide an d respect the animals
 
 
Hey In my country ..Chavez forbade or prohibited THE SIMPSONS....BIG CENSURE Angry
 


Edited by markosherrera - April 09 2008 at 12:09
Hi progmaniacs of all the world
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 09 2008 at 07:11
Originally posted by StyLaZyn StyLaZyn wrote:

Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Up next, the pope turns a whiter shade of pale, what do you think?
 
Is this in reference to him being the Last Pope?
 
 


Sorry, just a play on this thread's title and a Procol Harum song title.
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65613
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 08 2008 at 17:16
 ^ yeah headlines are usually quite deceptive, I'm always surprised what the real story is when compared to the hype

I really give modern Germany credit for facing their past.. and from what I'm told by those who've visited, Berlin has become one of the most civilized, art-oriented cities in the world


Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 08 2008 at 16:22
OK
 


Edited by StyLaZyn - April 08 2008 at 16:24
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 08 2008 at 16:13

Please, Stylasyn, I haven't been born yesterday, you mention that article because most people will only read the heading and believe it.

I'm just explaining what the article says.

Iván

            
Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 08 2008 at 15:55
Calm down. Did you ever think that's why I said it was a coincidence? Patience.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 08 2008 at 15:39
Originally posted by StyLaZyn StyLaZyn wrote:

Here's a brand new link to check out. What coincidence.
 
 
 
Bravo, do you understand what you read, or just worried about the heading?:
 
  1. This report was written by the Vatican.
  2. It's obvious Vatican had nothing to do with this abuse commiten INSIDE GERMANY UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE SS,
  3. As a fact the article clearly specifies that all those people under the GERMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, SURVIVED, something thatdidn't happened to most of the people in the same conditions.

Do you believe for God's sake that the  German Priests had any control over what was done in the monasteries by the SS??????

The SS entered to a monastery, office, building, castle, etc, created a military office and took absolute control of everything, read a bit of history.
 
Quote The 703-page official report documents the fate of 1,075 prisoners of war and 4,829 civilians who were forced to work for the Nazis in nearly 800 Catholic institutions   http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24012634/ 
 
The  article doesn't say they were forced to work for the Church, they were forced to work for the NAZIS inside buildings or constructions originally owned by the German Catholic Church, it doesn't say they were forced to work for the Catholic Church!!!!!Angry
 
As a fact the article explains it:
 
Quote Hitler's feared SS expropriated more than 300 monasteries and Catholic institutions between 1940 and 1942 and thousands of Catholics were sent to concentration camps, said Karl-Joseph Hummel, co-author of the book.
 
So yes, this people were forced to work in monateries CONTROLLED BY THE SS, NOT BY THE CHURCH, BECAUSE THEY WERE EXPROPIATED IN 1942!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
As a fact, Priests had no control, or do you believe that the priests and nuns were using machine guns to force them to work, if you think so, you know nothing about war OR HISTORY, because no SS would give weapons to anybody that could be a danger to them. 
 
A POW has an obligation to escape SO THEY MUST BE CONTROLLED BY MILITARY PERSONEL, OR DO YOU BELIEVE A NUN CAN CONTROL A TRAINED SARGENT OR MARINE?????.
 
 I'm 200% sure that the German army and SS were the ones who had control over military personel in the monasteries, cadtles, pribvate houses, etc most surely the monks were as prissoners as the other prissoners
 
Please, before giving links that are obviously tendencious, read and think a bit.
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - April 08 2008 at 21:53
            
Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 08 2008 at 13:56
Here's a brand new link to check out. What coincidence.
 
 
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 08 2008 at 12:08
Originally posted by StyLaZyn StyLaZyn wrote:

 
Thank you for your submission. You misspelled a word and I read it "Cathaholic." LOL
 
 
 
The point is not a typo Stylasyn, the point is spreading lies that contradict history without any verification.
 
BTW: I may have a few problems writing in a foreign language, but I don't have problems with the truth (Not talking abouyt spiritual issues, but about facts that can be verified).Wink
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - April 08 2008 at 12:10
            
Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 08 2008 at 08:29
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by StyLaZyn StyLaZyn wrote:



BTW...unless I'm mistaken, Hitler and the Catholic Church were quite cozy together.
 
You are mistaken, as a fact the Vatican hosted  8,683  Jewishs diring WWII behind their walls or in other Cathholic safe houses, ignorants criticize the Church for a weak position.
......
 
Iván

 
Thank you for your submission. You misspelled a word and I read it "Cathaholic." LOL
 
 
Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 08 2008 at 08:27
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Up next, the pope turns a whiter shade of pale, what do you think?
 
Is this in reference to him being the Last Pope?
 
 
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 08 2008 at 08:19
Up next, the pope turns a whiter shade of pale, what do you think?
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 08 2008 at 01:09
If I may just throw a comment here, the thing is that in dictatorships like Hitler's or Stalin's, the actual "party" and the "system" become a religion. Nazism in itself was also a cult and a sort of religion so it was never going to embrace catholicism. if you analyze dritten reich events and everything around it, it's a cult: processions, parades, banners, flames, signs, big swastika crosses and always the face of the redeemer omnipresent. very much the same with the USSR when it was less personal and more partisan, where the religion was created around the communist signs (hammer and hickle), around the apostles (marx, engels, lenin), and with mighty parades that only served to show the people the new god: the state. Other dictatorships that were more leaning to the right side like Pinochet's tried to get closer to the catholic church with mixed results. So, some religion is always present. Just not the one you think. if some catholics were with hitler, many weren't. If some atheists were with Stalin, many weren't. That the leader himself is one or the other doesn't matter: in the end his persona will assume the role of God, so big ego is on this problems. In china Mao created a "bible" (the red book), so in the end these dictatorships always try to capture the essence of cults and belief systems and convert them to their needs. it's not exclusive of catholics or atheists. Actually, both catholicism and atheism are thrown aside to the gutter once the new Cult is powerful enough to dominate, like with Mussolinni.  Don't blame either one. Blame the PEOPLE. blame Hitler, not Germany. Blame an specific priest or bishop, not the whole thing. Blame the person, not his disbelief. Actually, the only true atheist revolution in history (where all type of cultism was eliminated) which was the cambodian one was.. well.... in the end it degenerated into another cult, a cult to "Angka". So, it's not that atheists make it much better. The lack of a hypothetical powerful God above people makes them believe, sometimes, when they have all the power, that they're actually Gods.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 07 2008 at 23:39
Originally posted by StyLaZyn StyLaZyn wrote:



BTW...unless I'm mistaken, Hitler and the Catholic Church were quite cozy together.
 
You are mistaken, as a fact the Vatican hosted  8,683  Jewishs diring WWII behind their walls or in other Cathholic safe houses, ignorants criticize the Church for a weak position.
 
FOR GOD'S SAKE WHT ELSE DO YOU EXPECT FROM A LESS THAN 1/2  SQUARE KILOMETER COUNTRY WITH 100 SOLDIERS ARMED WITH LANTZES???
 
Did you ewanted Pius XII to declare the war too Hitler /while Chamberlain and Roosevelt were doing nothing)  and be invaded and a fake Pope placed in Berlin with the consequence of  the 8,693  refugees killed?
 
Have you read about Monsignor Hugues O'Flaherty ( http://www.geocities.com/msgr_hughoflaherty/chapter1.html ) who with the knowledge of Pius XII saved thousands of Italian Jewishs, of course this was silenced by the Britishs, because Monsignor was Irish and never hided his dislike for England.
 
Of 9,700 Roman Jews, 1,007 were shipped to Auschwitz. The rest were hidden, 5,000 of them by the official Church--3,000 in Castel Gandolfo (The Pope's summer residence), 200 or 400 (estimates vary) as "members" of the Palatine Guard and some 1,500 in monasteries, convents and colleges. The remaining 3,700 were hidden in private homes, including Msgr. O'Flaherty's network of apartments.
 
Msgr O'Flaherty also hidded several hundreed of POW, nearly 40,000 Italian Jews were hidden by humble proiests, what else do you want for a city with no army in the middle of an enemy country as Italy?
 
O’Flaherty was made a Commander of the British Empire, and awarded the US Medal of Freedom with Silver Palm. (All such decorations were sent to his sister in Ireland, to be kept in a drawer.) Italy offered him a lifelong pension, but he refused to use it.
 
But of coutrse nobody talks about this, it's better to accuse the Church without any proves.
 
I first heard this when a co-worker, who is a Seventh Day Adventist and looking for new joins, told me that Hilter met regularly with cardinals and other high level Catholics, including Pope Pius XII. I was told Roman Catholism was to be the official religion of the New Reich.
 
This is BS from somebody who doesn't like Catholic Church, as a fact in 1937 the Pope issued an Encyclical called "Mit BrennenderSorge" attacking the Nazi Government, yes, when England or USA did nothing to stop Hitler, the Pope was already protesting.
 
About the official Nazi Chuch, Hitler created the "Reich Church" in 1936 which as a fact was Protestant and Hitler placed Ludwig Muller as Reich Bishop.
 
The plans of Hitler were to invade the Vatican at the smallest provocation of the Pope, kill him and create a new Papacy in Berlin, what would had been chaotic.
 
 This doesn't mean I believe it but there are some incriminating photos out there.
 
Show them please, the only photos of Hitler with an offuicial Churchis with the Reich Church.
 
 
 
Here's the kicker. At the time, I was a regular communion taking church goer abiding by the Law. I couldn't believe what he was telling me and denied it blue. Odd how things change.
 
You are ready to believe? Why don't you read books, it's all in them, it's easy to find about it.
 
Please stop inventing lies about the Catholic Church quoting unreliable sources with the excuse "This doesn't mean I believe it" after already you spread the lie, everything is in black and white, you just need to search a little.
 
Iván



Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - April 07 2008 at 23:46
            
Back to Top
Salvo_ View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 27 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 110
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 07 2008 at 20:54
Originally posted by StyLaZyn StyLaZyn wrote:

Likewise, some evil atheists don't invalidate any positive change atheists bring.

BTW...unless I'm mistaken, Hitler and the Catholic Church were quite cozy together. I first heard this when a co-worker, who is a Seventh Day Adventist and looking for new joins, told me that Hilter met regularly with cardinals and other high level Catholics, including Pope Pius XII. I was told Roman Catholism was to be the official religion of the New Reich. This doesn't mean I believe it but there are some incriminating photos out there. Here's the kicker. At the time, I was a regular communion taking church goer abiding by the Law. I couldn't believe what he was telling me and denied it blue. Odd how things change.
Yeah...That's pretty much slander spread by those who wish to discredit the Church. You can find some "pretty incriminating" evidence for almost anything--just ask a 9/11 Truther. However, that doesn't really matter, as there were many popes in the past who did much worse things than maybe be kind of complicit with Nazi Germany by not violently protesting and risking Church sovereignty.
 
But this is off-topic, and, honestly, pretty retarded.


Edited by Salvo_ - April 07 2008 at 20:57
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 07 2008 at 20:46
Originally posted by darqDean darqDean wrote:

Originally posted by Salvo_ Salvo_ wrote:

I'm sorry that that happens, but some evil people doesn't invalidate anything. Need I remind you that the most ruthless dictators of the 20th century were athiest? (Not Godwinning the thread because Hitler's atheism is questionable)
That's not a strictly accurate statement - many of the 20th Century's dictators (or Presidents-for-life) were not athiest, yet still managed to be ruthless and "evil". Stalin's atheism also waivered.

Not only that, but Stalin's arm quavered. Hard to tell which was more important to history.
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 07 2008 at 20:18
Originally posted by Salvo_ Salvo_ wrote:

I'm sorry that that happens, but some evil people doesn't invalidate anything. Need I remind you that the most ruthless dictators of the 20th century were athiest? (Not Godwinning the thread because Hitler's atheism is questionable)
That's not a strictly accurate statement - many of the 20th Century's dictators (or Presidents-for-life) were not athiest, yet still managed to be ruthless and "evil". Stalin's atheism also waivered.
What?
Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 07 2008 at 19:59
Likewise, some evil atheists don't invalidate any positive change atheists bring.

BTW...unless I'm mistaken, Hitler and the Catholic Church were quite cozy together. I first heard this when a co-worker, who is a Seventh Day Adventist and looking for new joins, told me that Hilter met regularly with cardinals and other high level Catholics, including Pope Pius XII. I was told Roman Catholism was to be the official religion of the New Reich. This doesn't mean I believe it but there are some incriminating photos out there. Here's the kicker. At the time, I was a regular communion taking church goer abiding by the Law. I couldn't believe what he was telling me and denied it blue. Odd how things change.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 9>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.234 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.