Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - ProgArchives on Wikipedia!
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedProgArchives on Wikipedia!

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 7>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Bj-1 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 04 2005
Location: No(r)Way
Status: Offline
Points: 31644
Direct Link To This Post Topic: ProgArchives on Wikipedia!
    Posted: August 11 2006 at 21:27

That one got deleted too.Ouch Luckily, I saw what you wrote before it got deleted. Nice oneLOL

RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2006 at 00:45
LOL
Back to Top
The Miracle View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 09 2006 at 17:33
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006_August_4#4_August_2006
 
The last entry on that page is mine on PA. add something if you feel like itTongue 
Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67451
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 09 2006 at 16:15
Cry
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 09 2006 at 15:51
revived this to tell the saddening news, Wikipedia erased the article...
Back to Top
JrKASperov View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 07 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 904
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2006 at 14:15
Originally posted by NutterAlert NutterAlert wrote:

I think entry for P.A on Wikipedia should read:
 
MOSTLY HARMLESS
 
Tongue


In friendly large yellow letters.
Epic.
Back to Top
GoldenSpiral View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3839
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2006 at 13:31
Originally posted by Bryan Bryan wrote:

Originally posted by The Miracle The Miracle wrote:

Originally posted by Cygnus X-2 Cygnus X-2 wrote:

"Prog Folk Team and The Post Rock Team PA's smallest genre team."

Are you kidding? Stonie and I are the only ones on Neo Team as of now (because Greenback hasn't posted in almost two months. You can imagine what would happen if we disagreed on a topic.LOL


LOLLOL... That's not possible!

But he post rock team consists of GS alone and Bryan who is also a PM specialistWink
 
Funny you should say that considering Jimbo does probably the most work of any post-rock team member... Tongue
 
I think the folk-prog team is pretty much just Hughes though. LOL


Hey now, that's only because I can't add bands yet! Tongue
http://www.myspace.com/altaic
ALTAIC

"Oceans Down You'll Lie"
coming soon
Back to Top
Bryan View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 01 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3013
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2006 at 13:27
Originally posted by The Miracle The Miracle wrote:

Originally posted by Cygnus X-2 Cygnus X-2 wrote:

"Prog Folk Team and The Post Rock Team PA's smallest genre team."

Are you kidding? Stonie and I are the only ones on Neo Team as of now (because Greenback hasn't posted in almost two months. You can imagine what would happen if we disagreed on a topic.LOL


LOLLOL... That's not possible!

But he post rock team consists of GS alone and Bryan who is also a PM specialistWink
 
Funny you should say that considering Jimbo does probably the most work of any post-rock team member... Tongue
 
I think the folk-prog team is pretty much just Hughes though. LOL
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2006 at 06:56
Originally posted by NutterAlert NutterAlert wrote:

Hey Rico, Don't be so harsh on Wikipedia. I just went there and searched for Ricochet and I found the reason why you chose your name for this forum:
 
 
Do you still have the tartan trousers?
 
 
 


LOLClap

I'm not harsh on Wikipedia though. Confused

LOL
Back to Top
NutterAlert View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 07 2005
Location: In transition
Status: Offline
Points: 2808
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2006 at 06:55
Hey Rico, Don't be so harsh on Wikipedia. I just went there and searched for Ricochet and I found the reason why you chose your name for this forum:
 
 
Do you still have the tartan trousers?
 
 
 
Proud to be an un-banned member since 2005
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2006 at 06:38
Not a very coherent conversation, Imo, I'm standing by my opinion.
Back to Top
imoeng View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 03 2006
Location: Indonesia
Status: Offline
Points: 2450
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2006 at 06:32
Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

Why should I,Imo? I'm not fit for something like that.Nor do I have the references or the desire to manage something like that. In my opinion, Prog Archives should be an external link or most of all a connotation of "a fabulous, extensive, extraordinary reference to prog rock and et etcaetera" Confused inside the progressive rock main section of Wikipedia.

This side exteriorization of the site and of the forum is merely a mellow appreciation of its value. You literally explain the features of the site and the definition of the section, you succintly describe the normal characteristic and so on...

I don't want to elaborate much on this, yet I don't really feel content with what was made. And a "d.i.y. then" response is also something I don't consider valorous...
 
So what you were saying is there shouldn't be a PA article on wiki? Is that because of the entry James and I have put in or you just simply dont want it there? Confused 
 
If its because of the information there, why dont you make it better? Because you dont have the desire to do so? Well I do, and I think many people here as well, as I reckon its better to improve than delete. Moreover, I rather silent than say something like you said.
 
I think progarchives is one of the biggest reference (and there is also progarchives.com in the external links on prog rock article) in progressive rock and deserves a place on wiki.
 
 

Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2006 at 05:58
So you have a banana as a pet??!
Back to Top
Hierophant View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 11 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 651
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2006 at 05:55
What are wikipedia's guidlines for entries? can I just make an entry on "my pet banana" and have it stay there?
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2006 at 04:55
Why should I,Imo? I'm not fit for something like that.Nor do I have the references or the desire to manage something like that. In my opinion, Prog Archives should be an external link or most of all a connotation of "a fabulous, extensive, extraordinary reference to prog rock and et etcaetera" Confused inside the progressive rock main section of Wikipedia.

This side exteriorization of the site and of the forum is merely a mellow appreciation of its value. You literally explain the features of the site and the definition of the section, you succintly describe the normal characteristic and so on...

I don't want to elaborate much on this, yet I don't really feel content with what was made. And a "d.i.y. then" response is also something I don't consider valorous...


Edited by Ricochet - July 25 2006 at 04:55
Back to Top
NutterAlert View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 07 2005
Location: In transition
Status: Offline
Points: 2808
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2006 at 04:13
I think entry for P.A on Wikipedia should read:
 
MOSTLY HARMLESS
 
Tongue
Proud to be an un-banned member since 2005
Back to Top
imoeng View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 03 2006
Location: Indonesia
Status: Offline
Points: 2450
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2006 at 03:26
So its Rico?? Shocked
 
But Rico, why dont you make it perfect rather than say "delete'???

Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2006 at 01:05
Oh, is that you, Rico?

There are other websites with forums that have wikipedia entries, so we thought it would be a good idea to add a wiki for the page.

If it goes, it goes, I understand the reasons for it.
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2006 at 00:57
Well,balance of the discussion means little in front of argumentations...

Only one clue: Tellier-Craig.
Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2006 at 00:54
But the deletes are 6 and the keeps are 3, so it's looking likely to be deleted.

By the way, I was curious as to why you wanted it deleted?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 7>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.176 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.