Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Should PA have a Psych Rock Lounge?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedShould PA have a Psych Rock Lounge?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Guldbamsen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Should PA have a Psych Rock Lounge?
    Posted: December 24 2014 at 04:06
I don't think I understand that either? We're a prog site y'know😉
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13097
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 23 2014 at 21:40
Originally posted by skane42 skane42 wrote:

Hey I just registered and wanted to update this post and say yes we definitely have to have a lounge like this in PA. 

Which also caters towards real rock and roll. What is happening to this state seriously? 


Real rock and roll? What, like Chuck Berry? And which state are you referring to?
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
skane42 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: December 23 2014
Location: PA
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 23 2014 at 21:33
Hey I just registered and wanted to update this post and say yes we definitely have to have a lounge like this in PA. 

Which also caters towards real rock and roll. What is happening to this state seriously? 
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17777
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 23 2014 at 09:42
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

^Who says women aren't into prog? LOLLOLLOL
 
Excuse me?
 
It says "progressive", not "prog"!
 
Methinks you's looking at something else in the picture!
 
(can't blame you, but what the heck!)
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2014 at 15:33
^Who says women aren't into prog? LOLLOLLOL
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
TODDLER View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 17 2014 at 14:46
LOLLOLLOLLOL
Originally posted by HolyMoly HolyMoly wrote:

YAY Progressive!



LOLLOLLOL.....Shocked...How on earth do I get her face out of my head? She is pasted everywhere on billboards, T.V. screens and internet. I'm starting to look at my wife and see her face instead...OMG....what do I do? Isn't she annoying? Is that suppose to be the concept? She should play a psycho killer in a modern film. A lot of profit could be made from that. Does she ease your day? your pain, if any? She certainly causes me a lot of pain that's for sureLOL     When the progressive woman begins to yell and shout, through a window I would like to throw her out..but I resolve not to do it and here's why, I'm afraid of hitting someone passing by. This is my New Years resolution..Wink



Edited by TODDLER - December 17 2014 at 14:48
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 16 2014 at 16:55
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Originally posted by earlyprog earlyprog wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

This means that non-Prog bands like Country Joe and The Fish are inadmissible because the Psychedelic Rock they played was not Progressive Psychedelic Rock.

It's really as simple as that.
I guess that you two never heard Section 43 and Marauder from the Electronic Sounds album?
 
Shirley you mean Electric Music for the Mind and Body, not Electronic Sounds. Wink

Two songs doth not a Prog album make.


You are correct, Sir. Have a cigar.
 
And don't call me Shirley! (that bugged me all day!Wink)
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2014 at 18:37
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Originally posted by earlyprog earlyprog wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

This means that non-Prog bands like Country Joe and The Fish are inadmissible because the Psychedelic Rock they played was not Progressive Psychedelic Rock.

It's really as simple as that.
I guess that you two never heard Section 43 and Marauder from the Electronic Sounds album?
 
Shirley you mean Electric Music for the Mind and Body, not Electronic Sounds. Wink

Two songs doth not a Prog album make.


What?
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2014 at 14:51
^Fair enough, EP. I'm glad I could alter your consciousness, even if it's with only two songs.
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
earlyprog View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Neo / PSIKE / Heavy Teams

Joined: March 05 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 2134
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2014 at 13:52
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Originally posted by earlyprog earlyprog wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

This means that non-Prog bands like Country Joe and The Fish are inadmissible because the Psychedelic Rock they played was not Progressive Psychedelic Rock.

It's really as simple as that.
I guess that you two never heard Section 43 and Marauder from the Electronic Sounds album?
 

Just did. They are just not sufficient to include the band in a full-prog category like psychedlic/space rock. Proto-prog at the most but again more than two songs are required for that to materialize.

Thanks for pointing me towards these two tunes and the album. Sounds like HP Lovecraft at times.
Back to Top
HolyMoly View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: April 01 2009
Location: Atlanta
Status: Offline
Points: 26138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2014 at 12:41
YAY Progressive!


My other avatar is a Porsche

It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.

-Kehlog Albran
Back to Top
Svetonio View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2014 at 11:48
Originally posted by tamijo tamijo wrote:

how about a progressive World subgenre........................ahh just kid'n
What about Progressive mainstream LOL
Back to Top
Svetonio View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2014 at 11:31
Off the topic - *Progressive electronic* sub should be renamed as *Berlin School of electronic music*, and to add that "ambient" sub for the acts as e.g. Eno, imho.

Edited by Svetonio - December 15 2014 at 11:35
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2014 at 10:56
Originally posted by earlyprog earlyprog wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

This means that non-Prog bands like Country Joe and The Fish are inadmissible because the Psychedelic Rock they played was not Progressive Psychedelic Rock.

It's really as simple as that.
I guess that you two never heard Section 43 and Marauder from the Electronic Sounds album?
 
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
Guldbamsen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2014 at 10:42
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Originally posted by Rivertree Rivertree wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:


 
...

If the criteria to admit them is flawed, out dated and just plain silly (which it seems), then fix it  or start a new sub genre.

...



now that makes it clear what your intention is.

You are not the first to claim such a change, this comes up on and off. But my answer, alongside with Dean, always will be - this is a progressive rock archive, as for that we only are willing to add progressive rock acts to our subgenres - simple as that Smile

would be interesting to know btw how this new subgenre should be named - non-progressive psychedelic/space rock, or something like that?



I know it's in poor taste to answer a question with a question, but what would you call George Harrisons experimental Moog album titled Electronic sounds?
 
Experimental Psychedelic Rock sounds good to me. And it still sounds like progressive rock to me. Wink
 
Now perhaps you can answer a question for me and explain how Brian Eno's ambiant music is considered progressive rock and why it's listed in PA under Experimental Electronic? Shouldn't it be called non-progressive experimental electronic rock instead? Smile


This is a snippet from a post of mine taken from a thread about The Orb:

The thing is that PA is about prog rock, and it's electronic sub only really exists because of the sites

inclusion of Krautrock; a scene so heavily interwoven with pure electronic music, that the two in fact are

inseperable. As a consequence of this, PA (mostly) restricts the electronic sub to acts who can trace a

direct lineage or sound back to the genre's rock roots. Granted we do have other countries chiming in from

along the same time, but then again, most of them were either highly influenced by the Germans or

similarly birthed from the country's own rock scene. 


“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams
Back to Top
tamijo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 06 2009
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 4287
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2014 at 10:25
how about a progressive World subgenre........................ahh just kid'n
Prog is whatevey you want it to be. So dont diss other peoples prog, and they wont diss yours
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2014 at 10:16
Originally posted by Rivertree Rivertree wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:


 
...

If the criteria to admit them is flawed, out dated and just plain silly (which it seems), then fix it  or start a new sub genre.

...



now that makes it clear what your intention is.

You are not the first to claim such a change, this comes up on and off. But my answer, alongside with Dean, always will be - this is a progressive rock archive, as for that we only are willing to add progressive rock acts to our subgenres - simple as that Smile

would be interesting to know btw how this new subgenre should be named - non-progressive psychedelic/space rock, or something like that?



I know it's in poor taste to answer a question with a question, but what would you call George Harrisons experimental Moog album titled Electronic sounds?
 
Experimental Psychedelic Rock sounds good to me. And it still sounds like progressive rock to me. Wink
 
Now perhaps you can answer a question for me and explain how Brian Eno's ambiant music is considered progressive rock and why it's listed in PA under Experimental Electronic? Shouldn't it be called non-progressive experimental electronic rock instead? Smile


Edited by SteveG - December 15 2014 at 10:22
Back to Top
dr wu23 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20631
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2014 at 09:55
I have no problem with a Psych Rock Lounge.....I don't think we need another sub genre.
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone.
Haquin
Back to Top
earlyprog View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Neo / PSIKE / Heavy Teams

Joined: March 05 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 2134
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 15 2014 at 06:10
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

This means that non-Prog bands like Country Joe and The Fish are inadmissible because the Psychedelic Rock they played was not Progressive Psychedelic Rock.

It's really as simple as that.
Back to Top
bhikkhu View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 06 2006
Location: A² Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 14 2014 at 17:54
No
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.133 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.