The Strange Omissions of the Archives |
Post Reply | Page <1 678910> |
Author | |||||
Snicolette
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 02 2018 Location: OR Status: Offline Points: 6039 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
And I feel that we can agree to disagree. Discussion is all that is happening here and my perspective is different based on my own life experience...Just as my musical taste is, and everyone else's. And I appreciate the open discussion without denigration into name-calling etc. No, during the psych era I was not in the studio with those people, but I know what I heard and how it played out over the ensuing years....I do know how I heard how things changed as they changed, but that isn't in everyone's experience. I had a very unusual circumstance in being near to the hotbed of pyschedelia and seeing it come close to home in it's time. And also was certainly listening and going to all of the shows, reading all of the press, etc. during the heyday of the introduction of Prog as it occurred. And I do contend that without the previous way being paved by what went before, I don't think it would have been as possible for it to flourish.
|
|||||
"Into every rain, a little life must fall." ~Tom Rapp
|
|||||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65266 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||||
Prog had a brief and glorious moment and did top the Charts, but the staying power of classic 60s Psych outdoes 70s prog. Ask someone on the street if they've heard of the Doors, Hendrix, Janis Joplin, or the Dead and almost all will say "Of course" or "Yeah my Dad used to like those guys". Then ask about ELP, Gentle Giant, or even Genesis and they probably won't even know 80s Genesis let alone the prog era version. |
|||||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||||
dougmcauliffe
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 23 2019 Location: US Status: Offline Points: 3895 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Aye that’s some good news |
|||||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18275 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Well, some of that is arguable. Anyway, they all had progressive elements. They just didn't get labelled prog or progressive until much later. Even the Beatles on Sgt. Peppers had progressive elements. Many consider a day in the life to be a prog song. They both evolved concurrently. That's my opinion. Progressive music/proto prog/art rock became prog rock later but it was there around the same time(or at the very least those elements were) psych started. The Doors were proto prog also and are listed as such on here. Aside from Pink Floyd who I consider prog not a psych no psych band was as big as ELP, Yes, Genesis, JT etc. Prog in it's hey day was most certainly bigger than psych. Look up album sales. The term psych became more well known than the term prog but that's starting to change.
Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 30 2019 at 20:41 |
|||||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18275 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Well, some of that is arguable. Anyway, they all had progressive elements. They just didn't get labelled prog or progressive until much later. Even the Beatles on Sgt. Peppers had progressive elements. Many consider a day in the life to be a prog song. They both evolved concurrently. That's my opinion. Progressive music/proto prog/art rock became prog rock later but it was there around the same time(or at the very least those elements were) psych started. The Doors were proto prog also. Aside from Pink Floyd who I consider prog no psych band was as big as ELP, Yes, Genesis, JT etc. Prog in it's hey day was most certainly bigger than psych. Look up album sales. The term psych became more well known than the term prog but that's starting to change.
Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 30 2019 at 20:34 |
|||||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65266 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||||
Examples of ... ? That's why I say it's in the LPs chronologically. Anyone can just claim "A band was this or it was that", but that's not good enough, is it. You go to the releases-- what albums had been released at what specific moments, who was listening, and which influences then can clearly be heard, audible on later albums by other artists. That's music history |
|||||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65266 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Psychedelic rock was huge, far bigger than prog ever was even in prog's popular heyday. It still is, for crying out loud. The Doors, Hendrix and Pink Floyd (yes Floyd was a psych band) are still far more popular than ELP or Yes or Tull. Zappa, the Nice, GG&F, most certainly did evolve from Psych, if not in style than in spirit. |
|||||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18275 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Hey, stop taking her side. LOL. At least provide specific examples then(something I have yet to see).
Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 30 2019 at 20:24 |
|||||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18275 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Yes, that's exactly my point. They were prog bands not psych bands and didn't evolve from psych either(since they were so early).
|
|||||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65266 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
They became separate, but you can't tell me the Nice, one of the single most important early symphonic rock bands, was not in reality an English Psych group. Just listen to the first two LPs. Psych in the most kitschy and classic way. Which leads me to my next point which is that being in the friggin' studio is not required to draw clear lines between the music being made & recorded, who was influencing who, and which albums were impacting subsequent albums. Far more accurate and historically correct than what any book or historian or opinion has to say about it. Follow the music, it's all right there. |
|||||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18275 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Pere Ubu isn't on here? Well, you have to have the Tubes also then.
|
|||||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18275 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Sorry, I don't mean to be rude here but unless you were in the recording studios or hung out with these early bands you weren't there. You don't know what the musicians were thinking or what they were actually striving for. Early prog didn't get much exposure it was very underground. Those albums I mentioned were not psych. DOFP by the Moodies was not psych. It was early prog/ proto prog or art rock. Art rock and psych were separate. I'm not the only one who feels that way. I have spoken to others who were "there" who agree with me. I actually used to think that way too and in did for a very long time until I took a really long deep look at it. Sure on the surface it seems like prog evolved from psych(since psych may have started earlier) but it didn't. It was already starting by the time psych hit it's commercial peak. As I said before they were two separate ideologies.
Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 30 2019 at 20:15 |
|||||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65266 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
^ Oh I think they know about the Space, but that isn't generally a prog marker. It's shocking, I know. |
|||||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18275 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
I don't understand why the Dead aren't in here. They should be in here for prog related at least if not psych/ space. My guess is those who make these decisions are not aware of the Grateful Dead's space jams(not to mention Terrapin Station) and only know their radio hits.
|
|||||
Snicolette
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 02 2018 Location: OR Status: Offline Points: 6039 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
I see both points of yours (Mike) and Atavachron (David, I think?). No one knew what it was, it was an organic growth at the time....again, I was there and to me, I can see the direct lines, but I don't expect that everyone would and also understand that this is a Prog site, not a Psych site.
|
|||||
"Into every rain, a little life must fall." ~Tom Rapp
|
|||||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65266 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||||
Which is why most of those bands are here in full Prog categories: Crossover, Avant, Symph, etc. rather than Proto or -Related like where the Dead might be placed. Edited by Atavachron - July 30 2019 at 19:56 |
|||||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18275 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
It may have laid the ground work in some respects but Mothers of Invention, The Nice, Procol Harum, the Moody Blues, Clouds/123 and maybe one or two others(even PF if we want to throw them in)were doing progressive music(or proto prog)in 1967. The ideology of progressive music was different than psych. Imo, they were two separate ideologies that bands were starting to explore around the same time. Sure, there was overlap but I don't think prog grew out of psych like many people seem to think. THey were related in the sense that they were both experimenting with a different approaches to music but they both had different goals and methodologies. Anyway, yes no reason why a few more psych bands can't be added. I'm pretty sure Spirit is on here under proto prog. Even though you didn't mention them I don't know about Moby Grape or QSMS.
Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 30 2019 at 19:54 |
|||||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18275 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||||
That's not how it happened. You and I have been through this a million times. Maybe for some bands but not as distinct genres. I actually can't think of many psych bands who turned into prog but I suppose there were some. Maybe Pink Floyd.
[/QUOTE]
And I see your point, that is likely true, and definitely PF began as a psych band, no bout adoubt it, with them in particular. I was merely speaking to the psych music movement laying the groundwork for prog, which maybe I mistakenly was thinking this thread was speaking about. Thus I used the word, "progenitors." But there was still progressive elements even in that first PF album. It's just that the psychedelia overshadowed it. Psychedelic was popular before prog I'll give you that much. Actually, prog didn't come out of nowhere and there were psych elements in a lot of the earlier stuff. Many of those earlier bands have been given the label proto prog. Of course nobody called them proto prog at the time. Some people even used the term classidelica apparently to refer to some of them. Was there overlap between the two? Yep. Pink Floyd are also sometimes referred to as the fathers of space rock. Hawkwind's debut wasn't until 1970(great year ;) so PF had a headstart.
|
|||||
stegor
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 23 2013 Location: Minnesota Status: Offline Points: 2029 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Tuxedomoon +2 and I raise you Pere Ubu. XTC goes without saying, again.
|
|||||
Snicolette
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 02 2018 Location: OR Status: Offline Points: 6039 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
If we're going to psychedelia, it would seem that Country Joe & The Fish should also be an addition....Assuredly one of the most psychedelic of them all....I am in absolute agreement that psych is one of the progenitors of prog, having witnessed it metamorphose in action (and all without LSD on my part ) That's not how it happened. You and I have been through this a million times. Maybe for some bands but not as distinct genres. I actually can't think of many psych bands who turned into prog but I suppose there were some. Maybe Pink Floyd.
[/QUOTE]
And I see your point, that is likely true, and definitely PF began as a psych band, no bout adoubt it, with them in particular. I was merely speaking to the psych music movement laying the groundwork for prog, which maybe I mistakenly was thinking this thread was speaking about. Thus I used the word, "progenitors." |
|||||
"Into every rain, a little life must fall." ~Tom Rapp
|
|||||
Post Reply | Page <1 678910> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |