Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Metallica ?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedMetallica ?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 21>
Poll Question: how do you fel about Metallica being added ?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
42 [28.77%]
29 [19.86%]
75 [51.37%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 19:48
So......all that red and big font was totally necessary.





Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 19:41
I added this band so I feel specially compromised when people say that metallica was added just because of sheer pressure put on by a group of members.... sounds like a big ugly mob just swept away with reason and logic and got Metallica into the weak and easy-to-manipulate heads of the Admin team and the site's owner....
 
By the way, just a useless personal point.... Metallica's been here for a loong time... I still haven't reviewed one SINGLE ALBUM.... and I have reviewed plenty of albums since they were added.... maybe, just maybe I (as well as the rest of the "add metallica" crew) HONESTLY THOUGH METALLICA BELONGED HERE as honestly as you Ivan believe they didn't? Maybe?? Maybe???
 
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Interesting Ivan... You're supposed to, when controversional additions are done, say your opinion and then let it be... That's what you've said yourself countless times.... Now with Metallica, you keep coming back... you just can't let this one rest, too? Confused
 
Have you followed this thread T?????? Yes, in my case always, since I added this band and is a band I like and an addition I still want to defend.
 
I didn't brought Metallica here Obviously since the thread is even called "Metallica?" I'm not saying you did..., it was on discussion long 13 posts  and several pages before I dared to join,why did you join if A) you don't care for the bad, and B) "once it's added, I let it be".  You didn't said a word about other members having disagreements or about people making statements in favour, but seems that as soon as  I give my opinion is wrong if I don't agree with you.Other members don't say "once a band is added I let it be"... also, most people who object to Metallica's inclusion do it from a musical point of view, they're still discussing something that was settled... You, on the other hand, keep bringing back the "group who pressured the owner into changing his mind" argument... You've done it before... And I denounced it back then... And I will keep on doing it... We'll always be boring perople with this Ivan whenever you mention how we machiavelliically made the site owner and admin team fall for our request.
 
- I have to accept if you disagree with me.No.
- I can accept you insist hundreds of times even after a band is rejected. Yes...
- But I won't accept that you or anybody limit my right to disagree and give my arguments.The band is added. besides, the two arguments that you give are:
 
"Once an addition is done, I let it be". Why don't you add this to that phrase?: "except with Metallica."
 
"they are here because of pressure of a group of people that finally convinced the site owner" ... that all your argument... You left the musical discussion LONG AGO....
 
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

We know your arguments and they're valid though I don't agree with them. It's this part that  always had problems with: 
 
If you claim your right to disagree....Then allow me the same right...But don't worry, even if you don't allow me that right I will use it.I know you will. And I don't deny you that. You are the one who said "once a band it's added, i let it be"....
 
 
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

You keep coming back to this point disrespecting the same admins and the SITE OWNER WHO HIMSELF said "GREAT JOB ON THE BIO - GREAT ADDITION"......  Basically you're saying we brainwashed M@x, aren't you saying that?
 
1.- Isn't it true that M@X was STRONGLY against the inclusion of Metallica? Read this word that you yourself wrote: WAS.... WAS,..... WAS....
 
Quote
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin & Moderator

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 12589
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 31 2007 at 15:25

The Admin team considered the addition of Metallca very carefully. In the end, we could not come to a decision we could all agree on, so the matter was referred to M@x for the final say. He has come back with a very definite no. Metallica will not therefore be added.

No matter what the decision was, it was always going to be controversial. I'm sure those who were for them being added will respect the final decision, even though they disagree with it.
The Ultimate Progressive Rock Music Discography, Reviews and Forum.
www.ProgArchives.com
 
2.- Isn't it true that in every single poll most members voted against Metallica??????Yes... but PA is not a democracy. And polls have never decided if a band gets here or not.
3.- Isn't it truth that Metallica was rejected many times?????????Yes, but we're people, we CAN change our minds.... we don't have to always have the same mindset... conservativism in arts is difficult to sustain
4.- Isn't it true that you insisted despite they were rejected by M@X (Read the upper quote)?????Yes.... But the now-infamous 36-page thread WAS NOT STARTED BY ME AND IF YOU CARE TO CHECK IT I STARTED TO ARGUE IN FAVOR OF METALLICA A FEW PAGES INTO THE THREAD...
5.- Isn't it truth that Metallica was added only after a 10 or 13 pages thread started after several rejections??? Yes.... again, by a third member.... who I don't even remember....
 
You're always right. 5 YES!
 
But most important:
 
 I NEVER DISRESPECTED THE ADMINISTRATORS OR THE OWNER.I never literally said you did. I said you may think we brainwashed the site owner, which is more an attack to our integrity... But you're a lawyer Ivan, read through my words....
 
I MAY DISGREE WITH ONE OR MORE OF THEM IN DIFFERENT SITUATIONS, BUT THAT ISN'T DISRESPECT, THIS IS A DISCUSSION SITE AND DISAGREEMENT IS NOT EQUAL TO DISRESPECT .............LEARN IT.you better learn that your "lawyer" tone is not ALWAYS PLEASING FOR THE REST OF THE PEOPLE.... we ALL can learn something every day
 
Then I haven't said a lie or anything false, I stand on what i said.I will not say otherwise.
 
If you like my opinion, it's ok with me if you don't like it, well it's your problem......not mine..I have no problems with you believing anything you want. Just stop the "metallica was added because pressure of a group" even though "once a band is added I let it be"
 
 
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Can you leave this thing be? Will this really hurt you till the end of times? Maybe, just MAYBE, you were wrong and the people supporting the addition were right... just maybe... MAYBE we didn't just use "pressure against the opinion of the vast majority".... Last time I checked, anyway, and you have said that yourself, the owner's opinion mattered more than "the vast majority:...
 
 
M@X decided it, I believe it was a mistake, I won't even try to revoke his decision, because it's his site and he decides, I respect his decision but I can disagree, and I'm sure M@X respects my right to disagree with him.Yes he does, i'm sure. Again, I never literally said you disrespected [email protected] just ASKED you if you thought we brainwasehd him...  you read it through my words... You always have to read every possible meaning in people's words Ivan.... I understand that. Now whether I meant that or not, only I can know.... But it's baffling how you keep saying you weren't disrespecting nobody.... why does this haunt you so much Ivan?
 
I have always respected you but please, stop with the "pressure group who convinced the site owner" thing... it is DISRESPECTFUL for a group of people who HONESTLY BELIEVED METALLICA DESERVED TO BE HERE and who got the decision overturned BECAUSE OF THE STRENGTH OF THEIR ARGUMENTS... you should be a defender of arguments Ivan... accept it...
 
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

So, as the owner has spoken, can't we let this thing be? Forget this thing?
 
Say that to the people that gave their opinions (against or in favour) 13 posts and several pages  before I joined this thread. Every now and then you keep bringing the "gropu of people who pressured blah blah blah" argument to the fore... that's why I reply you... other people discuss the subject and let it go.... you keep coming back after an addition that was done long ago.... a biography that took me some time to write.... something I did for the site, again, with no personal interest (I haven't even reviewed a single Metallica album yet, again)....
 
Try for once to see some error in your ways, too.
 
Iván  Teodoro Gomez de la Torre R.
 
[/QUOTE]

Edited by The T - July 05 2009 at 20:17
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 18:06
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

On the contrary, they were probably the first Prog Metal band. They are not simply Prog related, they are Prog. By every definition.
 
 
Seems a paradox, but I'm sure that if added to Prog Metal, probably all this problems would have been avoided, because the Metal component is so strong in Metallica, that nobody would had questioned the decision of the team.
 
The rejection of Prog Metal caused this conflict of watching a 100% Metal band, rejected by all the three Prog Metal sub-genres added to PR.
 
But the Prog Metal team took a decision from the start and that's what they are here for.
 
Iván
 
BTW: I like your signature:
 
"The important thing is not to stop questioning. "  ClapClapClap


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - July 05 2009 at 18:07
            
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 17:35
Now THIS needs its very own reply...
 
Originally posted by Transgressor Transgressor wrote:

Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:


And Master of Puppets & And Justice for All are prog.


Ah-ehm...NO!!!
 
 
Ah-ehm.... YES!!!
 
 
Originally posted by Transgressor Transgressor wrote:


There are only some prog influences in ...and justice for all (and we can count maybe master of puppets)
In techincal metal Metallica were followers not leaders. (I consider Master and justice two metal masterpiece eh...so it's not about likes and dislikes)
 
Can you be more specific - "Prog Influences" - what do you mean?
 
Both albums are so intensely influential that they don't need to have Prog influences - indeed, surely if you're influenced by a Prog Band, that pretty much denies the possibility of your band being Prog!
 

Originally posted by Transgressor Transgressor wrote:


Here is a list in cronological order of the most important album of the eighties about prog and technical metal (I've focused on technical thrash listing to see that techno thrash was a movement that doesn't belong to or start with Metallica)

1985
"Killing is my business..."- Megadeth (thrash with tech elements and prog elements)
"Energetic Disassembly" WatchTower (the first techincal metal album)
"The Spectre within"- Fates Warning (Heavy/Power with prog elements)
 
Hang on - you've forgotten about all the thrash that existed before 1985 - these albums did not come out of a vacuum!
 
Killing Is My Business was released TWO YEARS after Kill 'Em All, yet features some of the same riffs.
 
It is obviously more rock/metal based than "pure metal" based, and is more technically aligned than Kill 'Em All, which is a perfect blend of technicality (considering it was released so much earlier) and developing riffs more closely aligned with King Crimson than Judas Priest or Black Sabbath.
 
The Fates Warning album I'm not sure about - I heard a couple of tracks from it, and it's not very progressive.
 
Watchtower I've reviewed - it's not Prog, it's pure tech, which is something different.
 

Originally posted by Transgressor Transgressor wrote:


1986
"Baptism under fire "- Juggernaut (prog-thrash)
"Peace Sells..." Megadeth (thrash with tech elements and prog elements)
"Awaken the Guardian"- Fates Warning (Heavy/Power with more and more prog elements)
"Somewhere in time"- Iron Maiden (Heavy with some prog elements)
"Rage for Order" Queensryche (Heavy that has influenced prog)
(Master of puppets)
 
Hang on - What are all these Prog elements?
 
Master of Puppets doesn't just have elements, it drips Prog - it out-Progs Prog - it is one of the Proggiest Prog Metal albums I have EVER heard.
 
There's stuff on "Master..." that you still hear being recycled by other bands - and Dream Theater are only one of the bands that were HIGHLY influenced by that one album.
 
Trying to think of a successful band that has been as strongly influenced by any of the other albums... Nope.

Originally posted by Transgressor Transgressor wrote:


1987
"RIP"- Coroner (thrash with high tech elements)
"Killing Technology"- Voivod (thrash with high tech elements)
"Mekong Delta- Mekong Delta (prog-thrash)
"Trouble within"- Juggernaut (prog-thrash)
"Into THe Pandemonium" Celtic Frost (it was called Avantgarde Metal)
 
OK, the big mistake you're making is equating tech with Prog - it's not the same thing.
 
Celtic Frost I'd agree with - that's one quirky album, and I love it.
 
BUT
 
Despite the varied styles on that album, it's not as inherently Proggy as Master Of Puppets - or Ride The Lightning, come to that.

Originally posted by Transgressor Transgressor wrote:


I have also to think about
"The ultra violence" (1987)- "frolic through the park" (1988) by Death Angel;
 
Man - you can't be serious!
 
Originally posted by Transgressor Transgressor wrote:

 TEstament's "Practice what you preach" (1989), and maybe also Anthrax's "Persistence of time" (1990);  "Twisted into form" (1990) by Forbidden .......
 
Testament?
Anthrax? (You're making me laugh!)
 

Sorry, but the entire list here is made up of albums that are either technical, or only partially Prog (ie, Prog-Related, which is what Queensryche arguably are).
 
Metallica's first 5 albums changed heavy metal forever - especially their 3rd and 4th albums (with a large consideration to the 5th, no matter how standard it is now).
 
 
Metallica were pure, aggressive leaders - but they were also humble followers - they knew the music they liked, and they played it.
 
More often than not, they played it better than the people who originally wrote it - but always gave full credit and support to those bands.
 
Yes, back in the day, Metallica were a seriously good (and PROGRESSIVE) band.
 


Edited by Certif1ed - July 05 2009 at 17:37
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 17:30
Hey, feel free to use my posts as examples but I'm officially done with this thread.
Not that I'm angry but I've heard sufficient explanation's from the mods/collabs

I still don't really agree...but I DO see why Metallica has been included, I really do see their points.
Besides, debating is fun...but pretty pointless since they are on.


So don't worry guys, no more trouble from me Wink



Edited by JJLehto - July 05 2009 at 17:42
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 17:19
Ahem... Wink
 
 
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:


3 prog-ish albums does not a prog-related band make.

 
True, but 5 utterly progressive (including 3 pure Prog Metal albums a Prog Metal band easily makes.
 
Originally posted by Transgressor Transgressor wrote:


So: Rust in Peace is a prog-thrash album more than every  album Metallica did.
 
 
No, it isn't.
 
It's a good album, but Megadeth never got into the purely progressive way of writing that Metallica did on albums 2-4.
 
I'll re-listen, but Megadeth are a technical metal band, not a progressive metal band.
 
Tech is not the same as prog.
Originally posted by Transgressor Transgressor wrote:

The question is: why Metallica and not Megadeth or Coroner (or others more proggy and more important for techincal and prog metal music than Metallica)?
 
Coroner were never as progressive as Metallica - and I cannot think of any band as progressive or more important for prog metal than Metallica.
 
Can you provide good examples of how Coroner are important to Progressive Metal?
 
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Metallica was added because of preasure of a group of members against the opinion of the vast majority, this poll proves it, that ended convincing the owner who was against the inclusion.
 
Iván
 
 
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

No - Metallica were added because they are fundamentally crucial to the development of progressive metal, as much as the Beatles were to Progressive Rock.
 
They changed the possibilities of the Metal genre that much.
 
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

^ So Metallica are prog after all?Tongue
 
By the contrary, they are a non Prog band added with the excuse that Prog Related is not Prog, if they were Prog, the Prog Metal Team would had added Metallica.
 
Iván
 
 
 
On the contrary, they were probably the first Prog Metal band. They are not simply Prog related, they are Prog. By every definition.
 
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Especially when they started as thrash metal, and that was their intent.

Really - I don't ever remember seeing them saying that - can you point me to an article where they said that?

They always wanted to push the envelope (which they did), hence Cliff Burton was the bassist of choice, not Ron McGoverney.
 
They wanted someone who could think coherently about pushing musical boundaries, which is why Dave Mustaine was fired from the band. (Nothing against Dave or his phenomenal abilities, just bluntly stating what actually happened).
 
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

So because Lars says it, that makes it true?
 
Actually, no - if you listen to the music, it is true!
 
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Besides Kill 'em All was open E riffing for 5 minutes, with crazy solos of course.
 
Some tracks have passages of open E riffing, it's true, but not the whole album - that is a fallacy!
 
You could say the same about many Hawkwind albums, but you'll never see Hawkwind being disputed on this forum.
 

Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:


Thus, proving my point Metallica is a thrash metal band, that was their intent NOT to be progressive.
 
Sorry - I don't follow the logic.
 
How is that point proven?
 
Please explain, and use musical examples so that your logic may be followed more clearly.
 
Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:


However, since they are on this site Megadeth MUST be as well. Someone also mentioned Coroner.
These should be added, since Metallica is.
 
Not at all, unless both bands can be proven to have been as significantly Progressive Metal as Metallica. Which I doubt - but would be very interested to read the arguments, as I like both bands.
 
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:

 
And Master of Puppets & And Justice for All are prog.
 
 
ClapClapClapClapClap
 
And Ride The Lightning - and parts of Kill 'Em All too.
 
 
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:

Again, COMMERCIAL SUCCESS is the easiest & biggest reason when it comes to such groups being slammed as not prog. Because everyone thinks they know the music.
 
Isn't it wierd how commercial success hasn't affected Genesis, Yes, Tull or especially Pink Floyd's standing as Prog Rock groups?
 
 

 
 
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 16:25
Who joins a Prog Rock site just to discuss Metallica and Metal?

Confused
Back to Top
Transgressor View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: July 04 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 12
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 16:12
 x debrewguy

Yes, I know that not so many people know the technical metal movement of the '80. Only who is keen on technical metal knows these things so it's obvious that for many people Metallica (a really really really famous band) are  innovators also for techno-thrash metal because a lot of them knows only and justice for all...and maybe other who knows also Megadeth mentioned them together with the san francisco band.

It's the same thing for people that thinks that Dream Theater invented prog metal. That it's not true. But a lot people knows only them.

By now, I'm thinking about some presentations for other bands....maybe!
I don't think that the add of  "prog related" section to the site is a good think. But it's only my opinion...

P.S. I can recommend some band to you, but it depends on your musical tastes...Wink
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 15:59
Claude, after so many posts, I only have to say something.
 
As long as I don't insult anybody (And I haven't done it), I will give my opinions and arguments.
 
I stand on everything I said.
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - July 05 2009 at 16:00
            
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 15:11
O.K., but my point is not the merits of other bands. Which you are free to use in proposing new additions to PA's database. Nor is it my intention to make a claim as to whether any or all of the "new" bands are deserving of inclusion. After Megadeth, Voivod, and Iron Maiden, my knowledge of some is limited to one album (Death Angel - Frolic through the Park. Annihilator - Alice in Chains. Celtic Frost - Into the Pandemonium). But i wouldn't feel qualified to debate their candidacies. The rest, I recognise the names, but that's it.
Voivod's in. That's a clear cut case. Iron Maiden - based on their influence and a good part of their music - is a good fit for prog related. Megadeth - I'll repeat myself - I think they belong here. But I don't think I can make a sufficient case for them, and I haven't seen one posted here yet.  Emphasis on the "yet" part.

And the rest - well, you've been invited to present your presentation for their inclusion. It seems to me that whatever you come up with is likely to be well thought and organized . Which makes it easier for PA to make a decision. Which would also end up building a good rep here. God only knows every community can always use people who can contribute in a positive and clear manner. Thumbs Up

Sooooo .... here's to hoping we see some or all of your bands getting their day in the sun. I'll certainly be one that will follow up to see if there's some music I should check out.Cool


"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
Transgressor View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: July 04 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 12
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 14:43
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:


And Master of Puppets & And Justice for All are prog.


Ah-ehm...NO!!!
There are only some prog influences in ...and justice for all (and we can count maybe master of puppets)
In techincal metal Metallica were followers not leaders. (I consider Master and justice two metal masterpiece eh...so it's not about likes and dislikes)

Here is a list in cronological order of the most important album of the eighties about prog and technical metal (I've focused on technical thrash listing to see that techno thrash was a movement that doesn't belong to or start with Metallica)

1985
"Killing is my business..."- Megadeth (thrash with tech elements and prog elements)
"Energetic Disassembly" WatchTower (the first techincal metal album)
"The Spectre within"- Fates Warning (Heavy/Power with prog elements)

1986
"Baptism under fire "- Juggernaut (prog-thrash)
"Peace Sells..." Megadeth (thrash with tech elements and prog elements)
"Awaken the Guardian"- Fates Warning (Heavy/Power with more and more prog elements)
"Somewhere in time"- Iron Maiden (Heavy with some prog elements)
"Rage for Order" Queensryche (Heavy that has influenced prog)
(Master of puppets)

1987
"RIP"- Coroner (thrash with high tech elements)
"Killing Technology"- Voivod (thrash with high tech elements)
"Mekong Delta- Mekong Delta (prog-thrash)
"Trouble within"- Juggernaut (prog-thrash)
"Into THe Pandemonium" Celtic Frost (it was called Avantgarde Metal)


1988
"The Music of Erich Zann"- Mekong Delta (prog-thrash)
"Operation:Mindcrime" Queensryche (Heavy, very important for prog)
"Life's cycle"- Sieges Even (Technical metal)
"So far, So good...So what!"- Megadeth (thrash with tech elements and prog elements)
"...and justice for all"- Metallica (thrash with tech elements and prog elements)
"Seventh son..."- Iron Maiden (Heavy with more prog elements)
"No exit"- Fates Warning (Prog metal with heavy/power roots)
"Endless war"- Realm (techno- thrash)
"The sane asylum"  - Blind illusion (techno- thrash)
"Dimension Hatross" - Voivod (prog -and psichedelic-thrash)
"Deception ignored" Deathrow (techno-thrash)
"Master project genesis" Target (techno-thrash)
"Punishment for decadence" Coroner (thrash metal with high technical skills)
"Universe" DBC (techno-metal)

1989
"Control and resistance" - WAtchTower (the definitive technical metal album)
"Perfect Simmetry"- Fates Warning (a true prog metal album)
"Nothingface" Voivod (Psychedelic/prog metal)
"When dream and day unite" Dream Theater (prog metal with heavy/power elements )
"The principle of doubt" Mekong Delta (prog metal with thrash as the base)
"No more colour" Coroner (thrash with high technical skills)
"Piece of time" Atheist (techno-death)
"Gutter Ballet" Savatage (a Heavy  release that has influenced prog)
"Alice in Hell" Annihilator (thrash with very high technical points)

1990
"Dances of death..." Mekong Delta (the definitive prog thrrash album)
"Steps" Sieges Even (technical and prog metal)
"Rust in peace" Megadeth (I think we can consider it prog-thrash..)
"Act III" Death Angel (thrash with prog elements)
"A social grace" Psychotic Waltz (prog/techno metal)
"Never Neverland" Annihilator (Techno-thrash)
"Empire" Queensryche (Heavy that has influenced prog)

I 've had to  stopp here in 1990 ( I'm very tired...Big smile)
I have non considered '80 Rush album, and If we should insert Master of puppets... I have also to think about
"The ultra violence" (1987)- "frolic through the park" (1988) by Death Angel; TEstament's "Practice what you preach" (1989), and maybe also Anthrax's "Persistence of time" (1990);  "Twisted into form" (1990) by Forbidden .......
I don't know if the list of the metal band that during the '80 was important for prog and technical metal (or has done album with high technical skills as or more Metallica's)  is complete...


 






Edited by Transgressor - July 05 2009 at 15:05
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 13:28
P.S. if someone checks out PA because Metallica is on here, I doubt that it's going to be their first time reading or hearing about the band. I, for one, don't buy albums from bands just because they're listed at PA. And if someone did buy, say , Master of Puppets because it's here, well ... what's wrong with that ? Would you have a problem with their purchase of Abacab or Citizen ?

And for those worry warts who fear for our reputation, I suggest you give some time to seriously think about this "reputation". Then read the main page's "about PA" bit. Then consider whether any music site of any genre, anywhere on the web is in complete agreement on everything other sites declare about said genre or music.
I mean, who are these people who don't "respect" us ? Is there a reason for us to care ? Would they really their opinion of us just because we did things your way ?
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 13:27
DB's series of slightly coherent replies divided into smaller bite sized chunks of pseudo wisdom


5) I believe there is some merit to Megadeth, Toto, and Dire Straits' candidacies. I also believe that there hasn't been sufficient "proof" brought forward to justify their admission at this time, whether in a full blown prog genre or prog related or proto prog or whatever. And possibly ever. Again, the case hasn't been made yet.

So please people, Metallica was admitted after much debate, and made it in based on a very considered presentation supporting their inclusion. M@x didn't bow to pressure, a secret society of collabs or admins did not conspire to slip them in based on their personal tastes.



"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 13:26
DB's series of slightly coherent replies divided into smaller bite sized chunks of pseudo wisdom

part 4) Progkidjoe - Metallica has been judged by PA to be prog. They're in. end of discussion. I await your refusal to believe your own words work any better against you.
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 13:25
DB's series of slightly coherent replies divided into smaller bite sized chunks of pseudo wisdom

part 3) Ivan - a } you lose the respect you have gained here when you make statements like - "Metallica was added because of preasure of a group of members against the opinion of the vast majority, this poll proves it, that ended convincing the owner who was against the inclusion." And you know damn well (how many damn wells so far ? ) that others here still have to work with you, and are willing to overlook many things to get a job done right. So don't assume that others weren't offended just 'because they didn't tell you so. Your presence is usually helpful towards PA's goals. Your comments haven't always been.

            b} You know damn well that some very deserving acts have gotten in when higher ranking members have been able to present a strong enough case that was able to overcome any reservations other collabs / admin / reviewers or even M@x may have had. You've always been very clear in stating  that some "experts'" opinion should hold more weight than other less "knowledgeable" members. So please, if you say you let lost battles be, then let them be. The picture others are painting of this recurring behaviour of yours  is spot on. Words mean less than the actual example.

           c} And you also know damn well that it was felt that prog related was the best compromise available to bring an end to an interminable debate. Prog metal is where they belong, but we'd still be fighting over Metallica, eh. Oops, we still are !

           d} And Ivan - you cannot claim to say you've shown no disrespect after your comment - "Metallica was added because of preasure of a group of members against the opinion of the vast majority, this poll proves it, that ended convincing the owner who was against the inclusion."  You either have little respect for M@x or the people who came up with a strong enough case to change M@x's mind. And that is a right that everyone has - to change their mind if a sufficient case is made to do so. The legal process calls this an appeal. Which does on occasion bring about a change in a verdict, right ?

           e} You also know damn well (that'stoo many damn wells so far) that not every band that is in has gotten a majority vote in general polls, nor even in the final decision by admins. And you also know damn well that some additions were not always supported by a majority of collabs outside the genre team responsible, O.K. . They are given the authority to decide by themselves, but that doesn't mean they need ( and they don't) a majority from the rest of us. Just as our Symphonic team is given the job of deciding who gets in. But admin & M@x have the right to override us. And I have no problem with that. I may not agree with it. But that is their position in the hierarchy and they handle that responsibility quite well , thank you very damn well.
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 13:24
DB's series of slightly coherent replies divided into smaller bite sized chunks of pseudo wisdom

part 1) - JJletho& Transgressor - Genesis were initially offered a record contract as a way to highlight their songwriting, which some felt might be saleable. The Beatles were a straight up Pop / Rock N Roll band when they started. Rush were a heavy blues act. The Strawbs were folk, not prog folk, folk. Bluegrass even, at their very beginning (the strawberry hill boys). Early Jetho Tull were folk / blues influenced. Many an RPI band has an anthology of early releases where they were essentially "pop" bands. Moody Blues - Go Now, anyone ? Harmonium - a francophone America ? Voivod's first two releases made Metallica's Kill 'Em All sound like Dream Theater. Inclusion in any genre at PA is based on more than your origins.


"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 13:20
DB's series of slightly coherent replies divided into smaller bite sized chunks of pseudo wisdom

part 2) if x is here why not Y ? Well now, if you believe so, you are free to make the arguement for their inclusion. In extreme cases, yes, M@x may intervene if the right case if made. That happens. If the only info given is "I think they're prog, so they are", then don't be surprised that your suggestion is refused. And while Megadeth has been turned down, if you're determined to get them in, go over the previous threads, see if you present a stronger case for their admittance. It happens, you know.

"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 13:08
Originally posted by p0mt3 p0mt3 wrote:

Why is this even an issue anymore? They are here, now. Drop it, folks.


We should try to make it more obvious to visitors that their being here does not mean that the admins and collabs of PA think that they're a prog band.
Back to Top
Pekka View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 03 2006
Location: Espoo, Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 6442
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 12:49
Originally posted by debrewguy debrewguy wrote:

Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Originally posted by Keppa4v Keppa4v wrote:

Originally posted by JJLehto JJLehto wrote:

Especially when they started as thrash metal, and that was their intent.

"Thrash metal to me is just "open E" riffing for five minutes as fast as you can go. From a musician's point of view, I don't really like that term. It implies lack of arrangement, lack of ability, lack of songwriting, lack of any form of intelligence. We do play very fast, but I think there's a lot more to our music than just thrashing."

-Lars Ulrich to Kerrang! around the time of Puppets


So because Lars says it, that makes it true?
Bands always talk about their genre and where they do/don't belong and when it comes to music I'll listen to ALOT of peoples opinions before Lars LOL
Besides Kill 'em All was open E riffing for 5 minutes, with crazy solos of course.

Thus, proving my point Metallica is a thrash metal band, that was their intent NOT to be progressive.
However, since they are on this site Megadeth MUST be as well. Someone also mentioned Coroner.
These should be added, since Metallica is.


I think the intent was to provide a very succinct defense of Metallica's music.
Just as debrewguy well said what I was going to, by that logic Genesis is and always was a pop band, Rush are a bunch of kids trying their best to imitate Zeppelin and so on. By that same logic I'm a punk musician because the first song I wrote years ago was somewhat punky. Nevermind the fact that I've got some weird 7-13 minute songs under construction at the moment. They're punk metal because my first song was.

I pretty much agree with Lars on the Thrash Metal definition and understand judging by their music why he would make that kind of a statement at that point of time.
Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 12:45
Why is this even an issue anymore? They are here, now. Drop it, folks.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 21>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.154 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.