Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 10:33 |
From an aesthetic point of view an extra 5 metal categories the Prog Archives main menu would over-dominate.
|
What?
|
 |
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21618
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 10:20 |
darqdean wrote:
Sub dividing Prog Metal is a good idea: Neurosis, Opeth and Dream Theater lumped together does not compute, but I feel six is too many (even though the reality is probably more than six ) - it becomes too esoteric and subjective. Would it not be better to start small, say 3, and see how it works out?
|
Of course. This would also be possible: - Prog Metal (the traditional kind, combining Power + Melodic from my previous example)
- Tech/Extreme Prog Metal (Tech/Math + Extreme)
- Post/Avant Prog Metal
Or this: - Prog Metal
- Tech/Avant/Extreme Prog Metal
- Post Metal
But I don't think it makes much of a difference whether you have 3 or 6 sub genres - as long as they're all valid and there are enough bands which naturally fit in each of them. Of course there would be a few bands which fit equally well in several of these genres - Atheist were mentioned. For these some rules would have to be determined (e.g. "Extreme" overrules "Tech").
Edited by MikeEnRegalia - September 18 2007 at 10:21
|
|
 |
Abstrakt
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 18 2005
Location: Soundgarden
Status: Offline
Points: 18292
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 10:14 |
jikai55 wrote:
Post-Metal (Isis, Neurosis...) Avant-Garde Metal (Subterranean Masquerade, Unexpect...) Jazz Metal/Tech Metal (Cynic, Atheist, Meshuggah...)
And keep the category 'Progressive Metal' for bands like DT and Fates Warning. Just my ideas. |
Yeah, i agree!
|
 |
Prog-jester
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 05 2005
Location: Love Beach
Status: Offline
Points: 5909
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 10:14 |
Time Signature wrote:
Is there really such a genre as post metal? If yes, what is it? |
It depends on how much you like artists. I'd personally join rogether RIO/Avant/Zeuhl and Jazz/Fusion as I'm a total n00b in them and rarely enjoying music from those bands  . I'd also add Indo-Prog to Prog Folk and would name this mixture an Ethnic Prog
Post-Metal are PELICAN, THE MORNINGSIDE, GIANT SQUID, GRAYCEON, RED SPAROWES, RUSSIAN CIRCLES, ISIS, NEUROSIS, CULT OF LUNA, AGALLOCH and many others. I suppose 1/5 of all Prog-Metal bands on PA would fit here  . Almost a hundred of bands is quite enough for a new category, eh?
Edited by Prog-jester - September 18 2007 at 10:16
|
 |
Time Signature
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 20 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 362
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 09:51 |
If we keep up at this rate, well end up having a separate genre per artist. Is there really such a genre as post metal? If yes, what is it?
|
 |
Prog-jester
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 05 2005
Location: Love Beach
Status: Offline
Points: 5909
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 09:06 |
Agree with Post-Metal genre idea
|
 |
oracus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 12 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 497
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 08:35 |
P.H.P. wrote:
Now it really is AnythingArchives!!
|
It is already AnythingArchives. We have from Iron Maiden to GY!BE, from Billy Cobham to Led Zeppelin...
|
|
 |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 07:46 |
Sub dividing Prog Metal is a good idea: Neurosis, Opeth and Dream Theater lumped together does not compute, but I feel six is too many (even though the reality is probably more than six ) - it becomes too esoteric and subjective. Would it not be better to start small, say 3, and see how it works out?
|
What?
|
 |
jikai55
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 21 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 296
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 07:42 |
Sounds great Mike, though Atheist is better in tech metal in my opinion.
Edited by jikai55 - September 18 2007 at 07:43
|
I like cheese and I like metal! --Mikael Åkerfeldt
|
 |
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21618
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 07:33 |
^ the bands are different enough to justify the genres ... prog metal simply branched out much more than most other sub genres of prog rock. In the last 20+ years it developed into a base genre ... like an offshoot of prog rock, a child branch which developed into a separate tree. Imagine Frank Zappa, Mahavishnu Orchestra, Genesis, Hawkwind, Sigur Rós, Can and Rush being in the same category ... that's a bit like what we currently have in Prog Metal.
|
|
 |
activetopics
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 29 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 156
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 07:26 |
so....many......subgenres.....aaah!
|
 |
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21618
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 07:20 |
jikai55 wrote:
Yes, I feel the post-metal genre is neccessary!
Remember, not all Sludge bands are Post-Metal bands!
Well, if you were breaking down Prog Metal, heres some categories I could recommend:
Post-Metal (Isis, Neurosis...)
Avant-Garde Metal (Subterranean Masquerade, Unexpect...)
Jazz Metal/Tech Metal (Cynic, Atheist, Meshuggah...)
And keep the category 'Progressive Metal' for bands like DT and Fates Warning. Just my ideas. |
That's not very far from what we have in mind in the PMT ... but there are two more candidates for new categories IMO: Prog Power Metal (Kamelot, Symphony X, Nightwish, Rhapsody, ... all bands with a focus on Power Metal (both European/American style)) Extreme Prog Metal (Opeth, Meshuggah, Death, Atheist, Enslaved, ... all bands based in extreme metal genres like Death, Black, Thrash etc) As a result the bands remaining in Prog Metal would all be melodic and symphonic, So it might be renamed to Melodic Prog Metal: - Melodic Prog Metal
- Prog Power Metal
- Extreme Prog Metal
- Post Metal
- Avant Metal
- Tech/Math Metal
|
|
 |
chamberry
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 24 2005
Location: Puerto Rico
Status: Offline
Points: 9008
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 07:20 |
^^^ And what should we do with the Doom Metal bands? Those guys may be progressive in the true sense of the word, but they aren't really part of the progressive rock movement. I like your idea of the subdivisions of the genre, by the way.
|
|
 |
jikai55
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 21 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 296
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 07:15 |
You just have to draw the line between sludge and post-metal. Sure, bands like Isis and Neurosis are sludge AND post-metal, but bands like Bongzilla and Acid Bath aren't post-metal.
|
I like cheese and I like metal! --Mikael Åkerfeldt
|
 |
chamberry
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 24 2005
Location: Puerto Rico
Status: Offline
Points: 9008
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 07:09 |
They may seem out of place in Prog Metal, but can you imagine what this place will be like if its open for Doom Metal and more common Sludge Metal bands? We'll loose control of those genres very quickly. I'm a big fan of Doom Metal and all of things slow riff related (  ), but adding new genres will be too much, in my opinion.
|
|
 |
jikai55
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 21 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 296
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 07:02 |
Yes, I feel the post-metal genre is neccessary!
Remember, not all Sludge bands are Post-Metal bands!
Well, if you were breaking down Prog Metal, heres some categories I could recommend:
Post-Metal (Isis, Neurosis...)
Avant-Garde Metal (Subterranean Masquerade, Unexpect...)
Jazz Metal/Tech Metal (Cynic, Atheist, Meshuggah...)
And keep the category 'Progressive Metal' for bands like DT and Fates Warning. Just my ideas.
|
I like cheese and I like metal! --Mikael Åkerfeldt
|
 |
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21618
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 06:53 |
^ maybe you should be more careful laplace ... I've read many of your reviews and posts and while I respect your opinion, you often make it sound like the things you say are fact. They're not ... the existence of this very thread proves you wrong for example ("terribly rigid" - Post Metal is a prime example for unusual metal bands).
Edited by MikeEnRegalia - September 18 2007 at 06:56
|
|
 |
laplace
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 06 2005
Location: popupControl();
Status: Offline
Points: 7606
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 03:56 |
^well, the entry "progginess" level is lower just because of how terribly rigid metal is, naturally, but I think the teams *tend* to pick the most inventive bands from what's available...
|
 |
Mategra
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 23 2004
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 592
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 03:46 |
 Metal isn't real Prog.
|
 |
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21618
|
Posted: September 18 2007 at 02:30 |
Currently there are approximately 400 prog metal bands in the database, another 70 have been cleared for addition, and another 100+ bands are being considered. It's about time that this huge category gets split ... as some of you will know the PMT worked out a suggestion which would result in 4 or 5 new categories, each of which would contain 50-150 bands.
|
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.