Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Least Proggy Metallica Album
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedLeast Proggy Metallica Album

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 7>
Poll Question: Which album has the littlest prog relation??
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
10 [10.00%]
1 [1.00%]
1 [1.00%]
1 [1.00%]
9 [9.00%]
7 [7.00%]
4 [4.00%]
29 [29.00%]
1 [1.00%]
1 [1.00%]
36 [36.00%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Hawkwise View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 31 2008
Location: Ontairo
Status: Offline
Points: 4119
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 20:45
All of them Heavy Mental Rubbish 
Back to Top
Angelo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 07 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 13244
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 17:32
Originally posted by Avantgardehead Avantgardehead wrote:

Now wait just a minute! Genesis had a nursery rhyme in their Nursery Cryme album, so I think you're on to something! LOL


Careful - they also had a shopping list in The Aisle of Plenty. Before you know it.... Confused


ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected]
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 16:56
Originally posted by MaidenMadness MaidenMadness wrote:

why cause master of puppets, ride the lightning and and justice for all have more complex songs than your typical have metal?
 
That's a part of it - the rest is in the other thread
 
Originally posted by MaidenMadness MaidenMadness wrote:

of course that might not have anything to do with the fact that bay area thrash bands are more leaned towards technicality, as opposed to coast thrash whose sound was closer to punk and hardcore or german thrash metal who drawn influence from venom?
 
We went into that in the other thread.
 
Originally posted by MaidenMadness MaidenMadness wrote:


sorry but if that is the reason why metallica are considered a prog band than one can go easily and add the likes of megadeth, testament, death angel, heathen and the whole lot. personally i think its a weak argument.
 
We went into that in the other thread.
 
Originally posted by MaidenMadness MaidenMadness wrote:


other explanations metallica's sound influenced the likes of dt? fair enough but in a same way nwobhm bands such as diamond head should be considered to be at least as equally influential as metallica as metallica's sound was much more influenced by them, than prog metal bands a'la dt's sound was influenced by metallica.
 
Not just the sound - please read the other thread.
 
I agree about Diamond Head, BTW - always have done - but there are almost no "bands such as..." in Diamond Head's case - and they never made a fully Prog Metal album, more's the pity.
 
Originally posted by MaidenMadness MaidenMadness wrote:



if we want to be honest bands such as virgin steele or savatage have more prog elements in their music than metallica ever had.
 
I don't think so. Haven't heard many prog elements in their music myself.
 
 
Originally posted by MaidenMadness MaidenMadness wrote:



i am reading through that thread now and personally i don't see what i consider to be valid case for considering metallica prog related.
 
 
Really?
You should do a bit more than skim-reading it then.
 
Which bits do you disagree with?
 
 
Originally posted by MaidenMadness MaidenMadness wrote:


now if people here want to hold it against me then so be it. i stick by what i said, imo metallica is neither:

a) prog

nor

b) prog related in any greater extent than the likes of megadeth, venom, celtic frost, bathory, metal church and co are.
 
 
You stick to what you said, I stick to what I said, everyone is happy - except that why Metallica are more Prog-related than those other bands (except, perhaps, Celtic Frost) has been reasoned through with no serious counter-argument in the other threads on this subject - so you need not just a better argument, but an argument.
 
I don't hold it against you - I can just see you haven't actually thought it through.


Edited by Certif1ed - October 19 2008 at 17:01
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Avantgardehead View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 29 2006
Location: Dublin, OH, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1170
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 16:44
Originally posted by MaidenMadness MaidenMadness wrote:

syd barrett drew certain inspiration from nursery rhymes and that doesn't make nursery rhymes a'la humpty dumpty or twinkle twinkle little star prog.


Now wait just a minute! Genesis had a nursery rhyme in their Nursery Cryme album, so I think you're on to something! LOL

Plenty of prog bands have non-prog influences, so I don't think going around and adding all these influences is going to do any good (remember when My Dying Bride was here? Censored). Mention the influences in the bio of the prog artist and let the reader do his or her own research.
http://www.last.fm/user/Avantgardian
Back to Top
WinterLight View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 09 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 424
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 16:19
Originally posted by MaidenMadness MaidenMadness wrote:


why cause master of puppets, ride the lightning and and justice for all have more complex songs than your typical have metal? of course that might not have anything to do with the fact that bay area thrash bands are more leaned towards technicality, as opposed to east coast thrash whose sound was closer to punk and hardcore or german thrash metal who drawn influence from venom?

sorry but if that is the reason why metallica are considered a prog band than one can go easily and add the likes of megadeth, testament, death angel, heathen and the whole lot. personally i think its a weak argument.

other explanations metallica's sound influenced the likes of dt? fair enough but in a same way nwobhm bands such as diamond head should be considered to be at least as equally influential as metallica as metallica's sound was much more influenced by them, than prog metal bands a'la dt's sound was influenced by metallica.

if we want to be honest bands such as virgin steele or savatage have more prog elements in their music than metallica ever had.

i am reading through that thread now and personally i don't see what i consider to be valid case for considering metallica prog related.

Read carefully through the Prog Related page on the site.

now if people here want to hold it against me then so be it.

Although I disagree with your view, I have no intention of "holding it against" you.  However, the belligerence with which you articulate your opinion does have an alienating effect.


i stick by what i said, imo metallica is neither:

a) prog

nor

b) prog related in any greater extent than the likes of megadeth, venom, celtic frost, bathory, metal church and co are.

Despite popular platitudes, not all opinions have equal value:  some are well-informed and reasonable, others not so much.

Back to Top
Angelo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 07 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 13244
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 15:59
Originally posted by MaidenMadness MaidenMadness wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:


if you  really wanted to know... you would go to THAT thread.. and read just why the site believes they were related.    The admins here make that final determination...   call them spineless fanboys why don't you. 

have a clappie as a parting gift..Clap I have lots of them..

 for at least spicing up a boring Sunday around the forums.. 
are you insinuating i could be banned cause i disagree that metallica are either prog or prog related. cause personally i have a hard time thinking that the management around here is so closed minded that they ban people simply cause they don't share their views Tongue


You could be right on that one. However, I suggest you keep an eye on the kind of language you use on these forums. Calling people names, or using words that don't pass our auto-censor function (the **** in your previous posts) don't work to your advantage. You are fully entitle to an opinion, and to presenting it, as long as you stick to arguments. If that's to hard, we'll know what exit to show you.
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected]
Back to Top
MaidenMadness View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 28 2006
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 15:08
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Wrong. The other thread explains why you are wrong here.
 
The FACT is that they have every relation with Prog Metal - and that's why you're wrong.
 
why cause master of puppets, ride the lightning and and justice for all have more complex songs than your typical have metal? of course that might not have anything to do with the fact that bay area thrash bands are more leaned towards technicality, as opposed to east coast thrash whose sound was closer to punk and hardcore or german thrash metal who drawn influence from venom?

sorry but if that is the reason why metallica are considered a prog band than one can go easily and add the likes of megadeth, testament, death angel, heathen and the whole lot. personally i think its a weak argument.

other explanations metallica's sound influenced the likes of dt? fair enough but in a same way nwobhm bands such as diamond head should be considered to be at least as equally influential as metallica as metallica's sound was much more influenced by them, than prog metal bands a'la dt's sound was influenced by metallica.

if we want to be honest bands such as virgin steele or savatage have more prog elements in their music than metallica ever had.

i am reading through that thread now and personally i don't see what i consider to be valid case for considering metallica prog related.

now if people here want to hold it against me then so be it. i stick by what i said, imo metallica is neither:

a) prog

nor

b) prog related in any greater extent than the likes of megadeth, venom, celtic frost, bathory, metal church and co are.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 14:50
*munch munch munch*
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 14:34
Originally posted by MaidenMadness MaidenMadness wrote:

metallica have never been, at this moment aren't and in future never will be prog, or prog related. the fact certain prog metal bands drew inspiration from metallica among others doesn't change that fact. syd barrett drew certain inspiration from nursery rhymes and that doesn't make nursery rhymes a'la humpty dumpty or twinkle twinkle little star prog.

the fact some of you like to think of metallica as prog because you like them for reasons which are only clear to you doesn't make metallica nor prog nor prog related. i love iron maiden but i am clear about the fact that they don't have any relations with prog whatsoever.


 
 
Wrong. The other thread explains why you are wrong here.
 
The FACT is that they have every relation with Prog Metal - and that's why you're wrong.
 
 
Originally posted by MaidenMadness MaidenMadness wrote:

oh please gimme a break. just what makes metallica prog/prog related?
 
Read the other thread.
 
 
Originally posted by MaidenMadness MaidenMadness wrote:

the fact they influenced every single band that came after them. well boyo sorry to break it to you but the first cavemen who decided to create music out of the blue is prog/prog related as well but when you search pa for john doe or jane doe you don't get a single artist.

prog bands drew inspirations from so many different bands of different genres that in fact you could include just about every single band out there as prog/prog related.

the fact that people on pa came up with a genre pa doesn't shape the musical world in a way that there really is a genre named prog related. its strictly a fiction of mind of certain people from pa.

the genre prog related is nothing but a bunch of crap. under same thoughts one could include the likes of diamond head, motorhead, queen or someone from first wave of black metal such as venom or bathory?
why not count early norwegean black metal bands such as mayhem or darkthorne or burzum as prog as well after all didn't they have direct or indirect influece on the likes of opeth?

the tag prog related is nothing but a piece of sh*t.
 
No it isn't - it means Prog Related. I dispute that, because Metallica are so obviously Prog Metal - at least, to those of us with ears.
 
The rest of your argument is just rubbish - and answered by the other thread that you refuse to read.
 

 
Originally posted by MaidenMadness MaidenMadness wrote:


on your 2nd question metallica in fact died with cliff burton. and justice for all just happened. the rest of it i don't acknowledge it exists because if i did acknowledge its existance i couldn't have any respect whatsoever for the band that created 4 classic albums from kill em all to and justice for all.  its not about me being closed minded about music is them releasing crap albums. i mean black? load? reload? or how about garage inc which is nothing but 2 cds filled with covers? thats even without me even mentioning st anger. sorry but for me metallica after and justice for all doesn't exist. not even songs a la nothing else matters that many see as classics.
 
 
So what?
 
For many, Genesis didn't exiist after "The Lamb..." - but that doesn't stop them being Prog!
 
 
Originally posted by MaidenMadness MaidenMadness wrote:

sorry but as someone who has been listening to both metallica and prog for over a decade i don't need a 35 page thread to come to conclusion that metallica aren't a prog band.

if you like to believe in a lie that metallica made 4 prog albums its your choice, however your opinions don't make lies come true.
 
Sorry, but you really DO need to read that other thread.
 
No-one is lying, and your opinions are not as strongly based in reason as you seem to think they are. I too have been listening to Metallica, Prog, and music that would make your brain crawl out of your ears in protest for more than 2 decades. almost 4, in the case of Prog and other music.
 
 
The fact is that Metallica made at least 3 Prog Metal albums - whether you like it or not.
 
And I don't see any solid argument in your response, so I'm not actually sure why I'm replying, as I feel certain the response will not be carefully considered.
 
Let's see...
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
MaidenMadness View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 28 2006
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 14:24
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:


if you  really wanted to know... you would go to THAT thread.. and read just why the site believes they were related.    The admins here make that final determination...   call them spineless fanboys why don't you. 

have a clappie as a parting gift..Clap I have lots of them..

 for at least spicing up a boring Sunday around the forums.. 
are you insinuating i could be banned cause i disagree that metallica are either prog or prog related. cause personally i have a hard time thinking that the management around here is so closed minded that they ban people simply cause they don't share their views Tongue
Back to Top
WinterLight View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 09 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 424
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 14:04
Originally posted by MaidenMadness MaidenMadness wrote:


so what gets added? what majority of people feel should get added. nothing but a popularity contest.


It doesn't work that way:  look into the procedure for addition of artists to the archives.  For what it's worth, the majority objected to the inclusion of Metallica.
Back to Top
Alberto Muņoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 13:58
Originally posted by WinterLight WinterLight wrote:

Originally posted by MaidenMadness MaidenMadness wrote:


prog bands drew inspirations from so many different bands of different genres that in fact you could include just about every single band out there as prog/prog related.

the fact that people on pa came up with a genre pa doesn't shape the musical world in a way that there really is a genre named prog related. its strictly a fiction of mind of certain people from pa.

the genre prog related is nothing but a bunch of crap. under same thoughts one could include the likes of diamond head, motorhead, queen or someone from first wave of black metal such as venom or bathory?
why not count early norwegean black metal bands such as mayhem or darkthorne or burzum as prog as well after all didn't they have direct or indirect influece on the likes of opeth?

the tag prog related is nothing but a piece of sh*t.


Not interested in debating Metallica, as I've articulated my opinion in other threads.  However, I will say that although the term "prog related" is a somewhat ambiguous term, it was constructed, so I understand, to be ambiguous, i.e. to allow for future additions (not unlike the US constitution).  Whatever potential hazards the definition allows is checked by the addition process (loosely analogous to peer-review).  In genreal, such categorization has no real meaning, but it can be a useful guide in selecting music.


That's right that categorization has no real meaning at all.

 and BTW guys do not fight for something that was discussed BEFORE adding Metallica.
waste of time and bandwithLOLLOLLOLLOLLOL 




Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 13:54
Originally posted by MaidenMadness MaidenMadness wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

prog - RELATED..


read it, live it, understand it

before you make more of a fool of yourself
prog related i understand it fully, do you?

prog related meaning not prog but somehow linked to prog. once again something thats so undefined one can add whatever he wants to in there cause prog bands in general have many different influences.

so what gets added? what majority of people feel should get added. nothing but a popularity contest.


if you  really wanted to know... you would go to THAT thread.. and read just why the site believes they were related.    The admins here make that final determination...   call them spineless fanboys why don't you. 

have a clappie as a parting gift..Clap I have lots of them..

 for at least spicing up a boring Sunday around the forums.. 


Edited by micky - October 19 2008 at 13:58
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Alberto Muņoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 13:53
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

yawn.. .used the goddamned search function kid.. and find the 35 page thread that explains why they were added.


do it quick before you find yourself on the bad side of people who aren't as forgiving of stupid posts as these.


Here's the old thread: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=50828&KW=metallica





Back to Top
WinterLight View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 09 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 424
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 13:52
Originally posted by MaidenMadness MaidenMadness wrote:


prog bands drew inspirations from so many different bands of different genres that in fact you could include just about every single band out there as prog/prog related.

the fact that people on pa came up with a genre pa doesn't shape the musical world in a way that there really is a genre named prog related. its strictly a fiction of mind of certain people from pa.

the genre prog related is nothing but a bunch of crap. under same thoughts one could include the likes of diamond head, motorhead, queen or someone from first wave of black metal such as venom or bathory?
why not count early norwegean black metal bands such as mayhem or darkthorne or burzum as prog as well after all didn't they have direct or indirect influece on the likes of opeth?

the tag prog related is nothing but a piece of sh*t.


Not interested in debating Metallica, as I've articulated my opinion in other threads.  However, I will say that although the term "prog related" is a somewhat ambiguous term, it was constructed, so I understand, to be ambiguous, i.e. to allow for future additions (not unlike the US constitution).  Whatever potential hazards the definition allows is checked by the addition process (loosely analogous to peer-review).  In genreal, such categorization has no real meaning, but it can be a useful guide in selecting music.
Back to Top
MaidenMadness View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 28 2006
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 13:50
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

prog - RELATED..


read it, live it, understand it

before you make more of a fool of yourself
prog related i understand it fully, do you?

prog related meaning not prog but somehow linked to prog. once again something thats so undefined one can add whatever he wants to in there cause prog bands in general have many different influences.

so what gets added? what majority of people feel should get added. nothing but a popularity contest.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 13:46
prog - RELATED..


read it, live it, understand it

before you make more of a fool of yourself


Edited by micky - October 19 2008 at 13:46
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
MaidenMadness View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 28 2006
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 13:44
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

yawn.. .used the goddamned search function kid.. and find the 35 page thread that explains why they were added.


do it quick before you find yourself on the bad side of people who aren't as forgiving of stupid posts as these.
sorry but as someone who has been listening to both metallica and prog for over a decade i don't need a 35 page thread to come to conclusion that metallica aren't a prog band.

if you like to believe in a lie that metallica made 4 prog albums its your choice, however your opinions don't make lies come true.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 13:41
yawn.. .used the goddamned search function kid.. and find the 35 page thread that explains why they were added.


do it quick before you find yourself on the bad side of people who aren't as forgiving of stupid posts as these.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
MaidenMadness View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 28 2006
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2008 at 13:39
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:


hahahhaha...  sorry for being blunt... but that is the biggest bunch of bullsh*t I have read here in a nice bit.

bands are NOT added here because simply some people like them... .the people who work for this site judge the music regardless of whether they like it or not...   if the band was added... it was because there was very likely a REASON they belonged on the site.   If you don't agree..  suit yourself... opinions are like assholes.. everyone has one.  Don't call the integrety of the work the people do here into question however.
no reason to say sorry i like honesty.

and since we're all being honest why not answer my question. if metallica was added simply because it influenced prog metal bands why not add twinkle twinkle little star or the entire bunch of r&b artists as well since they influenced early prog metal bands?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 7>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.137 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.