| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
Wrath_of_Ninian 
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 04 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 230
|
 Posted: December 10 2004 at 05:47 |
 benny bouncer wrote:
erm GENESIS NUMBER 3......these guys have to listen to them before they place them that high! |
They are rubbish. Nice to know another prog fan that dislikes them too.
I was beginning to feel like I was the only one...I notice the prog collaborators on this site have a hefty chunk of Genesis in their current top twenty.
|
 |
Lunarscape
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 19 2004
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 374
|
Posted: December 09 2004 at 21:46 |
Ivan Melgar's post there wrap's it all up...Ridiculous site !
__________
Lunar 
|
|
Music Is The Soul Bird That Flies In The Immense Heart Of The Listener . . .
|
|
madgo2
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 25 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 118
|
Posted: December 09 2004 at 21:32 |
|
How about Jeff Beck or David Bowie, for his Berlin releases, they probably should be of course he is missing Bebop Deluxe, Roxy Music, and Supertramp...what about Beggars Opera just to name a few.
Edited by madgo2
|
|
He whom life can no longer surprise
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
|
Posted: December 09 2004 at 20:50 |
Dream Theater Neo Prog? (Look at the right side)
STYX before Anglagard, Rick Wakeman, PFM. The Strawbs, etc?
Genesis N° 3??? Should be N°1 at least the Gabriel era.
ASIA N° 21????? Should be at leat 210
TOTO Prog? I would say cheap POP instead.
California Guitar Trio is an excelent band but not remotely prog.
ELO N°12? Not really prog and one of the top in the list.
Happy The Man Psychedelic??? (Again at the right)
Holy God, this guys are clueless!!!!!!!!
Iván
|
|
Wizard/TRueStar
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 04 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 675
|
Posted: December 09 2004 at 19:52 |
|
|
|
selling_echoes
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 07 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 113
|
Posted: December 09 2004 at 19:43 |
benny bouncer wrote:
erm GENESIS NUMBER 3......these guys
have to listen to them before they place them that
high! |
Sorry man, must disagree.
My top three would be Pink Floyd, Genesis and Yes. But meh. That being me, and me being young and unexperiences with Prog.
|
|
benny bouncer
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 149
|
Posted: December 09 2004 at 17:13 |
|
erm GENESIS NUMBER 3......these guys have to listen to them before they place them that high!
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: December 09 2004 at 16:44 |
Electric Light Orchestra???
The Beatles????
Queensryche ABOVE Gong, Hawkwind, BJH, PFM, Amon Duul, Aphrodite's Child... 
Toto?
Yngwie Malmsteen?
Hatfield and the North at 147????? 
Since when where the Moodies a "psychedelic progressive band"? Kraftwerk Krautrock? Dream Theater neo-prog?
That list was put together by retards, surely...
I stuck some comments up there - I'll prolly regret them tomorrow, as I'm a significant way down this bottle of Highland Park... 
|
|
Wrath_of_Ninian
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 04 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 230
|
Posted: December 09 2004 at 16:35 |
Sorry, I didn't mean to suggest she wasn't, just that she was higher up than Can, who are without question one of the most influential and brilliant BANDS (never mind prog bands) of the 1970s.
I love Babooshka and Wow, and all that Heathcliff stuff. Apparently she wrote it all herself - in her TEENS. Where is she now I wonder...?
|
|
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
|
Posted: December 09 2004 at 16:30 |
It would betrer if they had just charted 'Progressive' artists and not specified 'Progressive ROCK'
Kate Bush is progressive IMO, just not rock
|
|
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
|
Wrath_of_Ninian
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 04 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 230
|
Posted: December 09 2004 at 16:19 |
What utter tosh.
69. Kate Bush
70. Can
?????????????????????????????????????????? How does that work?
83. Blood Sweat & Tears.
107. Banco Del Mutuo Soccorso
Do these people know what prog is? I was half expecting Stevie Wonder to appear at one point. They couldn't even spell Hatfield & The North correctly (No. 147 !!!!).
None of the bands I like even made it into the top 46.
Shut them down and destroy their gene pools.
|
|
Reed Lover
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
|
Posted: December 09 2004 at 15:47 |
Wow, Greg's got 1000 fingers!
|
|
|
|
gdub411
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
|
Posted: December 09 2004 at 15:38 |
The ending of my list would look something like this
998 Mariah Carey
999 Rush
1000 Yes
|
|
Reed Lover
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
|
Posted: December 09 2004 at 15:35 |
^
I follow Jon Andeson's lead on that one:
I get up, I get down
then I go back to bloody sleep!
|
|
|
|
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
|
Posted: December 09 2004 at 15:34 |
Reed Lover wrote:
gdub411 wrote:
Interesting....I don't agree with some of the bands on there...but still cool. I'm also having trouble with the whole Rush being higher than Pink Floyd bit as well.
Toto, Primus, Blood Sweat and Tears and Portis Head are prog?
|
I have trouble with King Crimson and ELP being placed higher than Rush.
Greg, I bet you have trouble tying your laces of a morning.
|
Me too!! Higher than Rush  Thats just nonesense...
I have trouble with my laces in the morning, but thats probably something to do with being bleary eyed, half asleep and stumbling around in darkness. I seem to get up before the rest of the human race!!
|
|
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
|
Proghead
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 08 2004
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 81
|
Posted: December 09 2004 at 14:17 |
|
Ben Dover ???
|
|
Reed Lover
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
|
Posted: December 09 2004 at 14:15 |
|
|
|
|
|
gdub411
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
|
Posted: December 09 2004 at 13:59 |
Reed Lover wrote:
gdub411 wrote:
Interesting....I don't agree with some of the bands on there...but still cool. I'm also having trouble with the whole Rush being higher than Pink Floyd bit as well.
Toto, Primus, Blood Sweat and Tears and Portis Head are prog?
|
I have trouble with King Crimson and ELP being placed higher than Rush.
Greg, I bet you have trouble tying your laces of a morning.
|
Bugger Off Troll!!
|
|
threefates
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4215
|
Posted: December 09 2004 at 13:55 |
Reed Lover wrote:
I have trouble with King Crimson and ELP being placed higher than Rush.
|
Rush?? I
I have a problem with ELP not being at least second..behind KC.
Edited by threefates
|
THIS IS ELP
|
|
Reed Lover
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
|
Posted: December 09 2004 at 13:48 |
gdub411 wrote:
Interesting....I don't agree with some of the bands on there...but still cool. I'm also having trouble with the whole Rush being higher than Pink Floyd bit as well.
Toto, Primus, Blood Sweat and Tears and Portis Head are prog?
|
I have trouble with King Crimson and ELP being placed higher than Rush.
Greg, I bet you have trouble tying your laces of a morning.
|
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
top 100 prog bands
