QM: Does Time exist?

MikeEnRegalia wrote: ^ There is no "science of scalar energy". I challenge you to properly define the term

Ah, dear challenger, I appreciate your spirited inquiry into the realm of scalar energy! The science of scalar energy is the systematic pursuit of knowledge about the scalar waves, employing observation, experimentation, and reasoning to uncover truths—essentially a rather clever way of asking "Why?" while donning a lab coat and wielding a beaker.
Thus, scalar waves hold huge potential in this field and find new research and applications. Research into scalar waves provides a stimulus to explore their uses on cellular and genetic levels. It was stated that the overall results show great promise for scalar waves as a facilitator of cellular repair, improving DNA function and enhancing the body's natural healing mechanisms. 

The technologies based on scalar waves, such as scalar energy generators and therapeutic apparatus, are becoming increasingly popular in the field of medicine; indeed, many of these machines have already found their way into the market as wellness devices. 

As research continues, new types of therapies might be developed that take advantage of the peculiar characteristics of scalar waves for improving human health.

One day Richard Feynman, looking at the quarks inside a proton asked: "By the way, who is Pink?" 

MikeEnRegalia wrote: ^ All of this is pseudo science.

It’s not pseudoscience. The sun and stars generate scalar energy, which is the universe's starting energy. The science of scalar energy is something we shall all be witnessing much more of in the future, and it represents a significant key to the technological innovations ahead, with a vast array of applications, particularly in the fields of energy production, physical healing, environmental remediation, and space exploration. For decades now, literature, films, and other forms of media have depicted futuristic technological capabilities as an inevitable progression for humanity, and the evidence suggesting that scalar energy plays a substantial role in this advancement is compelling.

tachyons are purely hypotethical. M=m0/SQRT(1-v^2/c?)

translated: Inertial mass =rest mass divided by the square root ov 1 minus velocity squared over c squared.

So if v>c , M is the square root of a negative number. 

Does it make sense? 

"i" appears also in Schroedinger's equation, so the presence of the imaginary unit doesn't seem to be a problem, but...

replace M with T and Time will flow backwards

The key is "Inertia". It's another thing that we know exists, but we don't know exactly what it is.

In my non-scientific opinion, is the resistanceof spacetime to motion.

Let me explain: assume that spacetime is discontinuous, and the minimum cell of spacetime is based on the Planck length. A particle is made of at least 4 Planck lengths squared (from the black hole entropy computed by Hawking).

A particle is a sort of "information" that's the sum of some spacetime cells. This information means mass, charge, colour and whatever measurables. 

Movement means transferring this information, or part of it to other cells (adjacent or not), and this transfer requires time. 

Apart of this idea, in order to accelerate, that means increasing v, me must spend energy, but energy increases the inertial mass, so to accelerate further you need more energy. 

This is asyntotic to c.  

In the tachyons world, you need energy to decelerate, so they can't be slowed down to c. 

How should the spacetime cells behave in that world?