Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Online
Points: 19538
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 22:55 |
pianomandust wrote:
I appreciate the comments, but we have gotten a little bit off topic - let me ask clarify the question a bit.. Will pop music (Nickelback, B. Spears, etc.)((not popular music)) become a new sound to our ears because we are so used to listening to prog music (whether or not is was/is popular at some point). I can listen to everything prog from Yes to Meshuggah, but at some point I will be used to the variety within prog. If I were to turn the radio to a "poppy" station, that music would sound progressive to me because I haven't heard a v-c-v-c-b-c song in so long.
I don't really think it will ever truly happen, but it is an interesting thought to examine.
|
Not in my case, but I'm too old to change.
Iván
|
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Online
Points: 19538
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 22:52 |
jammun wrote:
So the question is, how did the "kids" of the 60's (of which I was one) being force-fed the same advertising, suddenly decide that prog was a good thing? |
In first place, it was a different generation, much more `rebel than this one, Hippies gave a damn about propaganda and fashion, they dressed and acted as they wanted, today if kids don't buy clothes by Tommy or whoever is famous, they are unhappy.
In the 60's and early 70's, it was cool being against the system, living as you wanted, listening good Rock bands, today is just the opposite.
It's also important to notuice that the labels were managed by their owners, who had interest in recruiting good artists that could be part of their staff for years and supported them, today the labels are managed by young executives who are evaluated by the money they make in a short term, they don't care if an artist stays with the label for a year, they onlly care how many albums they will sell in 3 months.
And last but not least, even when Prog was much more popular, still never was a really popular genre, look at the to hits of 72, 73 and 74, none of them were Prog.
I started listening Prog in 1976 when I was 12, in those years most of the people only heard music in English, but in my promotion (144) only 3 of us were Progheads and not more than 10 or 20, knew about Prog
I'm sure that today there are kids listening alternative genres, but compared to lets say Rap, I'm almost sure they are the vast minority.
Iván
|
|
|
Petrovsk Mizinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 22:37 |
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Atavachron wrote:
I don't know Ivan, I often feel that way about it too but then I wonder if most people actually do - to some small degree - think for themselves, at least when it comes to things like music or films.. certain information on things as politics, current events and history is shaped largely on what journalists or companies present, this is true, but even then a person does vote for who they prefer, drinks the soft drink they like and reads the newspapers they enjoy. If they choose to pursue things further they may do that but if not, ultimately it's their decision and not what another individual or company says it should be. People may have different tastes but surely it is their taste and not another's.
|
David, most of the music is bought by kids, the kids are the most influenced people. they are told that Pepsi is better and they drink Pepsi, they are told that 50 Cent will make them popular and they will listen 50 cent.
Ask an average kid why do you like rap...They will answer you because it's cool,
And why it's cool? Because DJ's, magazines, MTV, etc say so.
Once they grow, they will be used to that music and will be hard to change them, that's the moment in which they will be manipulated about `politics.
Iván |
I agree to some extent, but not every that listens to rap likes it because 'it's cool' or whatever. I'm on the Prog Metal Team, I listen to Liszt, Rachmaninoff, jazz fusion and I like some Avant Garde stuff too. And I also like some hip-hop (not a lot, but maybe about 5 artists or so in the genre). There, I said it, and it's the truth. Okay, but before you need to say it, I know you'll say "but you're not the 'average kid", so that's out of the way now. But I have also known people who used to listen to nothing but hip-hop, out of ignorance. But then, one day he really enjoyed hearing me play guitar and wanted to take it up himself. Did he just start playing guitar and emulating my style? No, he choose his own style. Did he just start listening to music I liked because I liked it? No. In the last 12 months, our music tastes are a fair bit different now. Sure, we have a few bands in common, like Dream Theater, Porcupine Tree, King Crimson etc that we like, but other than that he likes a lot of music I don't like and I listen to lots of stuff he doesn't like either. The fact is, far less kids than you realize are as dumbed down and brain washed as you think. Face, there was probably a time when at least a sizable chunk of today's PA members started out on pop music and what was readily available on commercial radio, 'music for the unthinking, music for the masses etc'. And look where they are now. Formulating their own individual tastes in music and discussing right here on PA. I guarantee you, you ask for a show of hands and ask who here started out on heavily commercialized music, and there are gonna be people who stick their hand up. Because I know, for me personally, there was in fact a time before I started playing an instrument and taking it seriously, there was a time before I started studying music theory, there was a time before I started to read about politics so I could make up my mind of where I sit on the political spectrum and there was a time before I knew about prog rock. Some people are going to stay ignorant and not bother to learn, sure, but some people are just ignorant because they didn't know but yet they may always be willing to learn (as in the case of my friend who now enjoys prog rock alongside hip hop).
Edited by HughesJB4 - December 08 2008 at 22:38
|
|
|
jplanet
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 30 2006
Location: NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 799
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 22:33 |
If we talk about teenagers, who are the main demographic for pop music, there is a case for peer pressure circumstances.
I recall hanging out drinking with a bunch of friends in someone's basement when I was in high school. We were the "metalheads" group. Someone said, in a drunken stupor, "Metal is the only good music, man!". I was equally schnockered, and replied, "actually, metal kind of f**n sucks". Everybody burst out laughing, and one guy said, "you know, actually, when I think about it, I really don't like metal that much". The another person chimed in "everybody thinks Ozzy is cool, but he really can't sing for sh*t!". And so it went around the room. We figured out that people in the "metalhead" group probably only liked a little bit more metal music than any other kids in school, and probably because we had a social outlet built around the whole idea, and just had access to more of it.
|
|
|
jammun
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 22:30 |
So the question is, how did the "kids" of the 60's (of which I was one) being force-fed the same advertising, suddenly decide that prog was a good thing?
|
|
pianomandust
Forum Groupie
Joined: May 10 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 55
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 22:28 |
I appreciate the comments, but we have gotten a little bit off topic - let me ask clarify the question a bit.. Will pop music (Nickelback, B. Spears, etc.)((not popular music)) become a new sound to our ears because we are so used to listening to prog music (whether or not is was/is popular at some point). I can listen to everything prog from Yes to Meshuggah, but at some point I will be used to the variety within prog. If I were to turn the radio to a "poppy" station, that music would sound progressive to me because I haven't heard a v-c-v-c-b-c song in so long.
I don't really think it will ever truly happen, but it is an interesting thought to examine.
|
and then there was music...
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65272
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 22:24 |
No I fundamentally disagree -- firstly, kids don't always have the tools or vocabulary yet to articulate why they like something, if a kid says "it's cool" it may very well mean "I as an individual appreciate this", not "It seems to be popular with the masses and MTV plays it frequently". Second, let's apply the 50 Cent example but with a different artist usually included in the same market : I happen to think Eminem is a genius, on the same level with Prince and Beck in terms of talent and innovation, so if a kid says he likes Eminem is he saying it because Eminem is popular and highly promoted, or because he genuinely likes the music ? And are we prepared to suggest a kid is lying when he says he genuine likes it? I for one am not.
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Online
Points: 19538
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 22:12 |
Atavachron wrote:
I don't know Ivan, I often feel that way about it too but then I wonder if most people actually do - to some small degree - think for themselves, at least when it comes to things like music or films.. certain information on things as politics, current events and history is shaped largely on what journalists or companies present, this is true, but even then a person does vote for who they prefer, drinks the soft drink they like and reads the newspapers they enjoy. If they choose to pursue things further they may do that but if not, ultimately it's their decision and not what another individual or company says it should be. People may have different tastes but surely it is their taste and not another's.
|
David, most of the music is bought by kids, the kids are the most influenced people. they are told that Pepsi is better and they drink Pepsi, they are told that 50 Cent will make them popular and they will listen 50 cent.
Ask an average kid why do you like rap...They will answer you because it's cool,
And why it's cool? Because DJ's, magazines, MTV, etc say so.
Once they grow, they will be used to that music and will be hard to change them, that's the moment in which they will be manipulated about `politics.
Iván
|
|
|
jplanet
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 30 2006
Location: NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 799
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 21:56 |
Atavachron wrote:
^ but that just shows that record companies were basing decisions on what was popular, not what they thought should be popular but rather an acid-dropping, pot-smoking, post-hippie culture
|
Damn it, you're right again! Maybe this is why prog bands can still get gigs in Europe and Canada, pot is decriminalized in those places! Ok, here's the plan to bring back prog: We all have a moral obligation to encourage kids to do drugs.
|
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65272
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 21:52 |
^ but that just shows that record companies were basing decisions on what was popular, not what they thought should be popular but rather an acid-dropping, pot-smoking, post-hippie culture
|
|
jplanet
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 30 2006
Location: NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 799
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 21:48 |
I have to agree that many things which are popular - not just music, are only popular because people are told that that is what is popular. Prog WAS extremely popular. Remember my earlier post: Dark Side of the Moon is the best-selling record of all time, and ELP used to be the highest-grossing touring act in the world. At that time, the record industry was able to profit from prog - it went hand-in-hand with the acid-dropping, pot-smoking, post-hippie culture in the 70's.
I can remember hearing Gates of Delirium being played WPLJ in NY back in the 80's - it wasn't unusual to hear prog epics on the most popular radio stations at the time.
If you need further proof - taste a slice of Domino's and then taste a slice of real pizza - if you tell everyone that Domino's is what pizza is supposed to taste like, they will believe you. If there was nothing on the radio but Magma and Zorn, they would be playing sold-out stadiums...
Edited by jplanet - December 08 2008 at 21:49
|
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65272
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 21:06 |
I don't know Ivan, I often feel that way about it too but then I wonder if most people actually do - to some small degree - think for themselves, at least when it comes to things like music or films.. certain information on things as politics, current events and history is shaped largely on what journalists or companies present, this is true, but even then a person does vote for who they prefer, drinks the soft drink they like and reads the newspapers they enjoy. If they choose to pursue things further they may do that but if not, ultimately it's their decision and not what another individual or company says it should be. People may have different tastes but surely it is their taste and not another's.
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Online
Points: 19538
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 20:53 |
Atavachron wrote:
interesting matter -- it must be equally Average Joe's fault if he will indeed prefer pop-oriented music.. not his fault if it's what he likes, just that it's reality so the record companies are trying to make as much money as possible (which is not to say all companies promote bad music, or bad pop music). I would guess most record companies are gambling on what particular musics have markets (thank God prog has one albeit small) and those markets are people who know what they like as opposed to it being forced on them, i.e. Bon Jovi has made some good pop rock and therefore a huge number of people liked it.
|
Lets be honest David....Most people don't know what they like, they listen what is played in the radios, what the magazines says is best or what is cool.
I don't say they are forced, but they are guided, multiple artists like boys or girls bands are only products, they can't sing unless helped by technology (most of them of course), they don't play a damn instrument, hardly they write their music....They only have to look cool and attract kids who will buy records with dad's credit card.
Prog is normally ignored, and when not ignored, attacked, because the industry doesn't want a band that will take one, two or three years to reach a gold record, they want platinum on the first three months, because that's where the money is for the executives.
Yes, the average Joe doesn't want to research for good music, he wants to listen what somebody else with some "authority" tells them is good, and of course very few DJ's will tell them Prog is good.
We leave in an easy society, people want to be told the movies they must see, the food they must eat, the places they must go and of course the music they must listen. and very few will tell people to listen Prog.
Iván
|
|
|
Henry Plainview
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 20:40 |
Slartibartfast wrote:
micky wrote:
valravennz wrote:
Pop = New Prog? Maybe if relating it to such groups as Radiohead and Muse for example. But can we really include such genres as Rap/Hip Hop, R n B, Country and Reggae and straight out Pop eg: "I Kissed A Girl...", "I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus" etc. I am prepared to consider the merits of Alternative and Roots but the other genres - Heck no! What is progressive about them??? |
rock... R n B... country.... just what IS the difference really... preference perhaps?... does it have to ROCK to be prog. This site has answered that definitively...answered it in the negative.
|
We might want to drop the "rock" from "your ultimate prog rock resource" in the masthead. I'd prefer it to read "your ultimate progressive music resource". Then we could put that one to bed. I'm pretty sure we wouldn't have to let all of the riff-raff into the room. But I applaud the site for not being too narrow of mind. I've seen a lot of controversial additions since I've joined and I remain in favor of a bigger tent when it comes to what is included. Still there will be endless battles here regarding where the line is drawn.
|
I'd imagine some people would not be happy at letting free jazz in.
But we already have John Zorn and Miles, so I think it's only a matter of time. ;-)
|
if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65272
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 20:09 |
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
The average Joe will normally never like Prog, but not his fault, the record industry manipulates the music, radios and magazines so only what is profitable for them reaches the top, and Prog is not preciselty their best investmen.
|
interesting matter -- it must be equally Average Joe's fault if he will indeed prefer pop-oriented music.. not his fault if it's what he likes, just that it's reality so the record companies are trying to make as much money as possible (which is not to say all companies promote bad music, or bad pop music). I would guess most record companies are gambling on what particular musics have markets (thank God prog has one albeit small) and those markets are people who know what they like as opposed to it being forced on them, i.e. Bon Jovi has made some good pop rock and therefore a huge number of people liked it.
|
|
valravennz
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: March 20 2005
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 2546
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 20:05 |
|
"Music is the Wine that fills the cup of Silence"
- Robert Fripp
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 19:56 |
The musical traits that describe Prog are not unique to the genre, nor are they cast in stone. Prog frequently "borrows" from other genres and in return other genres employ some of the developments in musical styles that Prog pioneered.
on the plus side -
Pop evolves - it always has done - not every band, but a fair number have progressed and a few have even crossed-over into Prog - (this is a "good thing") - but even those bands and artists who don't make the complete transition make worthwhile music that improves what "Pop"
on the negative side -
Pop for one has proven time and time again that it can adopt and adapt anything - take the current trend of Pop Classical like Vanessa Mae, Bond and Il Divo - it's a hideous idea with horrendous results - yet still they sell like hot cakes - once that's fallen out of vogue they'll turn their attention to another genre to plunder ... now imagine Nous Sommes du Soleil trimmed to a nice radio friendly, accessible 3 minutes and given a good solid repetitive 4/4 beat - bet you're glad Simon Cowell isn't a Prog fan now...
|
What?
|
|
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 19:50 |
micky wrote:
valravennz wrote:
Pop = New Prog? Maybe if relating it to such groups as Radiohead and Muse for example. But can we really include such genres as Rap/Hip Hop, R n B, Country and Reggae and straight out Pop eg: "I Kissed A Girl...", "I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus" etc. I am prepared to consider the merits of Alternative and Roots but the other genres - Heck no! What is progressive about them??? |
rock... R n B... country.... just what IS the difference really... preference perhaps?... does it have to ROCK to be prog. This site has answered that definitively...answered it in the negative.
|
We might want to drop the "rock" from "your ultimate prog rock resource" in the masthead. I'd prefer it to read "your ultimate progressive music resource". Then we could put that one to bed. I'm pretty sure we wouldn't have to let all of the riff-raff into the room. But I applaud the site for not being too narrow of mind. I've seen a lot of controversial additions since I've joined and I remain in favor of a bigger tent when it comes to what is included. Still there will be endless battles here regarding where the line is drawn.
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|
valravennz
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: March 20 2005
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 2546
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 19:45 |
micky wrote:
valravennz wrote:
Pop = New Prog? Maybe if relating it to such groups as Radiohead and Muse for example. But can we really include such genres as Rap/Hip Hop, R n B, Country and Reggae and straight out Pop eg: "I Kissed A Girl...", "I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus" etc. I am prepared to consider the merits of Alternative and Roots but the other genres - Heck no! What is progressive about them??? |
rock... R n B... country.... just what IS the difference really... preference perhaps?... does it have to ROCK to be prog. This site has answered that definitively...answered it in the negative.
|
Micky - No - it does not have to ROCK to be prog. Perhaps I am being too simplistic in my understanding of what should not be regarded as prog music. I always understood Prog music to contain some elements of complexity such as "odd" time signatures that is not seen in the usual Pop composition. I don't want to get too far out of my depth here, but I think most of what is regarded as Pop music is too simple a music form to be regarded as prog music as I understand it.
|
"Music is the Wine that fills the cup of Silence"
- Robert Fripp
|
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Online
Points: 19538
|
Posted: December 08 2008 at 19:44 |
cobb2 wrote:
Ivan- I've got Yes at QPR. And this is after Tales where they fell from grace with the music rags.. and still popular. In my opinion it could have been their greatest historical recording- except for the extremely bad mixing. |
Excellent tape, Patrick Moraz is amazing, butt really, the mixing is terrible.
cobb2 wrote:
Back on topic. That quote of Emersons you put up sums up why prog will never be popular- who in the world wants to invest time and energy trying to understand something that makes absolutely no sense! And that is your average "Turn on the radio while I do the housework, dear" listener. |
Agree with you except for one thing,Prog makes sense, the problem is people want their music alredy chewed so they don't have to put any effort of concentration.
The average Joe will normally never like Prog, but not his fault, the record industry manipulates the music, radios and magazines so only what is profitable for them reaches the top, and Prog is not preciselty their best investmen.
Iván
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - December 08 2008 at 19:45
|
|
|