Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
sigod
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
|
Posted: October 24 2008 at 12:02 |
Love these guys to bits but I will admit they are a very recent discovery for me (thank you iTunes )
|
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
|
|
Vibrationbaby
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
|
Posted: October 24 2008 at 11:58 |
I wasn`t growling. I just checked them out and gave my lowdown. Never said they were crap. Just not my bag and I sort of tried to explain why. The Satan vocals.
|
|
Visitor13
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
|
Posted: October 24 2008 at 02:51 |
Jake Kobrin wrote:
Dude, if you say that about the vocals in 'Shugg then you obviously don't understand them. They're NOT supposed to be used like melodic instrument, as nothing else in the band is. They're used, like their drums, guitar, and bass, as a RHYTHMIC tool... like a second set of percussion. |
yup. And that's why they have to be shouted.
|
|
topofsm
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 17 2008
Location: Arizona, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1698
|
Posted: October 24 2008 at 02:42 |
I have to agree. Meshuggah definetely doesn't do death growls. In fact, I find Kidman's vocals pretty unique sounding in terms of growling type music, so much that you really can't compare them to other death metal bands.
Ya know, I think that growls are rather operatic. That's just my opinion. If done deep and heavy, I think they pull off a lot more than what just singing could do. And yes, I think that growls could be used in an opera. At least I'd go see an opera with a growling person.
And there's definetely music behind growling. You wouldn't say there's no music behind a snare drum player because they only play one note.
Anyway, we're turning this into a growling thread, and not a Meshuggah appreciation thread.
|
|
|
Petrovsk Mizinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
|
Posted: October 23 2008 at 21:40 |
Vibrationbaby wrote:
Wow ! The invasion of the metal heads ! The thing about all these death metal bands that ruins for me is the annoying satanic vocals . I actually took the time to listen to these guys ( I think Meshugga means something like insane or crazy in Hebrew ) and if they would just knock off those assinine vocals maybe there`s something here. I kind of liked the insanity that Mind`s Mirrors evoked sort of reminded me of some Hawkwind from the 80s. I watched the two videos Straws Pulled At Random and Shed and at leasst the latter is a bit more upbeat and reminds me of Crimson`s Thrak & Vroom album & EP a little. I own a lot of older heavier albums from Sabbath, Priest, Ministry, Rammstein, Laibach, Soundgarden etc. but these newer bands just blow it for me with the Satan vocals.
|
For a start, Meshuggah isn't even a death metal band. I don't see how anyone can confuse what it obviously an experimental/tech/groove metal band with a death metal band. They have completely and utterly different musical characteristics. Honestly, I'm starting to find it ridiculous that people come into threads, make up blatant rubbish like that, display a complete lack of knowledge/ignorance of a band/genre, and expect to still maintain credibility for their argument and expect not to receive backlash. Satan vocals? What are Satan vocals? Death Metal vocals are called death growls, not Satan vocals. What you hear in Meshuggah are vocals very much similar to hardcore screams. A completely different vocal style to "SATAN VOCALS". I don't go into a Yes thread for example and say "well, Yes wasn't an influential" when clearly that is not the case (an example of just posting blatant made up crap in a thread). If I, or others don't do that, I except the same kinda of respect back from other forum members. I think it would have been reasonable enough just to say "I don't like death metal style vocals". I think many of us can agree on that. And lastly, it's posts like those that ruin Appreciation Threads. Again, I don't go into a Caravan Appreciation thread and say "Well, personally I think Soft Machine is a far superior Canterbury band". I'd rather let all the hardcore fans just have the thread to show their love and appreciation for the band, just leave them alone without trolling a thread that was clearly not made for people to come in and bash a band. Think about how you would feel if someone came into your appreciation thread and bashed one of your favorite bands, before you go into another person's thread and bash their favorite band. It's all I ask.
|
|
|
Jake Kobrin
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 20 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 1303
|
Posted: October 23 2008 at 20:56 |
Dude, if you say that about the vocals in 'Shugg then you obviously don't understand them. They're NOT supposed to be used like melodic instrument, as nothing else in the band is. They're used, like their drums, guitar, and bass, as a RHYTHMIC tool... like a second set of percussion.
|
|
|
Visitor13
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
|
Posted: October 23 2008 at 14:11 |
^ Kinda like with Opeth... well, actually Opeth is even more problematic here, getting read of the growls would mean having to rewrite most of the instrumental sections.
|
|
Vibrationbaby
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
|
Posted: October 23 2008 at 14:07 |
Hardcore, Satanic whatever I`ll take Dio, Bruce Dickinson or Rob Halford any day . There`s just nothing musical here. It`s not singing. You might as well go to the zoo and listen to lions roar. Opeth have some great instrumental sections but the damn vocals just kill them.
Edited by Vibrationbaby - October 23 2008 at 14:09
|
|
Visitor13
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
|
Posted: October 23 2008 at 12:33 |
Vibrationbaby wrote:
Wow ! The invasion of the metal heads ! The thing about all these death metal bands that ruins for me is the annoying satanic vocals . I actually took the time to listen to these guys ( I think Meshugga means something like insane or crazy in Hebrew ) and if they would just knock off those assinine vocals maybe there`s something here. I kind of liked the insanity that Mind`s Mirrors evoked sort of reminded me of some Hawkwind from the 80s. I watched the two videos Straws Pulled At Random and Shed and at leasst the latter is a bit more upbeat and reminds me of Crimson`s Thrak & Vroom album & EP a little. I own a lot of older heavier albums from Sabbath, Priest, Ministry, Rammstein, Laibach, Soundgarden etc. but these newer bands just blow it for me with the Satan vocals. |
Eh, these aren't 'satanic' vocals, more like hardcore (the genre) ones. And you'd have to get rid of vocals altogether, no freaking way you can have anything in the way of clean vocals in Meshuggah, they'd come off even flatter than the present shouted ones. Removing vocals wouldn't be a major loss, but if you're to keep vocals in at all, this is the way they have to be.
|
|
The Pessimist
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834
|
Posted: October 23 2008 at 12:04 |
|
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."
Arnold Schoenberg
|
|
Vibrationbaby
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
|
Posted: October 23 2008 at 10:52 |
Wow ! The invasion of the metal heads ! The thing about all these death metal bands that ruins for me is the annoying satanic vocals . I actually took the time to listen to these guys ( I think Meshugga means something like insane or crazy in Hebrew ) and if they would just knock off those assinine vocals maybe there`s something here. I kind of liked the insanity that Mind`s Mirrors evoked sort of reminded me of some Hawkwind from the 80s. I watched the two videos Straws Pulled At Random and Shed and at leasst the latter is a bit more upbeat and reminds me of Crimson`s Thrak & Vroom album & EP a little. I own a lot of older heavier albums from Sabbath, Priest, Ministry, Rammstein, Laibach, Soundgarden etc. but these newer bands just blow it for me with the Satan vocals.
|
|
Jake Kobrin
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 20 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 1303
|
Posted: October 22 2008 at 18:50 |
Meshuggahs my third favorite band. In fact, I'm currently wearing a Meshuggah shirt! I've never heard something from this band that I haven't liked. Nothing beats Nothing though. Oh and... how much 'shugg could a 'shugg chuck chuck if a 'shugg chuck could chuck 'shugg?
|
|
|
Petrovsk Mizinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
|
Posted: October 22 2008 at 03:49 |
They have yet to release something that has disappointed me. Consistently awesome band.
|
|
|
ProgBagel
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2819
|
Posted: October 22 2008 at 00:12 |
I just listened to Obzen for the first time since I listened to it twice and didn't like it upon release. I don't know what I was thinking. This is another damn fine album by the band.
|
|
topofsm
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 17 2008
Location: Arizona, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1698
|
Posted: October 21 2008 at 21:38 |
DJPuffyLemon wrote:
I have only ever heard their 22 minute single titled I. And I was pretty bored to be honest. Maybve not the best place to start. Suggestions?
on a side note, i'm all for technicallity (its one of the reasons i like Protest the hero), but i also like when the technicallity doesn't destroy the musicallity of the band (another reason i like Protest the hero). so perhaps if this band sacrifies musicallity and listenability for technicallity it may not be my bag. I'm still willing to give them a shot though. |
I am perplexed, as that is the first material of Meshuggah I ever heard, and to this day it's one of my favorites ever.
I find it somewhat annoying when people say they are repetitive. They sort of tend to variate the rhythms sort of how composers like to put variations on a theme. Sure, at the beggining of a phrase, you'll pick out a couple measures of 7/8, then maybe an 11/8 here, and then they'll finish up with a couple 4/4s, and they repeat that phrase a couple times. But by the end of the song, they've just completely changed the rhythms, elongated certain notes in the phrase, shortened a couple of bars, stretched out key notes, and while the two different phrases sound the same, they may be completely different in terms of rhythm. Name another band that does that!
|
|
|
moe_blunts
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 18 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 617
|
Posted: October 21 2008 at 21:13 |
Besides putting out several superb studio releases, this band is ri-donkulously good live. They put on one of the most intense shows I've ever seen.
Favorite Releases: I, Nothing, Catch 33...in that order
|
|
|
zappaholic
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 24 2006
Location: flyover country
Status: Offline
Points: 2822
|
Posted: October 21 2008 at 20:36 |
I first tried them out a few years ago with Chaosphere and found it to be mostly a blur. Then last year I decided to try again, with catch thirtythr33. That one hooked me. I've since picked up Nothing, obZen and I. A fine band, although clearly not for everyone.
|
"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard." -- H.L. Mencken
|
|
Visitor13
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
|
Posted: October 21 2008 at 17:05 |
DJPuffyLemon wrote:
I have only ever heard their 22 minute single titled I. And I was pretty bored to be honest. Maybve not the best place to start. Suggestions?
on a side note, i'm all for technicallity (its one of the reasons i like Protest the hero), but i also like when the technicallity doesn't destroy the musicallity of the band (another reason i like Protest the hero). so perhaps if this band sacrifies musicallity and listenability for technicallity it may not be my bag. I'm still willing to give them a shot though. |
Eh, Meshuggah's technicality makes their musicality, not destroy it. How else would they be so funky without being so technical? The much larger issue is that once you've heard ~10 minutes of one of their albums, you've basically heard the whole album. Kibble_Alex is right, they manage to avoid that pretty well on Destroy, Erase, Improve, not least since the drummer is given more room there. I hope they return to a similiar approach one day.
|
|
avalanchemaster
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 730
|
Posted: October 21 2008 at 14:15 |
is all!
|
|
|
The Pessimist
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834
|
Posted: October 21 2008 at 11:51 |
DJPuffyLemon, I'd try out DEI, probably their most diverse effort and gradually ween yourself in with Soul Burn, Beneath and Inside What's Within Behind, as i see them as the most accessible songs. You'll soon buy Chaosphere after that, guaranteed.
Silver Sable: This is an appreciation thread. The clues in the title.
|
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."
Arnold Schoenberg
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.