Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Steve Howe (post-CTTE) is rubbish
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSteve Howe (post-CTTE) is rubbish

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Cesar Inca View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 19 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 4888
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 22:31

 

... On the other hand... I could hardly see Howe's labor on peda lsteel during the 'Soon' section overdone or gratuitously pyrotechnical: on the contrary, I find it sensitive and subtle, in a perfect communion with the mellotron magnificent layers provided by Moraz. Actually, the only "Relayer" track in which he seems particularly interested to show off is 'The Gates of Delirium', and he does a fine job, indeed. His Flamenco-esque electric guitar solo for 'Sound Chaser' is simply terrific, providing some fire after the jazz fusion-tinged whirlwind that preceded it. What's more, Moraz is given enough space to make some damn good solos in 'Sound Chaser' and 'To Be Over', and he also makes some damn good interplaying with Howe, doubling Steve's lines with his Mini-Moog or ARP Pro-Soloist. I don't hear Howe overshadowing his partners, I don't hear Moraz overshadowing Moraz.

Oh, I almost forget: his technique is not as polished as that of Hackett's, Akkerman's, Lifeson's or Di Meola's, just to put 4 examples.

Regards. 



Edited by Cesar Inca
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 20:38

I know that you mean...and yet I canīt agree. I find that "The Ancient" from the "Tales..." album has some of Howes best acoustic work. And everything on "Relayer", specialy "Sound Chaser" is excellent. But, yes, in a way "Fragil", "Close to the Edge" and specially "The Yes Album" has got different riffs and solos...

Back to Top
Fragile View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 27 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 1125
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 20:14
Ninian how long did it take you to arrive at this anti Steve Howe state of mind?No matter how well worded and intelligently put as your views are there are many on here  who believe that Steve is still the top guitar man.With the best will in the world I cannot begin to agree with your opinions on the magnificent Yes guitarist.Having witnessed him live on around 15 occasions and at very close quarters at venues such as Glasgow's Renfrew Ferry it is easy to see why so many people hold him in such high regard.Whilst you argue very well to state that post Ctte he is  rubbish is just plain silly to me.
Back to Top
Wrath_of_Ninian View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 04 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 230
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 20:01
Originally posted by John Gargo John Gargo wrote:

Originally posted by bluetailfly bluetailfly wrote:

"Well thought out and literately argued"??? It was a complete rant from start to finish. This is not a model of a considered argument, but more like a Rush Limbaugh diatribe.

Hey, I don't agree with him at all, but at least he was comprehensive with his arguments.  It's obvious that he's passionate about the subject, and its refreshing to read something on this forum besides "Queen sucks, ELP sucks, Kansas sucks" etc. etc.

I thought he stated his case and used some good examples to back it up.  Again, I DON'T AGREE WITH HIM, but he did give some reasons as to why he feels the way he does.

Thanks John, I actually DO feel quite strongly about this, especially as I find my respect for these Yes albums that I once totally admired, increasingly ebbing into the ether.  

Bluetailfly, you cant expect people to come on to the forum and set down 10,000-word Aristotelian dialectic theses about trivial subjects such as Steve Howe's performances on post-CTTE albums.  Of course there are going to be holes in an argument claiming that everything he conjured subsequently, was mediocre.  The objective was simply to encourage a bit of conversation in the spirit of the forum, without resorting to the types of exchanges that we are having now. 

From your posts, I can garner that you are fan of Howe's entire career, and you made some good points in support of some of his works.  I am now a bit more interested and will investigate the stuff.  Thats how it works.  I'm not sitting here sticking pins into Steve Howe 1973 dolls. I've got Phil Collins 1976 dolls for that...  

 

"Now all the seasons run together, and the middle days are gone..."
Back to Top
Fragile View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 27 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 1125
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 19:51
Send for the men in the white coats right now
Back to Top
Arsillus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7374
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 19:47

Howe is a genius, one of my all-time favourites. It was Relayer (my first Yes album I heard) that I knew this guy knew how to play like a beast. I was blown away by Sound Chaser.

Back to Top
bluetailfly View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1383
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 19:37
Originally posted by John Gargo John Gargo wrote:

Originally posted by bluetailfly bluetailfly wrote:

"Well thought out and literately argued"??? It was a complete rant from start to finish. This is not a model of a considered argument, but more like a Rush Limbaugh diatribe.

Hey, I don't agree with him at all, but at least he was comprehensive with his arguments.  It's obvious that he's passionate about the subject, and its refreshing to read something on this forum besides "Queen sucks, ELP sucks, Kansas sucks" etc. etc.

I thought he stated his case and used some good examples to back it up.  Again, I DON'T AGREE WITH HIM, but he did give some reasons as to why he feels the way he does.

I know, I'm sorry, I wasn't directing that comment to you, but to Wrath. While it is relatively well written (what with the examples and the humorous descriptive put-downs), I would classify it as a diatribe, because to sum up and dismiss a huge body of extremely varied work so bluntly is not a well-reasoned argument.



Edited by bluetailfly
"The red polygon's only desire / is to get to the blue triangle."
Back to Top
Wrath_of_Ninian View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 04 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 230
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 19:33
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

I think your talking absolute balls wrath.........and Howe didnt even write Parallels it was Squire ....so there

A view crudely exchanged!! You'll give forums a bad name Snow Dog if you just keep blindly disagreeing.  I think YOU'RE talking balls (and so on...)

And you're right about Parallels of course - I confidently made the comment based on a solitary (and clearly jaded) memory of reading the back of the record sleeve 10 years ago .  I do sincerely apologise, though you will agree that the statement was not central to my hypothesis...

Howe still ruins it.  

"Now all the seasons run together, and the middle days are gone..."
Back to Top
alan_pfeifer View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 823
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 19:32

Originally posted by Litl Litl wrote:

I can't agree with any of this.  Howe's uniqueness, and that of the entire band, is how these wildly talented and individualistic players come together and still create a whole that is greater than the sum of the parts - rather than a whole that is a mishmash of conflicting sonic egos.  I especially respect how Howe (sorry) stands out in the mix.  Where are the guitarists now who dare to take their playing and bring it to the fore where it can command and lead?  Frankly I'm tired of the mash potato sound where all the players are blended together on the puree setting.  Let's get some more adventure going in progressive music.  Isn't that what it's all about?

If your'e looking for commanding guitar, Try the Mars Volta (apologizes for Spam....kinda)

Back to Top
alan_pfeifer View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 823
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 19:26
Originally posted by Wrath_of_Ninian Wrath_of_Ninian wrote:

Originally posted by alan_pfeifer alan_pfeifer wrote:

I really like Relayer, but moreso for White.  But that's another post.  It can be tough at times to deal with his more techinical playing on some songs, espescially Gates. However, that Guitar line at the "Soon" portion of the song saves it.

Yes, White is immense - indeed, the whole band (bar Howe) are immense - its a great album.  Howe does have a couple of good moments on Relayer, like the one you mention, but his sound is still hellish.  Why is he so high up in the mix??  By the way, I think what 'saves' it are Moraz's keyboards and the beauty of Anderson's voice.

I think what had happened was an overblow of egos, mainly starting off at Tales.  Think about it: your'e a guitarist in one of the most successful bands of the time period.  You've just come off a great tour for an album that's been accepted well both criticaly and sales- wise (CTTE).  Who's ego wouldn't be huge after a thing like that?

Second, after Tales, Which Howe and Anderson wrote with minimal input from the band, I think the feeling they had on Tales, which was Anderson, Howe and Company, was still there when they went into record Relayer.  As attitudes tend to linger, so do playing styles (IMO) and Howe may have felt Compelled to up the ante on this album (due to the poor reception Tales had) or maybe he wanted to show that he was up there in skill with some of the heavy hitters of Rock music at the time (Page for example).

So, in the end, it all comes down to opinion, but I still think that Howe on Relayer, while unpleasant at times, helped to shape relayer into the wonderful album it is.

Back to Top
John Gargo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 450
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 19:18

Originally posted by bluetailfly bluetailfly wrote:

"Well thought out and literately argued"??? It was a complete rant from start to finish. This is not a model of a considered argument, but more like a Rush Limbaugh diatribe.

Hey, I don't agree with him at all, but at least he was comprehensive with his arguments.  It's obvious that he's passionate about the subject, and its refreshing to read something on this forum besides "Queen sucks, ELP sucks, Kansas sucks" etc. etc.

I thought he stated his case and used some good examples to back it up.  Again, I DON'T AGREE WITH HIM, but he did give some reasons as to why he feels the way he does.

Back to Top
bluetailfly View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1383
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 18:58
Originally posted by John Gargo John Gargo wrote:

Originally posted by Wrath_of_Ninian Wrath_of_Ninian wrote:

Right, I've just about had enough of Steve Howe.   I used to really like Yes, but I cannot listen to them anymore because of Steve Howe's inane weedling.  I LOVE Close To The Edge, I LOVE Fragile, and I LOVE the Yes Album, but my all time favourite Yes album was always Going For The One.  Unfortunately I've started to get irritated by Howe's playing on it, and now I can barely listen to it without grinding my teeth and drumming my fingers in agitation. 

I knew things had started to go wrong on Topographic Oceans - gone were the delicate atmospheric touches, the ghostly sounds, the meaningful attack, the sheer gorgeous melody, and in their place came....inane practice sessions of relentless arpeggios and cramming notes a al Maria Carey on anti-depressants.  Then things, got really bad.  He started to peek through the layers of my second favourite Yes album, Relayer - already suffering from the lack of Wakeman, but beautifully balanced and pitched with no instruments really dominating - the Howe effect started to ruin it for me.  Utterly pointless fret runs replaced any melody, whilst the SOUND of his guitar is just bloody awful.  My First Guitar Amp.  Ear-melting shrill and totally at odds to the brilliant ambience created by Moraz and Squire.

THEN, oh God, I NEVER thought it could happen - I started in small doses, noticing his inanity on Going For The One - his guitar runs, his pointless overworked licks, his sheer audacity in standing outside the immense vision of the rest of the band.  His 'slide' contribution to the title track is ear-grating enough, but his doddering open to Turn Of The Century is contemptable.  Indeed, I'm convinced Jon Anderson just gets bored and comes in half way through it.  Listen to it, you'll see what I mean.  I think Parallels was actually Howe's composition, and listen to the solo in it.  Its utterly awful, bending fruitlessly out of tune without any discernible relation to his own backing.  Thank God he was curtailed for the epic Awaken.  Somebody take that volume pedal off him.

In short, I hope this is contentious as the recent topics have been a little glib, but Howe represents everything that is WRONG with prog guitarists. His contributions to CTTE and Fragile were perfect, but after this time, he got totally carried away with his own technique-driven weedling, and in the process, the greatness of subsequent Yes albums was vastly reduced.   

He should've spent a bit more time listening to Franco Mussida.....


That was a good read... thanks for that.  I don't agree with you at all, but I always find it interesting to read opinions, particularly ones as well thought-out and literately argued as this one.

"Well thought out and literately argued"??? It was a complete rant from start to finish. This is not a model of a considered argument, but more like a Rush Limbaugh diatribe.

"The red polygon's only desire / is to get to the blue triangle."
Back to Top
John Gargo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 450
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 18:35
Originally posted by Wrath_of_Ninian Wrath_of_Ninian wrote:

Right, I've just about had enough of Steve Howe.   I used to really like Yes, but I cannot listen to them anymore because of Steve Howe's inane weedling.  I LOVE Close To The Edge, I LOVE Fragile, and I LOVE the Yes Album, but my all time favourite Yes album was always Going For The One.  Unfortunately I've started to get irritated by Howe's playing on it, and now I can barely listen to it without grinding my teeth and drumming my fingers in agitation. 

I knew things had started to go wrong on Topographic Oceans - gone were the delicate atmospheric touches, the ghostly sounds, the meaningful attack, the sheer gorgeous melody, and in their place came....inane practice sessions of relentless arpeggios and cramming notes a al Maria Carey on anti-depressants.  Then things, got really bad.  He started to peek through the layers of my second favourite Yes album, Relayer - already suffering from the lack of Wakeman, but beautifully balanced and pitched with no instruments really dominating - the Howe effect started to ruin it for me.  Utterly pointless fret runs replaced any melody, whilst the SOUND of his guitar is just bloody awful.  My First Guitar Amp.  Ear-melting shrill and totally at odds to the brilliant ambience created by Moraz and Squire.

THEN, oh God, I NEVER thought it could happen - I started in small doses, noticing his inanity on Going For The One - his guitar runs, his pointless overworked licks, his sheer audacity in standing outside the immense vision of the rest of the band.  His 'slide' contribution to the title track is ear-grating enough, but his doddering open to Turn Of The Century is contemptable.  Indeed, I'm convinced Jon Anderson just gets bored and comes in half way through it.  Listen to it, you'll see what I mean.  I think Parallels was actually Howe's composition, and listen to the solo in it.  Its utterly awful, bending fruitlessly out of tune without any discernible relation to his own backing.  Thank God he was curtailed for the epic Awaken.  Somebody take that volume pedal off him.

In short, I hope this is contentious as the recent topics have been a little glib, but Howe represents everything that is WRONG with prog guitarists. His contributions to CTTE and Fragile were perfect, but after this time, he got totally carried away with his own technique-driven weedling, and in the process, the greatness of subsequent Yes albums was vastly reduced.   

He should've spent a bit more time listening to Franco Mussida.....


That was a good read... thanks for that.  I don't agree with you at all, but I always find it interesting to read opinions, particularly ones as well thought-out and literately argued as this one.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 18:22

I think your talking absolute balls wrath.........and Howe didnt even write Parallels it was Squire ....so there

Back to Top
Wrath_of_Ninian View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 04 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 230
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 18:11
Originally posted by bluetailfly bluetailfly wrote:

Well, Wrath, what I mean by "fashionably contentious" is that a lot of people post ludicruously idiotic polls about "worst" band, or "worst" singer and then list prog musicians who are talented and have done amazing work. And then a little war of insults follow, which is ridiculous. Your post seems to fall into that category somewhat, though I see you are at least somewhat articulate.

The main problem with your post is that you say that everything since CTTE is rubbish. I mean, you could have said that his style has tended to a bit more meaningless meandering or some such, but to say that NOTHING he has done since this time reaches what he did before is a laughably inaccurate statement, especially coming from someone who states he liked Howe up to CTTE.

I think the problem is the inane limitations of what constitutes for you a "good" guitar solo: Something that sets a target and "reaches" it, or whatever you're implying by your criticism of Howe. Look, every solo a guitarist does isn't a set piece that has to accomplish the same "emotional" work every time (clearly you're into some sort of "beginning - middle - end" type of guitar solo; and I am to, just not every time).

Howe plays radically differently in a wide range of contexts, and to reduce his playing to all one sound really shows that the problem is more with your hang ups with what consitutes a "good" guitar solo than with the wide range of styles Howe incorporates.

Now, I'll expand on a couple of my earlier comments. In my earlier post I was only trying to give a few highlights that completely undermine your admittedly contentious argument:

For one, Howe's guitar work on "Machine Messiah" really pushed prog rock guitar into a place I really hadn't heard it go before. The torrential guitar that ends the piece is a masterpiece of evocative guitar work, no matter who's playing it. Dismiss it if you will, but I think you've missed out on a fantastic, highly evocative guitar moment.

His acoustic work on "Turn of the Century" especially his solo is astonishing---and oddly it does seem to fit the solo style you seem to so fascistically advocate. Dismissing this work seems oddly contradictory, and I think it points up the possibility that you're really suffering from some other, more personal, problem with Howe's work.

Well, there you have it. I could go on. It would be fun to go on. But I suppose it's time for you to weigh in and make fun of what I've written, so have a go at it.

I'm sorry Bluetailfly, the intention was not to make fun of people who like Howe and I apologise if I appeared a little ungracious.  I am, as you pointed out, a fan of Howe's work up to a point. 

However your summation that I have 'issues' with Howe is utterly precise - I'm 32 now, and as a growing teen in the 90s got into Yes, who provided the backdrop to some of my more colourful developing years (ahem!).  Upon trying to relive some of those moments through listening to the same albums, I found that Howe suddenly stood out as a horrible example of guitar-playing gone wrong.  I suddenly found myself listening to it and cringing when I put it on in the room with other people.  But most horrifically of all, I found it carved a great chunk out of the magic (I know, what a crap word - and you call me articulate!!) of the work as a whole. 

I am not trying to start a slanging match, indeed I put my thoughts down as honestly as I could (with obvious embellishments) in order to start a proper conversation.  This is not a Howe V Hackett poll.  I just wanted to know if it was JUST me that felt like this.  In many ways, your answer has been the most enlightening, and perhaps I will rediscover what it was I liked about Howe in the first place through this thread.  Just ask Ivan - after years of abuse directed at Genesis, I decided to listen to them properly and promptly became a fan.  I'm actually going to see the Musical Box this Saturday night .  Still havent told my friends.

Anyway, I just try to sound a bit more passionate on the forum, as I find it brings out the real feelings of the Forum posters.  Saying "Steve Howe is rubbish" was just a way in.  Saying "Steve Howe played some alright bits on Relayer dont you think?" is not going to interest anyone.

I will listen to the works you mention, and will promptly return a verdict.  And trust me, I WILL listen to them....

"Now all the seasons run together, and the middle days are gone..."
Back to Top
bluetailfly View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1383
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 17:43

Well, Wrath, what I mean by "fashionably contentious" is that a lot of people post ludicruously idiotic polls about "worst" band, or "worst" singer and then list prog musicians who are talented and have done amazing work. And then a little war of insults follow, which is ridiculous. Your post seems to fall into that category somewhat, though I see you are at least somewhat articulate.

The main problem with your post is that you say that everything since CTTE is rubbish. I mean, you could have said that his style has tended to a bit more meaningless meandering or some such, but to say that NOTHING he has done since this time reaches what he did before is a laughably inaccurate statement, especially coming from someone who states he liked Howe up to CTTE.

I think the problem is the inane limitations of what constitutes for you a "good" guitar solo: Something that sets a target and "reaches" it, or whatever you're implying by your criticism of Howe. Look, every solo a guitarist does isn't a set piece that has to accomplish the same "emotional" work every time (clearly you're into some sort of "beginning - middle - end" type of guitar solo; and I am to, just not every time).

Howe plays radically differently in a wide range of contexts, and to reduce his playing to all one sound really shows that the problem is more with your hang ups with what consitutes a "good" guitar solo than with the wide range of styles Howe incorporates.

Now, I'll expand on a couple of my earlier comments. In my earlier post I was only trying to give a few highlights that completely undermine your admittedly contentious argument:

For one, Howe's guitar work on "Machine Messiah" really pushed prog rock guitar into a place I really hadn't heard it go before. The torrential guitar that ends the piece is a masterpiece of evocative guitar work, no matter who's playing it. Dismiss it if you will, but I think you've missed out on a fantastic, highly evocative guitar moment.

His acoustic work on "Turn of the Century" especially his solo is astonishing---and oddly it does seem to fit the solo style you seem to so fascistically advocate. Dismissing this work seems oddly contradictory, and I think it points up the possibility that you're really suffering from some other, more personal, problem with Howe's work.

Well, there you have it. I could go on. It would be fun to go on. But I suppose it's time for you to weigh in and make fun of what I've written, so have a go at it.

 I later added this, because I'm really not upset and I don't intend to be rude, but hey it's rock criticsm...



Edited by bluetailfly
"The red polygon's only desire / is to get to the blue triangle."
Back to Top
Wrath_of_Ninian View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 04 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 230
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 17:34

Originally posted by Litl Litl wrote:

I can't agree with any of this.  Howe's uniqueness, and that of the entire band, is how these wildly talented and individualistic players come together and still create a whole that is greater than the sum of the parts - rather than a whole that is a mishmash of conflicting sonic egos.  I especially respect how Howe (sorry) stands out in the mix.  Where are the guitarists now who dare to take their playing and bring it to the fore where it can command and lead?  Frankly I'm tired of the mash potato sound where all the players are blended together on the puree setting.  Let's get some more adventure going in progressive music.  Isn't that what it's all about?

A fair point indeed.  Guitar styles have changed over time, and the traditional guitar hero nowadays seems only to fit into the quasi-metal band, regurgitating Maiden & Metallica solos backwards so as not to get caught pinching ideas. 

Unfortunately, I never saw Howe's playing as 'leading' the band - rather it began (after CTTE) to ramble unabated, countering ANderson's work, and overwhelming Moraz/Wakeman's work so that the some total of the work was: a completed Yes album + some unexplained guitar acrobatics.  Yes + Howe. 

Yes, adventure and experiment   

Dont noodle aimlessly....

"Now all the seasons run together, and the middle days are gone..."
Back to Top
Wrath_of_Ninian View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 04 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 230
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 17:20
Originally posted by con safo con safo wrote:

I think you need to consider the following... OPINION. whats yours is yours, it dosent make your word divine. i personally love howe's work and i'll continue to love it.

 

Good for you.  Looks like I'm 2-1 down.... 

"Now all the seasons run together, and the middle days are gone..."
Back to Top
Litl View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 09 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 112
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 17:18
I can't agree with any of this.  Howe's uniqueness, and that of the entire band, is how these wildly talented and individualistic players come together and still create a whole that is greater than the sum of the parts - rather than a whole that is a mishmash of conflicting sonic egos.  I especially respect how Howe (sorry) stands out in the mix.  Where are the guitarists now who dare to take their playing and bring it to the fore where it can command and lead?  Frankly I'm tired of the mash potato sound where all the players are blended together on the puree setting.  Let's get some more adventure going in progressive music.  Isn't that what it's all about?
Back to Top
Wrath_of_Ninian View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 04 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 230
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2005 at 17:17
Originally posted by tuxon tuxon wrote:

Originally posted by Wrath_of_Ninian Wrath_of_Ninian wrote:

Originally posted by tuxon tuxon wrote:

I like his needless noodling, it's part of his appeal and style.
Technically he's probably one of the most gifted guitarists around.
The point you make is quite correct, but I see it the other way around.
Where most guitarists go for a more cohesive melodic sound.
Howe try's to create that same atmophere in a different way,
with more notes and more technical 'difficult' textures.

That may not applease all listeners, but I for one enjoy it.

 

Technically, he's not.  He fluffs loads of notes on his epic fret runs (just listen to Yessongs) and his electric sound is comparable at times to a ban saw grinding a grand piano up whilst a choir of coal miners collectively grate their fingernails down a mile-wide chalk board. In terms of technique (though not quality), the bench mark is probably set by the real weedlers, Vai, Zappa, Van Halen, whilst the blowing your head off technique-meisters were probably Mussida, Hendrix, Page et al.  And Howe's acoustic work is laughable when compared to Jansch, though his attempts are admirable nonetheless. 

The main problem is that Howe sets himself targets that he clearly cannot attain, and whilst this is also admirable, Yes would have been better off without such excesses.  What happened to the cool considered grooves of Yours Is No Disgrace, or the scintillating melodies driving the epic CLose To The Edge???

The whole brilliance of Yes is based on the collective power of 5 entities - all their best albums have that trade-off, and that magic.  After Close To The Edge, Howe entered the prog wilderness, where he started seeing guitar-playing as a mathematical equation waiting to be solved.  He probably met Keith Emerson and John McClaughlin in that fog, also wandering about with their fingers permanently poised to press that elusive 'break new ground' button. By the time Yes got into the studio for Relayer, Anderson probably didn't know which way up he was, Howe clearly just cut loose with the biggest pile of self-indulgent rudiment-thick counter weedles.  The music didn't matter anymore.    

Blasfemie

At least someone has a sense of humour...!!!

"Now all the seasons run together, and the middle days are gone..."
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.176 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.