Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Clouds/1-2-3
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedClouds/1-2-3

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Dick Heath View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock Specialist

Joined: April 19 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 12815
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2007 at 17:57
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

8 Miles High is completely relevant not just here, but in modern rock generally - as is their electrified renditions of Dylan's songs that led to Dylan causing an outrage at the Newport Folk festival in 1965. The Byrds also introduced the Beatles to Ravi Shankar - these 3 (Dylan, Byrds and Beatles) and their important meeting(s) are probably THE most significant things to happen to rock music, ever - but that's all part of what came before Proto Prog, and this huge set of strands is well documented.
 
[


Joe Boyd in his autobiography White Bicycles, wrote about rock coming about at that Newport jazz & folk festival, when Dylan walked on stage with members of Paul Butterfield's BB and Al Kooper (?). Personally I don't remember using the word 'rock' until the late 60's - indeed whilst the word was freely bandied about by the music media (especially the underground press), my hesitancy to its use was because no clear definition of the term were provided - hence my confusion/bemusement what the difference was with rock'n'roll? Perhaps a forgotten reason why the terms 'progressive music' on this side of the Atlantic and 'underground music' both sides were preferred. So if 'rock' wasn't used until mid 60's, things having the name 'rock' crystallised very quickly or did they? I still hold that 'progressive rock 'only became commonplace after 1971/2
The best eclectic music on the Web,8-11pm BST/GMT THURS.
CLICK ON: http://www.lborosu.org.uk/media/lcr/live.php
Host by PA's Dick Heath.

Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2007 at 17:08
Originally posted by salmacis salmacis wrote:

 
As for improvisation and elaboration in rock, I remember hearing the original version of 'White Rabbit' by The Great Society on Dick's radio show. It has a very lengthy guitar introduction that was way ahead of its time, and is arguably even more ambitious than the Jefferson Airplane version...which I loved anyway! Perhaps The Byrds' 'Eight Miles High' is relevant here too, IMHO, with its Indian-inspired guitar lines.
 
 
I've got the Great Society's album, "Conspicuous by it's absence" - the version of "Somebody to Love" is great too, but these were the originals, ie, before the days of the Airplane. There's definitely a more improvisatory feel to the piece - but that's probably the influence of the Grateful Dead, who were the improv masters in that scene at the time, as I understand it.
 
8 Miles High is completely relevant not just here, but in modern rock generally - as is their electrified renditions of Dylan's songs that led to Dylan causing an outrage at the Newport Folk festival in 1965. The Byrds also introduced the Beatles to Ravi Shankar - these 3 (Dylan, Byrds and Beatles) and their important meeting(s) are probably THE most significant things to happen to rock music, ever - but that's all part of what came before Proto Prog, and this huge set of strands is well documented.
 
Originally posted by salmacis salmacis wrote:

Manfred Mann also did a few instrumentals in their earlier days; before any of the hits, they did a jazz-based single 'Why Should We Not/ Brother Jack', and in later years when Jack Bruce joined, did an EP called 'Instrumental Asylum' which had their takes on chart hits of the day. And The Yardbirds apparently did their 'rave up' versions of blues standards like 'Smokestack Lightining' that could go on for something like 20 minutes. 'Five Live Yardbirds' doesn't provide evidence of that, but then if you read the sleevenotes on the back of the original sleeve it's clear that that performance was not a natural representation of their normal set, IMHO. Still, at least it is still live; I know certain live albums (particularly those 'recorded live' at the Cavern, it seems!) from the era are not live at all but were doctored later on...
 
OK, so this is painting a picture of a growing trend that we can easily fit a band such as 1-2-3 into - they took this approach, but gave it their own little twist. I'm wondering how much of a twist they gave it - I'd really like to distribute the 1-2-3 recording I have among interested parties, but I'm currently waiting for my contact to give me permission.
 
Originally posted by salmacis salmacis wrote:

Didn't Delia Derbyshire contribute to the arrangement of the original 'Doctor Who' theme in 1963, written by Ron Grainer? It's funny how the very earliest versions of that theme have aged SO much better than the 80s-era ones; the Sylvester McCoy era version in particular played by Keff McCullough is utterly ghastly sounding!!LOL
 
Indeed - it is that Delia Derbyshire - she was utterly amazing, God rest her soul. "Love Without Sound", the first track on "An Electric Storm" is Trip Hop, two decades before its invention - except it's more haunting even than Portishead's "Glory Box" and seems to come from a different dimension... what a truly remarkable song!
 
 
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

I have a cassette a friend of mine made for me that has the S.B. Machine Head songs (about 5 I think) and the Artwoods and maybe something else, but I will have to look around. Thanks for the info.
 
Can you mp3 these and upload them somewhere?
 
That'd be really cool. Big%20smile
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10669
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2007 at 15:13
P.S. You probably already know this but I think Lord played on some of those early Kinks hits too.
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10669
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2007 at 15:11
I have a cassette a friend of mine made for me that has the S.B. Machine Head songs (about 5 I think) and the Artwoods and maybe something else, but I will have to look around. Thanks for the info.
Back to Top
salmacis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

Content Addition

Joined: April 10 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3928
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2007 at 14:41
Jon Lord's 'surf band' were called, AFAIK, Santa Barbara Machine Head. I have a track of theirs somewhere but as I understand it this was just a cobbled together name for a group of session musicians jamming; like the 60s jams between Jimmy Page and Eric Clapton (allegedly recorded in one of their living rooms), these have been endlessly recycled as if they were some sort of holy grail when they are anything but that and are really just ordinary blues jams, IMHO.
 
Jon Lord was, however, in an R & B act called The Artwoods which like The Graham Bond Organisation, is something of a breeding ground for British rock talent. Alongside Lord on the organ, Keef Hartley played drums and Art Wood, the brother of Ron Wood, handled the vocals. I have their album 'Art Gallery' and will have to give it another listen...Jon Lord also contributed some lovely mellotron to the cash-in (but I love it to bits) record by The Flowerpot Men, 'Let's Go To San Francisco'.
 
As for improvisation and elaboration in rock, I remember hearing the original version of 'White Rabbit' by The Great Society on Dick's radio show. It has a very lengthy guitar introduction that was way ahead of its time, and is arguably even more ambitious than the Jefferson Airplane version...which I loved anyway! Perhaps The Byrds' 'Eight Miles High' is relevant here too, IMHO, with its Indian-inspired guitar lines.
 
Manfred Mann also did a few instrumentals in their earlier days; before any of the hits, they did a jazz-based single 'Why Should We Not/ Brother Jack', and in later years when Jack Bruce joined, did an EP called 'Instrumental Asylum' which had their takes on chart hits of the day. And The Yardbirds apparently did their 'rave up' versions of blues standards like 'Smokestack Lightining' that could go on for something like 20 minutes. 'Five Live Yardbirds' doesn't provide evidence of that, but then if you read the sleevenotes on the back of the original sleeve it's clear that that performance was not a natural representation of their normal set, IMHO. Still, at least it is still live; I know certain live albums (particularly those 'recorded live' at the Cavern, it seems!) from the era are not live at all but were doctored later on...
 
Didn't Delia Derbyshire contribute to the arrangement of the original 'Doctor Who' theme in 1963, written by Ron Grainer? It's funny how the very earliest versions of that theme have aged SO much better than the 80s-era ones; the Sylvester McCoy era version in particular played by Keff McCullough is utterly ghastly sounding!!LOL


Edited by salmacis - September 30 2007 at 14:47
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2007 at 13:51
Originally posted by Dick Heath Dick Heath wrote:

Cert ,
Did you catch the 2nd episode of Jazz Britannia - about 18 months ago - on BBC4? It was argued because the old guard of British jazz musicians would not allow the new guard touch their instruments (esp the piano), the"kids" went and brought in their electric pianos, organs to play live (suggested there as the start of the UK jazz rock movement), e.g. Georgie Fame, Graham Bond (an early pioneer of the Mellotron), Brian Auger - I can only think of a young John McLaughlin being on the scene with a guitar. In addition there were keyboard lead pop/R'n'B bands: Manfred Mann, (Alan Price in) The Animals,  Stevie Winwood in the Spencer Davis Band - Ian Stewart was often called the 6th Rolling Stone and necessary to the band for his keyboard work. So there would have been experimentation from about 1962/3 - so if you are exploring pre-1967, check out some of these band's albums and hear what sort of "album-fillers" were being played.
 
Thanks, Dick - these are exactly the avenues I'm exploring, and the stuff about electric pianos was one of the first tid bits that leapt out at me when I perused the course of the birth of the Cool - and the criminally overlooked Lennie Tristano, who should be well-known to all Prog Metal fans not least because of his and Billy Evans' work tutoring Joe Satriani, but mainly because his tightly structured approach to modern jazz has more in common with Prog Rock than Miles'. I followed this in conjunction with BeBop through to Hard Bop before I found rock/jazz crossovers. Sadly I missed the TV programme you mention.
 
In an earlier post in this thread, I mentioned Graham Bond's Organisation as the first recorded band to use the Mellotron, and the Animals as early keyboard/rock bands - Spencer Davis Group are an old favourite of mine, but that's a good heads up about Ian Stewart though!
 
I'm really wondering where the improvisation and elaboration started to appear in rock - or whether Floyd and the Softies really were first.
 
There are the bands from the US, of course - the Grateful Dead with their tentative "jazz influences", and a band called Fifty Foot Hose, who I'm having a whale of a time exploring. These guys were influenced by jazz for real (early 1967), and also avante garde composers - particularly Varese (as Zappa was), but were so experimental they actually built and modified instruments to get the sounds the wanted.
 
I recommend their album "Cauldron" for repeated listens in order to "get" why they're so important. The song "Red the Sign Post" is clearly the basis for "Space Trucking" by Deep Purple...
 
Then there's the fascinating Delia Derbyshire, who set up Unit Delta Plus, and organised a festival of electronic music in Newbury in 1966, and also performed at the million volts light and sound rave at the roundhouse in 1967 - surely Pink Floyd weren't far away?
 
...none of which has much bearing on 1-2-3, sadly... I'm trying to track down more recordings of them live - it seems odd that there's apparently only one track in existence - you'd think there would be an entire reel or two somewhere from the sound desk of the Marquee, Dunfermline ballroom or other venues.
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10669
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2007 at 09:54
Jon Lord had some sort of instrumental band early on, they were sort of "surfy" sounding and were named after somewhere in California, maybe Malibu, I don't recall.
Back to Top
Dick Heath View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock Specialist

Joined: April 19 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 12815
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2007 at 08:10
Cert ,
Did you catch the 2nd episode of Jazz Britannia - about 18 months ago - on BBC4? It was argued because the old guard of British jazz musicians would not allow the new guard touch their instruments (esp the piano), the"kids" went and brought in their electric pianos, organs to play live (suggested there as the start of the UK jazz rock movement), e.g. Georgie Fame, Graham Bond (an early pioneer of the Mellotron), Brian Auger - I can only think of a young John McLaughlin being on the scene with a guitar. In addition there were keyboard lead pop/R'n'B bands: Manfred Mann, (Alan Price in) The Animals,  Stevie Winwood in the Spencer Davis Band - Ian Stewart was often called the 6th Rolling Stone and necessary to the band for his keyboard work. So there would have been experimentation from about 1962/3 - so if you are exploring pre-1967, check out some of these band's albums and hear what sort of "album-fillers" were being played.
The best eclectic music on the Web,8-11pm BST/GMT THURS.
CLICK ON: http://www.lborosu.org.uk/media/lcr/live.php
Host by PA's Dick Heath.

Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2007 at 15:47
Originally posted by Dick Heath Dick Heath wrote:

Clearly debatable - cross-fertilisation certainly for bands around London at the time, who would have been mingling. However, Middle Earth, Tiles, also were important (perhaps more important) venues for bands to play and hang out.  The Cuneiform Records release last year, (of one of the so-called influencees)  Soft Machine's Middle Earth Tapes, undoubtedly reveals Mike Ratledge and Machine were capable of doing their own thing in 1967 and many sources have stated than Ayer's mantra -like tunes, Ratledge's avant classic/jazz keys, Daevid Allen's experimental rock, and Robert Wyatt somewhere between Elvin Jones and Ringo Starr, give them a unique sound. I think if I can introduce contradiction on behalf of one band, then others can do so for other so-called infleuncees. So I don't accept that - but more than willing to check out Clouds in further detail. As to ELP, this indicates one writer is unaware of Emerson in Nice in 1967 - and Nice,  I thought, might have been listening to Vanilla Fudge as much as any other band. Finally, if Cloud were good, why were Pink Floyd and Soft Machine the top underground bands during this period?


But to repeat, I'll check this band out - I'm sure I have an odd recording on a psychedelic collection. But such claims don't really add up.

Finally it is total bollocks to lay the blame for the invention progressive rock/music etc. at the feet of one band, the music evolved! As I've stated before, progressive music/underground music (1966 to 1971), was about the experimental hybridisation of (this new fangled thing we were only just calling) rock with other musical genres - there were so many combinations to go at , and I suggest it was impossible for one band to use more than a few combinations at one time.
 
 
Of course it's nonsense to ascribe the development of Prog to one band - it's obvious that the Clouds website is exaggerating in order to get attention.
 
What I'm trying to find out is whether the previous incarnation, known as 1-2-3, were in some way instrumental in laying down the foundations or inspiring particular bands (specifically, the ones that the Clouds website claims influence upon, notably The Nice and Yes. Others may be taken with a grain of salt - the Genesis link is the most tentative of all!).
 
You're completely right about Pink Floyd (and the Softies) - they were undoubtedly the leaders of the underground, but they didn't use the particular techniques I'm interested in;
 
1) Fusing Jazz/Rock and Classical styling - this is all evident in the recording I've heard - and if the recording I've heard is of 1-2-3/Billy Ritchie, then he's a fantastic rock keyboard player with a very fertile imagination. Whoever played on this recording had some brilliant ideas - and the available Clouds recordings will not tell you much about this kind of invention. It does back up the claims on the website that the band were unhappy with the albums, and that they did not represent what the band did live - as with so many bands at that time.
 
2) Elaborating on other people's songs - this was something Vanilla Fudge were noted for, and it's VF's approach that I'm trying to backtrack. Allegedly, 1-2-3 predate VF in this.
 
3) Using the keyboard as the Lead instrument - in the recording I've heard, it's extremely prominent, and leads much the same way Emerson led. Again, it's alleged that Keith was in the audience when 1-2-3 played (he was in the backing band for P P Arnold at the time - this is before The Nice formed), and this is where he got his ideas.
 
 
The previous response is interesting - the band certainly split opinions of witnesses down the middle, as Amazon testifies: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/customer-reviews/B0000011OV/sr=8-3/qid=1191138069/ref=cm_cr_dp_all_helpful/105-8561709-5829234?ie=UTF8&n=5174&qid=1191138069&sr=8-3#customerReviews
 
There are those who seemed to think that the sun shone from their proverbial, and those that thought they sucked - and I can see why; there's an amateurishness in Ritchie's approach that some could see as charming, others as painful.
 
Certainly, the recording I've heard is on a par with The Nice's cover of the other "America" in terms of invention, fireworks and down to earth rock and roll. I've yet to hear anything by Quatermass or Atomic Rooster that would blow it out of the water - it sounds at least equal, but allegedly is a couple of years earlier.
 
Certainly, compared to the live recordings I've seen of AR on YouTube, Vincent Crane's keyboard work is primitive in comparison - mere repetitive rhythmic stabs of a very limited number of ideas - no wild flights of fantasy taking the listener to Bach and back.
 
Maybe Clouds stopped playing this type of material on record company advice?
 
If this recording turns out to be the real thing, ie from early 1967, it puts 1-2-3 in the right place, as an important part of Prog's development - but not as the inventors, as the site might have you believe!
 
If it turns out to be from later, then as long as it predates Prog proper, the band deserve an honourary mention in the history books.
 
If it's a fake, then I'm still enjoying researching this particular era (pre summer of 1967).
 
Big%20smile
 
 
*edit - is that the same J Cleary who posted the Amazon review?
 
Why the animosity? Were they really that awful? Did you ever see them when they were 1-2-3?
 
Can you describe what they did in technical terms?
 
This would be VERY useful to the research.


Edited by Certif1ed - September 30 2007 at 03:59
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
jcleary View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: February 02 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 45
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2007 at 15:23
I saw Clouds live three times. The first playing at a festival headlined by Jethro Tull in May 1970. They were
ok, but nothing great. Tull blew them away. Then saw them twice more at different times at the Whisky A Go Go.
They were always alot better live than on their albums. Their first album Scrapbook is a complete embarrassment.
Their second album Water Color Days is only slightly better. There is NO comparison between what Clouds was doing at the time and their contemporaries. I saw the band Quatermass around the same time as Clouds, and Peter
Robinson absolutely DROP KICKED Billy Ritchie! Ritchie is NOT even close to the same league as Emerson, Wakeman, Auger, Peter Robinson, and Vincent Crane! I've seen all of these Great Men Live and Ritchie was just ok nothing special. His claim to fame is that he says he was the first to play standing up. The Clouds Web Site is a complete EXAGGERATION!!! Just listen to Scrapbook!
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10669
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2007 at 09:42
Well certainly Keith used a lot of classical stuff in the Nice, but his exotic lounge influence didn't show as much till ELP albums like the first one and Trilogy. It probably has a lot to do with the fact that he wasn't using synths in the Nice.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2007 at 08:22
Clap Thanks Richard 
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Dick Heath View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock Specialist

Joined: April 19 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 12815
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2007 at 08:20
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

I think Mr. Heath needs to check this out LOL


MIcky Here's what I wrote you privately - reading in more details I think it's worth adding my halfpenny'sworth here on the thread


Clearly debatable - cross-fertilisation certainly for bands around London at the time, who would have been mingling. However, Middle Earth, Tiles, also were important (perhaps more important) venues for bands to play and hang out.  The Cuneiform Records release last year, (of one of the so-called influencees)  Soft Machine's Middle Earth Tapes, undoubtedly reveals Mike Ratledge and Machine were capable of doing their own thing in 1967 and many sources have stated than Ayer's mantra -like tunes, Ratledge's avant classic/jazz keys, Daevid Allen's experimental rock, and Robert Wyatt somewhere between Elvin Jones and Ringo Starr, give them a unique sound. I think if I can introduce contradiction on behalf of one band, then others can do so for other so-called infleuncees. So I don't accept that - but more than willing to check out Clouds in further detail. As to ELP, this indicates one writer is unaware of Emerson in Nice in 1967 - and Nice,  I thought, might have been listening to Vanilla Fudge as much as any other band. Finally, if Cloud were good, why were Pink Floyd and Soft Machine the top underground bands during this period?


But to repeat, I'll check this band out - I'm sure I have an odd recording on a psychedelic collection. But such claims don't really add up.

Finally it is total bollocks to lay the blame for the invention progressive rock/music etc. at the feet of one band, the music evolved! As I've stated before, progressive music/underground music (1966 to 1971), was about the experimental hybridisation of (this new fangled thing we were only just calling) rock with other musical genres - there were so many combinations to go at , and I suggest it was impossible for one band to use more than a few combinations at one time.


Edited by Dick Heath - September 29 2007 at 08:25
The best eclectic music on the Web,8-11pm BST/GMT THURS.
CLICK ON: http://www.lborosu.org.uk/media/lcr/live.php
Host by PA's Dick Heath.

Back to Top
salmacis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

Content Addition

Joined: April 10 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3928
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2007 at 08:10

As for classical/rock fusions, one of my personal favourites is the 1967 hit by The Move, 'Night Of Fear'. I always felt 'Nutrocker' is fun but something of a novelty record (of course, it turns up at the end of ELP's 'Pictures...'), but 'Night Of Fear' turns a section from '1812 Overture' into a bona fide pop song with quintessential psychedelic lyrics. It's one of my favourite singles of all time.

Around 1962 or so, a band called The Outlaws did a version of 'Hall Of The Mountain King'; Ritchie Blackmore was in that band, AFAIK, but whether he's playing on that I can't recall.
 
'Lovers Concerto' was by a band called The Toys, I seem to recall.
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10669
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2007 at 07:25
If your talking about old bands using classical music, I think Kim Fowley's Nut Rocker goes back aways. Also there is a song by the Andrew Sisters that I think is called Lovers Concerto that uses a well-known theme by Bach.
There are tons of exotic lounge bands that would do covers of tunes like Bolero, Pavanne, Clair de Lune, Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto No 2 in C minor etc. Some of those artists include very experimental arrangers like Martin Denny, Dick Hyman, Les Baxter, and Esquival. They were also some of the first users of the new Moog synth.

I guess those bands aren't really rock, but they would combine lots of styles in their arrangements including rock.
The first ELP record has a lot in common with exotic lounge music. Keith would often use the theme from Hyman's Minatour in his synth improvs.






Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2007 at 06:47
I think Mr. Heath needs to check this out LOL
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2007 at 06:45
Hmm - I didn't spot that the Clouds website is run by Billy - and your interpretation seems a reasonable one.
 
But without real evidence either way, it's hard to prove either story.
 
It is totally possible that Emerson, members of Syn (who movd on to Yes) et al were in the audience at the Marquee and were influenced by some of the things that this band did.
 
The story behind "America" (which I'm merely relating from my contact) is that someone in the 1-2-3 entourage happened to be working at the studio in which S&G were recording the songs for Bookends (which took a long time to put together). He got permission for 1-2-3 to cover the song (not unusual for the time), and they put together their own arrangement.
 
Another contact of mine says he definitely remembers the band doing this song in 1967, and wondered how they got their hands on it first - so this does go some way to explaining it. When you consider that Yes released it as a single in 1971 in their own arrangement, but S&G didn't release it until the next year, it becomes even more likely that Yes were influenced by 1-2-3 or Clouds.
 
On a slightly side-issue, I'm working back the thread of bands that used the classics in their songs or arrangements, and the somewhat startling result is that rock bands have been doing it since year 0 - 1955. Even Elvis used the classics in songs such as "Wooden Heart", "Can't Help Falling in Love" and "It's Now or Never", and I've found 2 examples of Perry Como and Ken Dodd using them - and there was a band in 1961 called "Nero and the Gladiators" who, it seems, often used Classical influences and were an influence on Ritchie Blackmore (http://www.vintageguitar.com/artists/details.asp?ID=58), and an equally obscure band called B Bumble and the Stingers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B._Bumble_and_the_Stingers, http://www.allbutforgottenoldies.net/b-bumble-and-the-stingers.html.
 
Arranging other people's songs into elaborate arrangements was something that jazz bands did frequently - and B Bumble and the Stingers did this too, arranging songs (including jazz songs) into rock. The second link has samples of published music, so at least these guys can be verified.
 
Proto Prog? LOL
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Man Overboard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 07 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 3830
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2007 at 04:29
 
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

 
Well, let's sum up what we know;
 
1. The band existed and played the Marquee at the right time and, became Clouds in 1968.
 
2. Clouds were featured on TWO major label promotion compilations alongside great progressive artists including King Crimson, Jethro Tull, Traffic, Nick Drake and Spooky Tooth.
 
3. There are numerous reports of keyboardist Billy Ritchie doing all these things live that were influential and mind-blowingly different.
 
4. The recordings I have listened to, even if they turn out to be later than claimed, are significantly progressive enough to warrant some attention - the music contains clear jazz and classical influences, and some really neat tricks with tempo and time signature alteration - and it rocks.
 
5. Everything I've read on the bands' website exaggerates somewhat - but the exaggerations seem more attention-grabbing than overly excessive.
 
 
The jury is currently out... Wink
 


It reads really funny.  The testimonials on the website do seem quite attention-grabbing and freakishly specific for something with no concrete evidence of doing more than, well, existing.  Did In The Court even -have- an organ, btw?  Tongue

But in all seriousness, it feels like this:  The band can somewhat prove that it existed pre-prog.  The band had an organist, who when faced with a drummer and a bassist, most likely took the lead.  David Bowie seems to like them.

Now, there are no verifiable recordings of this group.  What recordings are surfacing are definitely suspect in origin and nature, as I understand, as well as time period. 

This band 'became' Clouds, who supposedly took a more commercial leaning because they found little success with their supposedly incredible groundbreaking prog.

What if the real story reads more like this?  1-2-3 were a decent, if relatively unmemorable psychedelic band in the late 60's, who had no official recordings, despite playing at the Marquee.  They quickly went downhill, their label regulating them to play cabarets and such.  Later influenced by proto-prog and prog acts springing up around them, they reformed as Clouds and tried their hand at this new prog style, but as evidenced by the recordings that -do- exist, they did not meet success.

This rendition also fits with the hard facts that exist, and is in all honesty much more likely.

So let's say that it's the 21st century.  Billy Ritchie is upset, because he's not even a has-been; he's a never-was.  He's looking back at 1-2-3 and Clouds and wondering where he went wrong.  After contemplating it, he realizes that there's so -little- legacy of his output that with some creative twists, he can rewrite the entire story, and become the hero to his peers who surpassed him by so far, so long ago.

Considering cloudsmusic.com is owned and run by one Billy Ritchie, I'd say that it's pretty obvious how this played out, yes?  Wink


Edited by Man Overboard - September 27 2007 at 04:31
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2007 at 04:06
Originally posted by Man Overboard Man Overboard wrote:

Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

 
I've been told that the stuff I've heard (a live performance of Simon and Garfunkel's "America")  was put together in 1966, and the performance was Saturday March 18th, 1967 - which would put them ahead of the Nice.
 
 
My quesion now is, if the band put the arrangement together in 1966, and performed it in March 1967, where did they get the Tardis from?
 
Simon and Garfunkel's "Bookends" was released on April 3rd 1968, and "America" wasn't released as a single until 1972 - the year after Yes covered it.
 
It's a very good cover, but... Confused


LOL  Hoax, confirmed?
 
 
Well, let's sum up what we know;
 
1. The band existed and played the Marquee at the right time and, became Clouds in 1968.
 
2. Clouds were featured on TWO major label promotion compilations alongside great progressive artists including King Crimson, Jethro Tull, Traffic, Nick Drake and Spooky Tooth.
 
3. There are numerous reports of keyboardist Billy Ritchie doing all these things live that were influential and mind-blowingly different.
 
4. The recordings I have listened to, even if they turn out to be later than claimed, are significantly progressive enough to warrant some attention - the music contains clear jazz and classical influences, and some really neat tricks with tempo and time signature alteration - and it rocks.
 
5. Everything I've read on the bands' website exaggerates somewhat - but the exaggerations seem more attention-grabbing than overly excessive.
 
 
The jury is currently out... Wink
 
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Man Overboard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 07 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 3830
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2007 at 03:52
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

 
I've been told that the stuff I've heard (a live performance of Simon and Garfunkel's "America")  was put together in 1966, and the performance was Saturday March 18th, 1967 - which would put them ahead of the Nice.
 
 
My quesion now is, if the band put the arrangement together in 1966, and performed it in March 1967, where did they get the Tardis from?
 
Simon and Garfunkel's "Bookends" was released on April 3rd 1968, and "America" wasn't released as a single until 1972 - the year after Yes covered it.
 
It's a very good cover, but... Confused


LOL  Hoax, confirmed?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.240 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.