Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
eduardossc
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 15 2005
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 257
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 14:16 |
There´s good music among metal prog. Definitely. However.....oh what the hell ¡¡.
You know what I really hate of metal prog?. There are some, or a lot of songs there that for many minutes sound exactly as any ordinary metal band, then they start playing synths to make it more bearable.
Other songs are nothing but plain metal. Some of them are even sung with that barking style as any Sepultura crap, and then they show a passage of a piece of music completly different to metal for a minute of so before returning to the barkings....That´s nothing but making metal with the intention of being considered prog. That´s cheesy. I see no conviction on that.
Still, I´ve heard great songs from Metal prog bands..Not for being prog, but for making original, creative, interesting, diverse and sophisticated compositions.
|
|
Ed_The_Dead
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 29 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4928
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 13:41 |
My fav genre!
|
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21328
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 08:14 |
^ well said ... I'd like to throw in the label "Heavy Rock" ... also often applied to bands like Deep Purple or Led Zeppelin.
|
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 08:02 |
Early Heavy Metal and Hard Rock were pretty much interchangeable as terms.
The music is based in the riffing structures of the late Heavy Blues bands - many of whom moved away from their blues roots to play more riff-based Hard Rock style music.
The band setup is more or less the same - lead guitar with plenty of soloing, bass, drums, and often a rhythm guitar as well as vocals. The 5-piece setup is classic for both Hard Rock and Heavy Metal.
Hard Rock tended to focus on the traditional blues themes, but elaborated them into celebratory themes of lust, life and luurve, and the music became swaggering and testosterone-laced. The rhythms became cleaner, but retained much of the swing of the original blues bands. (Think Aerosmith or AC/DC, etc.).
Heavy Metal focussed more on cult, dark or occult themes, and the music became darker - the riffs tending towards use of the tritone interval (e.g. E -> Bb). The rhythm guitar particularly used more fuzz and distortion and the rhythms became more constant, eschewing any notion of "swing" or anything that might indicate some sort of cheerfulness. (Think Blue Cheer, Black Sabbath, Judas Priest, Iron Maiden, Slayer, etc.).
Of course, there's always been crossovers, and bands that played some metal tracks and some hard rock tracks and it's not black and white (Think the Scorpions, Blue Oyster Cult, Saxon, etc.) - but I think that covers the basics.
|
|
Lindsay Lohan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 07:54 |
rockandrail wrote:
This time I agree with you Maiden. Hard rock should better be called hard blues because it's where it finds its roots.
What about Black Sabbath? I adore all their early records (until sabotage). Metal or Hard Rock?
|
Hard to tell They dont show an obvious blues influence and their riffs sound a bit harder that other hard rock bands...i would rate them somewhere in between hard rock and metal...proto metal or something
|
|
|
rockandrail
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 22 2005
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 310
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 07:50 |
This time I agree with you Maiden. Hard rock should better be called hard blues because it's where it finds its roots.
What about Black Sabbath? I adore all their early records (until sabotage). Metal or Hard Rock?
|
Pierre R, the man who lost his signature
|
|
Lindsay Lohan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 07:46 |
rockandrail wrote:
Citanul wrote:
rockandrail wrote:
I don't like metal. At all! Though I like Hard Rock. |
Where do you draw the line between hard rock and metal?
| Difficult to draw a line. The guitar has to have some feeling, there have to be distinctive solos, the tempo must remain reasonable. No "me I am able to play faster than my shadow, only pulling off and tapping" guitarist.
Aerosmith, AC/DC, Status Quo, Deep Purple, Led zeppelin is what I call Hard Rock (since 1969). It may have changed as a definition but I don't care.
|
Hard rock puts alot more focus on blues than metal i think
|
|
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 07:42 |
MikeEnRegalia and Progtologist:
As I understand it, you two (if there are others, this includes you to) are working on the organization of prog-metal. I agree with this. I think one of the propositions Mike made in the original thread in the Prog Music Lounge, to make "Prog Metal" a seperate entitiy from "Prog Rock" yet still include it on this site, is a great idea. Even if that is not what you plan on specifically doing, I support your project fully.
Carry on.
|
|
|
rockandrail
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 22 2005
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 310
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 07:25 |
Citanul wrote:
rockandrail wrote:
I don't like metal. At all! Though I like Hard Rock. |
Where do you draw the line between hard rock and metal?
|
Difficult to draw a line. The guitar has to have some feeling, there have to be distinctive solos, the tempo must remain reasonable. No "me I am able to play faster than my shadow, only pulling off and tapping" guitarist.
Aerosmith, AC/DC, Status Quo, Deep Purple, Led zeppelin is what I call Hard Rock (since 1969). It may have changed as a definition but I don't care.
|
Pierre R, the man who lost his signature
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 07:19 |
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
I think it's a good thing that the poll doesn't have a "I'm being indecisive" option ... if you like some Prog Metal bands, you like Prog Metal. Only if you're sure that you don't like a single Prog Metal band, you should choose the other option.
To me, liking a particular band does not mean that I like the entire genre, neither does disliking a band mean that I dislike that band's genre.
Hence the need for at least one mid range option - otherwise it comes out lop-sided, as I'm sure that few people dislike Prog Metal as a genre.
BTW: You have been very silent about my Prog Metal categorization project ... any thoughts?
I haven't looked, to be honest - I assumed that it was about more sub-categorisation, which is not something I like to dwell on.
I prefer to think "Do I think it's prog or not, and if so, why so". I could care a great deal more about whether it fits into a subgenre that's badly defined from the word go - even the super-genre Prog Rock is only hazily defined by its advocates.
Progressive Metal should be a) Progressive and b) Metal. Defining those should be the priority over subclassification, IMO.
But I'll take a quick look in case my assumptions are unfounded... |
|
|
BaldFriede
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 06:05 |
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
Adagio are an amazing band, very professional and ambitioned musicians and quite sophisticated songwriting. But they're not very diverse in their choice of musical "tools", it is mostly centered around classical piano parts and Power Metal. Initially I placed them in the Symphonic category, but like Symphony X they are very close to the traditional metal sound, that's why they're now in the Power/"Heavy" category.
Just out of curiosity: How would you describe Adagio - how would you "tag" them (multiple genres)?
|
I would just put them into "Symphonic", without any further tagging.
By the way: If all someone had ever heard of Genesis was the live version of "The Knife", he might get the impression they are a prog-metal band.
|
BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
|
|
Citanul
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 14 2005
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 430
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 06:03 |
rockandrail wrote:
I don't like metal. At all! Though I like Hard Rock. |
Where do you draw the line between hard rock and metal?
|
Be or be not. There is no question. - Yoda, Prince of Denmark
|
|
rockandrail
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 22 2005
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 310
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 05:52 |
I don't like metal. At all! Though I like Hard Rock. Therefore, as regards Prog Metal, the least metal and the more prog the band will be, the more I will have a chance to like it.
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21328
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 05:47 |
Adagio are an amazing band, very professional and ambitioned musicians and quite sophisticated songwriting. But they're not very diverse in their choice of musical "tools", it is mostly centered around classical piano parts and Power Metal. Initially I placed them in the Symphonic category, but like Symphony X they are very close to the traditional metal sound, that's why they're now in the Power/"Heavy" category.
Just out of curiosity: How would you describe Adagio - how would you "tag" them (multiple genres)?
|
|
|
Lindsay Lohan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 05:46 |
BaldFriede wrote:
It is not that I dislike prog-metal in general. There are some bands which are listed under prog-metal which I do like (Adagio for example), but these bands are also bands which I would NOT put into that category, if I had to organise this site. What irritates me most about some prog-metal is the pubescent attitude "Look what a strong and heavy guy I am!" If I were still a teenager it might probably appeal to me, but I am not. |
i think both ayreon and fantomas are great and i don think they could fall into this category of just showing of...in general music is to be expressing peoples emotions...and if they are very agressive the music can tend to get agressive..although i dont like that kind of music
|
|
|
Phil
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 17 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1881
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 05:46 |
BaldFriede wrote:
What irritates me most about some prog-metal is
the pubescent attitude "Look what a strong and heavy guy I am!" If
I were still a teenager it might probably appeal to me, but I am
not. |
I agree with this sentiment. But as I've raved over Tool I suppose I should vote yes.
|
|
BaldFriede
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 05:37 |
It is not that I dislike prog-metal in general. There are some bands which are listed under prog-metal which I do like (Adagio for example), but these bands are also bands which I would NOT put into that category, if I had to organise this site. What irritates me most about some prog-metal is the pubescent attitude "Look what a strong and heavy guy I am!" If I were still a teenager it might probably appeal to me, but I am not.
|
BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
|
|
Lindsay Lohan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 05:33 |
Yes i think prog metal is the only sub genre that could do with a bit of more accurate classification...symphonic prog already got a sub sub genre wich is not very helpful at all..as it does nothing to describe the music
|
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21328
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 05:25 |
Alright, I take the blame. I don't have a problem to admit that I want to promote prog metal.
|
|
|
BaldFriede
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 05:14 |
Because the intitial approach already was wrong (and clearly is proof for my statement). Had the initial approach been: "I suggest that some of the major genrés become more organized. I volunteer to do that for prog-metal.", I'd be with you. But it wasn't. It was a mere suggestion of re-organization of prog-metal. Need I say more?
|
BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.