HIFI Advices please read |
Post Reply | Page <1234 8> |
Author | |||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: September 19 2011 at 12:47 | ||
Yeah, I've done that with some of the ported subs I've built - a neat party trick.
Your guess is as good as mine - adding extra weight in the main speaker stands (eg sand-filled) would help somewhat, and I guess that the slabs of marble on top of each piece of electronic equipment do more to deaden acoustic rattle from the sub than they do any electrical induction they are intended to prevent, (however their resonance is most likely to be in the audio band anyway - if you tap them with a hammer they're going to go "ding" rather than "thud" which would result in sound reflection rather than absorption). I would also imagine there could be some weird phase relationships between sub and left-channel speaker - then that may improve the sound-stage - only Oliver would know that for sure.
Edited by Dean - September 19 2011 at 12:47 |
|||
What?
|
|||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17845 |
Posted: September 19 2011 at 12:34 | ||
If the sub is designed to move so much air mass, even with my tiny Bose sub I have blown out a candle flame......I wondered if putting your sub almost directly behind your bookshelf speaker (as in oliverstoned setup), would add unwanted vibration or movement?
Is this possible?
|
|||
|
|||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: September 19 2011 at 10:05 | ||
... Nope. That "theory" does not hold water - in a market sector where money is no object the extra freight charges would be negligible, or at least a "feature" worth exploiting. This does not appear to be the case - as far as I know subs are not sold with 70kg ballast weights in any of the market sectors were subs are used (surely the ICE and PA markets would be just as interested in this, if not more so), nor are there a readily available sources of add-on ballast weights for after-sales fitting available in the audiophilist stores.
Something does not have to be sentient to be subjected to brutal treatment - flattening a warped vinyl with a 50 tonnes road-roller would be brutal.
No it doesn't, but never mind, if you think it does then that's fine, you carry on. At least you've protected the cabinet from being scratched by a lump of rock.
Edited by Dean - September 19 2011 at 10:07 |
|||
What?
|
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: September 19 2011 at 08:13 | ||
Some audiophiles even put some hydraulic jacks on all sides of their subs...
It not only works for me but for everybody: if you don't do that, the low dribbles. The effect is huge. Anyway, it's not the fault of engineers but money and weight contraints. Including a 100lbs plate would have a cost in freight as well. If you want your sub to work fully, you have to add weight or find another way, that's why optimization is necessary. Brutal treatment? To my knowledge, subwoofers don't have mindstates, i think a rationalist like you would agree with that EDIT: i added a 1mm layer of felt under the granite blocks (as well as those on the source elements) to lower extra resonances with the elements on which the blocks are. Edited by oliverstoned - September 19 2011 at 08:22 |
|||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: September 19 2011 at 06:59 | ||
okay... yes it will sort of do that... the weight of the rock puts the sidewalls of the cabinet under tension, which only serves to move the resonance higher up the frequency spectrum, it will also create a sub-sonic pendulum type effect (stick with a weight on the end) which may not be such a good idea. But, again - if it works for you then that's fine. Frankly I'm surprised that the sub needed such drastic (and brutal) treatment - those design guys at Magnat should be able to design a cab that doesn't rattle.
|
|||
What?
|
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: September 19 2011 at 06:32 | ||
OK it make sense. There are about 75 kg of granite blocks on the sub, it's something that i use from a long time, my sub has been installed in two different small rooms before and now it's in a quite big open space (the pic you saw) with a quite high ceiling (2,70m). Whatever the room, heavy weight on sub tightens and globally enhances the low (and so affect the high as we saw before) by reducing the "skin drum" effect. |
|||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: September 18 2011 at 04:46 | ||
/edit: I notice in your picture there is something on top of the sub covered in a cloth - if that is a huge lump of concrete then I suspect you needed that to bring the sub under control in such a confined space. (I also note the bubble-wrap to stop the speaker cable from touching the sub ) Edited by Dean - September 18 2011 at 04:58 |
|||
What?
|
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: September 17 2011 at 01:52 | ||
It doesn't sounds stupid on the paper but i recently moved my system to the living room but just before it was in a less than 30m2 room with low ceiling and full of furnitures and it wasn't sounding unpleasant at all...I think each room has its acoustic, some rooms stand the extreme low, others don't.
|
|||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: September 16 2011 at 12:28 | ||
As with any speakers, choose your sub to fit your room and the amount of sound absorbing furniture you have. In a small room (less than 30m³ or 1200 cubic-feet) with lots of hard surfaces a 38cm (15") sub will sound unpleasant. Also the speaker cab is more important than the diameter of the driver.
|
|||
What?
|
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: September 16 2011 at 11:52 | ||
OK, my advice is Atacama (Nexus) Stands. There are the best, nice looking, cheap...
Edit: stands provided by speakers manufacturers are often bad, especially on these kind of speakers Edited by oliverstoned - September 16 2011 at 11:58 |
|||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: September 16 2011 at 11:50 | ||
|
|||
|
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: September 16 2011 at 11:47 | ||
IMO a real sub is 38 cm diameter. Below, it just makes "boom boom". |
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: September 16 2011 at 11:45 | ||
Well, congrats too, it's a good purchase IMO. Do you have the stands provided by BW? If yes, are the speakers screwed on the stands, is it possible to fill the stands with sand?
Edit: I screwed all my speakers on its stands, if not, there's much energy lost on bass attacks and forte. A big gain in clarity. Edited by oliverstoned - September 16 2011 at 11:50 |
|||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: September 16 2011 at 11:39 | ||
The CM1s are so amazing but they I can't afford them even with employee price...
|
|||
|
|||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17845 |
Posted: September 16 2011 at 11:21 | ||
^ Nice!! Congrats......I think I heard those at the Magnolia HiFi in Bellevue, WA store...........Dude that is an awesome price!!!! CM1s not so much
|
|||
|
|||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: September 15 2011 at 19:23 | ||
Well today I bought the B&Ws 685s. 650 USD normal, 357 with my price as an honorable Magnolia employee. My system gets better and one day it might push walls, though it's still quite far from it.
|
|||
|
|||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: September 15 2011 at 16:55 | ||
True, 80Hz isn't that low and it certainly isn't sub-sonic.
"For frequencies below 800 Hz, the dimensions of the head (ear distance 21.5 cm, corresponding to an interaural time delay of 625 µs), are smaller than the half wavelength of the sound waves. So the auditory system can determine phase delays between both ears without confusion. Interaural level differences are very low in this frequency range, especially below about 200 Hz, so a precise evaluation of the input direction is nearly impossible on the basis of level differences alone. As the frequency drops below 80 Hz it becomes difficult or impossible to use either time difference or level difference to determine a sound's lateral source, because the phase difference between the ears becomes too small for a directional evaluation." (wikipedia)
Your sub is specified from 16-200Hz - well within the range where direction is indeterminate on level alone but can be detected on phase-errors if the signal is strong enough.Of course this presupposes that there are tones between 80-200Hz in the music you are listening to and they haven't been cut-off by the crossover filter in your subwoofer amp - if the frequecies below 80Hz dominate the signal then you will not be able to locate the sound using just your ears. However that doesn't change the fact that if you can see the subwoofer then you subconsciously know where the sound is coming from.
|
|||
What?
|
|||
oliverstoned
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 26 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 6308 |
Posted: September 15 2011 at 15:22 | ||
It should not as extreme low is omnidirectional...or maybe it's because it's NOT real extreme low |
|||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: September 15 2011 at 13:14 | ||
|
|||
What?
|
|||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17845 |
Posted: September 15 2011 at 12:06 | ||
Thanks Dean....totally makes sense. But is it then my mind playing tricks on me, when I actually see the sub under a table or next to a setup (like in Olivers case)...that I can tell where the low end is coming from and if I move around it seems to "disappear", the sound that is.
I have my Bose sub tucked behind a sofa at least 4.5m away from the small cube speakers.....I guess our ears can play tricks on us......
|
|||
|
|||
Post Reply | Page <1234 8> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |