Kid A sucks

MorgothSunshine wrote: Alfi wrote: actually i'm quite open-minded towards experimental music but i have to say that Kid A from Radiohead is just a 'sound collection' without any musical trace. radiohead try to be experimental for the sake of experimental.  I completely disagree, it's one of the most interesting albums of the '90's (and Amnesiac too), absolutely original, they have well combined experimentation and commercial success!

i have disagree there Vapour Trails was one of the best prog albums of the 90's - tracks like ghostrider blow my head off!! Not literally though!

BELVA wrote: Good start playing and actually TAPING in studio. Then you'll like Radiohead more, AND YOU'LL TRASH AWAY STINKY PROG METAL

Too old (25) and too busy to start playing an instrument to really get the hang of it and too old to get rid of musical tastes I've had since I was 5...

Not too old to expand on them, however... 

BELVA wrote: Than thank good I play modern jazz at the music academy...............

Then thank God I love modern jazz...

BELVA wrote: Radiohead require some good musical basis to be understood.

Phew, well then thank God for the time I played "Silent Night" on a children's dulcimer back in primary school... 

I always say and maintain that Greenwood and Yorke are Radiohead and the other members are non existent. I struggle with Hail to the Thief and Kid A is supposed to be more far out so i haven't dared listen to it yet!

The thing I find with Radiohead is that they arent particularly interesting IMO as there are very few time signature changes. They are still a good band but just not as GREAT as some people make them out to be