Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Hendrix?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedHendrix?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 6>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2008 at 01:22
Originally posted by mystic fred mystic fred wrote:

not Prog but one of the most influential progressive artists of all time, he deserves a place here at least in Space Rock or Proto-prog - the problem here is he is basically a Blues player, something which PA are reluctant to handle as this would "open too many other floodgates" (Groundhogs, Free et al...).Ermm

 


Proto Prog, maybe........just maybe (although I still wouldn't agree with it, at least it would make a tiny teeny bit of sense).
But as for adding Hendrix to a fully a full fledged prog genre (Space/Psychedelic) will certainly not happen without it becoming problematic in some way or another.
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2008 at 01:18
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

 
T...can you tell me when I said this??????  Please do it...If you can. . 
YOU ARE PLACING WORDS IN MY MOUTH and trying to fix your mistake with a lot of fforced arguments. Ok. You didn't say that. I can give you that Ivan. 
 
 
Please, put is as big as your initial post. LOL That would had been enough T to avoid all this disgusting problems, quote what I say, because I'm the kind odf person that always says my truth loud and clear.
 
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

 No matter how many explanations you give, no matter how many times you say Mike made that thread to boost his site, you  and all the fotrum know that  Mike started the thread to suport Metallica. Now YOU are putting words (or better, intentions) on Mike's actions. Why can you do this and I can't? Do you know for a FACT that he created that thread to support Metallica? 
 
Please T, don't pretend to be that naive.
  1. There's a debate about metallica that already has 10 pages
  2. Mike starts another one PRECISELY IN THAT MOMENT SUPPORTING METALLICA'S PROGRSIVENESS LOL
  3. And you say it's not to suport Metallica...PLEASE T!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please T, it's yellow, has feathers, says quack, it's a duck.


What if you painted a duck red? Then you'd be wrongLOL

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

 
But Metallica is here, nobody can do a thing, even if we start 100 threads asking to  remove Metallica, things won't change, so stop all this, I said something that i supported with quotes and facts, you made a scandal  ansd placed words in my mouth I never said. If I "made a scandal" it's because I'm DAMN TIRED of people mentioning an addition that was approved by THE SITE OWNER. And that went through a LOT of discussion before ever happening. 
 
Exactly what I'm saying MAKING A FINAL DECISION ABOUT A BAND IS FUTILE, BECAUSE PEOPLE WILL INSIST EVEN IN M@X  , THE ADM AND MOST OF THE PEOPLE (METALLICA LOST OF THE POLLS) DISAGREE.

Yes, but the people who were against Metallica's addition AND posted in the thread didn't provide good enough arguments/evidence to substantiate their posts.
Most arguments went as far as "no Metallica".
On the other hand, many of the pro Metallica posts by Cert for eg, had great evidence and arguments.
 
Iván 


So, about that Hendrix thing.....


Back to Top
mystic fred View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 13 2006
Location: Londinium
Status: Offline
Points: 4252
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2008 at 01:17

not Prog but one of the most influential progressive artists of all time, he deserves a place here at least in Space Rock or Proto-prog - the problem here is he is basically a Blues player, something which PA are reluctant to handle as this would "open too many other floodgates" (Groundhogs, Free et al...) never mind the funk thing (though Jazz Fusion gets away with it as its so popular among the PA cognoscenti...Wink)

 
 
 


Edited by mystic fred - December 01 2008 at 01:21
Prog Archives Tour Van
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2008 at 01:11
Originally posted by ziggystardust360 ziggystardust360 wrote:

I don't think Hendrix belongs in the archives.
Because if we added Hendrix we'd have to add bands like Funkadelic,Sly Stone,Grateful Dead.
They all had the same system going on all had the same styles,now think about this what if all these bands were added because all have the same qualities Hendrix's music had.
Now doesn't that just sound ridiculous.


Let's refrain from "If X band , why not Y? pleaseWink


"They all had the same system going on all had the same styles,now think about this what if all these bands were added because all have the same qualities Hendrix's music had"

Substantiate this please. Doesn't wash with me.



Edited by HughesJB4 - December 01 2008 at 01:13
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65268
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2008 at 21:35
Originally posted by ziggystardust360 ziggystardust360 wrote:

I don't think Hendrix belongs in the archives.
Because if we added Hendrix we'd have to add bands like Funkadelic,Sly Stone,Grateful Dead.
They all had the same system going on all had the same styles,now think about this what if all these bands were added because all have the same qualities Hendrix's music had.
Now doesn't that just sound ridiculous.


luckily it doesn't work that way and we wouldn't have to add any artist based on any other, which is part of the argument against Jimi's inclusion;  he either was influential on progrock or he wasn't, and he couldn't really be ProgRelated because he died in 1970


Back to Top
ziggystardust360 View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: July 22 2008
Location: Orlando
Status: Offline
Points: 80
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2008 at 21:30
I don't think Hendrix belongs in the archives.
Because if we added Hendrix we'd have to add bands like Funkadelic,Sly Stone,Grateful Dead.
They all had the same system going on all had the same styles,now think about this what if all these bands were added because all have the same qualities Hendrix's music had.
Now doesn't that just sound ridiculous.
''I always had the repulsive need to be something other than human''-David Bowie
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2008 at 21:15
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

 
T...can you tell me when I said this??????  Please do it...If you can. . 
YOU ARE PLACING WORDS IN MY MOUTH and trying to fix your mistake with a lot of fforced arguments. Ok. You didn't say that. I can give you that Ivan. 
 
 
Please, put is as big as your initial post. LOL That would had been enough T to avoid all this disgusting problems, quote what I say, because I'm the kind odf person that always says my truth loud and clear.
 
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

 No matter how many explanations you give, no matter how many times you say Mike made that thread to boost his site, you  and all the fotrum know that  Mike started the thread to suport Metallica. Now YOU are putting words (or better, intentions) on Mike's actions. Why can you do this and I can't? Do you know for a FACT that he created that thread to support Metallica? 
 
Please T, don't pretend to be that naive.
  1. There's a debate about metallica that already has 10 pages
  2. Mike starts another one PRECISELY IN THAT MOMENT SUPPORTING METALLICA'S PROGRSIVENESS LOL
  3. And you say it's not to suport Metallica...PLEASE T!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please T, it's yellow, has feathers, says quack, it's a duck.

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

 
But Metallica is here, nobody can do a thing, even if we start 100 threads asking to  remove Metallica, things won't change, so stop all this, I said something that i supported with quotes and facts, you made a scandal  ansd placed words in my mouth I never said. If I "made a scandal" it's because I'm DAMN TIRED of people mentioning an addition that was approved by THE SITE OWNER. And that went through a LOT of discussion before ever happening. 
 
Exactly what I'm saying MAKING A FINAL DECISION ABOUT A BAND IS FUTILE, BECAUSE PEOPLE WILL INSIST EVEN IN M@X  , THE ADM AND MOST OF THE PEOPLE (METALLICA LOST OF THE POLLS) DISAGREE.
 
Iván 


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - November 30 2008 at 21:39
            
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65268
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2008 at 20:57
Originally posted by anoah anoah wrote:

Hello everyone,

I'm fairly new here--young too, so I doubt this post will really be noticed, BUT...

I know various artists (Metallica, Radiohead, etc.) have stirred up a bit of controversy here, and I appreciate all the people who are making valid points on both sides, but why does this need to turn into attacks, things that have nothing to do with music at all. We do not need to accuse people of being liars or being "new" and inexperienced. This is a music community, and we are supposed to come together to share our musical tastes, to discuss and disagree on music styles and techniques, to recommend music that is important to us.

I love Jimi Hendrix! He's an amazing guitarist and influenced countless musicians. But it doesn't matter to me whether he gets into the archives or not. Him being a member of the archives doesn't increase his greatness. He was never renowned as the greatest prog guitarist of the last century. He's just an amazing musician. His spot in the archives is an interesting topic, and as I said, it's nice that people are making arguments for why he should and shouldn't be a member of the archives, but frankly, does it even matter?

Should we really let another musician's spot in the archives get between fellow prog-lovers? We are a special community. There are very few places where music listeners who enjoy a very lovely and unique style of music can come together to share their love of the music. This is an amazing place.
 
-Noah


it is an amazing place, Noah, thanks for reminding us of that..  many here have strong feelings due to years of listening behind them and those feelings come out with passion sometimes  ..for those that are the caretakers here, it matters because decisions have to be made, and artists cannot then be removed so it's important to be sure and to have all arguments on the table   

hope you enjoy your time here



Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35951
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2008 at 20:55
Originally posted by crimson87 crimson87 wrote:

Man , the only way to solve this issue about Hendrix is to ask the greats in prog like Fripp , Howe , Hackett or Gilmour. If they say how Hendrix influenced them then is more than clear that he is prog.

Vote The Rolling Stones for Prog Related!!!!LOL



Or for Proto Prog for this:




Back to Top
anoah View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: November 25 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 69
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2008 at 20:51
Hello everyone,

I'm fairly new here--young too, so I doubt this post will really be noticed, BUT...

I know various artists (Metallica, Radiohead, etc.) have stirred up a bit of controversy here, and I appreciate all the people who are making valid points on both sides, but why does this need to turn into attacks, things that have nothing to do with music at all. We do not need to accuse people of being liars or being "new" and inexperienced. This is a music community, and we are supposed to come together to share our musical tastes, to discuss and disagree on music styles and techniques, to recommend music that is important to us.

I love Jimi Hendrix! He's an amazing guitarist and influenced countless musicians. But it doesn't matter to me whether he gets into the archives or not. Him being a member of the archives doesn't increase his greatness. He was never renowned as the greatest prog guitarist of the last century. He's just an amazing musician. His spot in the archives is an interesting topic, and as I said, it's nice that people are making arguments for why he should and shouldn't be a member of the archives, but frankly, does it even matter?

Should we really let another musician's spot in the archives get between fellow prog-lovers? We are a special community. There are very few places where music listeners who enjoy a very lovely and unique style of music can come together to share their love of the music. This is an amazing place.
 
-Noah
Back to Top
crimson87 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 03 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 1818
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2008 at 20:45

Man , the only way to solve this issue about Hendrix is to ask the greats in prog like Fripp , Howe , Hackett or Gilmour. If they say how Hendrix influenced them then is more than clear that he is prog.

Vote The Rolling Stones for Prog Related!!!!LOL

Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2008 at 20:09
^^^ Now I understand why you used so big font. LOL
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - November 30 2008 at 20:11
            
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2008 at 20:06
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

]
 
I can say thatEminem is a progfg artiost in 100 size font. and won't be truth.
 
 
No it won't.... But some people will start believing it..LOL The lost art of propaganda... LOL


Edited by The T - November 30 2008 at 20:07
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2008 at 20:05
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

 
Guess this size is better if we want to win any arguments around here... LOL
 
No T, nobody wins or loose an argument shouting and using large fonts with non truth phrases,.
 
You make a point with arguments, quotes and facts.
 
I can say that Eminem is a prog artist in 100 size font. and won't be truth.
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - November 30 2008 at 20:08
            
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2008 at 20:03
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by T T wrote:

 
"SO STOP SAYING THAT WE ADDED METALLICA BECAUSE WE JUST "WANTED TO".
 
 
This thread isn't even about Metallica! Confused But I had to make the point.
 
T...can you tell me when I said this??????  Please do it...If you can. You never said it. I told you, it's implied.  Just like you read implications in my word, I read them in yours. Sorry, I do that too.
 
YOU ARE PLACING WORDS IN MY MOUTH and trying to fix your mistake with a lot of fforced arguments. Ok. You didn't say that. I can give you that Ivan. 
 
No matter how many explanations you give, no matter how many times you say Mike made that thread to boost his site, you  and all the fotrum know that  Mike started the thread to suport Metallica. Now YOU are putting words (or better, intentions) on Mike's actions. Why can you do this and I can't? Do you know for a FACT that he created that thread to support Metallica? 
 
But Metallica is here, nobody can do a thing, even if we start 100 threads askingg to  remove Metallica, things won't change, so stop all this, I said something that i supported with quotes and facts, you made a scandal  ansd placed words in my mouth I never said. If I "made a scandal" it's because I'm DAMN TIRED of people mentioning an addition that was approved by THE SITE OWNER. And that went through a LOT of discussion before ever happening. 
 
Enough about Metallica. With that I agree.
 
Iván T
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2008 at 19:58
Originally posted by Peter Peter wrote:

THIS IS AN EVEN BIGGER FONT!!! Shocked
 
Guess this size is better if we want to win any arguments around here... LOL
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2008 at 19:58
Yes, ridiculous, I agree
 
Iván
            
Back to Top
Peter View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2008 at 19:56
THIS IS AN EVEN BIGGER FONT!!! Shocked
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2008 at 19:55
Originally posted by T T wrote:

 
"SO STOP SAYING THAT WE ADDED METALLICA BECAUSE WE JUST "WANTED TO".
 
 
T...can you tell me when I said this??????  Please do it...If you can.
 
YOU ARE PLACING WORDS IN MY MOUTH and trying to fix your mistake with a lot of fforced arguments.
 
No matter how many explanations you give, no matter how many times you say Mike made that thread to boost his site, you  and all the fotrum know that  Mike started the thread to suport Metallica.
 
But Metallica is here, nobody can do a thing, even if we start 100 threads askingg to  remove Metallica, things won't change, so stop all this, I said something that i supported with quotes and facts, you made a scandal  ansd placed words in my mouth I never said.
 
Enough about Metallica.
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - November 30 2008 at 19:57
            
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2008 at 19:45
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

MAX THEN SAID "YES". HE EVEN CONGRATULATED ME FOR THE BIOGRAPHY. SO STOP SAYING THAT WE ADDED METALLICA BECAUSE WE JUST "WANTED TO". We didn't just ignore MAX decisions. He APPROVED. THE SITE OWNER SAID YES
 
Sorry for the caps, but your style, in this case, fits my point perfectly Ivan. With all respect.
 
 
T
 
If this is what you think implies that you lied, you're wrong Ivan. I'm just interpreting your words and continous references about the Metallica addition as a way of saying that "we added metallica because we just wanted to".  It was an addition that fulfilled all requirements and even more and I'm tired of seeing it mentioned as an example of the danger of insisting. 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 6>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.246 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.