Least Proggy Metallica Album |
Post Reply | Page <1234 7> |
Author | |||||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65442 |
Posted: November 29 2008 at 20:47 | ||||
off topic-- heard a few cuts off the new one.. seemed quite familiar, disappointing
|
|||||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: November 29 2008 at 17:15 | ||||
When you're talking about METAL can you at least do some research before? Norwegian BLACK Metal is what you're talking about. The school of death metal that's most famous in Europe is the SWEDISH school of Melodic Death Metal (The "Gothemburg" sound) as opposed to the mostly-Bergen-based Norwegian bands that started (or really defined) Black metal.
|
|||||
|
|||||
Valarius
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 08 2005 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 1480 |
Posted: November 29 2008 at 13:40 | ||||
It depends on your definition of "proggy". I voted Kill 'Em All, as to me that is a straight up metal album. To start saying KEA has proggy elements such as time changes etc, basically says that there is prog elements in every style of music.
At which point if that's that case why is it nessesarily a "Prog element"?
If that doesn't make sense, don't worry, I'm confused by it myself. Basically, Kill 'Em All is the least Proggy, end of.
|
|||||
Abstrakt
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 18 2005 Location: Soundgarden Status: Offline Points: 18292 |
Posted: November 29 2008 at 12:27 | ||||
I kinda like St Anger actually
|
|||||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 36516 |
Posted: November 29 2008 at 11:44 | ||||
No offence, but I've heard plenty of Metallica material, and it is not self-evident to me that the music is Prog even if it isn't standard metal.
|
|||||
DatM
Forum Groupie Joined: November 19 2008 Location: Berlin, Germany Status: Offline Points: 95 |
Posted: November 29 2008 at 11:39 | ||||
Metallica is kinda like pot...for many they were the gateway to harder dru...I mean, music...
Actually I think many thrash and metal bands showed prog leanings back then, which made a lot of metalheads like me check out Rush and other prog bands. This is why DT made such an impact when they came out. |
|||||
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: November 29 2008 at 09:57 | ||||
You're overlooking the fact that complexity and long tracks are not the only criteria for adding a band.
Metallica is also the band that took on a bassist because he was the best experimental metal bassist on the scene.
They are in Prog-Related, but it's self-evident that the music is Prog, not standard (or even simply elongated) metal.
|
|||||
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
|||||
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 26 2008 Location: PA, USA Status: Offline Points: 4335 |
Posted: November 28 2008 at 15:12 | ||||
And if we are going to include all complex albums with long tracks we could put a lot of bands that aren't prog here. Frankly, I think that Metallica can only be justified as being here if there was an Influences category otherwise it's a little like the rock and roll hall of fame letting Madonna in, she was popular and influenced a generation of pop princesses but is that what rock is all about. Metallica is the band that turned down a bassist because he played too well for god's sake. Oh well, gotta run now and put on an album from my favorite grammy award winning metal band, Jethro Tull.
I do say, I enjoy this healthy debate and respect very much everyones passion and civility. Tell me this isn't fun.
|
|||||
Time always wins. |
|||||
WinterLight
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 09 2008 Status: Offline Points: 424 |
Posted: November 28 2008 at 10:51 | ||||
Not exactly.
My emphasis added in both quotations. I don't think any commentary on the discrepancy is necessary. Edited by WinterLight - November 28 2008 at 15:47 |
|||||
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 26 2008 Location: PA, USA Status: Offline Points: 4335 |
Posted: November 28 2008 at 10:28 | ||||
Going by what progrocker said here:
|
|||||
Time always wins. |
|||||
Raff
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 29 2005 Location: None Status: Offline Points: 24429 |
Posted: November 28 2008 at 09:06 | ||||
Bands cannot be removed once added to the site. Sorry about that, but this is what the OWNER of PA wishes. I'm afraid that people who don't agree with this policy will just have to accept it, or find another place to hang out at. |
|||||
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: November 28 2008 at 08:32 | ||||
They're not here "based on a few complex songs" - please review all of the reasoning rather than making such a snap assumption.
|
|||||
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
|||||
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 26 2008 Location: PA, USA Status: Offline Points: 4335 |
Posted: November 27 2008 at 18:30 | ||||
The prog metal category has to be cut up into 7 different descriptions and my ears have me placing more importance in the word metal than prog for any of the bands within that i've heard, and basically all I've said there is that I don't care for metal even if its labelled "prog" but that's my problem. That doesn't now mean that I believe former metal gods Metallica should be included on this site based on a few complex songs and the fact someone claims them as an influence. If there was a Prog Influences category then fine but hypothetically say the Dixie Dregs were influenced by, say, the Allman Brothers Band and say that said Allman Brothers had a few somewhat complex songs of there own then maybe.....see where we are here. Now I like the Allman Brothers but I don't want them thrown in here just so that I can review their work.
Edited by manofmystery - November 27 2008 at 18:31 |
|||||
Time always wins. |
|||||
J-Man
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 07 2008 Location: Philadelphia,PA Status: Offline Points: 7826 |
Posted: November 27 2008 at 10:28 | ||||
|
|||||
Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime |
|||||
J-Man
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 07 2008 Location: Philadelphia,PA Status: Offline Points: 7826 |
Posted: November 27 2008 at 10:19 | ||||
|
|||||
Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime |
|||||
J-Man
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 07 2008 Location: Philadelphia,PA Status: Offline Points: 7826 |
Posted: November 27 2008 at 10:14 | ||||
|
|||||
Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime |
|||||
Petrovsk Mizinski
Prog Reviewer Joined: December 24 2007 Location: Ukraine Status: Offline Points: 25210 |
Posted: November 27 2008 at 03:45 | ||||
I am safe to assume you guys need to be directed to some background reading? i.e previous threads on the matter |
|||||
|
|||||
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: November 27 2008 at 03:29 | ||||
Not necessarily.
I think there are plenty of Death Metal bands here - Death, for example.
The reasoning that if a subgenre of Metal progressed the Metal genre, then that subgenre is progressive is fatally flawed: Progressive music is easily identifiable in that it is inherently progressive. How that identification is made is much trickier, and is usually decided on a per-band basis, not a per subgenre basis.
Kill 'Em All "qualifies" for many, many reasons.
Master of Puppets is a Bona Fide Prog metal album, superior in many ways to Prog metal albums that followed it - most importantly in that it is one of the very few Progressive Metal albums that actually contains complex compositions instead of mere complicated ones.
Not only are both distinctly (one might say completely) different to everything that preceeded them in a very large number of ways, they also contain plainly identifiable elements of Progressive Rock music, including what is, to me, the most important feature - that the music itself is inherently Progressive, not a simple literal progression from what went before - although there is a case for MoP being a simple progression of RtL.
That's quite a feat
The evidence says otherwise
Apart from the fact that this is almost completely incoherent - assuming you're a native English speaker (if not, I apologise) - your reasoning here is non-existent and plain rude to all the people who think that Metallica should be here.
The reason that not all metal bands are added is because not all metal bands are progressive. Metallica WERE, just like Genesis WERE. Edited by Certif1ed - November 27 2008 at 03:34 |
|||||
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
|||||
BroSpence
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 05 2007 Status: Offline Points: 2614 |
Posted: November 27 2008 at 00:31 | ||||
St. Anger is the least proggy. They tried hard to ditch their influences with that one. Bad riffs, and uninteresting song structures. Their lyrics focused much more on personal problems than outside political/societal issues. Although to be fair, that is where they were at the time, and needed to get through.
|
|||||
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 26 2008 Location: PA, USA Status: Offline Points: 4335 |
Posted: November 27 2008 at 00:22 | ||||
seems like this band, above any other, needs to be eliminated from this website
sticks out like a sore thumb, why not add all metal bands then, or every single rock band for that matter
|
|||||
Time always wins. |
|||||
Post Reply | Page <1234 7> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |