Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Hawkwind vs Kansas
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedHawkwind vs Kansas

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Poll Question: Which band do you prefer ?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
26 [40.00%]
39 [60.00%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Yorkie X View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 1049
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2008 at 20:59
Originally posted by darksideof darksideof wrote:

I know why some of you guys like Hawkwind more Kansas. Because of Hawkind had the naked ladies onstage! that's all.   
Thats it I'm convinced now I`m going to vote to for Hawkwind on the strength of the naked ladies on stage.  wait when Kansas play Magnum Opus their is this section called release the beavers ...  I`m switching my vote back to Kansas Wink
Back to Top
darksideof View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 22 2007
Location: Newark N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 2318
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2008 at 17:34
I know why some of you guys like Hawkwind more Kansas. Because of Hawkind had the naked ladies onstage! that's all.   

Edited by darksideof - August 03 2008 at 17:36
http://darksideofcollages.blogspot.com/
http://www.metalmusicarchives.com/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Darksideof-Collages/
Back to Top
Philip View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 13 2007
Location: Porto, Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 413
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2008 at 12:48
Kansas. Ireally didn't like anything I heard from Hawkwind.
Back to Top
Toaster Mantis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 02 2008 at 16:12
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

That BBC documentary was on last night on BBC 2. I didn't know that when I posted that Youtube link on the previous page. What a coincidence!


I saw it earlier today and was somewhat surprised they chose to interview Nik instead of Dave. Confused
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 02 2008 at 03:38
Originally posted by Toaster Mantis Toaster Mantis wrote:


Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Hawkwind were 'patchy' shall we say, but they need to be judged in the context of the music scene of the time, and what they represented. They were musical terrorists, playing with a punk spirit, years before punk became the phenomenon it did. But they combined this with the psychedelic and fantasy element to forge a sound and style that no one else was doing, to my knowledge.
Yeah. I happen to like Hawkwind for the same reason that SouthSideOfTheSky dislikes them; their music is thematically rather complex yet aesthetically anything but formal. How many other bands can write songs about the Three Laws of Robotics without coming across as remotely nerdy? Tongue


Absolutely, and the work Calvert done with the band in the mid to late 70's is some of my favorite Hawkwind.

That BBC documentary was on last night on BBC 2. I didn't know that when I posted that Youtube link on the previous page. What a coincidence!
Back to Top
Yorkie X View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 1049
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 02 2008 at 03:34
Originally posted by Toaster Mantis Toaster Mantis wrote:

Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Hawkwind were 'patchy' shall we say, but they need to be judged in the context of the music scene of the time, and what they represented. They were musical terrorists, playing with a punk spirit, years before punk became the phenomenon it did. But they combined this with the psychedelic and fantasy element to forge a sound and style that no one else was doing, to my knowledge.


Yeah. I happen to like Hawkwind for the same reason that SouthSideOfTheSky dislikes them; their music is thematically rather complex yet aesthetically anything but formal. How many other bands can write songs about the Three Laws of Robotics without coming across as remotely nerdy? Tongue
Rush ? Tongue     wait I didnt read the nerdy bit ... ummmm  Confused   hey listen I`m with you thats why I put these bands together both have strong loyal followings and enormous merit in their aplications to the prog movement ..  getting back to that  Three Laws of Robotics thing without sounding dorky I think you have made an excellent point  Clap


Edited by Yorkie X - August 02 2008 at 03:40
Back to Top
Toaster Mantis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 12 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 5898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 02 2008 at 03:24
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Hawkwind were 'patchy' shall we say, but they need to be judged in the context of the music scene of the time, and what they represented. They were musical terrorists, playing with a punk spirit, years before punk became the phenomenon it did. But they combined this with the psychedelic and fantasy element to forge a sound and style that no one else was doing, to my knowledge.


Yeah. I happen to like Hawkwind for the same reason that SouthSideOfTheSky dislikes them; their music is thematically rather complex yet aesthetically anything but formal. How many other bands can write songs about the Three Laws of Robotics without coming across as remotely nerdy? Tongue
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2008 at 13:39
For anyone who's not yet seen the BBC documentary of Hawkwind, it's here on Youtibe. Sadly Brock didn't take part, having fallen out with Nik Turner, but it's very interesting and entertaining..

Hawkwind on the beeb



Edited by Blacksword - August 01 2008 at 13:50
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2008 at 13:37
Originally posted by SouthSideoftheSky SouthSideoftheSky wrote:


 


<P =Msonormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 1.5pt 0pt"><SPAN lang=EN style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-: EN">I use Hawkwind's first three albums (whom I rate with one star each) as a low water mark for prog. I have heard a lot of prog from the 70's and these albums are the worst I have ever heard. It cannot get any worse than that!! Badly produced, lack of good musicianship, no melodies, very repetitive songs, a lot of unbearable noise. The drums are the worst. I do like Levitation though with Ginger Baker on drums, but I have no respect for early Hawkwind.<?: prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></SPAN>


<P =Msonormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 1.5pt 0pt"><SPAN lang=EN style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-: EN"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN>


<P =Msonormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 1.5pt 0pt"><?: prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on"><SPAN lang=EN style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-: EN">Kansas</SPAN></st1:State></st1:place><SPAN lang=EN style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-: EN"> is a much better band in all respects.<o:p></o:p></SPAN>


<P =Msonormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 1.5pt 0pt"><SPAN lang=EN style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-: EN"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN>


<P =Msonormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 1.5pt 0pt"><SPAN lang=EN style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-ansi-: EN">Very strange comparison though. <o:p></o:p></SPAN>



Hawkwind were 'patchy' shall we say, but they need to be judged in the context of the music scene of the time, and what they represented. They were musical terrorists, playing with a punk spirit, years before punk became the phenomenon it did. But they combined this with the psychedelic and fantasy element to forge a sound and style that no one else was doing, to my knowledge.

They have made some classic albums, and they have turned out some dross too. It has to be said. But ove the years some excellent musicans have passed through their ranks; notably Simon House, Ginger Baker, Adrian Shaw and of course Huw Lloyd Langton, who is a very original and I think 'underated' guitarist. Liked his voice too.

Incidentally, I reccomend Huw Lloyd Langtons solo album, 'Night Air' Not especially progressive, just good memorable songs, and some great melodic lead guitar work.
Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2008 at 19:10
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Lemmy ... greater than all Kansas put together hahhah

Space Ritual... greater than all Kansas albums put together

has anyone from Kansas inspired these words of wisdom....

(ultracool proghead)Who'd win in a wrestling match, Lemmy or God?

(member of the PA's dope smokers genre team) Lemmy?

[imitates a game show buzzer]

(geek wearing a  Rush shirt ) God?


Wrong, dickhead, trick question. Lemmy *IS* God.
 
Hmm how do you join I wonder. LOL
 
That reminds me of some comedy skit several years ago where they have a game show show called stump the pothead or something like it.
 
There are three stoners at their consols with buzzers and the Question is (what one question stumps a stoner everytime) "What were we just talking about?"
All three of the stoner contestants don't even move for like thirty seconds.  Then one guy hits his buzzer and asks Did I win?"
 
I'm still sticking with KansasWink
 
 
 


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2008 at 19:09
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Lemmy ... greater than all Kansas put together hahhah

Space Ritual... greater than all Kansas albums put together

has anyone from Kansas inspired these words of wisdom....

(ultracool proghead)Who'd win in a wrestling match, Lemmy or God?

(member of the PA's dope smokers genre team) Lemmy?

[imitates a game show buzzer]

(geek wearing a  Rush shirt ) God?


Wrong, dickhead, trick question. Lemmy *IS* God.
 
Hmm how do you join I wonder. LOL
 
That reminds me of some comedy skit several years ago where they have a game show show called stump the pothead or something like it.
 
There are three stoners at their consols with buzzers and the Question is (what one question stumps a stoner everytime) "What were we just talking about?"
All three of the stoner contestants don't even move for like thirty seconds.  Then one guy hits his buzzer and asks Did I win?"
 
I'm still sticking with KanasasWink
 
 
 


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
Hawkwise View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 31 2008
Location: Ontairo
Status: Offline
Points: 4119
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2008 at 10:44
[/QUOTE]
 
I won't beat you up, but HAWKWIND has been aof itself for much longer than KANSAS.
 
       Kind regards.
[/QUOTE]


Now you really are talking out your backside it shows you know nothing of Hawkwind and how Dave Brock has kept Hawkwind flying all these years  ,  Nick Turner's Space Ritual you could say that about but  Hawkwind NO , Brock has always tried to keep the Hawks Moving forward with new music ideas , thats why he has always bought in new  members into the band , Hawkwind are not just a Prog or Space rock band they have moved into many different genres of music from Punk'ish years of Calvert  through the Dance and  Ambient years of the 90s  , there last couple albums even had a bit of Drum N Bass mixed in with the usual Space Rock,  they have also kept to there ideals playing free gigs and they never have high ticket prises
and now also run there own Hawkfest (which was the weekend just gone )  to say they are tribute band of them selfs is just Incorrect  but they do also have there own Tribute band called   The Technicians Of Spaceship Hawkwind  , so stop talking out yer backside and get ya facts right ,

LONG LIVE THE MIGHTY HAWKS !!!!!
Back to Top
Cesar Inca View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 19 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 4888
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2008 at 10:25
Originally posted by E-Dub E-Dub wrote:

The boys from Topeka. No question.

E
 
The same here. Both bands' discographies have got ups and downs, and HAWKWIND has been more prolific in quantitative terms, but definitely KANSAS shows more technical proficiency, more musical imagination, a wider array of nuances and feelings, and when they rock, they do it more solidly. The remastered double CD "Two for the Show" allows me to rest my case easily.
 
    Kind regards.
Back to Top
Cesar Inca View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 19 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 4888
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2008 at 10:20
Originally posted by febus febus wrote:

Tough choice but my vote will go for Hawkwind! why???
because when they are good, they are brillant and can bring you in some ''spheres'' not too many bands are able to..
second reason is Hawkwind is still producing quality music nowadays...they had a few stinkers but still came with great, great CDs in the 80s, 90 s and still now. The return of  Davey in the fold with Brock and Bainbridge still guarantees fantastic music ''Take me to the Ladder'', ''Electric teppee'', ''Vortex'' ''Palace Sun'' and others still match the goodies from the 70s.
Kansas on the other hand produced great music as well, but for only a short time---74 to 78-- after that was freefall...
So analyzing their respective carreer, this is 4-5 Kansas great years versus 30 Hawkwind good to great years .
 
Kansas is now more or less a tribute band of its glorious past...nothing wrong with that.....but Hawkwind is still creating new stuff year after year,.....almost 40 years after their beginning.
So sorry, Yorkie and E-Dub......my vote to the Hawks!. don't beat me upLOL 
 
I won't beat you up, but HAWKWIND has been a tribute band of itself for much longer than KANSAS.
 
       Kind regards.
Back to Top
Yorkie X View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 1049
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2008 at 05:36
Originally posted by Hawkwise Hawkwise wrote:

Hmmmmmm i love Hawkwind first album in fact i think  the first two are my Fav  Hawkwind  albums

but yes  Very strange comparison to do   but  Kansas a better band than Hawkwind  best Joke i ever heard in my Life thats soooooooooooo funny  !!!! 



  Hawkwind  may not be great musicians to the same level that obviously Kansas are,   Hawkwind are entertaining in a completely different way to Kansas, with some nocturnal activity I'd probably enjoy Hawkwind more (though I would still realise their musicality is far less)  but straight (no weed needed)  Kansas provides a  much more rewarding prog experience. That makes Kansas better I think.  Smile


Edited by Yorkie X - July 31 2008 at 05:37
Back to Top
Hawkwise View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 31 2008
Location: Ontairo
Status: Offline
Points: 4119
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2008 at 18:49
Hmmmmmm i love Hawkwind first album in fact i think  the first two are my Fav  Hawkwind  albums

but yes  Very strange comparison to do   but  Kansas a better band than Hawkwind  best Joke i ever heard in my Life thats soooooooooooo funny  !!!! 



Back to Top
SouthSideoftheSky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Symphonic Team

Joined: June 29 2008
Location: Close To The...
Status: Offline
Points: 1960
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2008 at 18:28
 

I use Hawkwind's first three albums (whom I rate with one star each) as a low water mark for prog. I have heard a lot of prog from the 70's and these albums are the worst I have ever heard. It cannot get any worse than that!! Badly produced, lack of good musicianship, no melodies, very repetitive songs, a lot of unbearable noise. The drums are the worst. I do like Levitation though with Ginger Baker on drums, but I have no respect for early Hawkwind.

 

Kansas is a much better band in all respects.

 

Very strange comparison though.

Back to Top
Hawkwise View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 31 2008
Location: Ontairo
Status: Offline
Points: 4119
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2008 at 17:32
Hawkwind  !!!!!!!!  been my fav band since 1974  , Kansas not in the same league  , but don't see how how you can compare really there not at all a like   , 
just google Hawkwind  Discography  such a good and massive body of work over the years , also such a good live act over the years , The Top Festival Band of all Time for Shore   .





Back to Top
jimmy_row View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 11 2007
Location: Hibernation
Status: Offline
Points: 2601
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2008 at 17:32

I'm all out of weed so I have no way of enjoying Hawkwind.  I'll take the musicianship and good songs...

It's not really fair anyway, Kansas being one of my very favorite bands.

Signature Writers Guild on strike
Back to Top
darksideof View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 22 2007
Location: Newark N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 2318
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2008 at 17:28
Originally posted by febus febus wrote:

Tough choice but my vote will go for Hawkwind! why???
because when they are good, they are brillant and can bring you in some ''spheres'' not too many bands are able to..
second reason is Hawkwind is still producing quality music nowadays...they had a few stinkers but still came with great, great CDs in the 80s, 90 s and still now. The return of  Davey in the fold with Brock and Bainbridge still guarantees fantastic music ''Take me to the Ladder'', ''Electric teppee'', ''Vortex'' ''Palace Sun'' and others still match the goodies from the 70s.
Kansas on the other hand produced great music as well, but for only a short time---74 to 78-- after that was freefall...
So analyzing their respective carreer, this is 4-5 Kansas great years versus 30 Hawkwind good to great years .
 
Kansas is now more or less a tribute band of its glorious past...nothing wrong with that.....but Hawkwind is still creating new stuff year after year,.....almost 40 years after their beginning.
So sorry, Yorkie and E-Dub......my vote to the Hawks!. don't beat me upLOL 
 True what  you said!! but those 4 or 5 kansas albums are better that te 30 plus Hawkwind has...
http://darksideofcollages.blogspot.com/
http://www.metalmusicarchives.com/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Darksideof-Collages/
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.270 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.