Some of the reviewers deserve to be shot.

haas wrote: Yeah I have read this review to! Very strange, he was talking about some classical composer named Piel Koekjebla. Does anyone now him, because if so, I really want to hear the original.

No, it's just someone taking the piss. See the review below for more of the same, and the review of a DT album in the Report Abuse thread. Seems like somebody is enjoying themselves trying to slip these things in unnoticed.

MIKE OLDFIELD Incantations
Review by Piel Koekjebla @ 2:28:36 PM EST, 3/5/2005

 —  This is Mike Oldfields Tales from topographic oceans. That should say enough. But for the ones who don't know what I mean by that; it's his most ambitious work to date, its about eighty minutes of music. It has been carefully constructed and very well composed, and it includes some of his best melodies and playing (just as tales did for yes) BUT because it is so long, I can understand that you would probably want to turn it off. It can be dull and boring and repetative (just as tales did for yes) So, to sum it up, it's a truly fantastic album, probably Oldfields best, but it needs patience and attention to appreciate it. While Mike was still working on it, the project was firtly named Inbaftations, this was because of some strange dutch language joke, but because of marketing reasons virgin changed it into Incantations. (this is actually a fact, and most people don't know about this! I heard it from Sally, his sister, when she was visiting southern Ginuea, and I met her at a third world aid project!)

This is why all reviews at this site should be taken with a grain of salt...Take this review of JT's, "Songs From The Wood".

"This one is certainly not the best Jethro Tull album...far from Aqualung & others. I've difficulties to understand the concept of this album. For me nothing looks like to a fairy tale here...Music from the wood...surely not it is. Just hippy & sloppy! Only for absolute fans."

Sloppy? Phillippe, if you can write and record better music, let me hear it. Otherwise let someone who isn't completely deaf review albums.

AngelRat wrote: The mental image I have of reviewers like this is that of some spotty 14-year old kid who's sitting alone in his room behind his pc, he obviously has no friends and certainly no girlfriend (who wants some ugly retard like that). The kids at school laugh at him because he's bad at sports and his mother provided him with extremely bad taste in clothing. His parents want him to be a rocket scientist or a real smooth lawyer, but he'll probably end up like an third grade employee in a grocery store instead. Frustrated as he is he alternates his hour long obsessive masturbation sessions with writing of his anger with real lame reviews on random sites hoping to finally get some recognition.

Well shucks, I was going to write a bio of my own, but you saved me the trouble.

Thanx.

The stuff about mommy Palmer and the birthday present , although funny is too limit unrespectful of the man's talent (however over-rated)

Bryan's review and Phil talk about the album in a correct manner and explain why they do not like it in a good argumentative way. A few months ago , Three fates wanted to take some ELP reviews away because she did not like them and I argued for those remained posted. In this case, this is meant to get under someone's skin - if need be look at the name of the reviewer.

This is clearly a spoof and it got me a good laugh!!!