Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
TheProgtologist
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
|
Posted: June 02 2007 at 09:28 |
NaturalScience wrote:
Lota wrote:
Any thought about this album? |
Yes. I think it is the most important album in the history of rock music.
|
I agree 100%
|
|
|
rushaholic
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 13 2005
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1138
|
Posted: June 02 2007 at 09:12 |
My favorite Beatles album but not one of my favorite all-time albums.
I do understand though that it was one of the most important albums ever.
Edited by rushaholic - June 02 2007 at 09:13
|
|
Philéas
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 14 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 6419
|
Posted: June 02 2007 at 09:06 |
One of the first albums I ever bought (I was ten or something I think). Very good, but I rarely listen to it nowadays.
|
|
febus
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: January 23 2007
Location: Orlando-Usa
Status: Offline
Points: 4312
|
Posted: June 02 2007 at 08:06 |
If not for SERGEANT PEPPERS, where would we be now??? it was the pandera's box that opened a lot of new musical inspirations and horizons, and it didn't stop only with the music.
Thanks PAUL MCCARTNEY ......JOHN LENNON
|
|
Man Erg
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: August 26 2004
Location: Isle of Lucy
Status: Offline
Points: 7456
|
Posted: June 02 2007 at 03:41 |
What Sgt. Peppers did do was to inspire other bands to make amazing albums.The Zombies,Oddyssy (sic) and Oracle for example.Although, bands like Pink Floyd,The Who and The Moody Blues were working along the same lines comtemporarily.
|
Do 'The Stanley' otherwise I'll thrash you with some rhubarb.
|
|
Floydian42
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 13 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 846
|
Posted: June 02 2007 at 03:37 |
BroSpence wrote:
Wow, it seems like the Beatles and Sgt. Peppers are almost as despised here as Dream Theater which is pretty sad.
|
I don't hate them at all, and I certainly appreciate what they did for music and all, it's just that the music never reached me, is all. I won't say it's bad, just not my style.
|
|
BroSpence
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 05 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2614
|
Posted: June 02 2007 at 01:53 |
Wow, it seems like the Beatles and Sgt. Peppers are almost as despised here as Dream Theater which is pretty sad. Filler? I don't know about that. And just because some songs are overplayed doesn't mean they're bad. That's the radio's fault (if thats where you're hearing it).
Sgt. Peppers is not my favorite Beatles album, but it is f**king great. And you can bet your ass that there's a lot of proggers that wouldn't exist had it not been created. People also seem to forget a few things about Sgt. Peppers.
1. The Beatles were trying to make something that wasn't commercial and they thought would not gain a lot of attention. They just wanted to mess around and create some good sh*t they'd like a lot. Didn't really work that way completely as it was an extreme success
2. Fans and critics believed the Beatles had peaked at the time before Sgt.'s release. Their minds were soon blown away.
Anyways, the album is great and just becaue it may be over-exposed does not take away from it's greatness.
|
|
The Whistler
Prog Reviewer
Joined: August 30 2006
Location: LA, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 7113
|
Posted: June 02 2007 at 01:32 |
Oh. Right. Well, I was sort of being serious, but, okay!
Yeah, Mob Rules DEFINITELY inspired the world. Everywhere afterwards, young people were wearing evil cowls and the like. Mobsters we called 'em.
|
"There seem to be quite a large percentage of young American boys out there tonight. A long way from home, eh? Well so are we... Gotta stick together." -I. Anderson
|
|
Atomic_Rooster
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1210
|
Posted: June 02 2007 at 01:31 |
Even Heifetz?
|
I am but a servant of the mighty Fripp, the sound of whose loins shall forever be upon the tongues of his followers.
|
|
Bastille Dude
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 30 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 906
|
Posted: June 02 2007 at 01:29 |
Umm.. Yes.. Except Mob Rules!
Edited by Bastille Dude - June 02 2007 at 01:30
|
DEATH TO FALSE PROG!
|
|
The Whistler
Prog Reviewer
Joined: August 30 2006
Location: LA, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 7113
|
Posted: June 02 2007 at 01:26 |
Bastille Dude wrote:
I still believe Pepper's surpasses anything recorded before or after it. |
Well, like...ever? Like, even more important than Robert Johnson or Irving Berlin?
|
"There seem to be quite a large percentage of young American boys out there tonight. A long way from home, eh? Well so are we... Gotta stick together." -I. Anderson
|
|
Bastille Dude
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 30 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 906
|
Posted: June 02 2007 at 01:21 |
I still believe Pepper's surpasses anything recorded before or after it.
|
DEATH TO FALSE PROG!
|
|
The Whistler
Prog Reviewer
Joined: August 30 2006
Location: LA, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 7113
|
Posted: June 02 2007 at 00:58 |
NaturalScience wrote:
Lota wrote:
Any thought about this album?
|
Yes. I think it is the most important album in the history of rock music.
|
Oh, misguided fools...this topic isn't about Aqualung...
|
"There seem to be quite a large percentage of young American boys out there tonight. A long way from home, eh? Well so are we... Gotta stick together." -I. Anderson
|
|
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: June 02 2007 at 00:23 |
Just coming off of a fresh listening of the thing (headphones), not totally focused, but interrupted for other things, one of the most interesting things I find is the way the early stereo mixing turned out, still primitive for today's standards. I think George Martin worked to be faithful to the remix on my version from what I've read about it. It still seems a bit primitive as one might see it these days, but cool for the times it was created in.
Edited by Slartibartfast - June 02 2007 at 00:24
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|
rileydog22
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 24 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 8844
|
Posted: June 01 2007 at 23:17 |
ClassicRocker wrote:
darqdean wrote:
This is my least favorite Beatles album - I really do not see what all the fuss is about, there's three good songs on it, one that was covered better Joe Cocker, a few also-rans, a filler and a real stinker.
I didn't like it when it came out either, eventhough I liked Revolver before it and the Magical Mystery Tour EP that came out after.
|
Yes, highly overrated in my opinion. Joe Cocker's "With a Little Help.." was much better.
The title track and lucy in the sky are overplayed. A Day in the Life is still excellent but it doesnt make up for the rest of the album's filler.
While it's not my least favorite Beatles album, it's definitely my least favorite from their "experimental phase": '67-70
AND FOR THE LAST DAMN TIME: IT's NOT THE FIRST CONCEPT ALBUM (It's not even a REAL concept album - It just has a reprise towards the end. Whoop-de-freaking-doo!)
|
That's EXACTLY what I've been telling people. Reprising the first song at the end does not make the album a concept album. Neither does making an album in which multiple songs contain the sounds of animals, for that matter. The first legitimate concept album was Days of Future Passed.
Edited by rileydog22 - June 01 2007 at 23:37
|
|
|
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: June 01 2007 at 22:57 |
This album crept into the culture before I really started listening to it. Still it was very influential. My first and only copy so far is a CD and I'm going to run off and listen to it on headphones for the first time. Not that I kind of hadn't heard it in bits and in whole already, just to check it out as it nears 40.
Don't bother me for the next 40 minutes or so
Edited by Slartibartfast - June 01 2007 at 22:59
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|
Novalis
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 15 2007
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 338
|
Posted: June 01 2007 at 22:30 |
|
|
ClassicRocker
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 894
|
Posted: June 01 2007 at 22:24 |
NaturalScience wrote:
Something wrong with your edit button? |
all better
Edited by ClassicRocker - June 01 2007 at 22:25
|
|
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: June 01 2007 at 22:22 |
Something wrong with your edit button?
|
|
ClassicRocker
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 894
|
Posted: June 01 2007 at 22:18 |
darqdean wrote:
This is my least favorite Beatles album - I really do not see what all the fuss is about, there's three good songs on it, one that was covered better Joe Cocker, a few also-rans, a filler and a real stinker.
I didn't like it when it came out either, eventhough I liked Revolver before it and the Magical Mystery Tour EP that came out after.
|
Yes, highly overrated in my opinion. Joe Cocker's "With a Little Help.." was much better.
The title track and lucy in the sky are overplayed. A Day in the Life is still excellent but it doesnt make up for the rest of the album's filler.
While it's not my least favorite Beatles album, it's definitely my least favorite from their "experimental phase": '67-70
AND FOR THE LAST DAMN TIME: IT's NOT THE FIRST CONCEPT ALBUM (It's not even a REAL concept album - It just has a reprise towards the end. Whoop-de-freaking-doo!)
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.