Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 1 Registration Process for FORUM+Review
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closed1 Registration Process for FORUM+Review

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>
Poll Question: Should album reviews only be accepted from Forum Members?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
26 [50.98%]
25 [49.02%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2005 at 13:06
Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Great job MaxClap


Agree with Cert, too.The name display should be compulsory but whether it be forum name or real name should be optional.



I really think it should be the forum name. Or else the real name would link to your PM's in the forum. This would give the review (and the reviewer) some accountability. Certainly You or Cert would be accountable it is not so much for you but for others like the Bill Bruford lurker using Tony Banks reviews to tell us how great Bill Bruford is. At least the reader can contact the person doing so. Or if there is a question.


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2005 at 11:58

Great job MaxClap

Agree with Cert, too.The name display should be compulsory but whether it be forum name or real name should be optional.




Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2005 at 11:50

I agree with Cert (there really should be a sucking-up emoticon).

I think the possibility to choose would be the best option (some people might only want to show their nick, or only their real name for privacy reasons, or other reasons).

I'm getting enthiousiastic about the re-vamp and the current additions/changes that have been made. very good work.

I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2005 at 11:37

I like the way this is going too, and the single registration matches my vision entirely - but I'm a little confused as to why you might want both your name and your forum nick to appear by a review.

Could the choice be offered as to which is displayed for reviews - one, other or both? It's simply a matter of having the option, as I would think many people would like this - a nice thing, not a necessary thing!

Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2005 at 11:19

I like that Max, it links the forum and the reviews sections together nicely.

 

Back to Top
M@X View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster

Joined: January 29 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 4028
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2005 at 10:49
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

 

Tuxon's point is valid. I think the majority of us submit reviews under our own names, but participate in the forum under a "character" name. For example, I'm Bob McBeath for reviews, but Easy Livin' in the forum, Vibrationbaby uses that name in the forums, but Ian Gledhill for his reviews, Bryan Adair = Useful idiot, etc.

From my own point of view, I prefer that my reviews have my "real" name on them, but I'd rather participate in the forum under my character name.

One other question, will it still be possible to view the reviews pages without registering with the site? I think it should be.

Real name + character name will be used for reviews

ex:

BEGGAR'S OPERA Act one Beggars Opera progressive rock album and reviews BEGGAR'S OPERA - Act One Beggars Opera
Review by Bob McBeath (nick: Easy Livin) @ 10:38:42 AM EST, 2/12/2005
PROG REVIEWER
4 stars  —   Beggar’s Opera’s first album has with the passage of time, gradually gained belated (but justified) recognition as a truly superb piece of work. The band, which hails from my native homeland (and in fact played at my school around the time this album was released!), hit the ground running in terms of originality and imagination.

What do you think ?

+ YES , it  will still be possible to view the reviews pages without registering



Edited by M@X
Prog On !
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2005 at 10:20

Max,

Tuxon's point is valid. I think the majority of us submit reviews under our own names, but participate in the forum under a "character" name. For example, I'm Bob McBeath for reviews, but Easy Livin' in the forum, Vibrationbaby uses that name in the forums, but Ian Gledhill for his reviews, Bryan Adair = Useful idiot, etc.

From my own point of view, I prefer that my reviews have my "real" name on them, but I'd rather participate in the forum under my character name.

One other question, will it still be possible to view the reviews pages without registering with the site? I think it should be.

 

Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2005 at 09:43

I read some people who wanted that, so I thought I ask it for them makes them look less stupid for asking dumb questions, and I already have a rep for being dumb anyway

I don't really mind myself

I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
M@X View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster

Joined: January 29 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 4028
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2005 at 09:36
Originally posted by tuxon tuxon wrote:

It's fine with me. I think it's a logical course of action.

1 question, will it still be possible to write under a different name than the name you use on the forum? or a possibility to have displayed on the review a different name than the one you use on the forum (submission on forum name, but another name displayed on the archives review part?)

If this sentence doesn't make sense, regard it as not written

.... it can be possible but why ?

Prog On !
Back to Top
M@X View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster

Joined: January 29 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 4028
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2005 at 09:35
Originally posted by mirco mirco wrote:

There will be a new registration proccess, or our present membership will be valid in the new arrangement?

present membership will be valid

Prog On !
Back to Top
mirco View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2005
Location: Venezuela
Status: Offline
Points: 819
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2005 at 08:50

There will be a new registration proccess, or our present membership will be valid in the new arrangement?

Please forgive me for my crappy english!
Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2005 at 08:47

It's fine with me. I think it's a logical course of action.

1 question, will it still be possible to write under a different name than the name you use on the forum? or a possibility to have displayed on the review a different name than the one you use on the forum (submission on forum name, but another name displayed on the archives review part?)

If this sentence doesn't make sense, regard it as not written

I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
M@X View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster

Joined: January 29 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 4028
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2005 at 07:48

Thanks all for your opinions

 

Ok , it is time to explain our vision about this !
(sorry for my english in advance )

1st, we were planning to SETUP a Free Registration Process for the website ( reviews, downloading and maybe others cool thing )

BUT , 2 memberships ( 1 forum , 1 website ) is kind of TOO MUCH.

So, as we already have a Free Registration Process in the FORUM , I would have use it AS THE MAIN Free Registration Process  for the website and the Forum (with some changes and customization to better explain the Integration with the 2 parts archives and forum)

If someone is planning to write a reviews or download a song, he would use the same login and password FOR both service, this would UNIFY the 2 parts of the site , that I think are becoming more and more UNITED . And the login page could be the same as the one in the forum and the COOKIES thing also.

The goal is :

"To become a part of our great community and share, you need to register at one place"

I think this make a lot of sense , and it would be easier to identify reviewers and their respective posts and (vice et versa )

This would be also much easier for us to MODERATE reviews and posts. And greatly improve the QUALITY of our content.

I don't think this would affraid new reviewers, and I am able to live with less (-15%) reviews but more quality of the community in general.

 

Now , let's hear about the boys... ?!

 

Prog On !
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2005 at 06:53
C'mon Reedy, keep them coming, you're good!Clap
Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2005 at 18:31

I've tried, but I manage to bore myself to death never mind you lot!LOL

RUSH A Farewell to Kings
Review by Reed lover @ 4:56:25 PM EST, 11/26/2004
5 stars

 —  One of the defining moments in my (then) young life was going into town to buy A Farewell To Kings, the first Rush album to be put out on official release in the UK. The wondeful gatefold sleeve, yet another Hugh Syme masterpiece,only served to heighten my excitement and expectation as I impatiently waited for the bus that would return me home. From the moment I placed it on the turntable and the first acoustic chords thrummed out from the speakers I knew this was going to be a classic album. A Farewell To Kings (the title track) immediately struck a chord with me-"cities full of hatred fear and lies" reminded me instantly of the atmosphere of fear that hung over the Punk- era UK. Gentle acoustic guitars and ringing synth give way to a tumult of powerchords and muscular drums and bass. Almost anthemic, sometimes brutal,this is really the song that defined Rush for me at this time, even loved the "yadda-yadda" vocals on this track that oddly sound treated in some way.The instrumental/solo break is one of their best a combination of "Bastille Day" and the later "Freewill" with the final few acoustic chords and cymbals setting the scene nicely for Xanadu. For me Xanadu will always be Rush's greatest epic and the track I always play to anyone I want to convert to the "Rush cause." It has the finest opening of any Prog Rock song, one that will always bring the goosebumps up on me:tubular bells and atmospheric guitar building up to a crescendo of foreboding before the more complex chops of drum, bass and rock guitar kick in.The mystical story provided by Coleridge's "Kublai Khan" is nicely judged as a framework for an epic musical workout, and boy do Rush do it justice.The guitar solo at the end of the piece is one of Lifeson's best and spawned a host of imitators ( Pallas & Def Leppard to name but two.) Closer To The Heart next and what can you say? Two minutes and fifty-five seconds of pure genius.This was always going to be a crowd favourite-hopeful lyrics, jangly guitars, a synth solo and gasp, more tubular bells! A minor hit in the punk rock-bloated Uk charts was the outcome. Cinderella Man is a pretty straight-forward (for Rush) song,echoing the title track in tone and execution. Madrigal is a pretty little soft-rock ballad that allows Geddt Lee to sing "normally" for a change. Sci fi sound effects lead us into another classic "Cygnus X-1." The bass throbs in with a pulsating riff, joined by strident guitars and drums.The band move into a pulsating, rythmic jam that wonderfully evokes space travel, pulsars,black holes and all things Steven Hawking.I always remember my parents baulking at the strangulated vocals especially as our hero plunges into the Black Hole, but to me it readily evoked the cataclysm of that mysterious space phenemenom.Bludgeoning guitars, bass and drums in unison-play at volume 10 for maximum impact! This is such a good album that any review would fail to do it justice.Go out and buy this if you dont already own a copy.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzCry



Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2005 at 19:35

Reed: no offense meant...but I feel confident that you could turn in a few great reviews if you felt like it.

I was getting self-conscious that I hadn't done enough reviewing myself, and then I saw the actual numbers of reviews listed next to each of the collaborators. Without tooting my own horn, I think I've earned a little bit of a voice here...of course, quantity and quality are always very different things, so maybe not. 

It is quite surprising how some of the more obviously knowledgeable members have so few reviews to their name. Perhaps it's simply time constraints on their part?

Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2005 at 17:00
Originally posted by James Lee James Lee wrote:

 It indicates a more definite level of dedication to the music than simply becoming a rampant post machine.

ahem...........I resemble that remark. Ouch

Wink




Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2005 at 16:56

I kinda agree that it should be the other way 'round...forum members should be required to post at least one decent review first. Think of all the crap and spam that it would have prevented!

For instance, I think I take Mr. Chantraine more seriously because he waited so long before dipping his feet in these forum waters. It indicates a more definite level of dedication to the music than simply becoming a rampant post machine.

On the other hand, nothing anyone can do will guarantee that someone has something truly interesting to say.

Back to Top
Joren View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 07 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 6667
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2005 at 14:35
Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

Originally posted by Joren Joren wrote:

Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

How about limiting reviewers to forum members with 100 posts...i.e....Senior members....this will show that they had showed some real dedication to the forums.

That's a stupid idea?

Why does everybody think the forums are so important? Respect the people who want to participate here. Forums suck!

Then why are you here!?!

Because I have nothing better to do

Back to Top
Joren View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 07 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 6667
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 06 2005 at 14:34
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

Originally posted by Joren Joren wrote:

ok, I don't know, but do you agree with me that reviews like this from non-members exist?

Yes, I'm sure you are right with that Joren.

If someone goes to the trouble of writing a review though, I don't think it's putting much on them to ask them to register once with the site to enable them to post it. The only reason for using the forum registration is that it saves having to set up another registration process, just for the reviews. It would not compel anyone to participate in the forum.

I did mention elsewhere that you should still be able to post reviews using a different name to the one you use in the forum (if you want to).

Ah, I see. Well, then I agree with you.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.119 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.