Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Ricochet
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
|
Posted: January 10 2007 at 13:09 |
430 reviews of that album means 430 people who have reviewed or rated that album. any person has the (one-time) right to review an album he wants. besides that, it can't be anything force or pushed.
|
|
|
progismylife
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2006
Location: ibreathehelium
Status: Offline
Points: 15535
|
Posted: January 10 2007 at 13:09 |
Asyte2c00 wrote:
progismylife wrote:
What about the people who have a limited collection of prgo (like they have the top 5 albums) and they want to review? What then? Are you suggesting we don't let the newbies review at all? |
Two Points:
They can review these albums, top five prog-defining albums, eslewhere.
It will just create more exposure for lesser known bands, like Triumvirat, T2, Ragnorak, Dirty Three, Yellow Magic Orchestra, David Sylvian, Rare Bird, Quicksand, Gastr Del Sol.
If this precept was in effect, this time next year every artist will have been reviewed on PA.
|
And we would have more over reviewed bands and then we couldn't review those any more and have to wait for new prog. Eventually all the bands that no longer play any more will not be able to be reviewed in a few years time.
|
|
Firepuck
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 28 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 657
|
Posted: January 10 2007 at 13:06 |
Time is the only friend of unreviewed albums, eventually they will be reviewed. You will not be able ot "force people to review lesser known albums", this is a flawed arguement.
To suggest that we limit the number of reviews of an album is folly.
|
Kryten : "'Pub'? Ah yes, A meeting place where humans attempt to achieve advanced states of mental incompetence by the repeated consumption of fermented vegetable drinks."
|
|
Asyte2c00
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 15 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2099
|
Posted: January 10 2007 at 13:05 |
progismylife wrote:
What about the people who have a limited collection of prgo (like they have the top 5 albums) and they want to review? What then? Are you suggesting we don't let the newbies review at all? |
Two Points:
They can review these albums, top five prog-defining albums, eslewhere.
It will just create more exposure for lesser known bands, like Triumvirat, T2, Ragnorak, Dirty Three, Yellow Magic Orchestra, David Sylvian, Rare Bird, Quicksand, Gastr Del Sol.
If this precept was in effect, this time next year every artist will have been reviewed on PA.
|
|
progismylife
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2006
Location: ibreathehelium
Status: Offline
Points: 15535
|
Posted: January 10 2007 at 12:59 |
Asyte2c00 wrote:
This will force peole to review lesser known albums, moreover,
increase exposure of unpopular bands.
Thoughts? |
It could also force people to stop coming to this site since they can't give their input on a great album.
|
|
progismylife
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2006
Location: ibreathehelium
Status: Offline
Points: 15535
|
Posted: January 10 2007 at 12:58 |
What about the people who have a limited collection of prgo (like they have the top 5 albums) and they want to review? What then? Are you suggesting we don't let the newbies review at all?
|
|
Asyte2c00
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 15 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2099
|
Posted: January 10 2007 at 12:56 |
I have noticed many of admins want people to review
"unreviewed albums" in the PA. Perhaps, the solution to this
problem is placing a limit on the how many times can be reviewed.
However, I realize it is unfair to impose PA members not to
review a particular album, but do we really 430+ reviews on In the
Court of the Crimson King.
This will force peole to review lesser known albums, moreover,
increase exposure of unpopular bands.
Thoughts?
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.