Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Hey , How come no Phil Collins
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedHey , How come no Phil Collins

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Vulkan View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: December 09 2005
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 43
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 11 2005 at 23:22
Originally posted by Bern Bern wrote:

Originally posted by GoldenSpiral GoldenSpiral wrote:

Originally posted by andYouandI45 andYouandI45 wrote:

Becuase he is not prog. He is pop, and he did in fact ruin the greatest prog band ever. Maybe he would be in Prog-Related but scince he like literally destroyed Genesis, screw him.

 



whoa, guy, the popification of genesis was a team effort.  finger pointing is not necessary in this case.


Totally agree

still, screw phill...he should have stayed on the drums

Why are we never too sure till we die or have killed for an answer...
...Though names may change each face retains the mask it wore
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 10 2005 at 01:51
Originally posted by pero pero wrote:

Originally posted by ivan_2068 ivan_2068 wrote:

Phil hasn't written a single Progressive note in any of his solo albums, he's included as a member of Genesis (Despite his crimes against Prog ).

But as a soloist, he should be in the Pop Atchives.

Iván

No way

Ok pal, name a single Prog' song in Phil's solo career?

If not, then send him to Pop Archives, because that's the music he was playing as soloist.

Iván

            
Back to Top
Orbert View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: September 29 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 51
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2005 at 17:21
And just to nitpick - or maybe not - he wasn't an original member of Genesis. He joined on the third album, Nursery Cryme, along with Steve Hackett.
In and around the lake...
Back to Top
Bj-1 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 04 2005
Location: No(r)Way
Status: Offline
Points: 31644
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2005 at 17:11

Phil Collins' solo stuff is Porn Pop (that kinda' pop who perfectly fits in Porn movies ) and absolutely NOT prog, or prog related!!

 

RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
Back to Top
PROGMAN View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 03 2004
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 2664
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 07 2005 at 06:26

I've heard "Face Value", "No Jacket Required" and "But Seriously" and must say it is American Radio freindly POP with Ballads, Jazzy Pop, and Electro Elements but no more than that, PROG no way o - zay.

CYMRU AM BYTH
Back to Top
Lindsay Lohan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 07 2005 at 04:28
Originally posted by Norbert Norbert wrote:

Most of the solo efforts of Phil Collins are simply pop, not even plain rock.

Of course, he's better than Michael Jackson, but this is not enough reason to his inclusion.

That should be the ONLY reason for inclusion

Back to Top
Norbert View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 20 2005
Location: Hungary
Status: Offline
Points: 2506
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 07 2005 at 03:37

Most of the solo efforts of Phil Collins are simply pop, not even plain rock.

Of course, he's better than Michael Jackson, but this is not enough reason to his inclusion.

Back to Top
RoyalJelly View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 29 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 582
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 07 2005 at 03:34

Originally posted by PhilPhan PhilPhan wrote:

well, couldn't one argue that genesis did indeed progress. doesn't the term progressive mean change ? what did you want them to do, redo "Firth of fifth" or "cinema show" again and again.

     Changing one's style is not the same as progressing, especially when the change involves reverting to a set of pre-existing pop clichés. No progression where there's no innovation. It's possible to be innovative within a pop format, Eno, Gabriel, Kate Bush and David Sylvian, for example,  can do that, but I wouldn't include Collins or later Genesis in that category.

     Ohhhh, you can't hurry love, nooohhhh, it's just got to wait!!!!....

Back to Top
Lindsay Lohan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 07 2005 at 03:30
I dont get that Prog Related thingie...there are many artists there that does not got any progressive elements at all
Back to Top
Jim Garten View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin & Razor Guru

Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 07 2005 at 03:26
Originally posted by PhilPhan PhilPhan wrote:

well, couldn't one argue that genesis did indeed progress. doesn't the term progressive mean change ? what did you want them to do, redo "Firth of fifth" or "cinema show" again and again?


Well, yes, actually - your point being?

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Back to Top
pero View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 11 2005
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 1242
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 07 2005 at 02:56
Originally posted by ivan_2068 ivan_2068 wrote:

Phil hasn't written a single Progressive note in any of his solo albums, he's included as a member of Genesis (Despite his crimes against Prog ).

But as a soloist, he should be in the Pop Atchives.

Iván

No way

Back to Top
BiGi View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 01 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 848
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 07 2005 at 02:32
Originally posted by Bern Bern wrote:


Originally posted by GoldenSpiral GoldenSpiral wrote:


Originally posted by andYouandI45 andYouandI45 wrote:

Becuase he is not prog.
He is pop, and he did in fact ruin the greatest prog band ever. Maybe
he would be in Prog-Related but scince he like literally destroyed
Genesis, screw him.

whoa, guy, the popification of genesis was a team effort.  finger pointing is not necessary in this case.

Of course it was, as we have already discussed many times...blame (if you wish, I don't) Tony Banks and Mike Rutherford as well for that!

Totally agree
A flower?

Back to Top
lunaticviolist View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 17 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 478
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 07 2005 at 02:05
Phil Collins had some great post-Genesis songs.  I personally am not much of a fan of his music, but he definitely deserves respect.  Inclusion on this site (as a solo artist), however, should not and will not ever happen.
My recent purchases:
Back to Top
SlipperFink View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 12 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 230
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 07 2005 at 00:42
KILL PHIL!!!
KILL PHIL!!!
KILL PHIL!!!
KILL PHIL!!!
KILL PHIL!!!
KILL PHIL!!!
KILL PHIL!!!
KILL PHIL!!!

EVERYBODY NOW!!!!!

LMFBO.

Ahh me.

Gotta love Prog fans.

Warms the cockles of me 'eart.

SM.
Back to Top
BleedingGum View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 21 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 257
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 07 2005 at 00:09
Phil Collins has done such a great job, whether you like it or not. He can play and write music what he wants to, without listening to anyone's opinion.

Even me, I stop buying Genesis post ATTWT and I am not interested to collect his albums. but I give him credits.
...this is called....BleedingGum ... !
Back to Top
NetsNJFan View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: April 12 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3047
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 06 2005 at 23:46

Originally posted by Cinema Cinema wrote:

You might say Phil Collins is to progressive rock, what Judas was to the
disciples.

Phil Collins has contributed A LOT to prog

I don't need to defend him, his brilliant career does

Back to Top
Cinema View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 25 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 06 2005 at 23:00
You might say Phil Collins is to progressive rock, what Judas was to the
disciples.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 06 2005 at 22:48
Originally posted by andYouandI45 andYouandI45 wrote:

Becuase he is not prog. He is pop, and he did in fact ruin the greatest prog band ever. Maybe he would be in Prog-Related but scince he like literally destroyed Genesis, screw him.

 

 (though just one thing he is a great drummer don`t forget that)
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 06 2005 at 22:25

Phil hasn't written a single Progressive note in any of his solo albums, he's included as a member of Genesis (Despite his crimes against Prog ).

But as a soloist, he should be in the Pop Atchives.

Iván

            
Back to Top
ldlanberg View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 249
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 06 2005 at 21:56

Phil was one of the two best things to happen to Genesis. (Steve Hackett being the other.) I preferred Phil's fluid, athletic stagemanship over Peter's stiff and choreographed stuff. Phil was an exciting drummer as well.

Yet I haven't heard anything from Phil's solo stuff that would qualify for reminiscing on this site. But of course I cannot stop anyone from reminiscing about anything. Nor would I want to be that kind of jerk.

 



Edited by ldlanberg
LDL
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.430 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.