Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Crafter
Forum Newbie
Joined: October 16 2005
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 32
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 18:15 |
I like it. I'd listened to metal before prog. I really like PoS, DT, Green Carnation, Jeremy (Korean Prog Metal ), Evergrey, The Provenance, SX and others, a bit Opeth too...
|
Uh ? Oh, I see :D
|
|
King of Loss
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 21 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Online
Points: 16673
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 18:02 |
I LOVE IT ULKULK!
|
|
Man With Hat
Collaborator
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team
Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166183
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 17:57 |
I dont care for it. I like Ayeron and a song or two from other bands, but that is pretty much the extent of it.
|
Dig me...But don't...Bury me I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
|
|
Olympus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 18 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 545
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 17:54 |
I Like it.
|
"Let's get the hell away from this Eerie-ass piece of work so we can get on with the rest of our eerie-ass day"
|
|
BaldJean
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 17:40 |
I just want to add that Friede and I suggested that a band could belong to more than one genré, which would make this splitting-up unnecessary and be much more accurate.
Edited by BaldJean
|
A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 17:37 |
have to be honest, of what I've heard (which isn't much) I don't really
care for it. I will make an honest effort to get into it someday.
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
Paulieg
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 934
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 17:37 |
I like it. As a matter of fact, I love prog-metal.
|
|
BaldFriede
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 17:33 |
stonebeard wrote:
BaldFriede wrote:
stonebeard wrote:
MikeEnRegalia and Progtologist:
As I understand it, you two (if there are others, this includes you to) are working on the organization of prog-metal. I agree with this. I think one of the propositions Mike made in the original thread in the Prog Music Lounge, to make "Prog Metal" a seperate entitiy from "Prog Rock" yet still include it on this site, is a great idea. Even if that is not what you plan on specifically doing, I support your project fully.
Carry on.
|
Sorry, but that's nothing than an attempt to have and eat your cake. Either prog-metal is a part of progressive rock, then no separation is necessary, or it isn't, then what the hell does it in here?
|
I think prog metal and progressive rock are closely and undeniably linked. Many people who like prog metal bands like Opeth and Dream Theater come to PA and discover bands like Yes, Marillion, Symphony X and others, thus increasing PROGRESSIVE ROCK's overall fanbase. So, I believe for that reason, prog metal should be kept on this site. Since it's here, why don't we try to organize it for the convenience of the readers? This is logical to me.
|
You miss my point. For convenience of the reader genrés like symphonic prog or art-rock are way overdue of a reworking. Why don't we tackle them all? Would this have been suggested, with the ones who proposed a splitting-up of prog-metal volunteering for prog-metal, I would have been all for it. But the way it was done it was only to direct some spotlight at prog-metal. I repeat: Why did those who suggested splitting up prog-metal not suggest a general overhauling of genrés and volunteer for prog-metal? That's what I would have called some improvement of the site, and I would have supported it immediately and would have applauded them. The current suggestion is just an attempt of prog-metal heads to get more attention for their genré.
And I repeat: This has nothing whatever to do with my liking or not-liking of prog-metal; I just see an imbalance to the site if we follow the given suggestion. I would say just the same if someone suggested to split up any other sub-genré of prog. This is not the prog metal archives, nor is it the Zheul archives or the Krautrock archives. Either we split them all up or none.
Edited by BaldFriede
|
BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
|
|
DeadGhost
Forum Groupie
Joined: October 06 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 99
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 16:47 |
great genre!!
my favorites are Opeth and Fates Warning
I truly think Opeth is taking this genre foward with awesome riffs, uniqueness, vocals and variety. one of the best bands today!!!
|
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 16:45 |
BaldFriede wrote:
stonebeard wrote:
MikeEnRegalia and Progtologist:
As I understand it, you two (if there are others, this includes you to) are working on the organization of prog-metal. I agree with this. I think one of the propositions Mike made in the original thread in the Prog Music Lounge, to make "Prog Metal" a seperate entitiy from "Prog Rock" yet still include it on this site, is a great idea. Even if that is not what you plan on specifically doing, I support your project fully.
Carry on.
|
Sorry, but that's nothing than an attempt to have and eat your cake. Either prog-metal is a part of progressive rock, then no separation is necessary, or it isn't, then what the hell does it in here?
|
I think prog metal and progressive rock are closely and undeniably linked. Many people who like prog metal bands like Opeth and Dream Theater come to PA and discover bands like Yes, Marillion, Symphony X and others, thus increasing PROGRESSIVE ROCK's overall fanbase. So, I believe for that reason, prog metal should be kept on this site. Since it's here, why don't we try to organize it for the convenience of the readers? This is logical to me.
|
|
|
John Gargo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 450
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 16:42 |
It's a flawed question, because there are so many prog metal bands with VASTLY different styles. Pain of Salvation sounds NOTHING like Arcturus which sound NOTHING like Psychotic Waltz which sound NOTHING like Fates Warning which sound NOTHING like Symphony X etc. etc. etc.
For those that voted that they don't like the genre, I think it has a lot to do with ignorance and an assumption that all prog metal bands sound like Dream Theater (these are the kind of people that only listen to music from the 70s... you have to be a LITTLE close minded to post at a prog forum but we're talking extremes with this crowd).
|
|
Bj-1
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 04 2005
Location: No(r)Way
Status: Offline
Points: 31520
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 16:36 |
I think prog-metal is great, though not my favorite genre
|
RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
|
|
Empty Spaces
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 06 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 16
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 15:11 |
Tough one... i do much prefer art/symph/space rock (i.e cool prog rock) to prog metal but from what ive heard its pretty cool. scenes from memory by D.T and some of Symphony X is real good anyway.
|
Bow before Rick Wright... For he is your God
|
|
BaldFriede
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 15:07 |
It is half-baked, because you concentrate on prog-metal only; I already outlined how it should have been done. What would have been wrong with a suggestion like the one I gave and volunteering for prog-metal on your side? You would still have got what you wanted, if reorganizing prog-metal was your goal, but you would have included the bigger aim of a reorganistaion of the whole site. But no, you had to make some ballyhoo about prog-metal. Once more: This is NOT because I dislike prog-metal, it is because of your lopsided approach for a reorganisation of the site. Read the proposal of mine again, as I think yours should have been; you would have had my full support then.
|
BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
|
|
TheProgtologist
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 15:00 |
BaldFriede wrote:
No, I am upset because this is clearly not an attempt to reorganize the site for the better (for that something like I wrote would have been the appropriate move), it is just making ballyhoo for prog-metal. And, by the way, I would have opposed it the same way, had someone started something like this for Krautrock or any other genré. If we are to re-organise the site, fine; I'm all for it. But don't start a half-baked and half-hearted attempt like this. |
YOU HAVE GOT SOME NERVE.FOR ONE THING THIS WAS NOT HALF-BAKED OR HALF-HEARTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A lot of thought and one hell of a lot of work went into what we did.
The best thing to do is have collabs who specialize in the other genres do the same thing.I love all prog,but my passion is progressive metal.Believe me,if my passion was symphonic I would have attempted to re-organize symphonic.It just so happens that people that were willing to take the time and put some effort into it were fans of prgressive metal.
Edited by TheProgtologist
|
|
|
BaldFriede
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 14:55 |
No, I am upset because this is clearly not an attempt to reorganize the site for the better (for that something like I wrote would have been the appropriate move), it is just making ballyhoo for prog-metal. And, by the way, I would have opposed it the same way, had someone started something like this for Krautrock or any other genré. If we are to re-organise the site, fine; I'm all for it. But don't start a half-baked and half-hearted attempt like this.
|
BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
|
|
TheProgtologist
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 14:49 |
BaldFriede wrote:
TheProgtologist wrote:
BaldFriede wrote:
Too few choices. I would have voted for something like "it's ok, but overrated". And lately some people are trying to turn this site into a prog-metal site, which I don't approve of. |
Speaking for myself,I am not trying to turn thus into a prog metal site.I am just trying to help make the prog metal section,which I think is very disorganized,a little more organized.
While I think you are a very knowledgeable and intelligent person,you are pretty biased towards music you don't like.Well,let me say it this way...you are pretty biased towards prog metal.If it's not some obscure RIO,Zeuhl,Krautrock music you basically don't want to heard about it.Bad attitude to have,you ought to be a little more open than that.
|
Nowhere did I say I don't like prog-metal, and it is not relevant at all whether I like it or not. I'll repeat what I said in another thread:
I'll restate my opinion: The whole project was started badly. If we go re-organizing sub-genrés at all, then let's tackle the big ones first (Art Rock and Symphonic). At least the proposal should have been something like this:
I propose that we reorganize the genrés a little by subdividing the genrés further. We need volunteers for reorganising:
Art Rock Symphonic Krautrock Prog-Metal etc.
I myself volunteer for prog-metal. The way it is done now is extremely lopsided. Thius is not the prog-metal archives.
This I would have fully appreciated. But I reject the way Mike went about it. It is lopsided and nothing but a big ballyhoo about prog-metal.
Had Mike started a thread like that, he would have had my full support. But the way he went about it - pfui.
|
BS.You are just upset because Mike and a few other people(myself included) took it upon themselves to do this and didn't ask for anyone permission or opinion first(how dare we!!).And it also galls you that the few people who took the intitiative and did something did it with prog metal FIRST.
|
|
|
BaldFriede
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 14:41 |
TheProgtologist wrote:
BaldFriede wrote:
Too few choices. I would have voted for something like "it's ok, but overrated". And lately some people are trying to turn this site into a prog-metal site, which I don't approve of. |
Speaking for myself,I am not trying to turn thus into a prog metal site.I am just trying to help make the prog metal section,which I think is very disorganized,a little more organized.
While I think you are a very knowledgeable and intelligent person,you are pretty biased towards music you don't like.Well,let me say it this way...you are pretty biased towards prog metal.If it's not some obscure RIO,Zeuhl,Krautrock music you basically don't want to heard about it.Bad attitude to have,you ought to be a little more open than that.
|
Nowhere did I say I don't like prog-metal, and it is not relevant at all whether I like it or not. I'll repeat what I said in another thread:
I'll restate my opinion: The whole project was started badly. If we go re-organizing sub-genrés at all, then let's tackle the big ones first (Art Rock and Symphonic). At least the proposal should have been something like this:
I propose that we reorganize the genrés a little by subdividing the genrés further. We need volunteers for reorganising:
Art Rock Symphonic Krautrock Prog-Metal etc.
I myself volunteer for prog-metal. The way it is done now is extremely lopsided. Thius is not the prog-metal archives.
This I would have fully appreciated. But I reject the way Mike went about it. It is lopsided and nothing but a big ballyhoo about prog-metal.
Had Mike started a thread like that, he would have had my full support. But the way he went about it - pfui.
|
BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
|
|
BaldFriede
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 14:30 |
stonebeard wrote:
MikeEnRegalia and Progtologist:
As I understand it, you two (if there are others, this includes you to) are working on the organization of prog-metal. I agree with this. I think one of the propositions Mike made in the original thread in the Prog Music Lounge, to make "Prog Metal" a seperate entitiy from "Prog Rock" yet still include it on this site, is a great idea. Even if that is not what you plan on specifically doing, I support your project fully.
Carry on.
|
Sorry, but that's nothing than an attempt to have and eat your cake. Either prog-metal is a part of progressive rock, then no separation is necessary, or it isn't, then what the hell does it in here?
|
BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
|
|
TheProgtologist
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 14:29 |
BaldFriede wrote:
Too few choices. I would have voted for something like "it's ok, but overrated". And lately some people are trying to turn this site into a prog-metal site, which I don't approve of. |
Speaking for myself,I am not trying to turn thus into a prog metal site.I am just trying to help make the prog metal section,which I think is very disorganized,a little more organized.
While I think you are a very knowledgeable and intelligent person,you are pretty biased towards music you don't like.Well,let me say it this way...you are pretty biased towards prog metal.If it's not some obscure RIO,Zeuhl,Krautrock music you basically don't want to heard about it.Bad attitude to have,you ought to be a little more open than that.
|
|
|