Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Subgenre discussion
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSubgenre discussion

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
WillieThePimp View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 02 2005
Location: Bryan, Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 421
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Subgenre discussion
    Posted: February 20 2006 at 02:41
I had a question about A.C.T being decided upon as Art Rock. To me, I believe they have a much more symphonic vibe, especially with orchestral sounds and instruments in every song.

If this needs to be moved to another forum I apologize.


Edited by WillieThePimp
You can't possibly hear the last movement of Beethoven's Seventh and go slow. ~Oscar Levant, explaining his way out of a speeding ticket
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2006 at 18:55

Well, I feel having King Crimson in the "Symphonic Prog" subgenre is both misleading and confusing. Only a few of their albums are symphonic. And if you're feeling a sense of deja vu reading this, yes, it has been said countless times before.

Back to Top
The Miracle View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2006 at 19:05

"Art rock" is a very strange one as well, looks like the bands that cannot be categorized or play different genres are placed there

For example, TMV should be in the RIO/avant-prog section.

Back to Top
King of Loss View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 21 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Points: 16820
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2006 at 19:14
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Well, I feel having King Crimson in the "Symphonic Prog" subgenre is both misleading and confusing. Only a few of their albums are symphonic. And if you're feeling a sense of deja vu reading this, yes, it has been said countless times before.

Maybe because the "Symphonic" obsessed freaks don't like the latter period!

I think KC should be placed in mhmm.........

Mhmmm......

Mhmmm....

Let's say Art Rock, ok?

Back to Top
FragileDT View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: June 20 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1485
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2006 at 19:22
Originally posted by King of Loss King of Loss wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:


Well, I feel having King Crimson in the "Symphonic Prog"
subgenre is both misleading and confusing. Only a few of their albums
are symphonic. And if you're feeling a sense of deja vu reading this, yes,
it has been said countless times before.



Maybe because the "Symphonic" obsessed freaks don't like the latter
period!


I think KC should be placed in mhmm.........


Mhmmm......


Mhmmm....


Let's say Art Rock, ok?



I would say Avant-garde prog.

EDIT: Than again, Crimson is Crimson. Labels are overrated.

Edited by FragileDT
One likes to believe
In the freedom of music
But glittering prizes
And endless Compromises
Shatter the illusion
Of integrity
Back to Top
King of Loss View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 21 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Points: 16820
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2006 at 19:26
Originally posted by FragileDT FragileDT wrote:

Originally posted by King of Loss King of Loss wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:


Well, I feel having King Crimson in the "Symphonic Prog"
subgenre is both misleading and confusing. Only a few of their albums
are symphonic. And if you're feeling a sense of deja vu reading this, yes,
it has been said countless times before.



Maybe because the "Symphonic" obsessed freaks don't like the latter
period!


I think KC should be placed in mhmm.........


Mhmmm......


Mhmmm....


Let's say Art Rock, ok?



I would say Avant-garde prog.

EDIT: Than again, Crimson is Crimson. Labels are overrated.

Yea... That was my second choice, but once again, King Crimson is above labeling.

Back to Top
____VdGG____ View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 10 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 156
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 20 2006 at 23:55
You should simply label it as King Crimson, because it's certainly not symphonic, for the most part, and it would just fit every other classification on this website even more loosely
Iron throated monsters are forcing the screams;
Mind and machinery box-press our dreams
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 21 2006 at 06:29
The same is true with VdGG. I never felt comfortable with having them placed into "Symphonic". Yes, some of their work is symphonic, but there are also strong elements of avantgarde. Does anyone really think disc 2 of "Present" is symphonic prog, for example? But that's the general problem with classification in the database. I would much prefer genrés assigned to albums rather than artists.


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
el böthy View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 27 2005
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 6336
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 21 2006 at 10:06
We should make a new genre: Crimson in which we could put Crimson in, and explain the change in nature this genre has and why there is only one band under it!
"You want me to play what, Robert?"
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.148 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.